Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 5:04 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:35 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
Garlett and Yarran were our respective 1st and 5th best goal-kickers this year and with no. 3 in Betts all but gone, who's going to keep the ball in the forward 50, along with the capacity of kicking 50 goals in a season? Armfield?
The draft sounds as though it's good at the top end but may peter out somewhat thereafter.


IMO that's been a major issue of ours. We rely on these small forwards who don't contribute anywhere else.

We need to change our whole forward structure because what we have had has failed badly in big games or when we have really needed them. Overall, especially considering how often they are a major target their return has been poor.

The game has changed dramatically. Mids now fill the role around small forward, wing and HB. They can run longer, have a more consistent impact on the game, gather more possessions and add dramatically to the sides flexibility.

Our defence has been much better after adding the run and endurance of Walker & Simpson.

The sooner we add to Gibbs, Murphy, Judd, Graham, Carrazzo, McLean etc and have them pushing through the forward line the better we will be.

I am positive they will produce as many goals if not more than what we currently have as well as adding to our depth around the ground.

No fluke that Freo, Geelong, Hawthorn & Sydney all do this.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:

IMO that's been a major issue of ours. We rely on these small forwards who don't contribute anywhere else.

We need to change our whole forward structure because what we have had has failed badly in big games or when we have really needed them. Overall, especially considering how often they are a major target their return has been poor.

The game has changed dramatically. Mids now fill the role around small forward, wing and HB. They can run longer, have a more consistent impact on the game, gather more possessions and add dramatically to the sides flexibility.

The sooner we add to Gibbs, Murphy, Judd, Graham, Carrazzo, McLean etc and have them pushing through the forward line the better we will be.

I am positive they will produce as many goals if not more than what we currently have as well as adding to our depth around the ground.

No fluke that Freo, Geelong, Hawthorn & Sydney all do this.


Garlett's stats are quite unbelievable in many key areas expectant of any forward. Pressure, tackles leading to turnovers, goal assists etc etc. Would be so much better without the personal issues.

Yarran has shown us nothing of what he's really capable of. He needs a mentor that can get through his head of what is required to play at this level. If Malthouse and Wiley can't do that then......
Yarran was always tabled for a mid-field rile but if he doesn't put in a Kreuzer or Curnow type pre-season, that won't be easy.

To be honest Psych, I don't care what combination we put together as long as we're willing to spill blood for one another and have the common goal.
We haven't been poor this year because of the talent we have. We've been poor because we haven't extracted the maximum from that talent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:49 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 835
Buckley and Menzel :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
In my opinion, only one of Betts, Garlett or Yarran will go. Look around the league and see how difficult it is to find one small forward ... let alone a combination of two that can feature in the top 5 goalkicking for a particular club.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:

IMO that's been a major issue of ours. We rely on these small forwards who don't contribute anywhere else.

We need to change our whole forward structure because what we have had has failed badly in big games or when we have really needed them. Overall, especially considering how often they are a major target their return has been poor.

The game has changed dramatically. Mids now fill the role around small forward, wing and HB. They can run longer, have a more consistent impact on the game, gather more possessions and add dramatically to the sides flexibility.

The sooner we add to Gibbs, Murphy, Judd, Graham, Carrazzo, McLean etc and have them pushing through the forward line the better we will be.

I am positive they will produce as many goals if not more than what we currently have as well as adding to our depth around the ground.

No fluke that Freo, Geelong, Hawthorn & Sydney all do this.


Garlett's stats are quite unbelievable in many key areas expectant of any forward. Pressure, tackles leading to turnovers, goal assists etc etc. Would be so much better without the personal issues.

Yarran has shown us nothing of what he's really capable of. He needs a mentor that can get through his head of what is required to play at this level. If Malthouse and Wiley can't do that then......
Yarran was always tabled for a mid-field rile but if he doesn't put in a Kreuzer or Curnow type pre-season, that won't be easy.

To be honest Psych, I don't care what combination we put together as long as we're willing to spill blood for one another and have the common goal.
We haven't been poor this year because of the talent we have. We've been poor because we haven't extracted the maximum from that talent.


Agree

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Menzel_Mayhem wrote:
Buckley and Menzel :)


Menzel should be our small forward whilst spending more and more time through the middle. Will take him another 2-3 seasons to really develop and engine. I see him as our Stevie J if he can.

As at the moment he is a bit limited and we need to play him how can we play the others?

Buckley IMO has the same issues as the three amigos.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
harker wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:

IMO that's been a major issue of ours. We rely on these small forwards who don't contribute anywhere else.

We need to change our whole forward structure because what we have had has failed badly in big games or when we have really needed them. Overall, especially considering how often they are a major target their return has been poor.

The game has changed dramatically. Mids now fill the role around small forward, wing and HB. They can run longer, have a more consistent impact on the game, gather more possessions and add dramatically to the sides flexibility.

The sooner we add to Gibbs, Murphy, Judd, Graham, Carrazzo, McLean etc and have them pushing through the forward line the better we will be.

I am positive they will produce as many goals if not more than what we currently have as well as adding to our depth around the ground.

No fluke that Freo, Geelong, Hawthorn & Sydney all do this.


Garlett's stats are quite unbelievable in many key areas expectant of any forward. Pressure, tackles leading to turnovers, goal assists etc etc. Would be so much better without the personal issues.

Yarran has shown us nothing of what he's really capable of. He needs a mentor that can get through his head of what is required to play at this level. If Malthouse and Wiley can't do that then......
Yarran was always tabled for a mid-field rile but if he doesn't put in a Kreuzer or Curnow type pre-season, that won't be easy.

To be honest Psych, I don't care what combination we put together as long as we're willing to spill blood for one another and have the common goal.
We haven't been poor this year because of the talent we have. We've been poor because we haven't extracted the maximum from that talent.


Garlett is a must keep. For me he's the best of our small forwards and he appears to have the hunger and the fitness.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
Yarran has shown us nothing of what he's really capable of. He needs a mentor that can get through his head of what is required to play at this level. If Malthouse and Wiley can't do that then......
Yarran was always tabled for a mid-field rile but if he doesn't put in a Kreuzer or Curnow type pre-season, that won't be easy.


This is the one area I really disagree with most. I have watched him carefully this year live on atleast 12 occassions. He workrate is actually greatly improved.

He is just NOT football smart. Ball in hand he looks good and especially in space but most times when he does he is fed the ball or got it on a turnover. Even then his efficiency is average.

He does NOT have the ability to find the ball himself. That is a major issue to make it in the AFL. It's not as if he's been improving and looks close. He is a long long way off the player we all hope he could be. He will NEVER be a midfielder.

I hope I'm wrong because he could be a player we really need. Unfortunately after more than 80 games I just don't like what I've seen.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 835
Agreed Menzel should be our "small" with resting mids.

buckley was more tongue in cheek comment ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:
This is the one area I really disagree with most. I have watched him carefully this year live on atleast 12 occassions. He workrate is actually greatly improved.

He is just NOT football smart. Ball in hand he looks good and especially in space but most times when he does he is fed the ball or got it on a turnover. Even then his efficiency is average.

He does NOT have the ability to find the ball himself. That is a major issue to make it in the AFL. It's not as if he's been improving and looks close. He is a long long way off the player we all hope he could be. He will NEVER be a midfielder.

I hope I'm wrong because he could be a player we really need. Unfortunately after more than 80 games I just don't like what I've seen.


Yarran was primed to take off after 2011. Ran around everything any anyone and was looked for when his teammates needed to dish the ball off.
That hasn't quite come about this year and I'm not really sure what role he's playing any more.

The guy has undoubted talent but is he coachable and has he the commitment?

Guess we'll find out what Mick thinks of him soon enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:23 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10597
Sorry guys but Menzel is not a small.
He is a midsize forward and will probably be played as such.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 835
Yeah thats why we say 'small' not small :D
Ge can crumb, mark, tackle etc then after a couple pre seasons go to chop out in the mid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
harker wrote:
Yarran was primed to take off after 2011. Ran around everything any anyone and was looked for when his teammates needed to dish the ball off.
That hasn't quite come about this year and I'm not really sure what role he's playing any more.

The guy has undoubted talent but is he coachable and has he the commitment?

Guess we'll find out what Mick thinks of him soon enough.


I love Yarran but if his response to being challenged by the coach is to say "I don't need this shit, I want out" as is rumoured then he doesn't have the steel Carlton need. This goes across the entire playing list, I'm tired of promising draft picks turning into average players with no apparent drive to succeed.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Wojee wrote:

I love Yarran but if his response to being challenged by the coach is to say "I don't need this shit, I want out" as is rumoured then he doesn't have the steel Carlton need.
This goes across the entire playing list, I'm tired of promising draft picks turning into average players with no apparent drive to succeed.


There were words said and there have been several versions of the same story.

That aside, the heat of the year is over and now is the time for reflection and introspection, by coach and by player.

It's a good time to sit down and have a comfortable chat and if that isn't good enough, then it's not and plan B comes into play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
The Rhino wrote:
Is the "if one Aboriginal player leaves, then all three have to leave because Aboriginals only ever talk to other Aboriginals at a footy club" line of logic now the new "He's from South/West Australia therefore Port/Crows/Eagles/Dockers will pay ridiculous amounts to get him back because those clubs only get players from WA/SA"?

:clap: LAND RIGHTS FOR AMIGOS!!

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
SnickerS wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
SnickerS wrote:
Robinson is a good player to move on IMO.

Would have reasonable trade value to a team that is pushing/filling gaps.... and i reckon you've seen the best of his abilities.... no more upside.


..just can't agree with this sort of arguement.. ..there's always upside with every player, until they're just about ready to retire.. ..greater fitness and experience will improve a player.. ..the idea that a player can have 'peaked' by early 20's is just flawed to my thinking.. .... ..and this is proven pretty much every year, by players improving upon previous years, regardless of age..


And thats fine, thats why i wrote "IMO".
Because in my opinion, he's a spud. Sorry to be so matter-of-fact.

No doubt his conditioning, experience and fitness will improve.
Will it change his decision making enough to be a top liner??? Will he stop bombing the ball at every opportunity without thinking? Will it improve his decision making and awareness?

Not so sure


..more disagreeing with the idea that experience and fitness won't improve a player.. ..awareness and decision making, they will improve with experience and fitness.. ..experience to learn from mistakes, fitness to think clearly and not stumble thru fatigue.. .... ..how much they will improve is the question, but players do improve.... ..and this doesn't mean i'm for or against trading Robbo, more just the arguements that a player [any player] has no upside.. ..its just, how much the upside will be..

..i think calling him a spud is harsh... ..he's better than a spud..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25323
Location: Bondi Beach
dane wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
We have gaps and I don't think the club will lose Betts plus Yarran, Robbo, Warnock/Hampson.

It's the bottom 15 we need to turnover for new blood.

We would love a KPF ...Boyd fits the bill. Patton. Who else, or a CHB......?...?who?

I'm sure they're out there,,,,plus a couple of big bodied midfielders..4 additions.

Daisy is back in talks with Pies so not much chance for us. They don't want to lose him, and if they do well Daisy is not a big bodied midfielder.

Laidler has walked so we get nothing for him.

We may well lose 4 quality players to get what we need.betts Warnock/Hampson and 2 more...Duigan is a b grade utility so don't expect much.

If only we could attract those player types we need... Then we can talk about quality for quality plus picks.

We need fresh blood.


Wow. Just wow.


You're cheeky but you make me laugh.

I know I'm stating the obvious, but the whole I want I need we should we will merry ground is a conundrum and we really have to wait and see.

What I see and think means jack shit at the club...easy tiger.....I know the club isn't the only one.

I just want a couple of big bodied mids TBH.

I wanted Hibberd afrom Frankston a couple years ago...he was just what we need. There must be more of them in the lower leagues.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Yep agree bondi a couple of big bodied mids


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4949
Rexy wrote:
Yep agree bondi a couple of big bodied mids


A couple of quality big bodied mids on the cheap like when Freo picked up Barlow from the VFL and/or Sydney getting Kennedy for a 3rd rounder.
We can only hope...

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Humpers wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Yep agree bondi a couple of big bodied mids

Sydney getting Kennedy for a 3rd rounder.



That still makes my head spin.
And here we are using a second rounder on Rowe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Cazzesman, jezzarules and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group