Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 2:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:41 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
The players certainly would have lost some confidence in the sides ability watching our two best defenders, and our no.1 ruckman, go down.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:43 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Tractor Boy wrote:
All Pagan teams need Heart. This current Carlton Team doesn't. So Pagan goes looking for Heart, and on the way casualties appear..

Losing , certain palyers along the way allows Pagan to fill spots in the quest to build a Carlton Team with Heart.

The test is not whether he can do it. The true test is how long will it take.

Sorry Campo ... You do not fit the mould of a player who can be a part of this Heart...

Thank you Good Bye, good luck and wave on the way down. If you really really wanted success again , you'd not be headed to Essendon*. We'll win another flag before them. So if you had half a brain you should've stayed and screwed us. What better way to get even with the Club. Take the money and under perform. Sound like a plan to me.

Thanks for giving up your spot on the Carlton List as we look at building.

Anyway....


I don't think he wanted him to leave:

Quote:
His former coach was understandably unimpressed at the decision of his senior player to leave and made it clear that, as he wanted him to stay, he would not make it easy for him to shift to Essendon*.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:47 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
I don't believe a word of that.

As we have seen through Beaumont, Allan, Murphy, Manton etc etc, if a player is becoming a parasite within the team, they will be moved on.

That quote was nothing more than to make out as if Pagan wanted to keep Campo.

I have no doubt he wanted him gone.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Blues2005 wrote:
Few people could see us completely unravelling like what happened and that is the baffling thing, why did this occur?


I dunno, plenty of people I know tipped us for the spoon pre-season despite our 2004 form.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:54 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
phoenix johnson wrote:
I don't believe a word of that.

As we have seen through Beaumont, Allan, Murphy, Manton etc etc, if a player is becoming a parasite within the team, they will be moved on.

That quote was nothing more than to make out as if Pagan wanted to keep Campo.

I have no doubt he wanted him gone.


So why were they traded while Campo wasn't?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:56 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
We got a suitable deal for them, while Bolton for Campo and Pick 36 probably didn't light up Denis' eyes.

I wouldn't have taken that deal either.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
phoenix johnson wrote:
We got a suitable deal for them, while Bolton for Campo and Pick 36 probably didn't light up Denis' eyes.

I wouldn't have taken that deal either.


And Clarke did?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:09 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
It's the principle of the trade.

Beauie was a friggin', slack, nuisance, who didn't want to abide by Deni's rule.
Granted Clarke was not the best option, but at least he wanted to be at Carlton and gave it his all. Beauie just didn't care.

I believe character and family background were the pre-requisites to joining Carlton for the 2004 season.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
BlueWorld wrote:
So why were they traded while Campo wasn't?


It's called a 600K contract that no club would take (obviously) and which we couldn't just afford to pay out without making him earn his money.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:38 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8222
Jarusa wrote:
Could you stop giving the $14 for the flag argument? :roll:

Carlton has a large supporter base, therefore more money goes into the betting market for Carlton compared to other clubs, so our price can sometimes seem artificially low. The same thing happens to Essendon* before the start of each season, they have been flag favourites some years with little justification except lots of Essendon* supporters putting money on their team.

Odds follow the market and if lots of money goes on a team the bookies have to cover their butts by lowering the odds. It does not mean the market is always rational, $14 were ridiculous odds even after the Wizza cup win.
I will because thats what it was. for a side that was close to finals in 2004 and comprehensive pre-season winners it was a reasonable quote. We could well be expected to push again for the finals after that.There are millions of "neutral" punters that aree out there who bet with their brain not their heart. When you're spending those sums you want to know you have a chance. The men with the most to lose, bookies and punters, are usually very good judges. so just because their are heaps of Carlton supporters doensn't mean it's going to bring a price in short. If you knew anything about betting you'd know that. Poor argument! That's why you have to ask what happened between April and August.


Last edited by jim on Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:45 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8222
Wojee wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
I still wonder how we can go from such a high to such a dramatic low and there has to be more to it than a perceived lack of talent. Something just isn't/wasn't right and I think it has to do with more than ability of the players.


If you do an honest appraisal of our list compared to the other clubs, where would you place us on the overall team talent ladder?
I'd place us in the bottom 3-4 which would make our 2004 result the anomoly, not our 2005 result.

As for the Whizzer, the team played very well, but in all honesty I think it was largely because we were allowed to play how we wanted. Come the regular season Fev and Lance were given little of the space they enjoyed in the pre-season comp. Chuck in the loss of Thornton and Livo to throw out the structure of the back half and we came crashing back to earth.
no such thing as an anomoly in that situation. If you're good enough once you good enough all the time. To push finals in 2004 and win the wizzer in the first place you have to have the talent, It's not a fluke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:50 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10625
phoenix johnson wrote:
Beauie was a friggin', slack, nuisance, who didn't want to abide by Deni's rule.


How many of these players where there and are still around PJ?
What is Denis rule? and what makes so right for us to lose such great servents?

I was willing to understand one, two, three or hell even four of our players not happy, but for goodness sake, every year there seems to be a swarm wanting out and even rumours of some "high" draftees. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:53 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
They are all bad people Surrey. Dennis is a top bloke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10625
What pisses me off TheGame is that these players got us into a GF in 99 and finals there after until we lost it with injuries/Brittain, etc..

These are the players that we signed up because the "market" demanded it at the time, yet some posters fail to recongnise any of that and solely blame the players and their salaries for everything wrong.

These are the same people riddiculing KOUTA at every opportunity because injury struck him down.

I just want a fair trial. Yes some want more money than they are worth or then we are willing to pay, but it seems the market is going to pay what we aren't, and therefore maybe just maybe we are wrong. Time will show Campo to be burning up the grass at AFL grounds wearing Red & Black enjoying JJ's & MJ's hard work. :evil: Will have to live with it now folks.

At the very least Lappin deserve better as an individual than he has been shown.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Get with it Surrey it is Kouta's fault Mathew Knights rolled across his leg. Any decent human being would have gave the money back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TheGame wrote:
Get with it Surrey it is Kouta's fault Mathew Knights rolled across his leg. Any decent human being would have gave the money back.

Just to put things into perspective for some of you.....Kouta maks FOUR TIMES what the whole of the recruit dept budget gets....

Im sure someone will ask me where i got that figure from......

*Thats how player contracts can effect a club in case some of you dont get it....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:37 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
SurreyBlue wrote:
What pisses me off TheGame is that these players got us into a GF in 99 and finals there after until we lost it with injuries/Brittain, etc..

These are the players that we signed up because the "market" demanded it at the time, yet some posters fail to recongnise any of that and solely blame the players and their salaries for everything wrong.

These are the same people riddiculing KOUTA at every opportunity because injury struck him down.

I just want a fair trial. Yes some want more money than they are worth or then we are willing to pay, but it seems the market is going to pay what we aren't, and therefore maybe just maybe we are wrong. Time will show Campo to be burning up the grass at AFL grounds wearing Red & Black enjoying JJ's & MJ's hard work. :evil: Will have to live with it now folks.

At the very least Lappin deserve better as an individual than he has been shown.


It's not only the money, but value for money. You cannot seriously tell me that Campo and Whitnall have been worth the money they've been on, particularly when you look at their wages comparatively to players in other teams. Lappin's is purely a question of contract length. In the case of all 3, they would have walked if given the contracts they (or their manager) wanted from other clubs. Only 1 has left, so maybe the club isn't far off their 'true' market value.

I want players willing to sacrifice a bit to play for this club. Anyone who doesn't like it, can f&*k off to Essendon* for all I care!

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:49 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote
Quote:
Just to put things into perspective for some of you.....Kouta maks FOUR TIMES what the whole of the recruit dept budget gets....

Im sure someone will ask me where i got that figure from......

*Thats how player contracts can effect a club in case some of you dont get it....


Don't have to convince me Synbad, I recall Jack telling everyone he was the highest paid player when they signed the contract. Truth is Synbad he was worth it when we signed the deal. He was dominating games like no player I've ever seen bar none. He got injured, shit happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Look, this is like The Never Ending Story. It just goes on and on and on. Take a 12 year break, come back here, and you guys will still be arguing about how much AFL footballers get paid.

See, AFL footballers get paid a lot. Get used to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Verbs wrote
Quote:
Look, this is like The Never Ending Story


My favorite movie as a kid along with Clash of the Titans.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group