ThePsychologist wrote:
Jimmae, what two extra talls?
Everitts best football has been as a running defender or pushing up on a wing. He may be tall but he doesn't play that way. Think Andrew Mackie.
Curnow had a great year as a tagger but I believe as we get better and develop midfield depth MM might not use that role and Garlett is good and will enjoy the space created by Betts leaving but IMO for him to be a regular in a top side he needs to contribute more up the field.
and who goes out? Also missing are Robinson Watson, Armfield, Ellard, Bell, Pick 13, Lucas, Bootsma who could easily be in the side as well.
Every year you say something along those lines about someone. You don't want to know the average.

Everitt is not a medium defender's arsehole. He'd be better off up the other end or playing on a tall he can cover with his speed and reach. His best work has been when he has the football or is near the contest forward of centre. He's not going to see enough of that as a defender.
You're playing two ruckman and a bloke who doesn't really add to the run, at the expense of two players who could.
I'd rather a solid and reliable defender in McInnes and find another position for Everitt as needed. His value should be noted as much in the fact that he was worth about the same as a 5th round pick as the way in which we courted him. People who think he's an automatic starter aren't looking properly at why he was recruited in the first place.
If just one of our starting talls goes down, he's the next guy alongside Warnock. Nobody wants the next guy after Warnock to be Casboult or Rowe if we actually want to improve.