Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 12, 2025 6:23 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:58 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
TruBlueBrad wrote:
It was easily his best game for the year.

It looks like his fitness, and probably his ankle, and almost back to normal now so he's able to run. Still hampering his kicking though as he had a couple of shockers.

The leadership you mentioned, organising players on field, and I'm sure setting an example on the training track are things most people miss.

I'd expect his form to be much, much better next year.

Whether it justifies the price tag is another story.


Agree. He is getting back towards his best. So he is not going to be a bust . The only valid criticism is the value equation. But isnt that the norm for free agency....that you pay overs? I think eventually all teams will be running around with a couple of free agents, all of which are being overpaid. Its just the cost of doing business. We will all be in the same boat, and the salary cap will reflect that. Free agents should be viewed as free kicks in the trading stakes, and as such worth paying a premium for. The player group if they are fair dinkum should accept that the free agents are on a higher level of pay than themselves, because they are in theory bringing them closer as a group to a premiership, which is what its all about. If they are good enough then they will be able to partake in the free agency bonanza themselves, when the time comes-if not then they are just "good ordinary footballers"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Synbad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
PLAYERS are openly admitting the penny has dropped on whats required ....

Carrazzo a half a million dollar tagger....

You dont think that Judds back playing good footy has anything to do with it

Judd is doing more of what is required also
So I suppose it's a team thing.

Sure Judd is good for the team if he's playing a more team game. But he's playing a more team game also/ as well.... that's the point.


Is that an admission that our players are changing the way they play.....is it possible that your rusted on assessment of our list has been too pessimistic? If judd can start running both ways then others can follow surely?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
<wrong thread>

_________________
"I had to eat"


Last edited by Navy Blue Horse on Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
padre our list is crap
nobody believes we have a reasonable list.
this is about those who are on our list understandingdoing what is required.. as distinct from not doing whats required...
nothing to do with quality
its about effort and bare miniumum required

beating GC doesnt mean you have made the big time... its just a step

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 5:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7193
ThePsychologist wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
No way known would i rest Menzel.................give him an easy out ? create another softy ! bullshit.Work him into the ground till he drops from exhaustion.Agree with other posters that he is taking short cuts and cheating,and for mine the cure for that is hard work.Mollycoddling young blokes with rest/fatigue management is giving blokes an easy copout.Menzel is one bloke who needs a rocket,not an easy out.Thats what has got us in the shit in the first place.Harden up or harden out.

Regards,Mick.


Mick, I am certainly not advocating an easy way out. I am more about getting the best out of him and asap. Give him his break now, have him back early and then give him the pre season from hell. Fitness, fitness, fitness, fitness.

If we do continue to play him, make it a run with role on a top player like Selwood or Boak. That's how he will quickly learn what is required. Sitting in a forward pocket looking for easy goals is a great way to learn bad habits. :wink:


Yep,thats what im sayin' Psych.............................keep him goin' no matter how hard the task.Runnuin' with Selwood is a great idea,at least for a quarter just to see what it takes.After all,it was Menzel himself who stated his preferance for a run in the guts,so give him what he wants.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 5:53 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8185
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Casboult's a bit like Docherty, a bit cooked after a year of being both 2nd ruck and 3rd forward. He's shown he can fill the role well though this year. Whether he can be a true key forward is another matter but he's perfect for the role he is in as was Leigh Brown. In an era where two ruckmen can clog a forward line when one resting and simply can't play forward, or where one ruck and a pinch-hitter can leave u short, Casboult is just right for that role.

Menzel will learn and will be a good player for us. A forward line of Waite, Henderson, Casboult and Menzel could end up very potent.


Jim, I agree about Casboult's role and I think if Kruezer can come back fit next year that will be a good combination. I'd be a bit disappointed if he was starting to fatigue though. He is 24 and has nearly 6 seasons in the system. I get the impression with him it's all about confidence. Very up and down.

I am still not confident about Waite. Been very good for 3 weeks but at 31 (32 before next season) and a history of injury and inconsistency I am a long way from being convinced he is our future. However, if we could get a Boyd alongside Henderson, Casboult/Kruezer that could be very good. At best Waite should be on a One year incentive based contract in 2015.

As for Menzel, I am not doubting his ability but it's his efforts especially in the last few weeks have been poor. I suggested a couple of weeks ago if he is struggling rest him and get him ready for a full pre season. He hasn't had one since arriving and needs one more. It's his work rate and endurance more than anything that needs improvement. Get that right and he could be a star.


In Casboult's case he wasn't greatly fit last year. Fitter this year but suddenly had to both ruck and play forward. Might've needed a year of that and be better for it next year. It's his first extended run in the seniors in that role. He'll improve further. What he has is his ideal role. Sydney win flags turning average players in to good "role" players by putting them into roles that suit their abilities. As you said, will work well with Kreuzer.

Menzel's been a bit in and out with injuries and I was just relieved that he didn't do his knee the last time, so he might be a touch rusty. Keep him playing, season's done and there's nothing to lose.

Waite's not our future but he is definitely our present. The best way to develop your side is to bring young blokes in regularly around your gun players. They develop and get educated faster and get the feeling of winning a few more games, not a losing mentality. To bring them in without the guns and letting them "fend for themselves" I believe holds them back in the development and education. We have alot of theories about this, about whether such and such will be in our best premiership team and whether players are our future, but the above way of developing a side works best IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:10 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Casboult's a bit like Docherty, a bit cooked after a year of being both 2nd ruck and 3rd forward. He's shown he can fill the role well though this year. Whether he can be a true key forward is another matter but he's perfect for the role he is in as was Leigh Brown. In an era where two ruckmen can clog a forward line when one resting and simply can't play forward, or where one ruck and a pinch-hitter can leave u short, Casboult is just right for that role.

Menzel will learn and will be a good player for us. A forward line of Waite, Henderson, Casboult and Menzel could end up very potent.


Jim, I agree about Casboult's role and I think if Kruezer can come back fit next year that will be a good combination. I'd be a bit disappointed if he was starting to fatigue though. He is 24 and has nearly 6 seasons in the system. I get the impression with him it's all about confidence. Very up and down.

I am still not confident about Waite. Been very good for 3 weeks but at 31 (32 before next season) and a history of injury and inconsistency I am a long way from being convinced he is our future. However, if we could get a Boyd alongside Henderson, Casboult/Kruezer that could be very good. At best Waite should be on a One year incentive based contract in 2015.

As for Menzel, I am not doubting his ability but it's his efforts especially in the last few weeks have been poor. I suggested a couple of weeks ago if he is struggling rest him and get him ready for a full pre season. He hasn't had one since arriving and needs one more. It's his work rate and endurance more than anything that needs improvement. Get that right and he could be a star.


In Casboult's case he wasn't greatly fit last year. Fitter this year but suddenly had to both ruck and play forward. Might've needed a year of that and be better for it next year. It's his first extended run in the seniors in that role. He'll improve further. What he has is his ideal role. Sydney win flags turning average players in to good "role" players by putting them into roles that suit their abilities. As you said, will work well with Kreuzer.

Menzel's been a bit in and out with injuries and I was just relieved that he didn't do his knee the last time, so he might be a touch rusty. Keep him playing, season's done and there's nothing to lose.

Waite's not our future but he is definitely our present. The best way to develop your side is to bring young blokes in regularly around your gun players. They develop and get educated faster and get the feeling of winning a few more games, not a losing mentality. To bring them in without the guns and letting them "fend for themselves" I believe holds them back in the development and education. We have alot of theories about this, about whether such and such will be in our best premiership team and whether players are our future, but the above way of developing a side works best IMO.


Yep, have to agree. Your points are well made and make sense. Especially regarding having some experience around. That's why I want Judd to stay.

The only one I will disagree with is Waite. Been good for three weeks but he has burnt us before and I'm not sure he is the best example for the kids. I just think we need to move on from him especially if we can recruit a gun young forward. No issue with him staying on our list but it needs to be for minimum wage and year by year. He's been well paid for long enough.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:36 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8185
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Casboult's a bit like Docherty, a bit cooked after a year of being both 2nd ruck and 3rd forward. He's shown he can fill the role well though this year. Whether he can be a true key forward is another matter but he's perfect for the role he is in as was Leigh Brown. In an era where two ruckmen can clog a forward line when one resting and simply can't play forward, or where one ruck and a pinch-hitter can leave u short, Casboult is just right for that role.

Menzel will learn and will be a good player for us. A forward line of Waite, Henderson, Casboult and Menzel could end up very potent.


Jim, I agree about Casboult's role and I think if Kruezer can come back fit next year that will be a good combination. I'd be a bit disappointed if he was starting to fatigue though. He is 24 and has nearly 6 seasons in the system. I get the impression with him it's all about confidence. Very up and down.

I am still not confident about Waite. Been very good for 3 weeks but at 31 (32 before next season) and a history of injury and inconsistency I am a long way from being convinced he is our future. However, if we could get a Boyd alongside Henderson, Casboult/Kruezer that could be very good. At best Waite should be on a One year incentive based contract in 2015.

As for Menzel, I am not doubting his ability but it's his efforts especially in the last few weeks have been poor. I suggested a couple of weeks ago if he is struggling rest him and get him ready for a full pre season. He hasn't had one since arriving and needs one more. It's his work rate and endurance more than anything that needs improvement. Get that right and he could be a star.


In Casboult's case he wasn't greatly fit last year. Fitter this year but suddenly had to both ruck and play forward. Might've needed a year of that and be better for it next year. It's his first extended run in the seniors in that role. He'll improve further. What he has is his ideal role. Sydney win flags turning average players in to good "role" players by putting them into roles that suit their abilities. As you said, will work well with Kreuzer.

Menzel's been a bit in and out with injuries and I was just relieved that he didn't do his knee the last time, so he might be a touch rusty. Keep him playing, season's done and there's nothing to lose.

Waite's not our future but he is definitely our present. The best way to develop your side is to bring young blokes in regularly around your gun players. They develop and get educated faster and get the feeling of winning a few more games, not a losing mentality. To bring them in without the guns and letting them "fend for themselves" I believe holds them back in the development and education. We have alot of theories about this, about whether such and such will be in our best premiership team and whether players are our future, but the above way of developing a side works best IMO.


Yep, have to agree. Your points are well made and make sense. Especially regarding having some experience around. That's why I want Judd to stay.

The only one I will disagree with is Waite. Been good for three weeks but he has burnt us before and I'm not sure he is the best example for the kids. I just think we need to move on from him especially if we can recruit a gun young forward. No issue with him staying on our list but it needs to be for minimum wage and year by year. He's been well paid for long enough.


Thanks!

Actually Waite's been pretty good for 10 years. Unreliable sometimes with brain fades, injury, discipline and occasionally decision making, but as a player been pretty good for 10 years at both end of the ground and often in the midfield in previous years. Seen better and worse on the on-field reliability side of things. Unfortunately gun forwards are near impossible to find, and the only one on the free agents list is Waite himself. Usually you have to take the risk, draft one and develop them yourself and hope for the best. Haven't done well in that regard and the only good one we drafted plays for the Eagles.

My theory with key position players is if you have a good one you keep them tight and bound and don't let them escape. Tough to come across if you lose them. Probably the lack of one cost the Bulldogs a flag. You can build a midfield around a spine, much harder to build a spine around a midfield.

Hence, IMO, we keep Waite. Once over 30 though one only hands out 12 month contracts. At worst one with an option both ways.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
mikeychook wrote:
Have really enjoyed Mick's pressers the past couple of weeks.
The reporters are asking decent questions and he seems willing to talk to them for a change.

Something has clicked over the last few weeks. We are winning, that obviously helps but there are certainly some fantastic signs that we are headed in the right direction.

Great to see Thomas string some quality performances together.

Loving it.


Looks more and more that Mick is getting what he wants from the team. And the new Pres's request to speak in a tad more friendly manner seems to have worked well for all parties :thumbsup:

Great to see the new Irishman go well first up. Very athletic and a natural kick. Get the feeling that Juddy will co all it quits, but would love to get one more year from the great man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 7:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
ThePsychologist wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
The commentators agree with you Psych. Great shut down role by Carrazzo and he's been doing it for years.
Do we need Curnow, Carrazzo, Ellard and Brock for shutdown roles and nothing else?
Curnow has a good motor and gets to many contests, but the other 3, and add Graham, they are plodders.
Brock is cooked!! Embarassing TBH and not AFL standard for pace.


Carrazzo being a shut down player isn't the future but MM is about doing everything to win a game. He is desperately about trying to develop a winning culture. When he gets better players he will have less taggers. I have no doubt that eventually we will just go with Curnow as the only stopper.

I think people are a bit harsh on Ellard. Does a good job and contributed again yesterday. Also, not what I would call slow. McLean on the other hand is glacial.

My judgements on Graham are of a kid that's played less than 4 FULL games. There are lots of things he needs to improve on but there are some skills there I like. I just think some of comments on him are naive and just pathetic. Only time will tell if he is any good but we need all we can get.


The point I'm making about Graham is that he lacks the required pace to be effective offensively and defensively. Players who lack pace must be bloody good in the middle as an extractor ala Ball of the Pies/ Saints to be useful. Now if Graham is a keeper then some of the other relatively 'slow' players cant be in the same team against a top 4 team for us to compete.

Ellard did really well yesterday at times, and I like him in the team because there is no one else that comes close to him in the reserves. I saw him struggle against pace a few times yesterday. I wouldn't call him fast. Would you Psych? If not, what is he?

Brock is glacial granted. The next level is slow, then there's fast, then quick, then express. You only have to look at our players running with, or at fast opponents (not express or quick) and you'll see Ellard, Graham, Curnow and Carrazzo havent got the speed to close them down let alone keep up. Result is they are allow their opponent to run free and destroy us down field or they cant get the space on them and have to rush their kick as the faster opponent closes down on them.

Issue is we become a very very slow team when we've got 1 Glacial and imo 4 slow players in the same team. It has been an issue all year. 1 or 2 gun inside mids who lack speed might be OK if we have a bit of speed around them and imo that would be Cripps because he has an uncanny ability to use his size to advantage and get the contested footy and hand it to the outside runner.

Other than Simmo, Judd Yarran and Murphy who can give us good outside speed? Maybe Bell...Judd will be gone soon, as will Simpson and then there's Mr reliable Garlett. That's where I'm coming from.

I appreciate the team effort to create a win. What we need to do is look at what we need to become a top 4 team...and we need speed, and a KP forward and Waite isnt the answer. He just fiils a gap when available...imo

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:24 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Casboult's a bit like Docherty, a bit cooked after a year of being both 2nd ruck and 3rd forward. He's shown he can fill the role well though this year. Whether he can be a true key forward is another matter but he's perfect for the role he is in as was Leigh Brown. In an era where two ruckmen can clog a forward line when one resting and simply can't play forward, or where one ruck and a pinch-hitter can leave u short, Casboult is just right for that role.

Menzel will learn and will be a good player for us. A forward line of Waite, Henderson, Casboult and Menzel could end up very potent.


Jim, I agree about Casboult's role and I think if Kruezer can come back fit next year that will be a good combination. I'd be a bit disappointed if he was starting to fatigue though. He is 24 and has nearly 6 seasons in the system. I get the impression with him it's all about confidence. Very up and down.

I am still not confident about Waite. Been very good for 3 weeks but at 31 (32 before next season) and a history of injury and inconsistency I am a long way from being convinced he is our future. However, if we could get a Boyd alongside Henderson, Casboult/Kruezer that could be very good. At best Waite should be on a One year incentive based contract in 2015.

As for Menzel, I am not doubting his ability but it's his efforts especially in the last few weeks have been poor. I suggested a couple of weeks ago if he is struggling rest him and get him ready for a full pre season. He hasn't had one since arriving and needs one more. It's his work rate and endurance more than anything that needs improvement. Get that right and he could be a star.


In Casboult's case he wasn't greatly fit last year. Fitter this year but suddenly had to both ruck and play forward. Might've needed a year of that and be better for it next year. It's his first extended run in the seniors in that role. He'll improve further. What he has is his ideal role. Sydney win flags turning average players in to good "role" players by putting them into roles that suit their abilities. As you said, will work well with Kreuzer.

Menzel's been a bit in and out with injuries and I was just relieved that he didn't do his knee the last time, so he might be a touch rusty. Keep him playing, season's done and there's nothing to lose.

Waite's not our future but he is definitely our present. The best way to develop your side is to bring young blokes in regularly around your gun players. They develop and get educated faster and get the feeling of winning a few more games, not a losing mentality. To bring them in without the guns and letting them "fend for themselves" I believe holds them back in the development and education. We have alot of theories about this, about whether such and such will be in our best premiership team and whether players are our future, but the above way of developing a side works best IMO.


Yep, have to agree. Your points are well made and make sense. Especially regarding having some experience around. That's why I want Judd to stay.

The only one I will disagree with is Waite. Been good for three weeks but he has burnt us before and I'm not sure he is the best example for the kids. I just think we need to move on from him especially if we can recruit a gun young forward. No issue with him staying on our list but it needs to be for minimum wage and year by year. He's been well paid for long enough.


Thanks!

Actually Waite's been pretty good for 10 years. Unreliable sometimes with brain fades, injury, discipline and occasionally decision making, but as a player been pretty good for 10 years at both end of the ground and often in the midfield in previous years. Seen better and worse on the on-field reliability side of things. Unfortunately gun forwards are near impossible to find, and the only one on the free agents list is Waite himself. Usually you have to take the risk, draft one and develop them yourself and hope for the best. Haven't done well in that regard and the only good one we drafted plays for the Eagles.

My theory with key position players is if you have a good one you keep them tight and bound and don't let them escape. Tough to come across if you lose them. Probably the lack of one cost the Bulldogs a flag. You can build a midfield around a spine, much harder to build a spine around a midfield.

Hence, IMO, we keep Waite. Once over 30 though one only hands out 12 month contracts. At worst one with an option both ways.


Yes but this is classic carlton thinking. We should trade waite/ free agency now not in two-years time when he has no value. We arent realistically going to challenge for a flag in that time frame, but we sure could develop a young guy that we get in exchange, who could be ready when our window opens.
We have a reasonable not great list at the moment. We need to top up on a few players, add in some of our missing players and we could challenge in a few years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Rod Waddell wrote:
Judd & Simmo very good. Waite was good although he messed a couple of shots & touched one on the line.

Casboult has struggled since the media have been singing his praises.

Menzel is it me or is starting to play like a popstar?


Looks like its not only me re Menzel. If you believe the rumour mill, he will be playing against his future team mates this week in Geelong.

One last positive was the crowd - just under 29k for a game against GC was a fairly good result given the way our season has gone.

Maybe it was the impact of nostalgia round........a Saturday arvo game!!!

We'll need to keep 3 home games at Etihad for the GC/GWS/Port/Lion type fixtures.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
I agree that Menzel could do with a rest.
I've been thinking that for a long time - surely it has to come at some point.

But you can't chalk it all up to being young and tired.
By my reckoning he attempted at least 2 or 3 overhead bicycle kicks on Saturday.

I like his energy and willingness to create movement, but his body language definitely suggests he's starting to get a few tickets on himself.

Hope I'm wrong.

With a mature, confident, experienced Footy manager there should be no problems smoothing over his expectations and convincing him to stay at the club.


Who is our footy manager again ?? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19229
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/a ... ld+sun_rss

THE Gold Coast Suns are fuming over an off-the-ball kneeing incident from Carlton’s Andrew Carrazzo that forced veteran Michael Rischitelli to be subbed out of Saturday’s game and has him in doubt to take on Port Adelaide this weekend.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:29 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
Somebody call the waaahmbulance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:51 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1197
[youtube]OGAg331GV1o[/youtube]

[youtube]x7njCmCd9jE[/youtube]

[youtube]6t46CIrpdL0[/youtube]

[youtube]DsJEuzHVWRI[/youtube]

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:42 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
Thanks for posting Judd's couch session - missed it live.

Champion, he is.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:55 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Loved judds interview. A real ambassador for the game. He had a nice sidestep to the question about pressures on footballers and refused to complain publicly. I was surprised to hear that a month ago he had decided to retire. Perhaps a certain new president saw that judd retiring would not be a good message , or more likely that judd deciding to go on sent a really positive message to the playing group and supporters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:21 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6934
yeah, judd is the real deal. intelligent, articulate and sees the game well.

i see a long future in coaching if he were up for it, but I'm guessing he'll get into business well outside of footy when he is finally done. In saying that Bradley played well into his 30's. Judd could have 2 or 3 years left of good football?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
I'd say if we are up and about next year and he doesn't get injured. He will be there the next year.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Traveller86 and 124 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group