Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 7:44 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 93  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2014 11:53 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Hornet wrote:
Judd, McLean & Gibbs go at seasons end = $1.9mil ???

Next season Warnock and Carrazzo = $8-900k ???

Not sure if my sums are correct but that's a hell of a lot of money freed up to secure young talent and attack free agency in the next couple of years


If Warnock goes we need an alternative ASAP.

Can't see kreuzer ever being healthy enough to be a number one ruck.

Surely carazzo wouldn't cost much as a veteran?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:26 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Bluey44 wrote:
Yazzamatazz wrote:
Gibbs for Dangerfield is what I'm hearing....supposedly from a good sauce.

Also that Levi has had a fallout with Mick..


Aren't they both free agents at the end of the year?
Where would this trade scenario come into it?


Paddy is a FA at end of 2015.

Anyway, why on earth would he come to us?

If Gibbs gets a good offer from Crows or whoever (600k+), and we finish bottom 4 (which is entirely possible), we would get a top 4 pick for Gibbs as it would activate a band 1 compo pick (based on salary, age & contract length). Hadn't considered this until tonight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 6:51 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7546
Location: NowHere.....
Sounds like we are preparing ourselves for Gibbs leaving...Tanking again, oh great!

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
This is not about list management anymore.
Its about the club and the management of the club.
Players wont survive in a competition with a culture that is not honest and doesnt have standards of excellence.

This is about the direction of the football club.... its not about the team... players etc

There is a big picture...

its having a strong house

ours is weak and unruly
it lacks discipline and innovation
it lacks passion and care....

dont worry about the team and coach for now.. that bird has flown and is long gone.

we should have worried about that 6 or 7 years ago.... we didnt...
we thought it would just happen

we thought were carlton @#$%&! the rest...

we thought we had a sense of entitlement to flags

years of choosing wrong options..have brought us back to this point

did you enjoy our window???
did it feel good???


its all unimportant if youre a serious club...

worry about the clubs direction
dont worry about the list'
first things first,

club >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. list

for years we havent had a clue what were doing...
amateurs
liars
sycophants
collaborators
lazy bastards
unimaginative fools
dreamers
cheats

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:26 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
there is something clearly wrong with the club and its direction!! Synbad and I have argued for all and sundry for aslong as this forum has existed, but something is drastically wrong, when I agree with what he is saying with no reservations!!

the club needs a massive overhaul. from top to bottom, from president to boot studder.

Dare I say, you only need to look at Port Adelaide, who are the becon for Carlton. They where utter tripe 18-24 months ago, on the verge of extinction, yet you look at them today and they are parallel opposites. IMO they will finish top 4, club is going great guns off the field!!

last night, was the first night, myself and my father considered membership next year. I play $800 a year, my father pays $800 a year and we pay it without even thinking normally, but nothing has changed, nothing will be changed while the current "carlton" is replaced, so im not convinvced I will be a member next year unless there are siginifcant changes this year.

something has to change and it has to change now.

The list needs a massive overhaul, and if the player isn't going to be there in 5 years they shouldn't be getting a game (with obvious exclusions like Judd/Scotland/Simpson who should be given the task of on field coaches to educate players constantly)

If a player does not have the ability of at least 75% disposal efficiency they should not be getting a game. Robinson/Walker/Kreuzer etc.. are in that list as they don't have great skills.

Rowe should not be played before Levi or any other potential forward
Mclean should not be played before Cripps, Bell or any other potential midfield
Trade Gibbs at season end, has not lived up to the hype and his attitude and the way he approaches the game is everything that is wrong with the club.

Is it unfair to put it in all on Gibbs? probably, but he is exactly what is wrong with carlton. Can play great football, can look awesome, can do great things .... his only consistency is his inconsistency, like the club. We need players that will give us everything every week, and they cant, get rid of them.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Last edited by ScottSaunders on Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
The two teams who spent years tanking, Carlton and Melbourne, are both basket cases.

But, but, but...we must lose to get access to the best young talent in the country, we were told at the time.

And look where that got both clubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:34 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Synbad wrote:
This is not about list management anymore.
Its about the club and the management of the club.
Players wont survive in a competition with a culture that is not honest and doesnt have standards of excellence.

This is about the direction of the football club.... its not about the team... players etc

There is a big picture...

its having a strong house

ours is weak and unruly
it lacks discipline and innovation
it lacks passion and care....

dont worry about the team and coach for now.. that bird has flown and is long gone.

we should have worried about that 6 or 7 years ago.... we didnt...
we thought it would just happen

we thought were carlton @#$%&! the rest...

we thought we had a sense of entitlement to flags

years of choosing wrong options..have brought us back to this point

did you enjoy our window???
did it feel good???


its all unimportant if youre a serious club...

worry about the clubs direction
dont worry about the list'
first things first,

club >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. list

for years we havent had a clue what were doing...
amateurs
liars
sycophants
collaborators
lazy bastards
unimaginative fools
dreamers
cheats


SPOT ON


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:38 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6937
verbs wrote:

But, but, but...we must lose to get access to the best young talent in the country, we were told at the time.



The biggest myth in professional sports, (from NBA to AFL). Tanking for picks & talent.

It only creates a losing culture and a toxic environment which no player, coach, administrator worth their salt wants to be a part of.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Braithy wrote:
verbs wrote:

But, but, but...we must lose to get access to the best young talent in the country, we were told at the time.



The biggest myth in professional sports, (from NBA to AFL). Tanking for picks & talent.

It only creates a losing culture and a toxic environment which no player, coach, administrator worth their salt wants to be a part of.



:thumbsup: Many were laughed at back in the day for suggesting such things, but how true its turned out to be...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
actually nothing wrong with getting talent

its what u do with it

we dont have talent

were a crap club

i think most people always coupled bringing in talent with doing most things right.

as for picks........

its not like our second and third round picks we had .. (not with the early pick re fantastic

last night 2nd and third rounders were represented by mitch and rowe

noone else...

thats it

you see... its not one thing ...its EVERYTHING!!!.. its the club....

didnt kill hawthorn getting buddy and roughy
even if they also got ellis.. muston.. dowler and thorpe



:lol: :lol:

their structures and practices were sound...

ours arent ,, never have been

youve got to see the big picture...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Bluey44 wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Judd, McLean & Gibbs go at seasons end = $1.9mil ???

Next season Warnock and Carrazzo = $8-900k ???

Not sure if my sums are correct but that's a hell of a lot of money freed up to secure young talent and attack free agency in the next couple of years


If Warnock goes we need an alternative ASAP.

Can't see kreuzer ever being healthy enough to be a number one ruck.

Surely carazzo wouldn't cost much as a veteran?


..much will depend on how krooz's foot recovers, but he has carried number one ruck for us more than any other ruck since recruitment..
....knockers isn't capable of carrying the ruck long term, he has averaged less than half a season over his career, and has had just the single season where he played most of the year, and even the needed a midyear rest.... ..he doesn't stand up to the workload..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:59 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
The saints were crucified by the media for trading out McAvoy...... Yet it's landed them another Lenny Hayes for 10 more years.

We had the port unity to trade Kruezer last year but the board rejected the move...... We are stuck with another Josh Fraser for the next few years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:09 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
More of this 'tanking came first, crapness second' nonsense. :screwy:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:38 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
trublu wrote:
The saints were crucified by the media for trading out McAvoy...... Yet it's landed them another Lenny Hayes for 10 more years.

We had the port unity to trade Kruezer last year but the board rejected the move...... We are stuck with another Josh Fraser for the next few years


..more rubbish.. ..if krooz foot stays buggered, our fault for pushing our luck.... ..otherwise, heart and soul player that will kill himself for his team, which few enough do.. ..and is good for us, when we play him as first ruck.. ....and he sets the tone, sets the agenda.. ..upon the very first bounce, krooz leads the charge.... ..for a good chunk of the season last year he was romping it as first ruck, wont ever be hit outs hog but he gets good numbers in quality and more importantly he stays involved in general play and always plays finals type footy at 100% work rate.. ..and that's what is really important for us, a player with team work in his veins..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:07 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
verbs wrote:
The two teams who spent years tanking, Carlton and Melbourne, are both basket cases.

But, but, but...we must lose to get access to the best young talent in the country, we were told at the time.

And look where that got both clubs.


Re writing history, we didn't tank in any year apart from 2007, even then It was only the last 4-5 games, we sacked a coach that year, you don't do that if your trying to lose games.

Also we may not have been awesome but we have made finals. 4 out of the past 5 years, more than Richmond have in the last 30.

So is it only know the losing culture of late 2007 is taking effect now?

A lot of things are wrong but that isn't one of them. Collingwood and Hawthorn did it too but people like to rewrite history to suit their own arguments.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:38 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20175
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I take no solace in 'we're better than richmond'.

Besides all the other reasons, we're actually not.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:17 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
bluehammer wrote:
I take no solace in 'we're better than richmond'.

Besides all the other reasons, we're actually not.


Yep. I just want to be the BEST. Then we are better than everyone! :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:02 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6937
One thing I've noticed in our first 3 games in 2014 is our bodies. Other teams look harder, more ripped and well, fitter, much more fitter. Look at our guys, we look softer than our opposition, our muscles (legs, arm, shoulders) are less defined, and it's no surprise we play like it.

Have we stopped working hard in the gym? Are we not running like we're meant to? What are we doing in the offseason? Our lazy play is an indictment of our fitness and offseason work, imo...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 45
Synbad wrote:
actually nothing wrong with getting talent

its what u do with it

we dont have talent

were a crap club

i think most people always coupled bringing in talent with doing most things right.

as for picks........

its not like our second and third round picks we had .. (not with the early pick re fantastic

last night 2nd and third rounders were represented by mitch and rowe

noone else...

thats it

you see... its not one thing ...its EVERYTHING!!!.. its the club....

didnt kill hawthorn getting buddy and roughy
even if they also got ellis.. muston.. dowler and thorpe



:lol: :lol:

their structures and practices were sound...

ours arent ,, never have been

youve got to see the big picture...



Agree with u on this Synbad, the trouble with us is we get a talent, we expect him to fix the club immediately in stead of enhance the list. Poor Murphys, Juddz, Gibbs, Kruezerz :-( weighted down by expectation at such young ages


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
The current mentality is to go out and throw cash (that we don't have) on someone like Hine because people are telling them our recruiting sux. There you go boys... all fixed.
It's one of the reasons we're in this mess.
Hindsight and all that but what if Hinkley was such an outstanding interviewee during our thorough and robust search for new coach, that he got the gig, half of Mick's salary to get his assistants and development people in place and a mandate to rebuild and bring kids through.
No short-term, ego-driven recruiting of players from your old club on overblown contracts and senior players told to commit or be prepared to move clubs.
We just don't have the balls for it.
Which is why Bryce will stay when we show him the money. Can't be seen to lose a bloke who wears no. 4.

I look at Port, North and the Doggies with envy. Who would have thought ...!

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 93  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group