Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 5:08 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:14 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24639
Location: Kaloyasena
mikeychook wrote:
It would be refreshing to see the club attempt something brazen and savvy for a change.

Dealing with us would be like playing chess with a six year old.

What Melbourne has done has taken some balls. What it has done has shored up belief amongst the current group that the coach has faith in them, whilst at the same time adding some serious midfield depth.

So, call me crazy, but I now see more of a future for both the Bullies and the Dees than for us.

Would all the supporters really be that upset if we made the call to forget about a flag for the next three years?

I could care less to be honest. It would save a lot of frustration.

This club does not inspire me right now, it leaves me quite flat.




Comparing us to a six year old chess player is doing the 6 year old chess player a disservice. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am actually really concerned about the direction we are heading. I think our List Management is reactive and archaic.

It is obvious to most we have not turned over enough players or recruited well enough.

This year we get Thomas and pay overs for him. At his best he is a top class player but he is 27 next season and hasn't played much in the last 2 years. We will get Docherty for around pick 33 and will be handy and is the right age but is no star.

We also lost Betts for nothing because we got Thomas for nothing and handed Collingwood Pick 11.

We have been shopping around Lucas, Casboult, Laidler, Bootsma, Garlett & Yarran with little or no interest. Pick 32 for Hampson was a fair deal IMO. Unless we can move one of these we wont be doing much else.

Look at some of the other clubs and how they top up or re generate.

Collingwood will lose Thomas & Shaw but get pick 11 and Adams. They will also get White & Karnezis with later picks. For the second year in a row they will have two picks inside the Top 20. They are gold. Last year they got Grundy & Kennedy. This year will be just as good plus Adams is a star with 10 years ahead of him.

Hawthorn after winning a Premiership go out and trade Pick 17 and Savage for McEvoy. He is a top flight ruckman for the next 10 years and coming into his prime. He will be supported by Hale & Ceglar, both recruited from other clubs!

Sydney go and get Buddy. Smart from several angles.

Freo will go and get Sylvia & Gumbleton.

The difference is these clubs plan and do deals and they can afford them!!

Even St Kilda, realising they are crap trade good players (McEvoy, Dal Santo through FA) to get picks because they need depth and class. A bit like us. They are targeting 4-5 picks in the top 25 in this years draft. They will also get Bruce & Delaney with late picks. IMO that is smart.

North have been stockpiling for 3-4 years and will now add Dal Santo. Watch out in 2014.


I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.

We have pick 13 at the moment. Our next is around 32? That is a lottery. We need early picks. If we could get pick 2 and maybe another inside 20 that would be a win. I hope we can.

Things need to change or we will be stuck in no mans land for a while. I have tried to be positive but what I see worries me as a supporter.


I share some of your general concern, but this is laughably negative. It's just the old "the grass is always greener on the other side" and the idea that another club's rubbish has to be better than our club's rubbish. Your opinions on the general outlook of the club appear to vacillate with each win or loss. One week the future looks bright, the next you are concerned about the general direction of the club.

Another way you could look at the Thomas transaction is that we have added one of the better midfielders in the competition, one who appears to be over his ankle issues and who should just be coming into his prime. If he is fit (and you have to assume that he is, or the club would not have risked it) then we have bolstered the midfield significantly. You have to pay overs to attract top players, or they would just stay at their current club. We identified a perceived gap and have tried to fill it with Thomas, a player who provides exactly what we need.

Another way you could look at the (proposed) Docherty transaction is that we are getting a pick 12 with two years' development and who wants to move to us for a pick in the 30s in what is considered to be a weak draft after the early going. A potential 10-year player for a relatively cheap price. You can be sure that if he was going to Collingwood instead of us, it would be considered some massive coup; but because he is going to us then it is an underwhelming deal. :roll:

You are happy to downplay Docherty but on the other hand, praise St Kilda for their potential recruitment of an inferior player in Luke Delaney? The same Luke Delaney who, if he were heading to Carlton, most on here would probably dismiss as a hack? You praise Freo for getting Gumbleton, a bloke who has played something like 20 games in the seven years in which he has been in the AFL system and who most on here would not want, but on the other hand, you are concerned about Thomas' injury record? :eek:

How on Earth do you propose we were supposed to go after Franklin? Do you not think that we would have tried if it were at all possible?

Ben McEvoy overall has been a disappointment so far and certainly not the "top flight ruckman" he was touted to be pre-draft. Ruckmen do take longer than most to develop, but I know St Kilda fans who were not at all unhappy to lose him, particular for what they got in return. Let's just wait and see on that one.

Another way you could look at the Betts transaction is that he was simply asking for too much money and that it would have been irresponsible of us to match Adelaide's offer. Betts was and is a quality player on his day but we identified a surplus of similar types and a list imbalance and with Adelaide willing to pay huge money, he was deemed expendable. You can also bet London to a brick that had we matched it, the next time Betts would have undergone a form slump, you would have had people on here complaining that we didn't just let him go to Adelaide. The club can't win either way.

It is also not our problem that the AFL's draft pick compensation system is a joke - are we supposed to not follow through with our trades out of fear that the AFL will consequently strengthen the opposition? There should be NO compensation at all for lost free agents. But because there is, this should stop us from going about our business? That we operate under a ridiculous system is the AFL's fault, not our own.

But I get it, Carlton are a complete rabble and everyone other club does things better than us because they are not Carlton! :roll:

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
harker wrote:
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
I think you are spot on BV.
Apart from throwing a bucket load of cash at someone, what would attract a player to us? Maybe Malthouse? We don`t stand for anything.
I`ll bet we will be in exactly the same position again next year. Nothing sustainable about us.


And others move just for the good-will. :grin:

We don't stand for anything? Sounds like a tough phrase but what does that mean?

What do Richmond stand for? Essendon**? Fremantle?
What did Geelong stand for only 7 years ago? Handbags maybe?
Sydney 8 years ago?

If so many of you know that nothing is going to change, then give up. Seriously. Go follow Melbourne Victory or something, or anything.
Why can't people just talk football instead of the constant putting down and whining? Is this the way you speak about your partners? It is, isn't it? :smile:


Don't you know, harker, the grass is always greener on the other side. :thumbsup:

Stick the the narrative, please. We are a complete rabble, incapable of putting one foot in front of the other and should be shut down immediately.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2715
Blues2005 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am actually really concerned about the direction we are heading. I think our List Management is reactive and archaic.

It is obvious to most we have not turned over enough players or recruited well enough.

This year we get Thomas and pay overs for him. At his best he is a top class player but he is 27 next season and hasn't played much in the last 2 years. We will get Docherty for around pick 33 and will be handy and is the right age but is no star.

We also lost Betts for nothing because we got Thomas for nothing and handed Collingwood Pick 11.

We have been shopping around Lucas, Casboult, Laidler, Bootsma, Garlett & Yarran with little or no interest. Pick 32 for Hampson was a fair deal IMO. Unless we can move one of these we wont be doing much else.

Look at some of the other clubs and how they top up or re generate.

Collingwood will lose Thomas & Shaw but get pick 11 and Adams. They will also get White & Karnezis with later picks. For the second year in a row they will have two picks inside the Top 20. They are gold. Last year they got Grundy & Kennedy. This year will be just as good plus Adams is a star with 10 years ahead of him.

Hawthorn after winning a Premiership go out and trade Pick 17 and Savage for McEvoy. He is a top flight ruckman for the next 10 years and coming into his prime. He will be supported by Hale & Ceglar, both recruited from other clubs!

Sydney go and get Buddy. Smart from several angles.

Freo will go and get Sylvia & Gumbleton.

The difference is these clubs plan and do deals and they can afford them!!

Even St Kilda, realising they are crap trade good players (McEvoy, Dal Santo through FA) to get picks because they need depth and class. A bit like us. They are targeting 4-5 picks in the top 25 in this years draft. They will also get Bruce & Delaney with late picks. IMO that is smart.

North have been stockpiling for 3-4 years and will now add Dal Santo. Watch out in 2014.


I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.

We have pick 13 at the moment. Our next is around 32? That is a lottery. We need early picks. If we could get pick 2 and maybe another inside 20 that would be a win. I hope we can.

Things need to change or we will be stuck in no mans land for a while. I have tried to be positive but what I see worries me as a supporter.


I share some of your general concern, but this is laughably negative. It's just the old "the grass is always greener on the other side" and the idea that another club's rubbish has to be better than our club's rubbish. Your opinions on the general outlook of the club appear to vacillate with each win or loss. One week the future looks bright, the next you are concerned about the general direction of the club.

Another way you could look at the Thomas transaction is that we have added one of the better midfielders in the competition, one who appears to be over his ankle issues and who should just be coming into his prime. If he is fit (and you have to assume that he is, or the club would not have risked it) then we have bolstered the midfield significantly. You have to pay overs to attract top players, or they would just stay at their current club. We identified a perceived gap and have tried to fill it with Thomas, a player who provides exactly what we need.

Another way you could look at the (proposed) Docherty transaction is that we are getting a pick 12 with two years' development and who wants to move to us for a pick in the 30s in what is considered to be a weak draft after the early going. A potential 10-year player for a relatively cheap price. You can be sure that if he was going to Collingwood instead of us, it would be considered some massive coup; but because he is going to us then it is an underwhelming deal. :roll:

You are happy to downplay Docherty but on the other hand, praise St Kilda for their potential recruitment of an inferior player in Luke Delaney? The same Luke Delaney who, if he were heading to Carlton, most on here would probably dismiss as a hack? You praise Freo for getting Gumbleton, a bloke who has played something like 20 games in the seven years in which he has been in the AFL system and who most on here would not want, but on the other hand, you are concerned about Thomas' injury record? :eek:

How on Earth do you propose we were supposed to go after Franklin? Do you not think that we would have tried if it were at all possible?

Ben McEvoy overall has been a disappointment so far and certainly not the "top flight ruckman" he was touted to be pre-draft. Ruckmen do take longer than most to develop, but I know St Kilda fans who were not at all unhappy to lose him, particular for what they got in return. Let's just wait and see on that one.

Another way you could look at the Betts transaction is that he was simply asking for too much money and that it would have been irresponsible of us to match Adelaide's offer. Betts was and is a quality player on his day but we identified a surplus of similar types and a list imbalance and with Adelaide willing to pay huge money, he was deemed expendable. You can also bet London to a brick that had we matched it, the next time Betts would have undergone a form slump, you would have had people on here complaining that we didn't just let him go to Adelaide. The club can't win either way.

It is also not our problem that the AFL's draft pick compensation system is a joke - are we supposed to not follow through with our trades out of fear that the AFL will consequently strengthen the opposition? There should be NO compensation at all for lost free agents. But because there is, this should stop us from going about our business? That we operate under a ridiculous system is the AFL's fault, not our own.

But I get it, Carlton are a complete rabble and everyone other club does things better than us because they are not Carlton! :roll:



:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
I suppose we all fall in to 1 of 2 categories - optimist or pessimist


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Blues2005 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am actually really concerned about the direction we are heading. I think our List Management is reactive and archaic.

It is obvious to most we have not turned over enough players or recruited well enough.

This year we get Thomas and pay overs for him. At his best he is a top class player but he is 27 next season and hasn't played much in the last 2 years. We will get Docherty for around pick 33 and will be handy and is the right age but is no star.

We also lost Betts for nothing because we got Thomas for nothing and handed Collingwood Pick 11.

We have been shopping around Lucas, Casboult, Laidler, Bootsma, Garlett & Yarran with little or no interest. Pick 32 for Hampson was a fair deal IMO. Unless we can move one of these we wont be doing much else.

Look at some of the other clubs and how they top up or re generate.

Collingwood will lose Thomas & Shaw but get pick 11 and Adams. They will also get White & Karnezis with later picks. For the second year in a row they will have two picks inside the Top 20. They are gold. Last year they got Grundy & Kennedy. This year will be just as good plus Adams is a star with 10 years ahead of him.

Hawthorn after winning a Premiership go out and trade Pick 17 and Savage for McEvoy. He is a top flight ruckman for the next 10 years and coming into his prime. He will be supported by Hale & Ceglar, both recruited from other clubs!

Sydney go and get Buddy. Smart from several angles.

Freo will go and get Sylvia & Gumbleton.

The difference is these clubs plan and do deals and they can afford them!!

Even St Kilda, realising they are crap trade good players (McEvoy, Dal Santo through FA) to get picks because they need depth and class. A bit like us. They are targeting 4-5 picks in the top 25 in this years draft. They will also get Bruce & Delaney with late picks. IMO that is smart.

North have been stockpiling for 3-4 years and will now add Dal Santo. Watch out in 2014.


I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.

We have pick 13 at the moment. Our next is around 32? That is a lottery. We need early picks. If we could get pick 2 and maybe another inside 20 that would be a win. I hope we can.

Things need to change or we will be stuck in no mans land for a while. I have tried to be positive but what I see worries me as a supporter.


I share some of your general concern, but this is laughably negative. It's just the old "the grass is always greener on the other side" and the idea that another club's rubbish has to be better than our club's rubbish. Your opinions on the general outlook of the club appear to vacillate with each win or loss. One week the future looks bright, the next you are concerned about the general direction of the club.

Another way you could look at the Thomas transaction is that we have added one of the better midfielders in the competition, one who appears to be over his ankle issues and who should just be coming into his prime. If he is fit (and you have to assume that he is, or the club would not have risked it) then we have bolstered the midfield significantly. You have to pay overs to attract top players, or they would just stay at their current club. We identified a perceived gap and have tried to fill it with Thomas, a player who provides exactly what we need.

Another way you could look at the (proposed) Docherty transaction is that we are getting a pick 12 with two years' development and who wants to move to us for a pick in the 30s in what is considered to be a weak draft after the early going. A potential 10-year player for a relatively cheap price. You can be sure that if he was going to Collingwood instead of us, it would be considered some massive coup; but because he is going to us then it is an underwhelming deal. :roll:

You are happy to downplay Docherty but on the other hand, praise St Kilda for their potential recruitment of an inferior player in Luke Delaney? The same Luke Delaney who, if he were heading to Carlton, most on here would probably dismiss as a hack? You praise Freo for getting Gumbleton, a bloke who has played something like 20 games in the seven years in which he has been in the AFL system and who most on here would not want, but on the other hand, you are concerned about Thomas' injury record? :eek:

How on Earth do you propose we were supposed to go after Franklin? Do you not think that we would have tried if it were at all possible?

Ben McEvoy overall has been a disappointment so far and certainly not the "top flight ruckman" he was touted to be pre-draft. Ruckmen do take longer than most to develop, but I know St Kilda fans who were not at all unhappy to lose him, particular for what they got in return. Let's just wait and see on that one.

Another way you could look at the Betts transaction is that he was simply asking for too much money and that it would have been irresponsible of us to match Adelaide's offer. Betts was and is a quality player on his day but we identified a surplus of similar types and a list imbalance and with Adelaide willing to pay huge money, he was deemed expendable. You can also bet London to a brick that had we matched it, the next time Betts would have undergone a form slump, you would have had people on here complaining that we didn't just let him go to Adelaide. The club can't win either way.

It is also not our problem that the AFL's draft pick compensation system is a joke - are we supposed to not follow through with our trades out of fear that the AFL will consequently strengthen the opposition? There should be NO compensation at all for lost free agents. But because there is, this should stop us from going about our business? That we operate under a ridiculous system is the AFL's fault, not our own.

But I get it, Carlton are a complete rabble and everyone other club does things better than us because they are not Carlton! :roll:


That is so far away from what I wrote it's ridiculous. I get the impression you're playing the man and not the ball.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16956
Location: Melbourne
He's playing the ball. Stop sooking as per normal just because someone suggests you are wrong and answer his questions. Your post was dubious at best based on half baked thoughts on players going to other clubs and things beyond Carltons control I.e. AFL rules.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Posts: 1508
I'm a realist.

We have some stars in the side, sure but our list management is left wanting.

_________________
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:00 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
Blues2005 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am actually really concerned about the direction we are heading. I think our List Management is reactive and archaic.

It is obvious to most we have not turned over enough players or recruited well enough.

This year we get Thomas and pay overs for him. At his best he is a top class player but he is 27 next season and hasn't played much in the last 2 years. We will get Docherty for around pick 33 and will be handy and is the right age but is no star.

We also lost Betts for nothing because we got Thomas for nothing and handed Collingwood Pick 11.

We have been shopping around Lucas, Casboult, Laidler, Bootsma, Garlett & Yarran with little or no interest. Pick 32 for Hampson was a fair deal IMO. Unless we can move one of these we wont be doing much else.

Look at some of the other clubs and how they top up or re generate.

Collingwood will lose Thomas & Shaw but get pick 11 and Adams. They will also get White & Karnezis with later picks. For the second year in a row they will have two picks inside the Top 20. They are gold. Last year they got Grundy & Kennedy. This year will be just as good plus Adams is a star with 10 years ahead of him.

Hawthorn after winning a Premiership go out and trade Pick 17 and Savage for McEvoy. He is a top flight ruckman for the next 10 years and coming into his prime. He will be supported by Hale & Ceglar, both recruited from other clubs!

Sydney go and get Buddy. Smart from several angles.

Freo will go and get Sylvia & Gumbleton.

The difference is these clubs plan and do deals and they can afford them!!

Even St Kilda, realising they are crap trade good players (McEvoy, Dal Santo through FA) to get picks because they need depth and class. A bit like us. They are targeting 4-5 picks in the top 25 in this years draft. They will also get Bruce & Delaney with late picks. IMO that is smart.

North have been stockpiling for 3-4 years and will now add Dal Santo. Watch out in 2014.


I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.

We have pick 13 at the moment. Our next is around 32? That is a lottery. We need early picks. If we could get pick 2 and maybe another inside 20 that would be a win. I hope we can.

Things need to change or we will be stuck in no mans land for a while. I have tried to be positive but what I see worries me as a supporter.


I share some of your general concern, but this is laughably negative. It's just the old "the grass is always greener on the other side" and the idea that another club's rubbish has to be better than our club's rubbish. Your opinions on the general outlook of the club appear to vacillate with each win or loss. One week the future looks bright, the next you are concerned about the general direction of the club.

Another way you could look at the Thomas transaction is that we have added one of the better midfielders in the competition, one who appears to be over his ankle issues and who should just be coming into his prime. If he is fit (and you have to assume that he is, or the club would not have risked it) then we have bolstered the midfield significantly. You have to pay overs to attract top players, or they would just stay at their current club. We identified a perceived gap and have tried to fill it with Thomas, a player who provides exactly what we need.

Another way you could look at the (proposed) Docherty transaction is that we are getting a pick 12 with two years' development and who wants to move to us for a pick in the 30s in what is considered to be a weak draft after the early going. A potential 10-year player for a relatively cheap price. You can be sure that if he was going to Collingwood instead of us, it would be considered some massive coup; but because he is going to us then it is an underwhelming deal. :roll:

You are happy to downplay Docherty but on the other hand, praise St Kilda for their potential recruitment of an inferior player in Luke Delaney? The same Luke Delaney who, if he were heading to Carlton, most on here would probably dismiss as a hack? You praise Freo for getting Gumbleton, a bloke who has played something like 20 games in the seven years in which he has been in the AFL system and who most on here would not want, but on the other hand, you are concerned about Thomas' injury record? :eek:

How on Earth do you propose we were supposed to go after Franklin? Do you not think that we would have tried if it were at all possible?

Ben McEvoy overall has been a disappointment so far and certainly not the "top flight ruckman" he was touted to be pre-draft. Ruckmen do take longer than most to develop, but I know St Kilda fans who were not at all unhappy to lose him, particular for what they got in return. Let's just wait and see on that one.

Another way you could look at the Betts transaction is that he was simply asking for too much money and that it would have been irresponsible of us to match Adelaide's offer. Betts was and is a quality player on his day but we identified a surplus of similar types and a list imbalance and with Adelaide willing to pay huge money, he was deemed expendable. You can also bet London to a brick that had we matched it, the next time Betts would have undergone a form slump, you would have had people on here complaining that we didn't just let him go to Adelaide. The club can't win either way.

It is also not our problem that the AFL's draft pick compensation system is a joke - are we supposed to not follow through with our trades out of fear that the AFL will consequently strengthen the opposition? There should be NO compensation at all for lost free agents. But because there is, this should stop us from going about our business? That we operate under a ridiculous system is the AFL's fault, not our own.

But I get it, Carlton are a complete rabble and everyone other club does things better than us because they are not Carlton! :roll:


:clap: b4 Psych. :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
Blues 2005 :thumbsup: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:18 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Cazzesman wrote:
He's playing the ball. Stop sooking as per normal just because someone suggests you are wrong and answer his questions. Your post was dubious at best based on half baked thoughts on players going to other clubs and things beyond Carltons control I.e. AFL rules.

Regards Cazzesman


Don't even go there Cazz. When is the last time you answered a question properly?

His suggestions aren't relevant to my post. Not even close.

My point is that clubs address their position as best possible and plan for the future. How have we done that in the last 5-10 years?

It's your mate Hughes and the recruiting department that are as culpable as anyone for our current position.


PS More than happy to be proven wrong. I just want us at the top again,

Why don't you detail how well we are doing, the direction we are heading and how we are going to get there?

Be great to hear. :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Last edited by ThePsychologist on Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
ThePsychologist wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am actually really concerned about the direction we are heading. I think our List Management is reactive and archaic.

It is obvious to most we have not turned over enough players or recruited well enough.

This year we get Thomas and pay overs for him. At his best he is a top class player but he is 27 next season and hasn't played much in the last 2 years. We will get Docherty for around pick 33 and will be handy and is the right age but is no star.

We also lost Betts for nothing because we got Thomas for nothing and handed Collingwood Pick 11.

We have been shopping around Lucas, Casboult, Laidler, Bootsma, Garlett & Yarran with little or no interest. Pick 32 for Hampson was a fair deal IMO. Unless we can move one of these we wont be doing much else.

Look at some of the other clubs and how they top up or re generate.

Collingwood will lose Thomas & Shaw but get pick 11 and Adams. They will also get White & Karnezis with later picks. For the second year in a row they will have two picks inside the Top 20. They are gold. Last year they got Grundy & Kennedy. This year will be just as good plus Adams is a star with 10 years ahead of him.

Hawthorn after winning a Premiership go out and trade Pick 17 and Savage for McEvoy. He is a top flight ruckman for the next 10 years and coming into his prime. He will be supported by Hale & Ceglar, both recruited from other clubs!

Sydney go and get Buddy. Smart from several angles.

Freo will go and get Sylvia & Gumbleton.

The difference is these clubs plan and do deals and they can afford them!!

Even St Kilda, realising they are crap trade good players (McEvoy, Dal Santo through FA) to get picks because they need depth and class. A bit like us. They are targeting 4-5 picks in the top 25 in this years draft. They will also get Bruce & Delaney with late picks. IMO that is smart.

North have been stockpiling for 3-4 years and will now add Dal Santo. Watch out in 2014.


I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.

We have pick 13 at the moment. Our next is around 32? That is a lottery. We need early picks. If we could get pick 2 and maybe another inside 20 that would be a win. I hope we can.

Things need to change or we will be stuck in no mans land for a while. I have tried to be positive but what I see worries me as a supporter.


I share some of your general concern, but this is laughably negative. It's just the old "the grass is always greener on the other side" and the idea that another club's rubbish has to be better than our club's rubbish. Your opinions on the general outlook of the club appear to vacillate with each win or loss. One week the future looks bright, the next you are concerned about the general direction of the club.

Another way you could look at the Thomas transaction is that we have added one of the better midfielders in the competition, one who appears to be over his ankle issues and who should just be coming into his prime. If he is fit (and you have to assume that he is, or the club would not have risked it) then we have bolstered the midfield significantly. You have to pay overs to attract top players, or they would just stay at their current club. We identified a perceived gap and have tried to fill it with Thomas, a player who provides exactly what we need.

Another way you could look at the (proposed) Docherty transaction is that we are getting a pick 12 with two years' development and who wants to move to us for a pick in the 30s in what is considered to be a weak draft after the early going. A potential 10-year player for a relatively cheap price. You can be sure that if he was going to Collingwood instead of us, it would be considered some massive coup; but because he is going to us then it is an underwhelming deal. :roll:

You are happy to downplay Docherty but on the other hand, praise St Kilda for their potential recruitment of an inferior player in Luke Delaney? The same Luke Delaney who, if he were heading to Carlton, most on here would probably dismiss as a hack? You praise Freo for getting Gumbleton, a bloke who has played something like 20 games in the seven years in which he has been in the AFL system and who most on here would not want, but on the other hand, you are concerned about Thomas' injury record? :eek:

How on Earth do you propose we were supposed to go after Franklin? Do you not think that we would have tried if it were at all possible?

Ben McEvoy overall has been a disappointment so far and certainly not the "top flight ruckman" he was touted to be pre-draft. Ruckmen do take longer than most to develop, but I know St Kilda fans who were not at all unhappy to lose him, particular for what they got in return. Let's just wait and see on that one.

Another way you could look at the Betts transaction is that he was simply asking for too much money and that it would have been irresponsible of us to match Adelaide's offer. Betts was and is a quality player on his day but we identified a surplus of similar types and a list imbalance and with Adelaide willing to pay huge money, he was deemed expendable. You can also bet London to a brick that had we matched it, the next time Betts would have undergone a form slump, you would have had people on here complaining that we didn't just let him go to Adelaide. The club can't win either way.

It is also not our problem that the AFL's draft pick compensation system is a joke - are we supposed to not follow through with our trades out of fear that the AFL will consequently strengthen the opposition? There should be NO compensation at all for lost free agents. But because there is, this should stop us from going about our business? That we operate under a ridiculous system is the AFL's fault, not our own.

But I get it, Carlton are a complete rabble and everyone other club does things better than us because they are not Carlton! :roll:


That is so far away from what I wrote it's ridiculous. I get the impression you're playing the man and not the ball.


Really? I am simply responding to your whingeing - it's all there in black (or blue) and white. I stand by everything I said. A look through my posting history on this site would indicate that I never play the man - that's not my style. I will tell people if I think that they are wide of the mark, like I think you are here. I debate content in a mature fashion, regardless of who posts it. Honestly, I am not sure what could have given you the impression that I am playing the man? Maybe you simply don't like your views being challenged?

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:26 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Cazzesman wrote:
He's playing the ball. Stop sooking as per normal just because someone suggests you are wrong and answer his questions. Your post was dubious at best based on half baked thoughts on players going to other clubs and things beyond Carltons control I.e. AFL rules.

Regards Cazzesman

We should still trade Gibbs, Lucas and Yarran to get the next wunderkinds in Aish, Acres/Bontempelli And Hartung. :donk: :banghead:

Imagine how much they'd be bitching about McKay, Sticks, Rogers and Hughes if we didn't get Thomas and Docherty...

"No one wants to join Carlton. Collingwood just picked up White and Armstrong after getting Lynch and Russell last year. They're getting all the spud role players."

:lol:

The naysayers probably believe that the likes of Rogers and Hughes are working in a tin shed and nowhere near Luke Williams. :razz:

I guess cashed up bogans like Bruce Mathison know as much about recruiting as TC. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:35 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
@blues2005.

Where did I say the Betts move was a bad one?
Where did I say we should get Buddy or Sylvia or Gumbleton?
Where am I critical of the Docherty deal?

My view, and its mine, that we seem to behind the times when its comes to our List Management. We still seem to be of the belief we can buy our way out of trouble.

My key point is these sides seem to always be improving or trying to improve their lists and make the hard decisions needed to do it.

What realistically have we done in the last few years? We have the lowest turnover of any club. No one can argue our recruiting has been pathetic.

We have been told that we will be aggressive in this years trades. Great, apparently now we can't trade anyone or have the money or room to do so.

From where I sit, in the cheap seats, it seems as though we either have our hands tied or can't attract anyone. Why

It seems as though we've been on the cycle for years and there is no end. I have tried to be as positive about our players as anyone but we seem to be stuck mid table and to be honest I don't like it.

Like I have said many times I hope I am wrong and FWIW its just my opinion.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:38 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Kouta wrote:
We should still trade Gibbs, Lucas and Yarran to get the next wunderkinds in Aish, Acres/Bontempelli And Hartung. :donk: :banghead:


Is that on offer? I'd do it in a heartbeat.

How far have those three taken us? What is the chance of those three taking us further?

Its that losers attitude you espouse that has us in the position we are in.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Last edited by ThePsychologist on Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 327
blues2005 is on the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
blueboys101 wrote:
blues2005 is on the money.


+1

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
Yes we may be hamstrung by the TPP now but theres nothing to stop us back ending contracts or 'renegotiating" with some current players.
If Waite and Judd will be gone or on substantially downgraded contracts in 2015, there's nothing stopping us backloading a contract for a new player until then.
There's always a way to navigate the system.

I'd suggest our problem is a) we're not the attractive proposition we were years ago and b) we have people bereft of ideas running the club and football department.
Its the reality of contemporary Carlton. We spent so much time telling everyone how good we were, we didnt notice that everyone else going past us.
We've become an average also-ran in most respects. Years ago players wanted to come to Carlton because it was a club built on success and achievement.
They would take less money to be a part of team and club success.

Now, we have to accept that players are no more inclined to join us than any other club unless we come up with more $$$$$$. Thats the reality IMHO.


Cannot disagree with that at all

Also, a) and b) aren't mutually exclusive. Our club is clueless and that's one of the reasons we're not an attractive proposition

And we keep making the same mistakes...the SAVIOUR syndrome we inherited from the Elliott days of telling Parko he could not rebuild, just top up. Look at all the duds we picked up after the 95 flag and all the beauties we passed up (that includes assistant coaches)

I have no faith anymore in this club. NONE WHATSOEVER. I love them for what they were, not what they are. Honestly, my blood boils

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:16 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Synbad wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I am told GWS are keen to trade Pick 2, even after they got Mumford with pick 35! :smoking:

If I was us I would be trying to get it. Trade Kruezer or Gibbs. Both very good players but neither is Elite and are in their prime. No one should be off limits. Even a deal incorporating a few of Walker, Jamison, Warnock, Garlett, Bootsma or Yarran should be considered.


Agree...and we've tried...but contracted players don't want to move and/or there's little or no interest in our tradeable players because we haven't recruited or developed them properly. It's bad list management (blame McKay and Swann), bad recruiting (blame Hughes and Ratten) and bad development (blame Ratten and co).

blame president sticks and the board...
theyre all responsible to the board
the directors set the tone by providing direction.


Spot on..Blame Sticks and the board for appointing Ratten with no due diligence.
Blame Sticks and the board for poaching Swann, Malthouse Butffant et al because they are flowering dumb, lazy and completely inept administrators
Vision, plan...
A nobody like Carl Dilena is making us look like a VFL side
FFFFfMMMMMMMDDDDDDD

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:20 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3257
We continue to refer to issues with TPP and it being the cause of our current ills.

Did the club issue a statement to the effect or has a poster received credible inside knowledge? Either, or........ would be delighted if anybody could de-mystify the issue with fact!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
Is Josh Bruce worth pick 32 or 33?
St.Kilda have offered GWS pick 41... If GWS reject pick 41, St.Kilda have threatened to take Bruce in the pre-season draft...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fenwick Snap and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group