Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 3:46 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 534 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:46 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
All problems would be solved if we played all our home games at Princes Park.


:roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:21 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6935
AGRO wrote:
All problems would be solved if we played all our home games at Princes Park.


:roll:



No, but it would be nice to have our own home ground. Build the fortress there etc etc ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:23 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.



You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
I'm pretty sure our home game record at Docklands is about as good as our away game record at Docklands.

:wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.



You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.



You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.



With a 5 wins 14 losses record in our last 19 games at Princes Park, I'm sure the other sides in the AFL were positively quaking in their boots at the prospects of playing us.


:roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
and here I was thinking the creation of the northern blues was going to make a difference eh

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Salsiccia wrote:
I see photos of D. Thomas everywhere but he has only played two comeback games, while Henderson is possibly our most important player. I suggest he is a better player than Josh Kennedy, yet the club favor others. It seems to me we still play favorites, still bring in the big name coach, still cling to the old ways. There does not appear to be any new vision, creativity or innovation within our club.



Daisy wasn't the best player at Collingwood either, but he's the most popular with kids.
It's all about marketability.

But I agree, Hendo is bloody crucial to our team, and you'd hope that the admin know which side their bread is buttered when it comes to renew Hendo's contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Fortress princes park is a giggle

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
kingkerna wrote:
and here I was thinking the creation of the northern blues was going to make a difference eh



I don't have a problem with Northern Blues playing at Princes Park, it is a terrific idea and I hope that they migrate all there home games there at some stage in the future.

:thumbsup:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:21 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Synbad wrote:
Fortress princes park is a giggle


It is a fortress now - but for keeping supporters out.

High gates everywhere, cant see the ground surface - FORT KNOX alright!

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 2
Dud tall players over the last 10 years or so. Ackland, McLaren, Cameron Cloke, Edwards, Bower, Saddington, Hartlett, Setanta, Mitchell, McCarthy and possibly Watson. Then we had to lose Kennedy, Sauce and Hampson. How can we be competetive with such crap recruiting?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6935
Just the mention of Watson's name, now induces convulsions and tongue swallowing from me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Mosquito Fleet wrote:

You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


What advantage do the cats and the swans have when they play in Grad Finals?

You would think, that Collingwood has the best draw and home ground advantage in the league. It plays 16, sometimes 18 games at the MCG and yet its record in Grand Finals is poor with only 2 flags from about 15 attempts in 55 years.

Good teams, that led well on and off the field, win anywhere.

Look at our performances at ETIHAD - one the worst records in the league and its one of home grounds. We often lose to interstate teams there as well...

The fortress is not in he surface or surrounding stands, nor is it in the crowd. It lays within the team, the players that enter the arena.

Get that right and it really doesn't matter where we play

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
AGRO wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.



You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
There are 4 things that have killed or is killing Carlton:

1 THE DRAFT
2. THE SALARY CAP
3. THE LOSS OF HOME GROUND
4. CONSTITUTION

Points 1 is directed to our poor recruitment, development and list management

Point 2 is directed to our poor Executive, administration and Board. We cannot buy Premierships any more.

Point 3 has two (2) Parts:

Part 1 - Loss of connection of the Membership with the Board and Administration - the Board and Administration are not properly advised or informed by its Members
Part 2 - Football home ground advantages where teams like Geelong now benefit

Point 4 - the Constitution provides for 13 Directors. Too large.


I hope you aren't suggesting that carlton cannot be successful when a even playing ground is in place by the AFL? Points 1 and 2 apply to all clubs (except of course for teams such as sydney which have been given almost 1 million dollars extra in the salary cap due to cost of living - a joke)

The loss of Princes Park as a home ground (point 3) was unfortunate and there is no doubt that the AFL used our weakness after the 2002/3 sanctions to purchase home game arrangement at Princes park which extended out to 2037. The AFL wanted another big club at Etihad. We negotiated a split between Etihad and the MCG with Collo at the helm. But the club isn't just the ground we play on.

Point 4 on the constitution is an interesting one. Not many know that in the late 1990s the Elliot board snuck through an amendment to the carlton constitution where the maximum number of board directors was increased to 20. This was to accommodate e north melbourne directors. There was a serious proposal for a merger between the kangaroos and the blues. Almost got up, with the blues owning almost 1/4 of the shares in the kangaroos.

If the blues were to move its home games away from princes park, then the MCG was the place to go.

The state of the club is the culmination of all the people involved and that includes we supporters.

What you have seen over the past decade or more is not due to anything external to the club.

We all [REDACTED] the club

It will take all of us to lift it up again.



You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.



With a 5 wins 14 losses record in our last 19 games at Princes Park, I'm sure the other sides in the AFL were positively quaking in their boots at the prospects of playing us.


:roll:


yep ....quote the weakest period in our history...

16 Premierships there is irrelevant :eek:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:

You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


What advantage do the cats and the swans have when they play in Grad Finals?

You would think, that Collingwood has the best draw and home ground advantage in the league. It plays 16, sometimes 18 games at the MCG and yet its record in Grand Finals is poor with only 2 flags from about 15 attempts in 55 years.

Good teams, that led well on and off the field, win anywhere.

Look at our performances at ETIHAD - one the worst records in the league and its one of home grounds. We often lose to interstate teams there as well...

The fortress is not in he surface or surrounding stands, nor is it in the crowd. It lays within the team, the players that enter the arena.

Get that right and it really doesn't matter where we play


Getting to the Grand Final might help first

Geelong 8 home games - 8 wins :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:

You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


What advantage do the cats and the swans have when they play in Grad Finals?

You would think, that Collingwood has the best draw and home ground advantage in the league. It plays 16, sometimes 18 games at the MCG and yet its record in Grand Finals is poor with only 2 flags from about 15 attempts in 55 years.

Good teams, that led well on and off the field, win anywhere.

Look at our performances at ETIHAD - one the worst records in the league and its one of home grounds. We often lose to interstate teams there as well...

The fortress is not in he surface or surrounding stands, nor is it in the crowd. It lays within the team, the players that enter the arena.

Get that right and it really doesn't matter where we play


Getting to the Grand Final might help first

Geelong 8 home games - 8 wins :screwy:


Yes skilled stadium.

Did you pick the cats in the final against the dockers last year? That game was played at skilled stadium if I recall correctly.

By your reasoning, the interstate teams who have about 11 home games should make the finals every year. The pies who get 16+ home games at the MCG each year seem to have the biggest home advantage.

Have you also looked at the record of geelong away from skilled stadium? Pretty good isn't it.
And what teams does geelong play at skilled stadium? Teams that it would beat anyway.

The big advantage for the cats is the 500,000 plus they make per game at skilled stadium. Directly into their bank account even with crowds of 22,000. A similar crowd at Etihad would produce a gate loss.

Call me crazy if you want, but at least counter my points with some evidence and logic.

(Claiming that the cats make the finals because they get 8 home games at skilled against teams they would beat anyway sounds a little luny doesn't it? It's got nothing to do with the fact that the cats have been the best run club and have the strongest player leadership culture in the league. And the players are honest and @#$%&! good footballers - surely it can't be that, it must be that they get 8 games at skilled so that they can beat melbourne, the doggies and GWS. That must beit)

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:

You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


What advantage do the cats and the swans have when they play in Grad Finals?

You would think, that Collingwood has the best draw and home ground advantage in the league. It plays 16, sometimes 18 games at the MCG and yet its record in Grand Finals is poor with only 2 flags from about 15 attempts in 55 years.

Good teams, that led well on and off the field, win anywhere.

Look at our performances at ETIHAD - one the worst records in the league and its one of home grounds. We often lose to interstate teams there as well...

The fortress is not in he surface or surrounding stands, nor is it in the crowd. It lays within the team, the players that enter the arena.

Get that right and it really doesn't matter where we play


Getting to the Grand Final might help first

Geelong 8 home games - 8 wins :screwy:



As I recall I think we only won one of those 16 Grand Finals at Princes Park. :wink:


Look if you want to play 8 home games in front of 35,000, at Princes Park on a Saturday afternoon, with no television audience to speak of, then you have my full support.

It just seems like the right thing to do, I guess it's the vibe.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:

You can be successful if you have the best ground - MCG of course. To deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history. Real supporters understand Etihad is killing our Club
Point 1 and 2 - we are the worst at. To deny otherwise, you are denying history
Point 3 - you havent addressed the advantage that Sydney and Geelong have playing on home soil - to deny the existence of home ground advantage is denying history
Point 4 - 20 directors I recall was a historical fact before Elliott I recall.


What advantage do the cats and the swans have when they play in Grad Finals?

You would think, that Collingwood has the best draw and home ground advantage in the league. It plays 16, sometimes 18 games at the MCG and yet its record in Grand Finals is poor with only 2 flags from about 15 attempts in 55 years.

Good teams, that led well on and off the field, win anywhere.

Look at our performances at ETIHAD - one the worst records in the league and its one of home grounds. We often lose to interstate teams there as well...

The fortress is not in he surface or surrounding stands, nor is it in the crowd. It lays within the team, the players that enter the arena.

Get that right and it really doesn't matter where we play


Getting to the Grand Final might help first

Geelong 8 home games - 8 wins :screwy:


Yes skilled stadium.

Did you pick the cats in the final against the dockers last year? That game was played at skilled stadium if I recall correctly.

By your reasoning, the interstate teams who have about 11 home games should make the finals every year. The pies who get 16+ home games at the MCG each year seem to have the biggest home advantage.

Have you also looked at the record of geelong away from skilled stadium? Pretty good isn't it.
And what teams does geelong play at skilled stadium? Teams that it would beat anyway.

The big advantage for the cats is the 500,000 plus they make per game at skilled stadium. Directly into their bank account even with crowds of 22,000. A similar crowd at Etihad would produce a gate loss.

Call me crazy if you want, but at least counter my points with some evidence and logic.

(Claiming that the cats make the finals because they get 8 home games at skilled against teams they would beat anyway sounds a little luny doesn't it? It's got nothing to do with the fact that the cats have been the best run club and have the strongest player leadership culture in the league. And the players are honest and @#$%&! good footballers - surely it can't be that, it must be that they get 8 games at skilled so that they can beat melbourne, the doggies and GWS. That must beit)


Yes all good points.. these are the same reasons me and Surrey have been banging on for years for PP to be developed.
Geelong have all the necessary ingredients: President, board, admin ceo, coach, recruiter, development, list manager and home ground to win Premierships
if you acknowledge this for Geelongs success, then logic cannot deny Carlton's need for it....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
You and surrey......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 534 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 27  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group