Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:59 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:51 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8166
Getting back to the original post. I agree that it's hard to see us recovering from where we're at anytime quickly. We only won one of our preseason games as well.

I'm keen to see Giles get a go, if he continues to perform well at VFL level. He's got some terrific AFL characteristics for a key position player. Tall enough. Athletic enough. Decent skills.
I'd also like games to be put into Bootsma as well. Still think he's got something worth persisting with for a while.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 11:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
gerry atric wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
You are kidding yourself if you compare freos and ports list of 2012 2013 wifh carltons

You were saying that at the start of last season were you MJ, (or is that Christi Malthouse). And if our list is so terrible that even a genius like miserable Mick can't help, why did we get him? He was expressly employed to win a flag while we still had Judd. I presume he won't have taken the job or the $s, if he didn't believe that was possible. Now apparently our list is woeful and M M is bravely holding us back from the abyss. If the coach has no responsibility for performance why have him?

Because we have a totally incompetent board and a pi$$ pot president

The Ratts/MM argument is pointless... we're miles away from a premiership with this list... everyone outside this club knows it now... I challenge anyone to convince me otherwise

Fact is Ratts and co built a mid table list and failed to progress it further... they [REDACTED] up the rebuild and now we have to go again

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
london blue wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Mick prunes 25 percent of the list
Mick moves Simpson back and reinvigorates him
Mick remodels buckley as a running back
Mick personally gets Everett and Thomas to carlton
Mick puts Duigan forward to win us a final
Just be careful you don't turn coaching appointments into a personality contest
He is the best thing going for us

Not sure I see a touch of genius in any of these. I admit I loathe the guy, but he hasn't done much so far to show he is a million dollar coach. Ross Lyon took a pretty unremarkably list and had them playing finals straight away. Hinkley has taken a basket case Port way past us. We need a long term coach who is not there to prove a point to his former employer.


must say that Port are actng impressively on and off the field. Love the way the are going about their football

As tiresome as its been all these years of having to look to other clubs, we can learn much from how Port and the Dogs have re-energised themselves. They'll have their bumps along the way but blind Freddie can see that they're on the right track, and their supporters cab see this.

A major problem the board has is this whole "at Carlton our supporters demand success" thing, that we're too dumb and impatient to wait on a proper, well thought out rebuild.

What we demand from club and team is 100% commitment, innovation, improvement, and delivery of KPIs in a clear plan towards success. I'd much prefer we build a complete team together and lose a few games, than watching us keep playing whack-a-mole everytime another hole appears or another saviour fails to deliver. All the while watching player after player lose interest and stagnate.

Deliver this Carlton,and these dumb, "empathetic" supporters may just surprise you.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
When does reno start,i think soon aswe know no finals it can begin.But first i like to see MM change our game plan to tipperty footy like robbo said on sen. It works for port geelong ess but i dont think we are fit like those clubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
I don't mind MM not playing the young players. He shouldn't just gift games to people because they are young. He does make the young players knock the door down hard to get a game. This might be why we witnessed a fantastic effort from Buckley. I like this approach because when a kid is given an opportunity, he will work his backside off and try and keep his spot in the team.

No body should be gifted games in the Navy Blue.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
If we merged with Melbourne we could renovate our coaching list as well :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
.
donstuie wrote:
As tiresome as its been all these years of having to look to other clubs, we can learn much from how Port and the Dogs have re-energised themselves. They'll have their bumps along the way but blind Freddie can see that they're on the right track, and their supporters cab see this.

A major problem the board has is this whole "at Carlton our supporters demand success" thing, that we're too dumb and impatient to wait on a proper, well thought out rebuild.

What we demand from club and team is 100% commitment, innovation, improvement, and delivery of KPIs in a clear plan towards success. I'd much prefer we build a complete team together and lose a few games, than watching us keep playing whack-a-mole everytime another hole appears or another saviour fails to deliver. All the while watching player after player lose interest and stagnate.

Deliver this Carlton,and these dumb, "empathetic" supporters may just surprise you.

Agreed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:33 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
I am horrified ... surely we picked a winner with Dr Strangelove. He has all the old fashioned tactics that won him 1 premiership in the last 18 years. He has coached the team to a point where they specialise in the bomb. All we need now is a pack of marking talls that are randomly scattered across the forward line ... genius! I am confident we will improve within 10 years.

It can't have been a big fat mistake. Tell me it aint so :cry:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:30 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
pew1 wrote:
When does reno start,i think soon aswe know no finals it can begin.But first i like to see MM change our game plan to tipperty footy like robbo said on sen. It works for port geelong ess but i dont think we are fit like those clubs.


Maybe we should have kept Cordy and left Buttifant at the gums then or should we give him 2/3years to see us improve our fitness after we've gone backwards in that department also?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:18 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..we haven't gone back in fitness, we just weren't fit enough to begin with.. ..or rather, not fit enough to play four quarters of a hard two way running team defence type style.. ..no matter which top four worthy game style we play, we are both not fit enough to carry it out all game week after week, but we also don't have the mental strength and courage to do all that unrewarded gut running that top teams do..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:28 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Clayman wrote:
I don't mind MM not playing the young players. He shouldn't just gift games to people because they are young. He does make the young players knock the door down hard to get a game. This might be why we witnessed a fantastic effort from Buckley. I like this approach because when a kid is given an opportunity, he will work his backside off and try and keep his spot in the team.

No body should be gifted games in the Navy Blue.


Do you think it's fair to say many of our players are "gifted" games at the moment? Not many would get games in good sides. You also need to see the benefits it would bring to the side in the future.

Is McLean really a better option than Graham given our current position?
Is White a better option than Watson?
Rowe better than Casboult?

Not easy questions to answer and to be honest I dont have high hopes for most of them! :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:26 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
BigBlueWave wrote:
I am horrified ... surely we picked a winner with Dr Strangelove. He has all the old fashioned tactics that won him 1 premiership in the last 18 years. He has coached the team to a point where they specialise in the bomb. All we need now is a pack of marking talls that are randomly scattered across the forward line ... genius! I am confident we will improve within 10 years.

It can't have been a big fat mistake. Tell me it aint so :cry:


I don't think it'd matter if Ken Hinkley was coaching...this playing group can't be coached. Too lazy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:42 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DocSherrin wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I am horrified ... surely we picked a winner with Dr Strangelove. He has all the old fashioned tactics that won him 1 premiership in the last 18 years. He has coached the team to a point where they specialise in the bomb. All we need now is a pack of marking talls that are randomly scattered across the forward line ... genius! I am confident we will improve within 10 years.

It can't have been a big fat mistake. Tell me it aint so :cry:


I don't think it'd matter if Ken Hinkley was coaching...this playing group can't be coached. Too lazy.



..yes and no.. ..yes, very lazy some of the established core players.. .no, I believe they can be coached.. ..it's just some 'names' should be dropped.. ..and not just cos they 'lose form', I would like to see a name dropped that has had an 'ok' game but didn't do what we demand.. ..if a player puts in a shocker ppl understand them being dropped, but if they are playing ok but not doing the basics, and you drop them as a name,, then others take Real notice..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:45 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
Clayman wrote:
I don't mind MM not playing the young players. He shouldn't just gift games to people because they are young. He does make the young players knock the door down hard to get a game. This might be why we witnessed a fantastic effort from Buckley. I like this approach because when a kid is given an opportunity, he will work his backside off and try and keep his spot in the team.

No body should be gifted games in the Navy Blue.


Do you think it's fair to say many of our players are "gifted" games at the moment? Not many would get games in good sides. You also need to see the benefits it would bring to the side in the future.

Is McLean really a better option than Graham given our current position?
Is White a better option than Watson?
Rowe better than Casboult?

Not easy questions to answer and to be honest I dont have high hopes for most of them! :wink:



..also, plenty of us think the more senior players have bad football habits they can't, or won't,, shake.. ..young players will be more coachable, and more willing to learn.. ..off field need to stay out, and realise we need to go back to go forward in some respects, so patience if we lose games, it is longterm development..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..we haven't gone back in fitness, we just weren't fit enough to begin with.. ..or rather, not fit enough to play four quarters of a hard two way running team defence type style.. ..no matter which top four worthy game style we play, we are both not fit enough to carry it out all game week after week, but we also don't have the mental strength and courage to do all that unrewarded gut running that top teams do..



Our mental weakness and tackling has always been a much talked about issue but we have always run out games very well.
Over the last few years we have had some gutsy resurgents due to our fitness base.
There have been some recent examples to compare with against the first two opposition teams this year or all of a sudden have the Power and tigers been great finishing and running teams


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:18 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
redback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..we haven't gone back in fitness, we just weren't fit enough to begin with.. ..or rather, not fit enough to play four quarters of a hard two way running team defence type style.. ..no matter which top four worthy game style we play, we are both not fit enough to carry it out all game week after week, but we also don't have the mental strength and courage to do all that unrewarded gut running that top teams do..



Our mental weakness and tackling has always been a much talked about issue but we have always run out games very well.
Over the last few years we have had some gutsy resurgents due to our fitness base.
There have been some recent examples to compare with against the first two opposition teams this year or all of a sudden have the Power and tigers been great finishing and running teams



..I've said it elsewhere, I think we looked fit cos we didn't run as hard as we were supposed to.. ..it's why we had gas left in the tank, not enough run and spread, not enough two way running nor that unrewarded running to open space, it's why after matches some players would never look spent, they just don't work hard enough, now that more is being asked they don't have the miles.. ..its why we love the shoot out run and gun style, only need to run ahead of the contest.. ..it's also why we haven't bee able to sustain it for more than a Cole of gams at a time.. ..our high fitness base was a lie.. .... ..and playing under done players alongside kids doesn't help team fitness either..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
redback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..we haven't gone back in fitness, we just weren't fit enough to begin with.. ..or rather, not fit enough to play four quarters of a hard two way running team defence type style.. ..no matter which top four worthy game style we play, we are both not fit enough to carry it out all game week after week, but we also don't have the mental strength and courage to do all that unrewarded gut running that top teams do..



Our mental weakness and tackling has always been a much talked about issue but we have always run out games very well.
Over the last few years we have had some gutsy resurgents due to our fitness base.
There have been some recent examples to compare with against the first two opposition teams this year or all of a sudden have the Power and tigers been great finishing and running teams



..I've said it elsewhere, I think we looked fit cos we didn't run as hard as we were supposed to.. ..it's why we had gas left in the tank, not enough run and spread, not enough two way running nor that unrewarded running to open space, it's why after matches some players would never look spent, they just don't work hard enough, now that more is being asked they don't have the miles.. ..its why we love the shoot out run and gun style, only need to run ahead of the contest.. ..it's also why we haven't bee able to sustain it for more than a Cole of gams at a time.. ..our high fitness base was a lie.. .... ..and playing under done players alongside kids doesn't help team fitness either..



yeah i agree kahuna.
our mids dont run deep enough they run way too shallow.
so they do not put themselves in scoring positions enough...
they like to play shallow around the centre square,,, well that puts more pressure on the forwards and the defenders...
which is whats been happening for years

dunno whats happened to my club.....who are these people wearing carlton jumpers ??

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:30 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..finals footy attitude is someone elses job at our club.. ..rookies have the nd recruits, nd recruits have the first rounders, those have the number ones, those had juddy, Judd had a whole style tailored for him, the system needed better coaching panel and on we go.....

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
The current crop of players have delivered nothing. 2011 is still celebrated as a success and we finished FIFTH!

Time to start again ... the Gibbs contract allows us to finally draw a line in the sand on what players are paid compared to actual output.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:52 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
redback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..we haven't gone back in fitness, we just weren't fit enough to begin with.. ..or rather, not fit enough to play four quarters of a hard two way running team defence type style.. ..no matter which top four worthy game style we play, we are both not fit enough to carry it out all game week after week, but we also don't have the mental strength and courage to do all that unrewarded gut running that top teams do..



Our mental weakness and tackling has always been a much talked about issue but we have always run out games very well.
Over the last few years we have had some gutsy resurgents due to our fitness base.
There have been some recent examples to compare with against the first two opposition teams this year or all of a sudden have the Power and tigers been great finishing and running teams



..I've said it elsewhere, I think we looked fit cos we didn't run as hard as we were supposed to.. ..it's why we had gas left in the tank, not enough run and spread, not enough two way running nor that unrewarded running to open space, it's why after matches some players would never look spent, they just don't work hard enough, now that more is being asked they don't have the miles.. ..its why we love the shoot out run and gun style, only need to run ahead of the contest.. ..it's also why we haven't bee able to sustain it for more than a Cole of gams at a time.. ..our high fitness base was a lie.. .... ..and playing under done players alongside kids doesn't help team fitness either..



Loving the shoot outs means running more than the opposition anyway, which means we were fitter for longer at the end.
Whether we conserved energy at the start or not doesn’t really matter. We chased at the start and ran in the end (opinions vary on how much chasing is done and by whom), we finished stronger which means we were fitter at the end and that’s what counts.
As for running and spreading Mickys game plan, structures and player selection have a lot of say in that department also.
Previously we picked the players for that type of game which suited the player. Micky picks the wrong players for the wrong type of game. If you’re going to use talls set them up for link players and not running players which destroys the runners around them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group