gerry atric wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
I'd be very happy to see Brock come back in.
I think he's been fabulous or us, and if he's playing well, should be included.
He has busted a gut for us, and kicked plenty of ripper goals as well.
I understand the Brock haters about as much as I do the Gibbs ones.
Obviously we have to blood the new kids as well, and soon enough, Brock's time will pass,
but not to play him for petty reasons is pathetic.
If you read all this crap Brock, I for one appreciate what you've put in for our club.
I am not a Brock hater BG. I admire the way he stuck to it and became a reasonable player for us, but i am a hater of the deal we did to get him and it still annoys me that we gave up a first rounder for him. Not his fault, but he has been average and other sides don't rate him much which is why he gets a lot of the ball. I'd prefer Army to play a shut down role and to be quick. And Cripps is the future and should stay in. Bell out when he was shaping well is a loss, but I'd rather us try young players to fill any gaps. Brock is just a battling plodder and we have too many of them.
Fair enough gerry.
I don't really think anyone hates Brock as such.
i really disagree with the usual adjectives applied to his playing though.
I'd go with super courageous, fearless, tough, in and under player who can kick goals, and inspire a game when needed.
Also completely agree about blooding new kids. I'm sure we can still do that even with Brock playing.
