Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..wrong, cos a coach will alter their style to remain coaching at a high level.. ....mm has a long time, the way his side plays has changed.. ..yes h plays wide, but many do.. ..there is much more to it.
And isn't that the frustrating part.
You and others keep telling me there is "much more" to Malthouses game plan but when I ask for details, you continually come up with nothing.
Until I'm offered something other than "the vibe", it's the actual statistical data that tells the tale.
Tell me what there is to it! Give me something!
..was actually referring to there being many more things that can skew a coaches stats, other than just gameplan.. ..a coach that has a team go through a rough patch will skew his averaged stats, which when interpreted won't portray the gameplan.. ..which is why I mentioned previously about studying a coach as they go year by year, or even month by month, instead of an averaged career..
..the 'press' isn't just a Lyon thing that the competition picked up, the 'swarm' isn't a Buckley thing either.. ..they are mm methods as much as either of them, but they are a recent mm things, he wasn't playing that way mid noughties, but by late noughties and 10/11 he was a supposed master coach.. ..very different from his early pies team, more different from his eagles and bullies team, so if yo average his career you are left with a skewed pattern..
..the bomb isn't a mm tactic.. ..the idea mm doesn't use taggers, not correct either.. ..mm does have his methods, but he alters them as the game evolves..
Login
Register
FAQ
