Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 6:32 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
actually time wont heal.... wasting an unprecedented amount of early picks ... and having to pick up the pieces is very difficult to get over
as other people have said this isnt criticism of ratten because hes dumb... oh no its not!!... hes dumb! wasnt his fault he couldnt manage a team and a list
its a reminder to this footy club that the powers that make decisions have alot to answer for...
the 7 stone weaklings that have been given key posts at this footy club just didnt cut it.. and the jury is out whether this club will ever be what it was again.
personally i dont believe it ever will....

if youre reading this ratten... no offence.... you should never have been given control of this club at such a crucial time
port didnt allow u
and hawthorn wont even for 2 weeks.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
oh and i forgot to add... GWS were not interested in him also....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21411
Location: North of the border
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:26 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
...and it is yet to be proven if hawthorn made the right choice so this thread is going off half cocked. They may well have stuffed it up. Only a flag with that list at that club will prove them correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:29 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6326
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG2cux_6Rcw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6326
And while Im at it here is a little message to the toolish board on the importance of a thorough interview process
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwasA4gBi2I


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple


Umm...no it's not

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 12:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
We are here now in the present, we know Ratts wasn't great, no point dwelling on it I don't think.

Keogh is trying to make sure we maintain the rage we had on the forum for the first 4 rounds, and not let a recent run of ok results fool us. Point is I don't think anyone is fooled at all, we have a very long way to go with a lot of people we believe are questionable in whether they will help us longer term.

Personally I think the last 5 weeks are proving Malthouse was a good appointment, as we have unearthed some guys who can play roles which we never thought possible early in the season, and all the recruits (Everett, Docherty and Thomas) look to be very shrewd additions to our side.

Aside from this part though, the off field stuff we all complained about earlier in the season is still valid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:24 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple

By what measures exactly do you get that Ratten's record is better than Malthouse's?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Last edited by moshe25 on Wed May 28, 2014 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:27 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:27 pm
Posts: 345
moshe25 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time malthouse's? Malvern - Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple

By what measures exactly do you get that Ratten's record is better than Malthouse's?


A good measurement is surely finals success.

On that, I have Malthouse already drawn level with Ratten after just one season (one win each)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:33 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
club29 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
club29 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
club29 wrote:
Hinkley got looked over many times.

Keoghs mate Brendon McCartney, the best coach he has ever seen, got a gig and is in his third year and it still doesn't look like finals. Ratts achieved it in his second year.

Crap thread.


..judd factor.... ..unquestionably.. (in my mind at least)


Judd played for Carlton. Recruited by Ratts and co. Same way Mcartney has Cooney and Griffen.

Now Bolton has the leagues best list, playing the best system with the best off field team and most professional club behind him. If Clarkson doesn't come back and Bolton doesn't win the flag then his appointment was a mistake and Keoghs thread gets filed with the worst threads ever.



..judd recruited by Pratt and swan.. ..cooney isn't and won't be close to his brownlow form 'over the journey' from here on out, griffin is good but not great..

..as for hawks, well drilled side will carry on.. ..however their injury toll would cause headaches for Clarkson so Bolton doesn't have a fit side or even a 85% fit side to use.. ..and the nature of why Clarke isn't coaching will also affect the team..


Who got judd to carlton is not the point. He was recruited with Ratts has head coach. He was part of our team. The team made the finals in Ratt's second year.

....and using injuries as an pre excuse for Bolton while trying to find an argument to put Ratts down is a touch ironic don't you think.


..am not making excuses for Bolton, that I didn't for rats.. ..nothing happens in isolation.. ..but rats was an average coach, it's why a fit and firing Judd lifted us, and why injuries cruelled us.. ..and why after years in the job we are only now sorting leadership and bad footy habits.., ..Bolton could turn out jus as bad, who knows, who cares.. ..I think it's very safe to say in '09 and in '10 Judd was the difference in us getting to the finals.. ..aside from the odd game here and there, rats wasn't any master coach, we usually won or lost due to individual performances, never as part of a unified team system..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
club29 wrote:
...and it is yet to be proven if hawthorn made the right choice so this thread is going off half cocked. They may well have stuffed it up. Only a flag with that list at that club will prove them correct.



..only a flag?, talk about a loaded benchmark.. ..I guess Kennet was right when he said it was time for hawks to move Clarke on when he lost to swans two years ago right..?.. ..I man, if only a flag proves correctness and alla that..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 3:43 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
club29 wrote:
...and it is yet to be proven if hawthorn made the right choice so this thread is going off half cocked. They may well have stuffed it up. Only a flag with that list at that club will prove them correct.



..only a flag?, talk about a loaded benchmark.. ..I guess Kennet was right when he said it was time for hawks to move Clarke on when he lost to swans two years ago right..?.. ..I man, if only a flag proves correctness and alla that..


Winnings a flag is the only way of being proven right. Anything else leaves it all up in the air. It may turn out Ratts would have been a better option.
That is why this thread is half arsed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 3:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..murphy had a great season in '11, but not as good as Judd's..


The AFL coaches disagree…..

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 4:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..murphy had a great season in '11, but not as good as Judd's..


The AFL coaches disagree…..


..judd won mvp by a landslide, and all year was talked up as future triple Charlie winner, just lost to swanny.. ..did it with two guys hanging off him half the time.. ..murphy couldn't have done it with the pressure and attention Judd copped during those years.. ..in fact, few players could, with only gaz the other modern player to play so well wit so much attention, actually not even him cos he hasn't dealt wit as mic attention cos suns were no finals chance up until now and some games gaz wasn't tagged as heavily cos suns were poor previously..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 4:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..murphy had a great season in '11, but not as good as Judd's..


The AFL coaches disagree…..


..judd won mvp by a landslide, and all year was talked up as future triple Charlie winner, just lost to swanny.. ..did it with two guys hanging off him half the time.. ..murphy couldn't have done it with the pressure and attention Judd copped during those years.. ..in fact, few players could, with only gaz the other modern player to play so well wit so much attention, actually not even him cos he hasn't dealt wit as mic attention cos suns were no finals chance up until now and some games gaz wasn't tagged as heavily cos suns were poor previously..




The reality is Murphy was voted best by the AFL coaches and his own club.
That shows he was appreciated most by those who have an acute awareness of his role and his impact on games.

To suggest we played finals purely because of Judd is fanciful IMO but hey, that's your opinion. I just don't share it..

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 5:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..in '09 and in '10 we just made the finals, Murphy and Gibbs were still kids.. ..watch some games from those years, see the massive work Judd did in those years, he was a machine.. ..don't be thinking of '11, I'm not talking of then.. ..the lift Judd have us was huge, in fact we're still not fully weaned off of him.. ..of he went to a more advanced club at the time of his trade, he'd be odds on to have another flag/s..

..I know you believe Judd is a champion, why then think he wasn't the difference in those early finals..?..

..murphy got off the leash, cos Judd was in brownlow form.. ....in those years Judd was the best clearance inside beast I have ever seen.. ..a contested first possession machine..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 6:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21411
Location: North of the border
moshe25 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple

By what measures exactly do you get that Ratten's record is better than Malthouse's?

Games won is a good measure
Malthouse currently 16 from 33

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 9:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18496
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple


Mencken.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 9:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
Right at the moment Ratts coaching record at Carlton is better than Malthouse coaching record at Carlton
Until such time Malthouses record at Carlton is better than Rattens the decision to replace Ratten with Malthouse was flawed
It is that simple

aactually right at the moment ratten is playing second banana to an unknown..... and we dont even know if hes actually second banana... he might even be 3rd banana to two unknown other bananas... hard to say... unless something happens to this bloke too
but if something does happen to this bloke ... youd have to imagine this as some kind of modern shakespearean play and ratten would be the main suspect ......
especially if something happens to yet another banana after bolton and nothing else happens.

but thats where ratten is at the moment....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], windy and 108 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group