Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:07 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 191 of 321
  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194 ... 321  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Trigger
PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
dane wrote:
I don't care. I want blood.

Sack them all, at least it will give the pre schoolers a rise.
Top
 Profile  
 
Trigger
PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
BigBlueWave wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Should be sacked now!!



lol ... should never have been appointed in the first place ... but unfortunately we are stuck with him and now need to make the best out of a bad situation :smoking:

Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.
Top
 Profile  
 
SurreyBlue
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:34 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10582
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:
Top
 Profile  
 
Trigger
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:

Great player yes, coach no.
Top
 Profile  
 
redback
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:


why bother?
ratten took us backwards from consistent spoons to consistent finalists
I hope micky takes us backwards also :lol:
Well maybe next year if the planets align or he can hustle a couple more years at the helm.
he will allegedly change his embarrassing demeanour during press conferences to appease the boss (great attitude adjustment at the right time), maybe he can change his dated game plan to win a extension (anything is possible)
with our easier draw at the right time everything seems to be stacked in mickys favour (is there anyone else to blame, stay tuned more after the break) :sly:
Top
 Profile  
 
dane
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:20 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
:lol:

_________________
dane's trolling again
Top
 Profile  
 
Bluey44
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:46 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:


why bother?
ratten took us backwards from consistent spoons to consistent finalists
I hope micky takes us backwards also :lol:
Well maybe next year if the planets align or he can hustle a couple more years at the helm.
he will allegedly change his embarrassing demeanour during press conferences to appease the boss (great attitude adjustment at the right time), maybe he can change his dated game plan to win a extension (anything is possible)
with our easier draw at the right time everything seems to be stacked in mickys favour (is there anyone else to blame, stay tuned more after the break) :sly:



Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still,
I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.

So if you think Mick is a mediocre overrated overpaid hack,
what does that make Ratten???

A 'value for money' Corolla that can't drive more than 50kms without needing RACV?
Top
 Profile  
 
redback
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Bluey44 wrote:
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:


why bother?
ratten took us backwards from consistent spoons to consistent finalists
I hope micky takes us backwards also :lol:
Well maybe next year if the planets align or he can hustle a couple more years at the helm.
he will allegedly change his embarrassing demeanour during press conferences to appease the boss (great attitude adjustment at the right time), maybe he can change his dated game plan to win a extension (anything is possible)
with our easier draw at the right time everything seems to be stacked in mickys favour (is there anyone else to blame, stay tuned more after the break) :sly:



Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still,
I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.

So if you think Mick is a mediocre overrated overpaid hack,
what does that make Ratten???

A 'value for money' Corolla that can't drive more than 50kms without needing RACV?



what, micky the great experienced cunning fox who gets 1 mill a year can't coach the list his predecessor took to 3 finals appearances from dead last
he needs more than three years to achieve the same heights that his novice lolly munching list destroyer had
mick should demand an extension ,more money, less scrutiny, lowered expectations and more people to blame
quick before someone else poaches him
shit with 9 wins last year someone is bound to come calling :lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
BigBlueWave
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:15 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
redback wrote:
Bluey44 wrote:
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:


why bother?
ratten took us backwards from consistent spoons to consistent finalists
I hope micky takes us backwards also :lol:
Well maybe next year if the planets align or he can hustle a couple more years at the helm.
he will allegedly change his embarrassing demeanour during press conferences to appease the boss (great attitude adjustment at the right time), maybe he can change his dated game plan to win a extension (anything is possible)
with our easier draw at the right time everything seems to be stacked in mickys favour (is there anyone else to blame, stay tuned more after the break) :sly:



Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still,
I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.

So if you think Mick is a mediocre overrated overpaid hack,
what does that make Ratten???

A 'value for money' Corolla that can't drive more than 50kms without needing RACV?



what, micky the great experienced cunning fox who gets 1 mill a year can't coach the list his predecessor took to 3 finals appearances from dead last
he needs more than three years to achieve the same heights that his novice lolly munching list destroyer had
mick should demand an extension ,more money, less scrutiny, lowered expectations and more people to blame
quick before someone else poaches him
shit with 9 wins last year someone is bound to come calling :lol:


:clap: :clap: :clap:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
robertbb
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
Bluey44 wrote:
Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still, I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.


There you go being rational and level-headed again... :screwy:
But seriously, this.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sydney Blue
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:55 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
redback wrote:
Bluey44 wrote:
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Trigger wrote:
Neither should have ratten. sent us back another ten years.


This obsession about an-ex Carlton great surely cannot be good. :confused:
Unless of course you aren't a true blue bagger. :idea:


why bother?
ratten took us backwards from consistent spoons to consistent finalists
I hope micky takes us backwards also :lol:
Well maybe next year if the planets align or he can hustle a couple more years at the helm.
he will allegedly change his embarrassing demeanour during press conferences to appease the boss (great attitude adjustment at the right time), maybe he can change his dated game plan to win a extension (anything is possible)
with our easier draw at the right time everything seems to be stacked in mickys favour (is there anyone else to blame, stay tuned more after the break) :sly:



Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still,
I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.

So if you think Mick is a mediocre overrated overpaid hack,
what does that make Ratten???

A 'value for money' Corolla that can't drive more than 50kms without needing RACV?



what, micky the great experienced cunning fox who gets 1 mill a year can't coach the list his predecessor took to 3 finals appearances from dead last
he needs more than three years to achieve the same heights that his novice lolly munching list destroyer had
mick should demand an extension ,more money, less scrutiny, lowered expectations and more people to blame
quick before someone else poaches him
shit with 9 wins last year someone is bound to come calling :lol:

Get your facts right
It was 7 wins and a draw:P

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws
Top
 Profile  
 
BigBlueWave
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
7 wins and a draw is a huge step forward. We have improved dramatically ... give Madhouse another 10 years please ... He deserves it.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
dane
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 12:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
If we shoot him do we have to pay out his contract?

_________________
dane's trolling again
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue Vain
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 12:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18026
robertbb wrote:
Bluey44 wrote:
Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still, I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.


There you go being rational and level-headed again... :screwy:
But seriously, this.


So we paid a coach a mill per year, paid out the existing coaching panel at significant cost and your expectation is to match the achievements of the previous rookie coach?

Is that the rational and level headed view?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.
Top
 Profile  
 
BigBlueWave
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Blue Vain wrote:
robertbb wrote:
Bluey44 wrote:
Mick still has 3 (and a half) seasons to eke out one more finals win to equal Ratten's achievement of 2 wins in 5 and a half seasons.

Par for Mick: One more finals win, with 3 seasons to achieve it.


Factor in a bit of consideration for the fact that we were on the bottom of the ladder when Ratts took over,
but still, I don't think Mick is quaking in his boots about the lofty standards his predecessor set.

Finals Losses are irrelevant.
I don't give a stuff about choking against the Swans and Lions in the first round - may as well not be there at all.


There you go being rational and level-headed again... :screwy:
But seriously, this.


So we paid a coach a mill per year, paid out the existing coaching panel at significant cost and your expectation is to match the achievements of the previous rookie coach?

Is that the rational and level headed view?


The pro Madhouse group just can't give a good answer ... clutching at the anti Ratten sentiments even though Ratten's team performed much better with less talent. The whole argument is so funny.

So disappointing that we now have to put up with such a dumb appointment ... but we live in hope ... maybe the Super Duper coach can have 1 good year. Lets hope so.

Go Blues.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
dannyboy
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
"The pro Madhouse group just can't give a good answer ... clutching at the anti Ratten sentiments even though Ratten's team performed much better with less talent."

This statement categorises both sides.
Finals wins v Finals appearances
Starting low v Waning
Ratt's Picks v Mick's Picks
Ratt's cost v Mick's cost

Two sides of a fence. When we win a flag I vote that coach, whoever she/he is or isn't, is better than those who didn't win a flag regardless of the fences people want to stand behind to watch their successes or failures or vice-versa.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue Vain
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18026
That doesn't rhyme!

(Which is probably why I like it)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.
Top
 Profile  
 
BigBlueWave
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:23 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
dannyboy wrote:
"The pro Madhouse group just can't give a good answer ... clutching at the anti Ratten sentiments even though Ratten's team performed much better with less talent."

This statement categorises both sides.
Finals wins v Finals appearances
Starting low v Waning
Ratt's Picks v Mick's Picks
Ratt's cost v Mick's cost

Two sides of a fence. When we win a flag I vote that coach, whoever she/he is or isn't, is better than those who didn't win a flag regardless of the fences people want to stand behind to watch their successes or failures or vice-versa.


Marks for trying ...

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
BigBlueWave
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:23 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Blue Vain wrote:
That doesn't rhyme!

(Which is probably why I like it)



:clap: :razz: :smile:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
dannyboy
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
BigBlueWave wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
"The pro Madhouse group just can't give a good answer ... clutching at the anti Ratten sentiments even though Ratten's team performed much better with less talent."

This statement categorises both sides.
Finals wins v Finals appearances
Starting low v Waning
Ratt's Picks v Mick's Picks
Ratt's cost v Mick's cost

Two sides of a fence. When we win a flag I vote that coach, whoever she/he is or isn't, is better than those who didn't win a flag regardless of the fences people want to stand behind to watch their successes or failures or vice-versa.


Marks for trying ...

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 191 of 321
  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194 ... 321  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 54 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group