Blue Sombrero wrote:
It's about dollars in the bank for the AFL. Nothing else. They want the top 6 to look like this (in any order)
Collingwood'
Carlton
Richmond
Essendon**
Hawthorn
WCE
That is their ideal. Then the policy of every side plays every other side twice would be like owning your own money tree for them. Of course, the following year, all the bottom sides would be on the eight because half the top six would have to drop out so it's just a nominal thing.
They do have a waiver.
The big games have to be played twice. You will rarely if ever see a season where Carlton and Collingwood play just once. And that year we played them at Etihad was obvioulsy a severe fukup on their part and will never happen again either.
We cop it and Collingwood has to cop it. In a way they suffer the most because of their drawing power. But they get the dolooars as a result. Up to now. If the AFL subsidises the gate takings, Eddie won't be so keen to play so many blockbusters because they won't get the gate.
Tend to agree, but would say Sydney is a bigger priority than Hawthorn, to secure the game, TV audiences etc.
Anyway, I don't care how often we travel, but if we don't have one match in Sydney every season from now, there's something very wrong. Ideally, we would have at least an alternating match against either side each year. That would be good for us, good for the AFL, good for the Sydney teams, and in case you missed it...good for Carlton.