Blue Vain wrote:
What are you talking about Jim?
When Nanette Malthouses health scare was announced, I heard nothing but positive messages directed to her and Mick.
It was Mick who bought her back into the debate saying she had been crying this week at the attention directed to him, not her.
Are you suggesting the media should back off Mick because his wife was ill in February? Give me a break.
As for them all sitting down and apologising to each other, this is the real world, not kindergarden. Mick has treated the media with contempt for 20 years and they're getting their bit back now.
The best way to solve it, shut up, do his job and start winning games of footy. No diversions, no excuses, no victim card.
Do the job he's being paid $1 million to do.
At the exact same time that health scare was mentioned, there were people crying in the media and on here that he shouldn't have missed the pre-season match versus the West Coast, and it came up again in the following week when there was speculation he could miss another game.
That's where all of this started. Barrett went in and had an interview alongside several other AFL-accredited outlets, and Mick mentioned the distraction comments. Two bad results and an average one later, after a full pre-season of media outlets rolling their eyes at our list, and here we are.
I can't really blame him for seeing red, but you're right, he needs to get in front of this stuff and show that the thing that drives him more than anything else, is to build this club into something lasting.