Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:19 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:37 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2763
As impressive as it was to see Ratten achieve pretty much everything he was asked to achieve in the first few years, it was clear in his final year that the team was struggling as the hunted rather than the hunters.
Given what many thought of as Ratts' limitations, and the availability of Malthouse (maybe Roos), they chopped Ratts. Given our performances against Port and Gold Coast esp, not many people were really complaining at the time.
Many of us were aware of the mental fragility of our players (I HATED that after significant losses, players like Murph and Gibbs would simply wave it away b/c we just need to tweak a couple things and we'll be right next week, no worries...).
I was looking forward to Malthouse getting into their heads. He is known as a master psychologist-type coach and I thought he'd get our boys playing at their best week in, week out.

What has become painfully apparent, is that this mob of players does not have the mental toughness required to be a champion team. Under 3 different coaches, the same superficial attitudes have been evident. It probably has a lot to do with our club culture too - I cannot believe that all the players we recruit are naturally mentally weak. Must be about club culture, development etc...

I compare our response to losses with the disgust, anguish and contempt that you see on Selwood's face when he loses a single contest!!!

In any event, whatever the causes, it now appears that this group will not win a flag, esp considering the current rising younger teams incl GC and GWS.
I am not confident in our players, the Board or the coach. (Note: I am usually the most optimistic Carlton supporter pre-season and even before most games I convince myself that we are going to win... But I have been mugged by reality.)

My solution is this:
1) Replace the Board. I love Sticks and all that. I don't sheet as much of the blame to him as others. We know his strengths and weaknesses. I suspect he does too. I reckon a bigger problem are too many big swinging personalities in the Board room, each full of their own ambition, agendas and limited football nous. The key will be to find the right group, capable and with Carlton as their no.1 focus.
2) let Malthouse coach out his contract. Do not extend until midway through next season. Base this decision on results. If Port can improve as they did, and Stk can show promise as it has, we should be able to show marked improvement b/w now and 10 rounds into next season.
3) trade SOME of our high value players. Gibbs, Kruezer (if we can get 1st round pick for him and if we are not going to play him as no.1 ruck - he is not a forward). I would keep our other better players. We need some experience. Case by case basis.
4) Recruit/trade for proven big game players, not 'potential' guns with great skills but clearly lacking in an important aspect like 'if they can improve their tank, they could play midfield...'. If they are not dominating at junior level they will not dominate at senior level. Freaks aside (eg Fyfe, who no-one picked...)
5) put in place excellent development capability. Find out what works. And then implement it. With the right people and practices. This does not mean paying more money to someone from Geelong or the swans. Do the hard yards. Understand what makes it work.
5) if need to replace the coach, put a panel together made up of some people who have done this before and find someone with the mental edge, experience, insight, people management skills to perform well.
PS. I think Roos is also overrated.

I am devastated b/c with all our high picks and Judd arriving, I honestly thought we had the ability to win multiple premierships with this generation.

The only positive I can see is that things can turn around quickly. But things must change for that to happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:24 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Manchego Cheese wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Manchego Cheese wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Mr Cheese please don't come on this forum and trott out "Daisy is good for memberships" .

It would have to be the most piss weak excuse of all time.

A mid 20 pick might be good about now. Daisy looks 48 years old, can't kick (unless it's to Mick in the change rooms) and lasts about 1.5 quarters.

He's awesome!!!


I think it a reality of the game. It wouldn't have been the decisive factor in acquiring him, least of all from the footy dept, but the guys in the office would've been pleased to get a known player in. Creates a bit of buzz, a bit of excitement.

Thomas has played 4 games for us, with a minimum of 84 more available to him over the life of this contract. How about we reserve judgement as to the merits of getting him/his impact until he's played a few more?


No, let's judge him from day ONE!

He's not some 17 year old kid, he's a mid 20's established footballer.

Right now he's busted. He'll produce nothing of value this season.

Next season is the part of the rebuild, so no value there.

Season following, still rebuilding, aiming for what , 10th?

60+ games later and we are still wandering around the middle and he's 30ish.

So, we have recruited this guy for our push for a top 8 finish in the last year of his contract?

Mr Cheese, I'm not sure MM has played this one all that well.


*sigh*

Even when going backwards to ultimately go forwards there's always room for good players, no matter their age.

I suppose all clubs who are struggling should immediately trade/delist any player with some sort of cache, whether it be on or off field.

I'm quite happy to have acquired Thomas. Furthermore, I'm more than confident he'll play good footy for us.

Currently he's played four matches in the navy blue. By virtue of this I'm prepared to delay issuing a judgment on him.


Sorry Cheesy ol Pal, you are sounding like a board member now (funny that ) .

This guy is adding nothing (apart from marketing) and is costing $650ishK per season.

He's not a guy you can build a side around.

Looks like Mick has made this guy a promise that we've had to deliver on.

Another box ticked for Mick!

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:30 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
'cheesy'
comedy gold jerry.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:43 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:44 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
17th Premiership wrote:
As impressive as it was to see Ratten achieve pretty much everything he was asked to achieve in the first few years, it was clear in his final year that the team was struggling as the hunted rather than the hunters.
Given what many thought of as Ratts' limitations, and the availability of Malthouse (maybe Roos), they chopped Ratts. Given our performances against Port and Gold Coast esp, not many people were really complaining at the time.
Many of us were aware of the mental fragility of our players (I HATED that after significant losses, players like Murph and Gibbs would simply wave it away b/c we just need to tweak a couple things and we'll be right next week, no worries...).
I was looking forward to Malthouse getting into their heads. He is known as a master psychologist-type coach and I thought he'd get our boys playing at their best week in, week out.

What has become painfully apparent, is that this mob of players does not have the mental toughness required to be a champion team. Under 3 different coaches, the same superficial attitudes have been evident. It probably has a lot to do with our club culture too - I cannot believe that all the players we recruit are naturally mentally weak. Must be about club culture, development etc...

I compare our response to losses with the disgust, anguish and contempt that you see on Selwood's face when he loses a single contest!!!

In any event, whatever the causes, it now appears that this group will not win a flag, esp considering the current rising younger teams incl GC and GWS.
I am not confident in our players, the Board or the coach. (Note: I am usually the most optimistic Carlton supporter pre-season and even before most games I convince myself that we are going to win... But I have been mugged by reality.)

My solution is this:
1) Replace the Board. I love Sticks and all that. I don't sheet as much of the blame to him as others. We know his strengths and weaknesses. I suspect he does too. I reckon a bigger problem are too many big swinging personalities in the Board room, each full of their own ambition, agendas and limited football nous. The key will be to find the right group, capable and with Carlton as their no.1 focus.
2) let Malthouse coach out his contract. Do not extend until midway through next season. Base this decision on results. If Port can improve as they did, and Stk can show promise as it has, we should be able to show marked improvement b/w now and 10 rounds into next season.
3) trade SOME of our high value players. Gibbs, Kruezer (if we can get 1st round pick for him and if we are not going to play him as no.1 ruck - he is not a forward). I would keep our other better players. We need some experience. Case by case basis.
4) Recruit/trade for proven big game players, not 'potential' guns with great skills but clearly lacking in an important aspect like 'if they can improve their tank, they could play midfield...'. If they are not dominating at junior level they will not dominate at senior level. Freaks aside (eg Fyfe, who no-one picked...)
5) put in place excellent development capability. Find out what works. And then implement it. With the right people and practices. This does not mean paying more money to someone from Geelong or the swans. Do the hard yards. Understand what makes it work.
5) if need to replace the coach, put a panel together made up of some people who have done this before and find someone with the mental edge, experience, insight, people management skills to perform well.
PS. I think Roos is also overrated.

I am devastated b/c with all our high picks and Judd arriving, I honestly thought we had the ability to win multiple premierships with this generation.

The only positive I can see is that things can turn around quickly. But things must change for that to happen.


Pretty much sums it up perfectly :thumbsup:

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:53 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
CarltonClem wrote:
The biggest loss to our club at the moment is Alan Richardson.


yes Carlton Clem, and quite a few here told us how good he was, and how he had his own ideas on coaching, which if given the chance might be great for our club.

I've said it a few times, but renewing MM's contract would be a disaster, mainly because of all the talent that would not work for us while he is head coach.
Not calling for him to go yet, we've wasted enough money, but am dead against renewal with him.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc



You mean the same St Kilda leadership that did quit on the coach for the last two years?

Coaching issue.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
watch reiwoldt and hayes and then watch waite and murphy

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
watch reiwoldt and hayes and then watch waite and murphy


I have watched them.

Watched them last year as well. Shows they play when they feel like it.

Coaching issue.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19483
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
3AW Football ‏@3AWisfootball 2m

Richardson re: leading teams being introduced this year: 'They've embraced it enormously.' #AFL

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19483
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
3AW Football ‏@3AWisfootball 50s

Richardson: 'I want coaches suggestions in the box. If it appears I'm an emotional lunatic in the box, it's less likely to get suggestions.'

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7392
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc



You mean the same St Kilda leadership that did quit on the coach for the last two years?

Coaching issue.

How many coaches have our players quit on in the past decade... 3 with Mick?

Maybe they're waiting around for the right 'gameplan'...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Hornet wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc



You mean the same St Kilda leadership that did quit on the coach for the last two years?

Coaching issue.

How many coaches have our players quit on in the past decade... 3 with Mick?

Maybe they're waiting around for the right 'gameplan'...


Haven't lost to Melb since 2007, looks like we'll be waiting a bit longer.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7392
cimm1979 wrote:
Hornet wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc



You mean the same St Kilda leadership that did quit on the coach for the last two years?

Coaching issue.

How many coaches have our players quit on in the past decade... 3 with Mick?

Maybe they're waiting around for the right 'gameplan'...


Haven't lost to Melb since 2007, looks like we'll be waiting a bit longer.

Recon we should offer 1 year contracts for coaches from now on... if the players like what they see, we'll extend it by a year.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Hornet wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Hornet wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
watch the leadership of stkildas senior players last night and compare that to say a j waite etc



You mean the same St Kilda leadership that did quit on the coach for the last two years?

Coaching issue.

How many coaches have our players quit on in the past decade... 3 with Mick?

Maybe they're waiting around for the right 'gameplan'...


Haven't lost to Melb since 2007, looks like we'll be waiting a bit longer.

Recon we should offer 1 year contracts for coaches from now on... if the players like what they see, we'll extend it by a year.


Nah, just give them to the right guys.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:37 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:56 am
Posts: 135
cimm1979 wrote:
Manchego Cheese wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Manchego Cheese wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Mr Cheese please don't come on this forum and trott out "Daisy is good for memberships" .

It would have to be the most piss weak excuse of all time.

A mid 20 pick might be good about now. Daisy looks 48 years old, can't kick (unless it's to Mick in the change rooms) and lasts about 1.5 quarters.

He's awesome!!!


I think it a reality of the game. It wouldn't have been the decisive factor in acquiring him, least of all from the footy dept, but the guys in the office would've been pleased to get a known player in. Creates a bit of buzz, a bit of excitement.

Thomas has played 4 games for us, with a minimum of 84 more available to him over the life of this contract. How about we reserve judgement as to the merits of getting him/his impact until he's played a few more?


No, let's judge him from day ONE!

He's not some 17 year old kid, he's a mid 20's established footballer.

Right now he's busted. He'll produce nothing of value this season.

Next season is the part of the rebuild, so no value there.

Season following, still rebuilding, aiming for what , 10th?

60+ games later and we are still wandering around the middle and he's 30ish.

So, we have recruited this guy for our push for a top 8 finish in the last year of his contract?

Mr Cheese, I'm not sure MM has played this one all that well.


*sigh*

Even when going backwards to ultimately go forwards there's always room for good players, no matter their age.

I suppose all clubs who are struggling should immediately trade/delist any player with some sort of cache, whether it be on or off field.

I'm quite happy to have acquired Thomas. Furthermore, I'm more than confident he'll play good footy for us.

Currently he's played four matches in the navy blue. By virtue of this I'm prepared to delay issuing a judgment on him.


Sorry Cheesy ol Pal, you are sounding like a board member now (funny that ) .

This guy is adding nothing (apart from marketing) and is costing $650ishK per season.

He's not a guy you can build a side around.

Looks like Mick has made this guy a promise that we've had to deliver on.

Another box ticked for Mick!


Not everyone with a contrary opinion (a more reasoned, sensible opinion, it must be noted) is a "plant".

You may revel in the possibility, but its just not reality.

Thought Thomas did some really encouraging things today. The bounce of the ball continues to elude him, but he kicked a lovely goal (the sort few of our players have seemed confident or capable of kicking recently) and genuinely competed and cracked in all day. Getting better.

Either way, pretty decent performance from Mick today - and all week, evidently. Got the guys up, picked a good team, delivered a good gameplan... Not bad at all.

_________________
Whatever happened to this club
I wish I understood
We used to be so strong
We used to be so good


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
1-4
3-2 is a pass mark.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
cimm1979 wrote:
1-4
3-2 is a pass mark.


depends who you play in those 5 games.

I would have thought that a 4:1 is a pass mark for Carlton's first 5 games

(If we had played the cats, hawks, freo in Perth, Sydney in Sydney and maybe a Port in Adelaide, the pass mark would be different - maybe 2:3 or even 1:4)

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Cretylus wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
1-4
3-2 is a pass mark.


depends who you play in those 5 games.

I would have thought that a 4:1 is a pass mark for Carlton's first 5 games

(If we had played the cats, hawks, freo in Perth, Sydney in Sydney and maybe a Port in Adelaide, the pass mark would be different - maybe 2:3 or even 1:4)


I'd have lived with 3-2 and some efforts with backbone in the losses.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:53 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Synbad wrote:
watch reiwoldt and hayes and then watch waite and murphy


Judd has said in public, that one of the players he admires most in the league is Lenny Hayes. (funny how players usually respect the players they could never be themselves isnt Mr S?)

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DLC, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], GreatEx and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group