Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:29 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:33 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:27 pm
Posts: 345
ThePsychologist wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.


Maybe after 30+ years of being the top dog, he's just a bit of an arrogant **** who doesn't rate the opinions of most people who have done fewer things in football? i.e. Stevaux.

Doesn't have any bearing on the task at hand, which is to rebuild the list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
ThePsychologist wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.


That view would be valid if Malthouse treated everyone that way.
He doesn't.

Ask intelligent and thoughtful questions and Malthouse will usually give an intelligent and thoughtful response.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:27 pm
Posts: 345
Wojee wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.


That view would be valid if Malthouse treated everyone that way.
He doesn't.

Ask intelligent and thoughtful questions and Malthouse will usually give an intelligent and thoughtful response.


Exactly...

Here's a few further thoughts through the dubious and somewhat gratuitous context of Taylor Swift... http://www.footyalmanac.com.au/the-peoples-elbow-shake-it-off-mick-malthouse-doesnt-care-what-you-think/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:41 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Wojee wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.


That view would be valid if Malthouse treated everyone that way.
He doesn't.

Ask intelligent and thoughtful questions and Malthouse will usually give an intelligent and thoughtful response.


It's irrelevant. There is no excuse. He is bullying and being deliberately difficult and rude. It is wrong.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 5:56 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
He is a bully... He has an anger problem... He's too old and cant hack coaching anymore... He's just a grumpy old man.
Sensitive media and disgruntled players who cant hack being held to account say so.
The media are obsessed with him. Every time a Carlton player is interviewed, they ALWAYS get asked whether they ve 'copped a spay' or 'had a death stare' from Mick. Its pathetic. Do they ask Hawks players the same about the angry ant Clarkson ? Its just a joke, but of course, it gives the haters a bandwagon to jump on.... Hate away!!!

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Last edited by Dominator_7 on Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 5:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
padre wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Totally out coached against Port, Carlton brought the effort, but Hinkley teared Mick's gameplan to shreds in the 1st qtr and the game was over. Amazing how good Port have transformed in to a power house from being a bottom 3 side two seasons ago. List hasn't changed much at all. Only one thing has changed though :)


Yep, a team with zero injuries pushing for a top 4 position beating the team sitting in 13th and missing 6 of their starting 18 comes down to coaching.

There was a time not so long ago when there was nothing better than going to watch Carlton play when they were riddled with injuries.
It was backs to the wall stuff and you knew yhe youngster's would get in and have a go abd usually win.
Now they chuck in yhe towel play for free kicks abd generally make excuses as to they lost


I think mick has a very valid point regarding this. The strength ,fitness , physicality of our modern game blows away the game and players of yesteryear. The season is long and in many respects, is a war of attrition. Usually teams have injuries, they are a given, therefore you either are blessed with minimal injuries or you have to have the depth to cover them when they occur. But even great sides will struggle when they have significant key injuries. Add to this, the pressure that great depth puts on players already in the side, and you have a multifactorial reason why we failed ...port had virtually a full list to choose from

Injuries an excuse for a 100pt loss. I think hawthorn has more key injuries than most this season and in top 4.

Ratts had a shocking run of injury in 2012 and just misssed out the finals. Got the sack. We are not even close this year to the finals and had a pretty decent run with injuries. Judd and kruzer the only major injury plagued players all season. Spare the injury crap


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
ThePsychologist wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Stevo is a 1st rate git.
Still not the issue.
Belittleing and engaging just drags MM and therefore our club, down to his crap level.
no good.
FWIW I bloody hate seeing the journos at the presser, and the whole way they do it now on 7.


First it was Sam Lane, then it was Lingy, and now its Stevo.
Notice the trend ?
7 has settled on an Agenda of 'Grumpy Mick goes bananas'
and push the story about the bad treatment of their journos by him
because it keeps them in the news between games.
Watch Mr 'Say that again' Luke Darcy have a crack at Mick on Talking Footy tonight to keep the story rolling.
Rucci and even Fat Robbo see it for what it is. A Ch 7 pushed agenda against him!!!
Joke of a network!!


Maybe but whatever the reason there is no excuse for the way MM treats people. NONE.


yep, that's what I'm trying to argue. :thumbsup:
it's not about them...yes..agreed..they are crap
#nothepoint

edited for crappy spelling mistakes

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Last edited by bluegirl72 on Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Let's get a petition going, sack mm , bring back ratts, sticks and Hughes.
One will quote stats at nauseum to suit the argument, the next will say we're cfc @#$%&! the rest and the last one will reply with it is not a perfect science and don't judge me on the past. 5.5 years set us back 10+.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4183
I have no issue with him being rude to a bunch flowering journos. If he was rude to anyone else, then I would have an issue with that. Mark Stevens is a flower. So is Slobbo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25230
Location: Bondi Beach
emtwenty wrote:
http://www.news.com.au/sport/breaking-news/michelangelo-rucci-says-channel-seven-has-hijacked-the-postmatch-press-conferences/story-fnect155-1227035027659


Thanks for the link m20

Really interesting. I'm in this journos camp.
Mark Stevens wants to be the story and the scribe.
The show is not about Mark Stevens.

Before he came to Carlton I disliked him.
I was always curious how his players at Dogs Eagles & Pies seemed close to him.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Juanita Jones wrote:
I have no issue with him being rude to a bunch flowering journos. If he was rude to anyone else, then I would have an issue with that. Mark Stevens is a flower. So is Slobbo.

If they ask a half decent question, they will get a decent answer. When they try to set him up with absolutley flower stupid crap looking for a headline that is when he bristles. Iv'e had to do pressers straight after a loss or even a win, It is bad enough straight after a game let alone when the idiots are asking you questions which have @#$%&! all to do about anything that has just transpired and keep trying to bait you or just dribble shit at nauseum.
Now they have these clowns on camera, what a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Juanita Jones wrote:
I have no issue with him being rude to a bunch flowering journos. If he was rude to anyone else, then I would have an issue with that. Mark Stevens is a flower. So is Slobbo.


Some here will argue otherwise, but he was also a prick to Sam Lane.
He has improved a fair bit toward all but Stevo. after being sked by the Judge to do so.
He's so immature in this, and I can't fathom supporting him when he represents our club with this kind of crap.

I'd rather he not do pressers, and concentrate on getting the team right for 2015.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Dead bat, answer with whatever info you want to give about the team and how we played.
Otherwise, it's all about Mick and the pathetic journo.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4183
How did you feel when Murphy went down?

How do you respond to something that moronic?

A better and more intelligent question would have been, when Murphy went down who do you think stood up?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:41 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Juanita Jones wrote:
How did you feel when Murphy went down?

How do you respond to something that moronic?

A better and more intelligent question would have been, when Murphy went down who do you think stood up?


yep, so just answer with any relevant info you want to give.
don't belittle or engage in a petty way. don't play the man.
act like a senior coach in other words.

either tht, or have a water pistol ready, and squirt it at stevo when ever he attempts a q.
that'd work too. :wink:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: The Clinic across the road.
Juanita Jones wrote:
How did you feel when Murphy went down?

How do you respond to something that moronic?

A better and more intelligent question would have been, when Murphy went down who do you think stood up?


That's it.
I was at the game and my first thought was; 'what a crap kick.'
MM said exactly that. Stevens asked, then repeated an inane question. The snide,"thanks Mick at the end of the PC is juvenile. Now even I want to punch him.

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
I love how Mick went out of his way to have a nice friendly chat with Rucci when the PC was over just to rub it in that little bit more.

Even Stevens' colleagues are turning on him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
bluegirl72 wrote:
Some here will argue otherwise, but he was also a prick to Sam Lane.


Why should she be treated any differently? She practically accused him of lying.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:36 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/b ... 0894d.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
The Rhino wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Some here will argue otherwise, but he was also a prick to Sam Lane.


Why should she be treated any differently? She practically accused him of lying.


She's a female Abe.
A female.
He was a big meanie to her.
Case closed.
Sakc Mick.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group