Punter22 wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
SnickerS wrote:
I would expect ALL candidates for the CEO role of a large sporting organisation to have prior CEO experience.
Which he doesnt.
To the best of my knowledge Steven Trigg doesn't. Steve Rosich doesn't. Does Stuart Fox? Is Andrew McKay any less credentialed for a CEO job than Brendon Gale?
I'd like a fresh start and would prefer McKay doesn't get the job, but there are some outlandish statements on here that really don't help the argument against him. And 'just a vet' is as bad as any of them. He's no more 'just a vet' than Steve Rosich is 'just an accountant'.
Stuart Fox learned underneath Brian Cook.
Brendan Gale is studied and completed a law degree.
I would rather an accountant or lawyer running my club than a vet who has focused on footy ops/management. Not only that - by any measure in his current role at Carlton has botched the job he supposedly has expertise in.
So he's got no skill to fix up the mess that is currently our footy department, seeing as he's played a key role in stuffing it up. He has no experience in the other side of the game, because prior to this role he was working in a footy based role for the AFL.
What in any of that suggests he's remotely qualified to take on the role in such a critical time?
I ahve to beleive that the board looks at the current situation and realises what they need - a new head of footy ops who actually knows what he is doing, and a CEO focusing solely on fixing up the non-footy areas within the club. McKay fits neither of those two criteria.
McKay learned underneath Greg Swann..
His previous roles within the AFL seem like he had the credentials for the job he's currently in. Perception around here is that he's performing poorly in his current role, but I'm not sure if that perception is shared across the football industry. Maybe he's more highly regarded than we realise.
I agree that a new CEO from outside our ranks would be better for the club, but as posted earlier it seems silly to shoot McKay down with such passion when most supporters wouldn't have a clue about his day to day duties or how his performance is rated. And the just a vet line does no justice to his many other skills and previous roles.
To avoid a double post I'll also add that to claim the AFL CEO hunt was a 'pretend process' because they found the 2IC to be the best suited person for the role is just nonsense. It's perfectly reasonable to expect that a firm would go through their process and find someone as previously involved as Gillon to be the best person to step up into the role.