Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:02 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:51 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is one thing that is pretty clear cut now and it doesnt matter who was there in the past ot who recruited who .Mick Malthouse has taken this side backwards
Now you could put any amount of spin and blame on Ratten Sticks Hughes etc . But the buck stops with Mick .this side was better before he took over


I can't DISAGREE with this more. MM has sorted out who can play a finals type disciplined style of football and who can't. A lot of players have improved under him. Players who may never of made it under Ratten.

Under Ratten we were downhill skiers. When we had the game on our terms we looked good. Against well structured sides we really struggled.

Our list is old, poor and lacks depth yet most weeks we are competitive. We have no real key forwards and lack quality depth through the midfield. Plus, we have no depth, no one pushing for a spot.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
its all about your planning
both can be ok.. winning and not winning
but you have to have a plan and work to it...
which ever way you choose you need to have a functional plan... we dont have anything.. were relying on either winning or losing

so my point is there are no rights or wrongs as long as you have a system in place to create an environment that leads to success.
you cant have half baked ideas.

for every tanking team thats gets pointed out as successful or not.. i can point to the opposite
for every non tanking teams success i can point to an example illustrating the opposite

we just are a clueless club.. so it wont matter what we do .. its doomed to failure till we learn to lay foundations to succeed... regardless of what route we take

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19468
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Synbad wrote:
its all about your planning
both can be ok.. winning and not winning
but you have to have a plan and work to it...
which ever way you choose you need to have a functional plan... we dont have anything.. were relying on either winning or losing

so my point is there are no rights or wrongs as long as you have a system in place to create an environment that leads to success.
you cant have half baked ideas.

for every tanking team thats gets pointed out as successful or not.. i can point to the opposite
for every non tanking teams success i can point to an example illustrating the opposite

we just are a clueless club.. so it wont matter what we do .. its doomed to failure till we learn to lay foundations to succeed... regardless of what route we take


:thumbsup:

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
Phys players improved under Ratten and othets didnt its not about individual improvements they mean shit.
The side has gone backwards we are 4 and 7 soon to be 4 and 8
Football is about winning and losing and the facts are we are losing more now than we were 2 years ago.l couldnt give a toss if player x or y has improved.
Has the team improved well the answer to that is a big fat no.
Malthouse has taken this team backwards when he was brought in to take us to the flag

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
which players improved under ratten?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19468
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Sydney Blue wrote:
Phys players improved under Ratten and othets didnt its not about individual improvements they mean shit.
The side has gone backwards we are 4 and 7 soon to be 4 and 8
Football is about winning and losing and the facts are we are losing more now than we were 2 years ago.l couldnt give a toss if player x or y has improved.
Has the team improved well the answer to that is a big fat no.
Malthouse has taken this team backwards when he was brought in to take us to the flag


We can look at Ratten and MM and it all comes back to a shambolic board who don't appear to be capable of making careful thought out decisions. It's either the champion player or the chequebook name signing.

Doc is right in that wins would give the board a 'get out' just like the Richmond QF win.

Now I don't know if pick 4 will be a big difference compared to pick 8 but the key is that the board and football department aren't able to hide.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:56 am
Posts: 135
Sydney Blue wrote:
Phys players improved under Ratten and othets didnt its not about individual improvements they mean shit.
The side has gone backwards we are 4 and 7 soon to be 4 and 8
Football is about winning and losing and the facts are we are losing more now than we were 2 years ago.l couldnt give a toss if player x or y has improved.
Has the team improved well the answer to that is a big fat no.
Malthouse has taken this team backwards when he was brought in to take us to the flag


A naive and incredibly unrealistic target. Part of the issue was they believed we were close following that disastrous 2012 'campaign' in which every time we played a decent team we were more or less shit on... except for when supreme individual efforts from a handful of players got us over the line against Collingwood.

_________________
Whatever happened to this club
I wish I understood
We used to be so strong
We used to be so good


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7385
Sydney Blue wrote:
Phys players improved under Ratten and othets didnt its not about individual improvements they mean shit.
The side has gone backwards we are 4 and 7 soon to be 4 and 8
Football is about winning and losing and the facts are we are losing more now than we were 2 years ago.l couldnt give a toss if player x or y has improved.
Has the team improved well the answer to that is a big fat no.
Malthouse has taken this team backwards when he was brought in to take us to the flag

If "the champ" had been fit, we could be 7-4 atm... don't agree, I don't give a Ratts :razz:

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
have we learnt nothing.


anyway we've got the king of development and a million dollar coach,

it's not about win lose, its the process

the process of getting an extension

he hasn't got it by losing and blaming everyone else so he might put some effort into trying to win and see how that pans out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Synbad wrote:
its all about your planning
both can be ok.. winning and not winning
but you have to have a plan and work to it...
which ever way you choose you need to have a functional plan... we dont have anything.. were relying on either winning or losing

so my point is there are no rights or wrongs as long as you have a system in place to create an environment that leads to success.
you cant have half baked ideas.

for every tanking team thats gets pointed out as successful or not.. i can point to the opposite
for every non tanking teams success i can point to an example illustrating the opposite

we just are a clueless club.. so it wont matter what we do .. its doomed to failure till we learn to lay foundations to succeed... regardless of what route we take


..no you can't synners.. ..there's a world of difference between a successful club that has bottomed out for a year or two, and a shiteful club that has been woeful like we have been.. ..a team with a strong culture, can benefit from bottoming out briefly.. ..a culture likes ours cannot.. ..if we had a winning culture, we Would win games like yesterday.. ..but routinely we lose those games, cos we are scarred.. ..we need to win, we will only improve our culture with on field improvements.. ..this group, right now, has to do it.. ..slightly better kids won't do it for us.. ..but this is just another way of passing the buck.. ..it's always up to somebody else.. ..earlier draft picks are wasted in a losing culture.. ..no quick fixes.. ..none.. ..we need to accept the long, slow, painful road.. ..this is what striving for every win does.. ..not just winning matches, but craving to win every individual contest in the match.. ..winning,, not accepting that a loss will have us winning tomorrow.. ..tomorrow never comes..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
striving for every win happens in the board room as well as the footy field

if the boardroom dont have answers it doesnt matter on the footy field

the culture isnt not germinated on the footy field but in the boardroom.

thats always been my bug bear about this club.... it just filters through and is shwn on the field because thats what we see...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:58 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DocSherrin wrote:
The thing a few of you fail to realise is you can't have both. You can't have wins AND change at years' end. Yep...I know it's a repetative argument but it's taken so long for the hrirarchy to get it. Sadly...they don't get it. And don't fret re: Malthouse...he's here to stay. Last night's (for use of a better word 'honorable' loss was a good result. Good teams win those games.


..have both of what?, winning matches and change at year's end..?.. .... ..if we are good enough to win matches, we don't need 'as much' change.. ..if we need drastic changes, we won't be capable of winning matches.... ..what changes do you think a losing team can make..?.. ..a slightly earlier draft pick is all that is on the cards for us.. ..there is no priority pick.. ..a losing team has no stars to trade out.. ..by not winning these sorts of games, what is the net benefit?, and what is it if we win..?..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 12:59 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7385
DocSherrin wrote:
This has nothing to do with wanting Carlton to lose...no one wants to lose...but where we are is worse than you all think. If losing is the only way for those in charge to see the problems then so be it.You can still take positives from a loss.

I see where you're coming from Doc and at a normal club, this may succeed.

But we ain't a normal club... the oligarchs are well and truly entrenched and there's no one out there ballys enough (insert Bootsma joke) to remove them.

This season has been well below expected and what do we do... rearrange the deck chairs.

So unless every Carlton supporter is willing to march on Princess Park, seriously unrealistic, we have to accept the board situation and work with what we have.

What we have is a decent coach and a list with holes in it that have forgotten how to win... because most of them we're brought in at a time when is was ok to lose... because we'll smash it with the draft picks.

Well, it's not ok to lose... we have to learn to win and bleed when we lose.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Synbad wrote:
striving for every win happens in the board room as well as the footy field

if the boardroom dont have answers it doesnt matter on the footy field

the culture isnt not germinated on the footy field but in the boardroom.

thats always been my bug bear about this club.... it just filters through and is shwn on the field because thats what we see...


..if our off field club is crap, an earlier draft pic means jac shite.. ..we of all clubs ought to know this.. ....but it's also just another way of passing the buck.. ..our team doesn't need to try as hard, cos our board doesn't.. ..and around and around we go.. ..somewhere, the circle has to be broken.. ..good culture is grown on every level, yes off field especially in modern times is crucial,, but these players need to tale full responsibility, as does everyone everywhere in the club..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7253
DocSherrin wrote:
The thing a few of you fail to realise is you can't have both. You can't have wins AND change at years' end. Yep...I know it's a repetative argument but it's taken so long for the hrirarchy to get it. Sadly...they don't get it. And don't fret re: Malthouse...he's here to stay. Last night's (for use of a better word 'honorable' loss was a good result. Good teams win those games.



But we've done losing, and it didn't change a thing. We had more wooden spoons than masterchef, and it didn't change a thing.

Our board is a law unto themselves, and they don't see things the way we do. They are self-serving and selfish.

Win or lose, they aren't going anywhere, they aren't ordering a full review and acting upon said review... so we may as well win and stop worrying about things like the carlton board, because we have no control over them, their decision making or whatever they decide to stand for.

On field culture led by coaching staff and the players can win out over board level disfunction. Plenty of teams have won flags with a chaotic board and off field situation.

West coast was a basket case off the field, and to some degree with ben cousins, on it. they still went back to back GF's and won a flag from it all.

The start of this season it was all, syndey are a rabble, players are fighting, the board is divided over signing franklin, some didn't want him, some did but not at the price they paid ... they were apparently in disarray. Yet here they, if healthy, nobody to stop them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
We should have won the game. Despite some very poor patches in the game, we did more than enough and actually deserved to win. Forget any rational arguments and bigger picture discussions about the club's broader direction and leadership, which I do happen to agree with for the most part.

Footy is, first and foremost, about being fun. Winning is more fun than losing.

We should have won last night.

We didn't.

And it @#$%&! sucks.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 4:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
DocSherrin wrote:
This has nothing to do with wanting Carlton to lose...no one wants to lose...but where we are is worse than you all think. If losing is the only way for those in charge to see the problems then so be it.You can still take positives from a loss.


People are silly; they'll whittle their standards away until they convince themselves that it's reasonable to be the modern day Footscray and unreasonable to expect a premiership at least every 18 years. If we put the onus on ourselves as fans then there's a chance the club will never come good. We should demand standards off and on field but I can't help but believe the two are in direct conflict with each other at the moment.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 4:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
redback wrote:
have we learnt nothing.


anyway we've got the king of development and a million dollar coach,

it's not about win lose, its the process

the process of getting an extension

he hasn't got it by losing and blaming everyone else so he might put some effort into trying to win and see how that pans out


:blinded:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 4:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
sstormin123 wrote:
This wouldn't be an issue if we had an administration who weren't hoping to paper over the cracks at every opportunity.

I too believe that the admin STILL don't realise how dire the situation is. Each win would help to validate their past decisions and the perception we aren't in that bad of a position.

The sole problem is THEY JUST DON'T GET IT.

Nobody wants to see their team lose. It breeds a poor culture, which we can see first hand. The point being, many supporters have such little faith in the club, they feel losing is the only thing that can get through to them.

Myself included.

I hate every loss and revel in every win.

The problem is the club is run by half arses and the only thing they seem to respond to is public perception. They are actively losing the supporter base.

I read this forum and some 40+ year supporters are packing it in.

The club needs to wake up. If this were the Middle East, there would be riots in streets and statues tumbling.

They just don't seem to acknowledge the gravity of our predicament. Which leaves us with little hope.


That's it. The alternative is peasant logic.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 4:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
To be perfectly honest I don't really care about the 2014 season. It's dead.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group