Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 7:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
99prelim wrote:
Yes the Pies are really flying atm


Had a look at your own team lately?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 10:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
padre wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Its hilarious seeing the excuses for tricky micky

I find it amusing that people can honestly think he should be extended beyond 3 yrs.

There is a saying if you keep doing what your doing without changing anything, then your going to keep getting the same results.

Its pretty clr that he cannot coach any differently then he has last 35 yrs. He should be a list manager by all the talk of him cleaning up the list. Definitely isnt a game day coach that has any diversity in game plans. Probably why we can never beat the pies under him or anyone of significance.


You have your mind up now- its pretty clear. You are convinced that we will have another shocking year like 2014. Most Malthouse defenders are really just more open minded than you. We see green shoots coming from 2014 that if built upon would result in us landing back in the 8. If that doesnt happen and what you are clearly convinced about eventuates, then there will be many, me included that will be questioning a new contract.
I am intrigued, why do you feel the necessity for "hero predictions" is it just so you can gloat and say I told you so if you are right ?, or is it that you have it in for mick and therefore will do anything to vent?

I don't buy carlton club membership to accept failure.

I would be over the moon if Mick turned the club around and we were successful next year and looking like we are heading in the right direction. However, l don't think that will happen. He simply needs another 5 - 10 years at the club to win a flag. What is the point of extending a guy for another couple years when the next coach is just going to rip his outdated gameplan out the window.

I was onboard with Mick for his first season and probably up to round 10 of last year. Basically around the time when he started blaming the playing list instead of taking any accountability and going back on what he said at the start of his first year and the start of his 2nd season. The more he lost, the more he blamed the list. Not the coaching style, no that is a winning formula in todays footy. Clarko has been successfully winning 3 premierships with the around the boundary line game plan.

He was brought in to take us to the next step. Come in to win a flag or at least get us a shot at a flag. Since he has come to the club, we have lost to a lot of mediocre clubs, losing record, got his mates to the club and got his son a big fat pay cheque that would be lucky to be in our top 5 at the club. As for the positives, he did some good list management and assisted in getting docherty and everitt to the club. He has got Rowe settled in the back line and is playing like he did in his sanfl games and put gibbs in the midfield, where he should of been years ago. Of-field antics are disciplined a lot better at the club and yeah.

Sorry if l missed any positives, but l am struggling to find any with how the club actually performs on field under his coaching. If delisting players is our only positive for mick m, well then.

Like l said, l would be over the moon if he could turn the club around, but l highly doubt it. I thought he was one of the best coaches going around in his time at Collingwood, but the game has simply changed and he has kept coaching the way he has had previous success. After 2 seasons, we know that is not working, but lets keep flogging a dead horse hey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 10:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
:lol:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
It's more about the whole of the club not just the coach.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:40 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Goltzenberg wrote:
padre wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Its hilarious seeing the excuses for tricky micky

I find it amusing that people can honestly think he should be extended beyond 3 yrs.

There is a saying if you keep doing what your doing without changing anything, then your going to keep getting the same results.

Its pretty clr that he cannot coach any differently then he has last 35 yrs. He should be a list manager by all the talk of him cleaning up the list. Definitely isnt a game day coach that has any diversity in game plans. Probably why we can never beat the pies under him or anyone of significance.


You have your mind up now- its pretty clear. You are convinced that we will have another shocking year like 2014. Most Malthouse defenders are really just more open minded than you. We see green shoots coming from 2014 that if built upon would result in us landing back in the 8. If that doesnt happen and what you are clearly convinced about eventuates, then there will be many, me included that will be questioning a new contract.
I am intrigued, why do you feel the necessity for "hero predictions" is it just so you can gloat and say I told you so if you are right ?, or is it that you have it in for mick and therefore will do anything to vent?

I don't buy carlton club membership to accept failure.

I would be over the moon if Mick turned the club around and we were successful next year and looking like we are heading in the right direction. However, l don't think that will happen. He simply needs another 5 - 10 years at the club to win a flag. What is the point of extending a guy for another couple years when the next coach is just going to rip his outdated gameplan out the window.

I was onboard with Mick for his first season and probably up to round 10 of last year. Basically around the time when he started blaming the playing list instead of taking any accountability and going back on what he said at the start of his first year and the start of his 2nd season. The more he lost, the more he blamed the list. Not the coaching style, no that is a winning formula in todays footy. Clarko has been successfully winning 3 premierships with the around the boundary line game plan.

He was brought in to take us to the next step. Come in to win a flag or at least get us a shot at a flag. Since he has come to the club, we have lost to a lot of mediocre clubs, losing record, got his mates to the club and got his son a big fat pay cheque that would be lucky to be in our top 5 at the club. As for the positives, he did some good list management and assisted in getting docherty and everitt to the club. He has got Rowe settled in the back line and is playing like he did in his sanfl games and put gibbs in the midfield, where he should of been years ago. Of-field antics are disciplined a lot better at the club and yeah.

Sorry if l missed any positives, but l am struggling to find any with how the club actually performs on field under his coaching. If delisting players is our only positive for mick m, well then.

Like l said, l would be over the moon if he could turn the club around, but l highly doubt it. I thought he was one of the best coaches going around in his time at Collingwood, but the game has simply changed and he has kept coaching the way he has had previous success. After 2 seasons, we know that is not working, but lets keep flogging a dead horse hey


From the wiki of Clarkson (as a comparison )

Hawthorn had five wins in Clarkson's debut season. Another round of culling saw the delisting of Angelo Lekkas and Nick Holland and the trade of Jonathan Hay and Nathan Lonie. Clarkson brought to the club delisted players Brent Guerra and Stephen Gilham whom he knew from his time at Port Adelaide. In 2006 the side improved as Clarkson showed innovation by restructuring the forwards with a system that became known as "Buddy's box". The team won its last four games in a row to finish in 11th spot on the ladder. The Hawks continued to improve in 2007, winning 13 games and finishing fifth on the premiership table. This took them into the finals, where they defeated Adelaide in an elimination final, before being eliminated in a semi-final against North Melbourne.

Comparing the Blues of 2012 to the hawks of 2004 (the last year of schwabs tenure) They hawks had made the finals in 00,01,03 narrow miss in 02, then bottomed out in 04. The wide perception was, that although Schwab had got them into finals virtually every year, they could not get past the "peripheral 8" benchmark of 12 wins. In other words he had taken the hawks as far as he could. I see a parallel with Ratten here
Clarkson gets in does marginally better in his first season than Schwab (5 v 2 wins) then at the end if his first two seasons delisted older players traded some off to other clubs (hampson) , got in some delisted players that he knew of ( Daisy, wood, ) etc . I see a parallel to Mick here
After two years Clarksons hawks were languishing at third last with only 5 wins after round 18. Then they suddenly turn a corner and win the last 4 games to finish a more respectable 11th. I see parallels with our second half effort in 2014 where we turned a corner form wise (although it didnt translate into wins)
In his third year the late form of the previous year is continued and they finish 5th. They win their first final against Adelaide and then lose in the semis.
In his fourth year he wins a flag

What is it about our results, that tell you so definitively that we are on the wrong track? Clarkson didn't have brilliant results after his second year either- although there were green shoots in the last four games.
lets look at our last 8 games
We beat
Saints- expected
North - Top 8 side
Gold Coast- expected

With luck we could have beaten
Fremantle
Geelong
Essendon*

Bad losses to Sydney and Port

if we had had the rub of the green we could have won 6 of our last 8 games We played 6 OF THE TOP 8 TEAMS during this period. Compare this to the 4 wins of the hawks in 2006 they played Carlton, Essendon*, North- the bottom 3 sides and Geelong who finished 10th. Ask yourself who had the better form line? Yet many are not willing to entertain the idea that we can improve? That to me tells me only one thing. They are extremely closed minded and have a set against Mick


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:47 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
But....but Clarkson has won 2 flags in 2 years a 100% record whereas Mick has won zero flags in 4 years a 0% record. Clarkson shits all over Mick.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
So 5th in 2015?

Bring it on!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Yes the Pies are really flying atm


Had a look at your own team lately?


Had a look at conversation threads lately?...or just cherry pick what you want to argue over

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Not to mention a great man-manager as well (Thomas, Shaw, Jolly, Buttifant, Walsh)

Yes the Pies are really flying atm

Eddie mustve visited Turin for some divine inspiration prior to his shroud decision to give MM the arse

Had a look at your own team lately?


Had a look at conversation threads lately?...or just cherry pick what you want to argue over


I don't argue, you're too "shroud" for me.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:18 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
padre wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
padre wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Its hilarious seeing the excuses for tricky micky

I find it amusing that people can honestly think he should be extended beyond 3 yrs.

There is a saying if you keep doing what your doing without changing anything, then your going to keep getting the same results.

Its pretty clr that he cannot coach any differently then he has last 35 yrs. He should be a list manager by all the talk of him cleaning up the list. Definitely isnt a game day coach that has any diversity in game plans. Probably why we can never beat the pies under him or anyone of significance.


You have your mind up now- its pretty clear. You are convinced that we will have another shocking year like 2014. Most Malthouse defenders are really just more open minded than you. We see green shoots coming from 2014 that if built upon would result in us landing back in the 8. If that doesnt happen and what you are clearly convinced about eventuates, then there will be many, me included that will be questioning a new contract.
I am intrigued, why do you feel the necessity for "hero predictions" is it just so you can gloat and say I told you so if you are right ?, or is it that you have it in for mick and therefore will do anything to vent?

I don't buy carlton club membership to accept failure.

I would be over the moon if Mick turned the club around and we were successful next year and looking like we are heading in the right direction. However, l don't think that will happen. He simply needs another 5 - 10 years at the club to win a flag. What is the point of extending a guy for another couple years when the next coach is just going to rip his outdated gameplan out the window.

I was onboard with Mick for his first season and probably up to round 10 of last year. Basically around the time when he started blaming the playing list instead of taking any accountability and going back on what he said at the start of his first year and the start of his 2nd season. The more he lost, the more he blamed the list. Not the coaching style, no that is a winning formula in todays footy. Clarko has been successfully winning 3 premierships with the around the boundary line game plan.

He was brought in to take us to the next step. Come in to win a flag or at least get us a shot at a flag. Since he has come to the club, we have lost to a lot of mediocre clubs, losing record, got his mates to the club and got his son a big fat pay cheque that would be lucky to be in our top 5 at the club. As for the positives, he did some good list management and assisted in getting docherty and everitt to the club. He has got Rowe settled in the back line and is playing like he did in his sanfl games and put gibbs in the midfield, where he should of been years ago. Of-field antics are disciplined a lot better at the club and yeah.

Sorry if l missed any positives, but l am struggling to find any with how the club actually performs on field under his coaching. If delisting players is our only positive for mick m, well then.

Like l said, l would be over the moon if he could turn the club around, but l highly doubt it. I thought he was one of the best coaches going around in his time at Collingwood, but the game has simply changed and he has kept coaching the way he has had previous success. After 2 seasons, we know that is not working, but lets keep flogging a dead horse hey


From the wiki of Clarkson (as a comparison )

Hawthorn had five wins in Clarkson's debut season. Another round of culling saw the delisting of Angelo Lekkas and Nick Holland and the trade of Jonathan Hay and Nathan Lonie. Clarkson brought to the club delisted players Brent Guerra and Stephen Gilham whom he knew from his time at Port Adelaide. In 2006 the side improved as Clarkson showed innovation by restructuring the forwards with a system that became known as "Buddy's box". The team won its last four games in a row to finish in 11th spot on the ladder. The Hawks continued to improve in 2007, winning 13 games and finishing fifth on the premiership table. This took them into the finals, where they defeated Adelaide in an elimination final, before being eliminated in a semi-final against North Melbourne.

Comparing the Blues of 2012 to the hawks of 2004 (the last year of schwabs tenure) They hawks had made the finals in 00,01,03 narrow miss in 02, then bottomed out in 04. The wide perception was, that although Schwab had got them into finals virtually every year, they could not get past the "peripheral 8" benchmark of 12 wins. In other words he had taken the hawks as far as he could. I see a parallel with Ratten here
Clarkson gets in does marginally better in his first season than Schwab (5 v 2 wins) then at the end if his first two seasons delisted older players traded some off to other clubs (hampson) , got in some delisted players that he knew of ( Daisy, wood, ) etc . I see a parallel to Mick here
After two years Clarksons hawks were languishing at third last with only 5 wins after round 18. Then they suddenly turn a corner and win the last 4 games to finish a more respectable 11th. I see parallels with our second half effort in 2014 where we turned a corner form wise (although it didnt translate into wins)
In his third year the late form of the previous year is continued and they finish 5th. They win their first final against Adelaide and then lose in the semis.
In his fourth year he wins a flag

What is it about our results, that tell you so definitively that we are on the wrong track? Clarkson didn't have brilliant results after his second year either- although there were green shoots in the last four games.
lets look at our last 8 games
We beat
Saints- expected
North - Top 8 side
Gold Coast- expected

With luck we could have beaten
Fremantle
Geelong
Essendon**

Bad losses to Sydney and Port

if we had had the rub of the green we could have won 6 of our last 8 games We played 6 OF THE TOP 8 TEAMS during this period. Compare this to the 4 wins of the hawks in 2006 they played Carlton, Essendon**, North- the bottom 3 sides and Geelong who finished 10th. Ask yourself who had the better form line? Yet many are not willing to entertain the idea that we can improve? That to me tells me only one thing. They are extremely closed minded and have a set against Mick



Wasn’t the same parallels made with lyon last year?

I for one think we will improve this year

back to 11 wins and a micky contract extension


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:41 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
I think we should improve as well. The problem is ... whether other teams will improve more ... as has been the case since Madhouse took over.

Lets hope its a big year ... Go Blues.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 5:54 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
Sniper........at .................Mt............Buller ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:23 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
It makes me laugh when the press talk about how calm Tricky Micky is this year after being rapped on the knuckles for his Madhouse behaviour. He is always calm ... even affable at this time of the year. Wait till we lose a game against StKilda or Melbourne and I am sure we will see the real Madhouse return.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
BigBlueWave wrote:
It makes me laugh when the press talk about how calm Tricky Micky is this year after being rapped on the knuckles for his Madhouse behaviour. He is always calm ... even affable at this time of the year. Wait till we lose a game against StKilda or Melbourne and I am sure we will see the real Madhouse return.


Or until he signs his next contract

all's good thou micky has identified where we have been scored against and has rectified the situation :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3256
redback wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
It makes me laugh when the press talk about how calm Tricky Micky is this year after being rapped on the knuckles for his Madhouse behaviour. He is always calm ... even affable at this time of the year. Wait till we lose a game against StKilda or Melbourne and I am sure we will see the real Madhouse return.


Or until he signs his next contract

all's good thou micky has identified where we have been scored against and has rectified the situation :thumbsup:

You guys work off each other very well :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:25 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
If a coach has 38 players on the track, I would be relaxed to.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1341
BigBlueWave wrote:
It makes me laugh when the press talk about how calm Tricky Micky is this year after being rapped on the knuckles for his Madhouse behaviour. He is always calm ... even affable at this time of the year. Wait till we lose a game against StKilda or Melbourne and I am sure we will see the real Madhouse return.


If we lose to teams like that then I would be dissapointed to not see him voice his displeasure about it!!

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
It makes me laugh when the press talk about how calm Tricky Micky is this year after being rapped on the knuckles for his Madhouse behaviour. He is always calm ... even affable at this time of the year. Wait till we lose a game against StKilda or Melbourne and I am sure we will see the real Madhouse return.


If we lose to teams like that then I would be dissapointed to not see him voice his displeasure about it!!



I agree ... displeasure with the umpires ... the players ... even (GULP) himself.

But not the childish rants we have seen in the past.

But eh ... bring it on!

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:38 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19419
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Interesting comments from Jamison a few days back (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/m ... 41244edc19)

Quote:
“Carlton teams of five years ago, we were pretty good at moving the ball forward, but once it got turned over, the ball went back over our heads too quickly,” he said.


The stats would suggest Carlton teams of recent times are the same. The 2015 Prospectus states:

Quote:
We hear coaches talk a lot about two-way running. We're not sure there was too much two-way running at the Blues. Across the season they turned the footy over 1347 times - the fourth fewest in the competition - but conceded the fourth-most points from this source. They were the second-easiest team to punish and opposition teams got the fourth-most value out of a Carlton turnover.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:08 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
moshe25 wrote:
But....but Clarkson has won 2 flags in 2 years a 100% record whereas Mick has won zero flags in 4 years a 0% record. Clarkson shits all over Mick.


....great point moshe(25), and backed up with rigorous, hard, cold statistical facts.

have you checked out the 2012 Champion data relevant to Port Power, just before Ken Hinkley took over?

Image

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 17th Premiership, Arnhem blues, Google [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group