Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:16 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Ratts did a great job and deserves more accolades for the job he did. So I refuse to distinguish between them.

I saw the last couple of weeks for the first time that we are starting to mould into the Malthouse way. He's adjusted the way we've played to suit our strengths and we we've responded accordingly. We have substance, less fragility, good run, and usually go where the best option is whether it down the corridor or around the boundary. We're setting our forwards up now instead of bombing. Defensively we finally look like a side after all these years. Players are developing, including average one becoming contributors, as he managed to do at the Pies.

It's taken us more than a year and a half, and some compromise from the coach but finally, after all this time, we're a slowly looking like a Malthouse side re: Collingwood and the Eagles. Suppose Rome wasn't built in a day and we have years of bad, habits, poor culture and attitude to get over. Still work to do though and it's still "early days".

We still have things to work on. Better kicking at goal, better composure when it matter, as alot of close losses aren't bad luck, as MM says, and those bloody red time goals. It was 5 last night. In a low scoring game that, together with
poor goalkicking, kills and cost us the game last night. There's those schoolboy errors too that still need to be eliminated but they're getting less.

it is not all about ladder position. If it was about the bottom line then mm did as well as ratten in his first year as ratten in 5. It is about the state a coach leaves the list in. Ratten left carlton futureless. Malthouse will leave the next coach with something to work with. If malthouse wins two finals will you admit you are wrong?

I'm more encouraged than i have been for years, despite our 6 wins, as we're looking like something. There's still work to do and we can easily still slip back.

Right now kudos to both Ratten, who took us from the brink of absolute sh1t to near PF, and MM for finally getting his playing to play with commitment and substance and being strong enough to change and coach more to our strengths.


Some fair points Jim but I felt that Ratten was always learning on the job and that is always dangerous with a young group.

In the end he was in charge of a football department that had great draft picks & Judd and due to poor recruiting and development under performed.


All you can look at under Ratts was the results. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, in this case the results and we improved each year, but the injury ridden last one, to the point of near playing a PF, injuries costing us there. Given where we were he did a really good job.

Not sure the coach has total control of the footy department and draft picks. It was something Terry Wallace was saying once on SEN.

Anyway, enough of Ratts, those days are done, back to MM. As I said for the first time we look a side with true substance, plying in the typical MM mould. That is another step up again on many previous years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
jim wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jim wrote:
Ratts did a great job and deserves more accolades for the job he did. So I refuse to distinguish between them.

I saw the last couple of weeks for the first time that we are starting to mould into the Malthouse way. He's adjusted the way we've played to suit our strengths and we we've responded accordingly. We have substance, less fragility, good run, and usually go where the best option is whether it down the corridor or around the boundary. We're setting our forwards up now instead of bombing. Defensively we finally look like a side after all these years. Players are developing, including average one becoming contributors, as he managed to do at the Pies.

It's taken us more than a year and a half, and some compromise from the coach but finally, after all this time, we're a slowly looking like a Malthouse side re: Collingwood and the Eagles. Suppose Rome wasn't built in a day and we have years of bad, habits, poor culture and attitude to get over. Still work to do though and it's still "early days".

We still have things to work on. Better kicking at goal, better composure when it matter, as alot of close losses aren't bad luck, as MM says, and those bloody red time goals. It was 5 last night. In a low scoring game that, together with
poor goalkicking, kills and cost us the game last night. There's those schoolboy errors too that still need to be eliminated but they're getting less.

it is not all about ladder position. If it was about the bottom line then mm did as well as ratten in his first year as ratten in 5. It is about the state a coach leaves the list in. Ratten left carlton futureless. Malthouse will leave the next coach with something to work with. If malthouse wins two finals will you admit you are wrong?

I'm more encouraged than i have been for years, despite our 6 wins, as we're looking like something. There's still work to do and we can easily still slip back.

Right now kudos to both Ratten, who took us from the brink of absolute sh1t to near PF, and MM for finally getting his playing to play with commitment and substance and being strong enough to change and coach more to our strengths.


Some fair points Jim but I felt that Ratten was always learning on the job and that is always dangerous with a young group.

In the end he was in charge of a football department that had great draft picks & Judd and due to poor recruiting and development under performed.


All you can look at under Ratts was the results. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, in this case the results and we improved each year, but the injury ridden last one, to the point of near playing a PF, injuries costing us there. Given where we were he did a really good job.

Not sure the coach has total control of the footy department and draft picks. It was something Terry Wallace was saying once on SEN.

Anyway, enough of Ratts, those days are done, back to MM. As I said for the first time we look a side with true substance, plying in the typical MM mould. That is another step up again on many previous years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 11:48 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I think any coach and any club who are 14th are going to radically prune the list. We could all name 8-10 players who will be on there way because they are not good enough. It is not innovative it is obvious. Guys who can't get a game for the 14th best side need to be very young or they will be delisted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:18 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
So Simon White gets in a fight but is allowed to play while Jeff Garlett gets in a fight and is NOT allowed to play...

#PleaseExplain


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:20 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
Rexy wrote:
So Simon White gets in a fight but is allowed to play while Jeff Garlett gets in a fight and is NOT allowed to play...

#PleaseExplain


Simon White has runs on the board :thumbsup:

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:22 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Can't suspend White unless he is proven guilty.

Marley Williams never missed a game until he was convicted.

AFLPA won't allow you to suspend a player unless they are proven guilty.

Scotland never missed a game until after he was convicted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:22 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7210
Rexy wrote:
So Simon White gets in a fight but is allowed to play while Jeff Garlett gets in a fight and is NOT allowed to play...

#PleaseExplain



Simon will fight hard on the field as well. Jeffery, will not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4773
Simon aka Simon Malthouse is his love child. White is a quarter of the player Jeffy is so go figure how he has become an automatic selection in our best 22 lately.

Mick has his favourites. He loves Ellard too. He is so transparent.

I understand what he is trying to do, but dont bullcrap and tell us Jeffy was going to play this week, but now his is not.

Garlett was one of his favourites before Daisy came along, and now he has dropped him like a hot potatoe.

I dont agree with jeffy being out late early in the morning, but he is not instigate anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
emtwenty wrote:
Can't suspend White unless he is proven guilty.

Marley Williams never missed a game until he was convicted.

AFLPA won't allow you to suspend a player unless they are proven guilty.

Scotland never missed a game until after he was convicted.

Is Garlett guilty of being a victim ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
To be honest I'm a bit the same with my students. If I've got a student who has one bad day where they're off task and distracted, unproductive etc, I tend to let it slide when they're right up to date and have been working hard 98% of the time. When it's a student who's stuffed around, already is way behind and needs to lift their game, they aren't afforded the same luxury. Garlett out til 5am clubbing on a school night when he can't crack the senior squad most of the year isn't a good sign of his dedication, whether he instigated the fight or not. Out til 5am in the park kicking the footy and running drills? That'd be acceptable. Priorities.


Last edited by Scotty12000 on Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Rexy wrote:
emtwenty wrote:
Can't suspend White unless he is proven guilty.

Marley Williams never missed a game until he was convicted.

AFLPA won't allow you to suspend a player unless they are proven guilty.

Scotland never missed a game until after he was convicted.

Is Garlett guilty of being a victim ?


Garlett's issue is he was out at 5am. He had club permission to go out and celebrate his borthday, but not til 5am.


As it is, I'm not convinced Jeffy was even considered to play seniors this week. I reckon Mick was just bluffing so it looks like Jeffy is being punished and we are taking a stand. Jeffy has done nothing to be in the running for selection for a number of weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:30 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
What has all this got to do with the topic of "Malthouse contract discussion"?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Em,

So is it fair that Mick can bullshit to the members to humiliate Jeff ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:33 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
dane wrote:
What has all this got to do with the topic of "Malthouse contract discussion"?

Big meanie Dr Madhouse Strangelove cruelly stalling Jeffy's domination of the AFL coz he loves his son Daisy apparently, so sakc sakc sakc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Rexy wrote:
Em,

So is it fair that Mick can bullshit to the members to humiliate Jeff ?

Poor Jeffy, humiliated by Mick. Come on now... until the media ask questions submitted by members, I don't consider press conferences to be directed to me as a member, AFL "journalists" don't deserve the whole truth for some of the questions they ask and it needs to be understood that press conferences go out to everyone, not just members, but opposition teams etc. Mick's an old hand at this and won't just throw his cards down on table, and why should he? For you? Because you're a member? If you ask someone at the club I'm sure you'll get the members' truth.

Nothing wrong with a bit of foxing. If you knew enough about opposition teams (and none of us really do) you'd know all coaches do this - it's hardly like Ross Lyon is holding up coaching strategy sheets at press conferences and allowing access into his office post-game, and I reckon Collingwood supporters probably complain that Buckley isn't a straight shooter either. All coaches tell the truth and tell lies and you're never sure which is which.

Maybe Jeffy was in the mix, maybe he wasn't. If he was, cop that - he didn't demonstrate the right attitude to keep his spot. If he wasn't, who cares that the media think he was? How do you even know Jeffy knew if he was or wasn't? Mick could be telling the truth, he could be lying, I really couldn't care less when it's to AFL journos. The facts are that Jeffy's not showing he wants to play with the big boys and hasn't for quite some time. His future at Carlton is in his hands.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:47 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Rexy wrote:
So Simon White gets in a fight but is allowed to play while Jeff Garlett gets in a fight and is NOT allowed to play...

#PleaseExplain


I think one consideration is the time of night both events occurred.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
Drewgirl wrote:
Simon aka Simon Malthouse is his love child.


You wouldn't have said that last year. MM has given White some tough love. He was dropped from the senior side last year. MM would like him because he responded, didn't sulk, wasn't lazy, trained hard and does everything (and more) asked of him.

If MM is rewarding players who set a very good example to the rest then I have no issues with that. If MM is playing lazy players who are last on the track and first off and boozing to 5am then our culture is shot.

To build a high performance team, you often need to go backwards before you can move forwards.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
woof wrote:
Rexy wrote:
So Simon White gets in a fight but is allowed to play while Jeff Garlett gets in a fight and is NOT allowed to play...

#PleaseExplain


I think one consideration is the time of night both events occurred.

Both got into a pub fight.

Both were good to go the next day for training.

Both were selected to play.

One of them gets suspended for being in a fight.

What's the truth ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:53 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Everything is Mick's fault.
This wouldn't have happened under Ratts.
He'd just innocently allow the whole group of players to get smashed on a boat and run amok.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Scotty12000 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Em,

So is it fair that Mick can bullshit to the members to humiliate Jeff ?

Poor Jeffy, humiliated by Mick. Come on now... until the media ask questions submitted by members, I don't consider press conferences to be directed to me as a member, AFL "journalists" don't deserve the whole truth for some of the questions they ask and it needs to be understood that press conferences go out to everyone, not just members, but opposition teams etc. Mick's an old hand at this and won't just throw his cards down on table, and why should he? For you? Because you're a member? If you ask someone at the club I'm sure you'll get the members' truth.

Nothing wrong with a bit of foxing. If you knew enough about opposition teams (and none of us really do) you'd know all coaches do this - it's hardly like Ross Lyon is holding up coaching strategy sheets at press conferences and allowing access into his office post-game, and I reckon Collingwood supporters probably complain that Buckley isn't a straight shooter either. All coaches tell the truth and tell lies and you're never sure which is which.

Maybe Jeffy was in the mix, maybe he wasn't. If he was, cop that - he didn't demonstrate the right attitude to keep his spot. If he wasn't, who cares that the media think he was? How do you even know Jeffy knew if he was or wasn't? Mick could be telling the truth, he could be lying, I really couldn't care less when it's to AFL journos. The facts are that Jeffy's not showing he wants to play with the big boys and hasn't for quite some time. His future at Carlton is in his hands.

Gday Couttsy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group