Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 11:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
club29 wrote:
Disciplined is the key Daggs001.

We were a dogs breakfast. No system, no effort and no hunger for the win.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine.


Yep.

I see next years excuses are already being wheeled out.

No midfield depth , no cap space, development .

All I can say is thank god almighty MM has seen the light and realized we need more mids and he failed in his attempt to get Cloke.

What a flower disaster that would have been . $1.0m a season for a target we can't get too.

Hopefully this year mick can.
Start before November
Not do a book tour
remember who the players are.
Get some decent assistants
Get some hunger into his team.

We may even be able to win the games we should then.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23911
nah..let's wait another year before we sakc him. :wink:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:13 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
cimm1979 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Disciplined is the key Daggs001.

We were a dogs breakfast. No system, no effort and no hunger for the win.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine.


Yep.

I see next years excuses are already being wheeled out.

No midfield depth , no cap space, development .

All I can say is thank god almighty MM has seen the light and realized we need more mids and he failed in his attempt to get Cloke.

What a flower disaster that would have been . $1.0m a season for a target we can't get too.

Hopefully this year mick can.
Start before November
Not do a book tour
remember who the players are.
Get some decent assistants
Get some hunger into his team.

We may even be able to win the games we should then.


All of that and he has to work on setting an example in the coaches box. Those tantrums and bottle bashing episodes are not setting much of an example.
Stay calm and stick to the process Mick just like we expect the players to do. You are no good to anyone carrying on like a pork chop.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
club29 wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Disciplined is the key Daggs001.

We were a dogs breakfast. No system, no effort and no hunger for the win.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine.


Yep.

I see next years excuses are already being wheeled out.

No midfield depth , no cap space, development .

All I can say is thank god almighty MM has seen the light and realized we need more mids and he failed in his attempt to get Cloke.

What a flower disaster that would have been . $1.0m a season for a target we can't get too.

Hopefully this year mick can.
Start before November
Not do a book tour
remember who the players are.
Get some decent assistants
Get some hunger into his team.

We may even be able to win the games we should then.


All of that and he has to work on setting an example in the coaches box. Those tantrums and bottle bashing episodes are not setting much of an example.
Stay calm and stick to the process Mick just like we expect the players to do. You are no good to anyone carrying on like a pork chop.

Clarkson is the biggest wanker in the box and out of it, seems to work just fine for the Dawkers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Scotty12000 wrote:
club29 wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Disciplined is the key Daggs001.

We were a dogs breakfast. No system, no effort and no hunger for the win.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine.


Yep.

I see next years excuses are already being wheeled out.

No midfield depth , no cap space, development .

All I can say is thank god almighty MM has seen the light and realized we need more mids and he failed in his attempt to get Cloke.

What a flower disaster that would have been . $1.0m a season for a target we can't get too.

Hopefully this year mick can.
Start before November
Not do a book tour
remember who the players are.
Get some decent assistants
Get some hunger into his team.

We may even be able to win the games we should then.


All of that and he has to work on setting an example in the coaches box. Those tantrums and bottle bashing episodes are not setting much of an example.
Stay calm and stick to the process Mick just like we expect the players to do. You are no good to anyone carrying on like a pork chop.

Clarkson is the biggest wanker in the box and out of it, seems to work just fine for the Dawkers.


He is pretty calm through games though. Put his hand through a wall once but even that was at the end of a game.

Don't take all this too serious. Just poking a bit of fun at Mighty Mick Malthouse.

We know he isn't going to be sakced.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
People do remember who won the flag last year right?

Sydney are a damn good team.
Carlton is a block of Swiss cheese.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
If Malthouse stuffs up our list further in an effort to 'save' it, I'll be in. There's always the possibility that cross communication could corrupt MM's vision. He can't 'go it alone', he's too involved to see the bigger picture.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:28 am
Posts: 23
club29 wrote:
BM123 wrote:
Dan Hannebury 33 touches
Kieran Jack 30 touches
Heath Grundy 32 touches
O'keefe 30 touches
Mcveigh 42 touches

They had five guys who got over 30 touches and we had one ( Walker) Hard to stop Mcveigh when you have 4 other guys tearing to shreds. You could put Gibbs on Mcveigh but then Kennedy would get loose and the ball wouldn't even get in our forward line. Front running forwards who don't like the hard stuff and don't apply pressure is what Ratten has left us. Despite what the stats say we got completely smashed on the outside and the inside except for the last quarter where Sydney stopped. People comparing our game against WC in 2011 need to get a grip. We play Paterson's 10 times better then ANZ and WC weren't as good as Sydney are now. Oooo the shame of losing a semi final against the fourth team when we finished ninth......


So many excuses.

Just admit it. Mick had the Blues under prepared for what was to come, not drilled well enough compared to his opposition coach, used the rubbish long kicking gameplan that hasnt worked with us all season and picked Casboult. Mick had a shocker and was outcoached by Horse who had his team playing like a well oiled machine even with injuries to key players and playing on an ice skating rink..


No offense but it sounds like your making excuses since you just dispute the facts and continue ranting. Duigan was put on Mcveigh when he went into defense and Duigan showed why he hasn't been picked all year. Armfield was put on Hannebury but he couldn't even tackle the guy without giving a free kick away. Sydney had Roos plugging away to get the perfect systems while we had Ratten's screwing around trying to copy whatever the current premiers were doing instead of developing his own system like Collingwood, Geelong and Sydney have. I laugh at how you think this current Carlton team which has been finishing around 5-10 since 2008 ( 10th, 7th, 8th,5th,10th,9th) should beat the reigning premiers at their own ground. What did you think of Ratten in 2010 when we went backwards ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:20 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:28 am
Posts: 23
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:24 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game

Agree

mm in one press conference articulated what many of have been so frustrated with.

No midfield depth and constant drafting of small fwds who can't play midfield and truck loads of hbfs

Mm press conference removed any doubt he is the right man for the job


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:33 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
BM123 wrote:
club29 wrote:
BM123 wrote:
Dan Hannebury 33 touches
Kieran Jack 30 touches
Heath Grundy 32 touches
O'keefe 30 touches
Mcveigh 42 touches

They had five guys who got over 30 touches and we had one ( Walker) Hard to stop Mcveigh when you have 4 other guys tearing to shreds. You could put Gibbs on Mcveigh but then Kennedy would get loose and the ball wouldn't even get in our forward line. Front running forwards who don't like the hard stuff and don't apply pressure is what Ratten has left us. Despite what the stats say we got completely smashed on the outside and the inside except for the last quarter where Sydney stopped. People comparing our game against WC in 2011 need to get a grip. We play Paterson's 10 times better then ANZ and WC weren't as good as Sydney are now. Oooo the shame of losing a semi final against the fourth team when we finished ninth......


So many excuses.

Just admit it. Mick had the Blues under prepared for what was to come, not drilled well enough compared to his opposition coach, used the rubbish long kicking gameplan that hasnt worked with us all season and picked Casboult. Mick had a shocker and was outcoached by Horse who had his team playing like a well oiled machine even with injuries to key players and playing on an ice skating rink..


No offense but it sounds like your making excuses since you just dispute the facts and continue ranting. Duigan was put on Mcveigh when he went into defense and Duigan showed why he hasn't been picked all year. Armfield was put on Hannebury but he couldn't even tackle the guy without giving a free kick away. Sydney had Roos plugging away to get the perfect systems while we had Ratten's screwing around trying to copy whatever the current premiers were doing instead of developing his own system like Collingwood, Geelong and Sydney have. I laugh at how you think this current Carlton team which has been finishing around 5-10 since 2008 ( 10th, 7th, 8th,5th,10th,9th) should beat the reigning premiers at their own ground. What did you think of Ratten in 2010 when we went backwards ?


Just a system that could beat the Bulldogs . Unless they are just too good for us also.

Mick got outcoached by Horse.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine. Micks had Carlton playing terribly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:36 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game


So silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:36 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Pafloyul wrote:
If Malthouse stuffs up our list further in an effort to 'save' it, I'll be in. There's always the possibility that cross communication could corrupt MM's vision. He can't 'go it alone', he's too involved to see the bigger picture.


..we all will, but i reckon the MM has left teams in better positions than when he walked in.. ..so much though i believe is about total commitment/work ethic.. ..in all facets, on and off the field for the players.. ..talent only gets you so far, i don't think our list is totally bereft of talent, we do have some weaknesses yes.. ..but our list with top4 type work ethic would improve dramatically..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Bigredisback wrote:
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game

Agree

mm in one press conference articulated what many of have been so frustrated with.

No midfield depth and constant drafting of small fwds who can't play midfield and truck loads of hbfs

Mm press conference removed any doubt he is the right man for the job


Yet our midfield has been performing well until this year. Probably top 4 in the AFL. Even last year when it was decimated by injury it performed better.
This year our contested footy, clearances, first use etc have been very good. Its only our uncontested footy has gone through the floor.
Why? Surely the coaches should take responsibility for implementing a gamestyle that saw our uncontested ball go to last in the AFL?

Im happy to admit Malthouse has done some good things this year. Our defence has been more settled and the productivity and cohesion of our back 6 has improved significantly. Even our forward line has been reasonable.
That doesnt mean I totally disregard areas where we have gone backwards substantially. Our midfield is the main area and I have no doubt our gamestyle contributed to the decline.
Getting more players wont fix the problem. Playing a gamestylethat allows us to retain possession is the only way our uncontested possession can improve.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:14 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Blue Vain wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game

Agree

mm in one press conference articulated what many of have been so frustrated with.

No midfield depth and constant drafting of small fwds who can't play midfield and truck loads of hbfs

Mm press conference removed any doubt he is the right man for the job


Yet our midfield has been performing well until this year. Probably top 4 in the AFL. Even last year when it was decimated by injury it performed better.
This year our contested footy, clearances, first use etc have been very good. Its only our uncontested footy has gone through the floor.
Why? Surely the coaches should take responsibility for implementing a gamestyle that saw our uncontested ball go to last in the AFL?

Im happy to admit Malthouse has done some good things this year. Our defence has been more settled and the productivity and cohesion of our back 6 has improved significantly. Even our forward line has been reasonable.
That doesnt mean I totally disregard areas where we have gone backwards substantially. Our midfield is the main area and I have no doubt our gamestyle contributed to the decline.
Getting more players wont fix the problem. Playing a gamestylethat allows us to retain possession is the only way our uncontested possession can improve.


We haven't been a high possession side for years (we have done better in the past but not to the level of many other clubs) and to me that doesn't just reflect on our starting midfield, it's all around the ground and I think that does at least partly reflect the 'cattle' we have. We don't have enough bigger bodied players and/or players with the required footy smarts.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Pafloyul wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game

Agree

mm in one press conference articulated what many of have been so frustrated with.

No midfield depth and constant drafting of small fwds who can't play midfield and truck loads of hbfs

Mm press conference removed any doubt he is the right man for the job


Yet our midfield has been performing well until this year. Probably top 4 in the AFL. Even last year when it was decimated by injury it performed better.
This year our contested footy, clearances, first use etc have been very good. Its only our uncontested footy has gone through the floor.
Why? Surely the coaches should take responsibility for implementing a gamestyle that saw our uncontested ball go to last in the AFL?

Im happy to admit Malthouse has done some good things this year. Our defence has been more settled and the productivity and cohesion of our back 6 has improved significantly. Even our forward line has been reasonable.
That doesnt mean I totally disregard areas where we have gone backwards substantially. Our midfield is the main area and I have no doubt our gamestyle contributed to the decline.
Getting more players wont fix the problem. Playing a gamestylethat allows us to retain possession is the only way our uncontested possession can improve.


We haven't been a high possession side for years (we have done better in the past but not to the level of many other clubs) and to me that doesn't just reflect on our starting midfield, it's all around the ground and I think that does at least partly reflect the 'cattle' we have. We don't have enough bigger bodied players and/or players with the required footy smarts.


7th highest in the AFL in 2010.
4th highest in the AFL in 2011
9th highest in the AFL in 2012

We were always middle range.

16th in 2013

18th for uncontested possession.
Entirely personnel? I wouldnt think so.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:09 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
club29 wrote:
Scotty12000 wrote:
club29 wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Disciplined is the key Daggs001.

We were a dogs breakfast. No system, no effort and no hunger for the win.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine.


Yep.

I see next years excuses are already being wheeled out.

No midfield depth , no cap space, development .

All I can say is thank god almighty MM has seen the light and realized we need more mids and he failed in his attempt to get Cloke.

What a flower disaster that would have been . $1.0m a season for a target we can't get too.

Hopefully this year mick can.
Start before November
Not do a book tour
remember who the players are.
Get some decent assistants
Get some hunger into his team.

We may even be able to win the games we should then.


All of that and he has to work on setting an example in the coaches box. Those tantrums and bottle bashing episodes are not setting much of an example.
Stay calm and stick to the process Mick just like we expect the players to do. You are no good to anyone carrying on like a pork chop.

Clarkson is the biggest wanker in the box and out of it, seems to work just fine for the Dawkers.


He is pretty calm through games though. Put his hand through a wall once but even that was at the end of a game.

Don't take all this too serious. Just poking a bit of fun at Mighty Mick Malthouse.

We know he isn't going to be sakced.


Yea ... but we can hope ... :smoking:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:28 am
Posts: 23
club29 wrote:
BM123 wrote:
club29 wrote:
BM123 wrote:
Dan Hannebury 33 touches
Kieran Jack 30 touches
Heath Grundy 32 touches
O'keefe 30 touches
Mcveigh 42 touches

They had five guys who got over 30 touches and we had one ( Walker) Hard to stop Mcveigh when you have 4 other guys tearing to shreds. You could put Gibbs on Mcveigh but then Kennedy would get loose and the ball wouldn't even get in our forward line. Front running forwards who don't like the hard stuff and don't apply pressure is what Ratten has left us. Despite what the stats say we got completely smashed on the outside and the inside except for the last quarter where Sydney stopped. People comparing our game against WC in 2011 need to get a grip. We play Paterson's 10 times better then ANZ and WC weren't as good as Sydney are now. Oooo the shame of losing a semi final against the fourth team when we finished ninth......


So many excuses.

Just admit it. Mick had the Blues under prepared for what was to come, not drilled well enough compared to his opposition coach, used the rubbish long kicking gameplan that hasnt worked with us all season and picked Casboult. Mick had a shocker and was outcoached by Horse who had his team playing like a well oiled machine even with injuries to key players and playing on an ice skating rink..


No offense but it sounds like your making excuses since you just dispute the facts and continue ranting. Duigan was put on Mcveigh when he went into defense and Duigan showed why he hasn't been picked all year. Armfield was put on Hannebury but he couldn't even tackle the guy without giving a free kick away. Sydney had Roos plugging away to get the perfect systems while we had Ratten's screwing around trying to copy whatever the current premiers were doing instead of developing his own system like Collingwood, Geelong and Sydney have. I laugh at how you think this current Carlton team which has been finishing around 5-10 since 2008 ( 10th, 7th, 8th,5th,10th,9th) should beat the reigning premiers at their own ground. What did you think of Ratten in 2010 when we went backwards ?


Just a system that could beat the Bulldogs . Unless they are just too good for us also.

Mick got outcoached by Horse.

Horse had his team playing like a well oiled machine. Micks had Carlton playing terribly.


You do realize that the Bulldogs in 2011 cost us top four when the smacked us around? Bulldogs, Saints and other Etihad teams have been bullying us for years now and it certainly isn't MM's fault. In fact Collingwood used to smack our team around a fair bit under Malthouse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:28 am
Posts: 23
Blue Vain wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
BM123 wrote:
If it wasn't for Judd I sincerely doubt Ratten could have taken us to a single finals game

Agree

mm in one press conference articulated what many of have been so frustrated with.

No midfield depth and constant drafting of small fwds who can't play midfield and truck loads of hbfs

Mm press conference removed any doubt he is the right man for the job


Yet our midfield has been performing well until this year. Probably top 4 in the AFL. Even last year when it was decimated by injury it performed better.
This year our contested footy, clearances, first use etc have been very good. Its only our uncontested footy has gone through the floor.
Why? Surely the coaches should take responsibility for implementing a gamestyle that saw our uncontested ball go to last in the AFL?

Im happy to admit Malthouse has done some good things this year. Our defence has been more settled and the productivity and cohesion of our back 6 has improved significantly. Even our forward line has been reasonable.
That doesnt mean I totally disregard areas where we have gone backwards substantially. Our midfield is the main area and I have no doubt our gamestyle contributed to the decline.
Getting more players wont fix the problem. Playing a gamestylethat allows us to retain possession is the only way our uncontested possession can improve.


We haven't been a high possession side for years (we have done better in the past but not to the level of many other clubs) and to me that doesn't just reflect on our starting midfield, it's all around the ground and I think that does at least partly reflect the 'cattle' we have. We don't have enough bigger bodied players and/or players with the required footy smarts.


7th highest in the AFL in 2010.
4th highest in the AFL in 2011
9th highest in the AFL in 2012

We were always middle range.

16th in 2013

18th for uncontested possession.
Entirely personnel? I wouldnt think so.


Remember that Judd has lost a yard of pace and has become a pure inside mid. Murphy's been injured and none of other current mids have the pace to play on the outside. Simpson is the only player in our team who we could rely on the wing to rack up the touches but he had to go into defense because Laidler and Duigan have been shit house even when playing VFL level.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Blue Vain and Club 29. You are just wrong. Malthouse has just equalled our best performance since 2001.
AND THAT IS BY YOUR DEFINITION WHICH EARLIER IN THE SEASON GAVE NO VALUE TO THE PROCESS AND FULL
VALUE TO THE RESULT.

If our list is not a problem why did the objective judges who pick the All Australian Side and the Rising Star award not choose one carlton player in either?

And actually a coach giving an open assessment of our midfield after the season is the kind of honesty that has been lacking for 10 years. Many seasoned posters on here last year, people with more football nouse than you or I, called for a mid field refresh and then when the coach also confronts the issue you paint it as him making an excuse - be reasonable!!!!

Do you also criticise the coach for saying he can not rebuild the list in one draft. That should be refreshing to your ears after 11 years of believing in a quick fix but no your interpretation or bias sees this as another out.

All our previous coaches apart from Brittain have had 5 years. You need to give Malthouse 4 - especially when we just finished 6th.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluedog, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group