Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:36 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Andain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Andain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You look at the payment structure standard and I fail to see how betts should be paid less than others.

If you fail to see why a small forward should be paid less than others in our side then you have questionable eyesight indeed.

Eddie was right to go, we were never going to pay him that kind of money and I'd have been fuming if we did.

Ok over the last five years which has been our most potent.
Game is about winning scores...
I don't care if he's small it tall he's our most productive forward
You sound like you doubt me because Eddie is not tall but Casboult Rowe are ?

You've been watching Carlton play over the last five years and you still don't understand why a decent key forward is more important to the structure of a team than a great small forward?

Seriously?? :confused:

P.S: I'm not saying that Casboult or Rowe are decent key forwards at the minute.

What are you saying?
That we don't need our best forward of the last five years for one hundred extra but we're can pay Judd alot more than that?
Look when we had fev we were told we didn't need him that he was a hog.
Now we don't need our next best forward over the last decade

But we need carrazzo Judd Waite on their contracts ?
Eddie if entering his prime

He has been one of our best performers and home grown
He's definitely been our best forward fifty player.

My point isn't just Eddie


It's the list management and contracting.
It's a sham....

What's Judd worth?
What's carrazzo worth?
Waite ?


Why can't we hold Eddie and bring in Thomas

Eddie is now in his prime

Those guys are shot!

I know who I'd rather look after

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Michael Jezz wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Could have lost hammer kept Eddie and got daisy and the unknown anyway.


much planning


Don't expect ripper stuff at Carlton just a half a step forward when we need to take steps forward to catch up

Onya Eddie !

Bet he would have stayed if the offer was better even if not exactly 500 k

But to gain the premium Eddie had to go. Make space etc.

Full salary cap dadidadida.


Come on.....you can't look at it that simplictically. Who knows what we offered say it was 400....that is clearly what he is worth and no more. If you paid him 450 where are we going to find the money for walker, Henderson, Murphy, Gibbs. They would all be warranted in asking for 600k. Imagine the negotiation " so your saying my player (walker) isn't as good as betts" etc etc and then you have a cap blow out. Then we would be criticizing the club for letting eg walker go, instead of betts. The point is this is overly negative and heaping criticism on the club where it isn't due


There's your problem. Not one of them is currently worth $600K NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEIR MANAGER'S PUSH IT.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
doofdoof wrote:
If the club couldn't manoeuvre things around so that we could give Betts an extra 100k a season as has been suggested then were really [REDACTED]. After all, he has been our most productive forward of the last decade Fev aside. Good chance we were probably happy to let him go and there was perhaps more to things than just money and not being able to fit him in.



Why do we have to manoevre it? The TPP is a finite amount. Rank each player and assess his worth. If he is not assessed at 500k, DON'T FLOWERING WELL PAY HIM 500k
Set the flowering standard and players will learn quickly they can't hold the club to ransom
Like Judd (numero uno) and Waite to name a couple
UNfortunately, the Thomas affair shows we don't flowering learn!!!!

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
That's my point
Eddie must move on Thomas must come in
Judd carrazzo and Waite are ok...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:53 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
dane wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
Raph at pick 28.


EFA.

If he's still there.

No chance he'll be there

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:58 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
I can dream

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Andain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Andain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You look at the payment structure standard and I fail to see how betts should be paid less than others.

If you fail to see why a small forward should be paid less than others in our side then you have questionable eyesight indeed.

Eddie was right to go, we were never going to pay him that kind of money and I'd have been fuming if we did.

Ok over the last five years which has been our most potent.
Game is about winning scores...
I don't care if he's small it tall he's our most productive forward
You sound like you doubt me because Eddie is not tall but Casboult Rowe are ?

You've been watching Carlton play over the last five years and you still don't understand why a decent key forward is more important to the structure of a team than a great small forward?

Seriously?? :confused:

P.S: I'm not saying that Casboult or Rowe are decent key forwards at the minute.

What are you saying?
That we don't need our best forward of the last five years for one hundred extra but we're can pay Judd alot more than that?
Look when we had fev we were told we didn't need him that he was a hog.
Now we don't need our next best forward over the last decade

But we need carrazzo Judd Waite on their contracts ?
Eddie if entering his prime

He has been one of our best performers and home grown
He's definitely been our best forward fifty player.

My point isn't just Eddie


It's the list management and contracting.
It's a sham....

What's Judd worth?
What's carrazzo worth?
Waite ?


Why can't we hold Eddie and bring in Thomas

Eddie is now in his prime

Those guys are shot!

I know who I'd rather look after

We need Eddie for $350,000 to $400,000.

We don't need Eddie for $500,000.

Simple as that. Bad financial decisions we've made to overpay some of our players isn't an excuse to continue overpaying more players.

And no a fit Thomas isn't overpaid at $650,000. A fit Thomas is our best player who fills a desperate need.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
No way known Eddie should've gotten near 500K from us considering Hendo is only on 450K max.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: The Clinic across the road.
I don't know what all our players are getting paid.
I don't believe everything i read in the paper.

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:36 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Zippy wrote:
It's irrelevant but Kreuzer shouldn't have gone pick 1. It should have been Cotchin. No ruckman (unless an absolute freak. E.g. 200cm Gary Ablett) should ever go pick 1.

Hopefully Kreuzer can become dangerous up forward and become a 20-30 goal a season forward/ruck because Warnock is our best ruckman.


As Leigh matthews said kruezer is struggling to be a B grader at best....


Never ever waste a first round pick on a ruckman. You can easily poach them from other clubs like swans and hawks have done. We've done it with Warnock.

Trent cotchin should be playing for us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
trublu wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Zippy wrote:
It's irrelevant but Kreuzer shouldn't have gone pick 1. It should have been Cotchin. No ruckman (unless an absolute freak. E.g. 200cm Gary Ablett) should ever go pick 1.

Hopefully Kreuzer can become dangerous up forward and become a 20-30 goal a season forward/ruck because Warnock is our best ruckman.


As Leigh matthews said kruezer is struggling to be a B grader at best....


Never ever waste a first round pick on a ruckman. You can easily poach them from other clubs like swans and hawks have done. We've done it with Warnock.

Trent cotchin should be playing for us.


We didn't use first round pick on Warnock .

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 12
what do you guys think west coast will give us for bootsma .. do you think we'll ask for a plater or draft pick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
teagueyubeauty wrote:
dane wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
Raph at pick 28.


EFA.

If he's still there.

No chance he'll be there

sit tight, be confident.

We're just biding our time. When we strike, we'll shake this trade period up

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
Lions want pick 28 (hampson pick) for docherty.
Blues want to give them pick 29 our second rounder.
Rapt to get him for pick 28.



28 or 29, who cares? Small price to pay for a kid who has "Triple Brownlow Medallist" written all over him

:razz:

I'm guessing both clubs have their eyes on the same player in the second round so whoever gets 28 gets that player and the other team misses out. Otherwise why bother?

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:04 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
cimm1979 wrote:
trublu wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Zippy wrote:
It's irrelevant but Kreuzer shouldn't have gone pick 1. It should have been Cotchin. No ruckman (unless an absolute freak. E.g. 200cm Gary Ablett) should ever go pick 1.

Hopefully Kreuzer can become dangerous up forward and become a 20-30 goal a season forward/ruck because Warnock is our best ruckman.


As Leigh matthews said kruezer is struggling to be a B grader at best....


Never ever waste a first round pick on a ruckman. You can easily poach them from other clubs like swans and hawks have done. We've done it with Warnock.

Trent cotchin should be playing for us.


We didn't use first round pick on Warnock .


I think that's his point! Warnock will end up being a big steal for us (although the 1 mil over 3 years was a large price to pay).. He will be coming into his prime over the next few years.. He actually has ruck smarts.. His ruck work can be brilliant at times.. Just needs to improve on his around the ground work and try get involved a bit more. I just hope Mick realizes he is our best ruckman.

Most ruckman don't really come into their peak until 25+ years of age and their peak is probably 4-5 years. They're such a waste of a high pick. Hawthorn and Sydney have done very well in this area, as did Collingwood with Jolly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18028
Andain wrote:
And no a fit Thomas isn't overpaid at $650,000. A fit Thomas is our best player who fills a desperate need.


A fit Murphy is far more value to our team than Thomas. Can win his own ball, plays multiple positions and uses the ball better.
Thomas isnt worth close to 650k.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 7:16 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Blue Vain wrote:
Andain wrote:
And no a fit Thomas isn't overpaid at $650,000. A fit Thomas is our best player who fills a desperate need.


A fit Murphy is far more value to our team than Thomas. Can win his own ball, plays multiple positions and uses the ball better.
Thomas isnt worth close to 650k.


Thomas' best has been greater than Murphy's best so far in their careers BV


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 7:28 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
SnickerS wrote:

Thomas' best has been greater than Murphy's best so far in their careers BV


Probably why Thomas has won an AFLCA award. Oh wait...

What a load of crap.
Which is not to say Thomas isn't worth the money, although I'd feel much easier about it being 625 than 700.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 7:35 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Stamos wrote:
So Waite got a $1.3m contract?
That's approx 433k a year, and about 217k included in the salary cap. Don't know what world you're living in, but in AFL in this decade, that's not a big or long contract.

Especially for a player of Waite's position and ability.



Stamos, I only care about the Carlton Football Club. I am guessing you care just as much as me about the strength of the Carlton Football Club as well. Whether it is Waite, Doull, Kernahan or anyone else they will be judged on what they have contributed to the football club. That is just an unfortunate reality as it is a tough business.


If we want to look at pure numbers and what he has produced we could break it down in a financial way (overlooking emotion, the element of his long term injury problems ...which Carlton knew about by the way before they signed him on a 3 year contract for 1.3 million)

This is what Waite has produced:

2012 - 11 games - 27 goals
2013 - 14 games - 27 goals
2014 - ?

2012 - in Carlton's winning matches that he was part of he got Brownlow votes in one match - the 5 goal match vs Essendon*.
His other good match was against Brisbane -with 5 goals. The rest were averaged out at about 1 goal a match.

So for that output based on the current pay rates...he would have contributed about $200,000 worth of work. (some might consider that is a generous estimation.) 2013 let's say $250,000 worth of work.

Therefore he has produced about $450,000-$500,000 worth of work and yet he was paid 1.3 million. That means his last year of the contract should be a $800,000 type of season...for that type of work the minimum requirement is that he makes the All-Australian team in 2014 if Carlton is going to get some sort of value for money.

I don't blame Waite- I blame the people that devised the contract negotiations. I am hoping that in his contract there was a clause about injuries...as they knew prior how susceptible to injuries he was...either way Waite is doing the best he can out of a tough situation.


His manager did a mighty good job let's just leave it at that. Could you imagine Hawthorn making this type of contract negotiation though? Carlton is an amateur club in all ways when compared to Hawthorn. This is just a symptom of the malaise.


All I want is for Carlton to get some sort of value for money based on how much they pay for players. If it out by $50,000-$100,000 then so be it..but I want value for money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 7:55 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Btw - these are some of the players that I think Carlton has got value for money from

1) Anthony Koutoufides - for the 1999 preliminary alone he would have brought in thousands of new supporters. Then on top of that what he did in the 1995 finals series. Carlton and Kouta both benefited from him being a one-club player. Perhaps Kouta "won" in terms of his final large contract - but he had runs on the board up to that point anyway.

2) Eddie Betts- gave his all, contributed goals, consistent. Gave value for money based on his contract size- was nominated for All-Australian. Other than Syd Jackson arguably our best indigenous player of all time. Syd wins out over Eddie in terms of Carlton's best indigenous player in my estimation due to the damage he caused in finals.

3) Lachie Henderson- is a contributor already. Winning player this year -Kicked 3 goals against the Saints. Never drops his head, professional. 2 year contract..keeps em keen for more of a contribution.

This is what I look for - both parties winning in a contract negotiation.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group