Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 2:15 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 533 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
harker wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Can't believe we're having this discussion. He's so much more than a ruckman, but he's a bloody good ruckman.


Here's why these "discussions" come up, time and again.

Some of us make our minds up about a player and stick fat with that irrespective of the changing situation.
We actually just see what we want to see and our leanings are towards the negative rather than for any positive.

e.g. Kreuzer may have a great game but it will be the one poor incident which will be highlighted.

Absolutely not true, go back to threads about Kreuz in his first/second year.....loved him.

Has not improved one iota in the 4 seasons since, some can look through their navy blue shades but he was actually doing more then than he does now.

I can just see it at the end of next season, no doubt many threads on why we keep players in the hope they'll get better but watch their trade value drop by the round

Not sure why my posts are being deleted but whatever.....

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
teagueyubeauty wrote:
harker wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Can't believe we're having this discussion. He's so much more than a ruckman, but he's a bloody good ruckman.


Here's why these "discussions" come up, time and again.

Some of us make our minds up about a player and stick fat with that irrespective of the changing situation.
We actually just see what we want to see and our leanings are towards the negative rather than for any positive.

e.g. Kreuzer may have a great game but it will be the one poor incident which will be highlighted.

Absolutely not true, go back to threads about Kreuz in his first/second year.....loved him.

Has not improved one iota in the 4 seasons since, some can look through their navy blue shades but he was actually doing more then than he does now.

I can just see it at the end of next season, no doubt many threads on why we keep players in the hope they'll get better but watch their trade value drop by the round

Not sure why my posts are being deleted but whatever.....


I'm sorry they're being deleted teaguey as one can only respond to what presents.
Mick has already put a knife through any suggestions of Kreuzer or Gibbs being traded. I think he means it and for very good reasons.

Why would you think that Kreuzers value will diminish. It may happen but it may just as much go the other way.
If someone has some facts at hand then all fine but just to rattle off the same old over and again against everything coming out of the CFC is a little bit...............pointless?

Anyway, again my response for you suggesting that Kreuzer was useless on Saturday. All thing considered he wasn't but if that's what one wants to believe against all the facts, so be it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
cimm1979 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..krooz being given every chance to play, but possible replacement is hammer, so bolt??..


where'd ya hear that BKB?
it doesn't make sense to go with hammer after all this time.
surely it would be the Bolt, or outside chance Rowe?
I'd vote Bolt. for marking.


It's about 4/4 I reckon BG.

Not sure Bolt can run out a whole game or even 3/4 if its hard and fast.

Hammer has the km's to go the whole game and the swans may have three ruck options .


..read it off phone app, mm understands the ballsiness of it, seems he wants 2 proper rucks.. ..hammer was playing magoos then got injured but has been training well for 3 weeks..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
Hampson has been training for the last 3 weeks.

He has done plenty of miles in his legs.

Can last 4 quarters on the field and Bolt couldnt

MM has thrown up his name....as a long shot...if a KP or ruck went down.

Kreuzer 50/50

Waite ????? he didnt look too good when he marked that stray ball from Robbo for his winning goal
Jammo's shoulders should hang in there...well that's all they're doing and he's getting through.
Hendo looks good to go
McInnes imo is out of form but the best available of White, Laidler and Duigan...hang on...Duigan!!!

Casboult and Hampson are in line.....give me Hampson in the last quarter just for the 1%ers.
I love Levi, so I'd be happy with him at FF...standing on the goal line and leading to the top of the square...goal square that is.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:27 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
harker wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
harker wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Can't believe we're having this discussion. He's so much more than a ruckman, but he's a bloody good ruckman.


Here's why these "discussions" come up, time and again.

Some of us make our minds up about a player and stick fat with that irrespective of the changing situation.
We actually just see what we want to see and our leanings are towards the negative rather than for any positive.

e.g. Kreuzer may have a great game but it will be the one poor incident which will be highlighted.

Absolutely not true, go back to threads about Kreuz in his first/second year.....loved him.

Has not improved one iota in the 4 seasons since, some can look through their navy blue shades but he was actually doing more then than he does now.

I can just see it at the end of next season, no doubt many threads on why we keep players in the hope they'll get better but watch their trade value drop by the round

Not sure why my posts are being deleted but whatever.....


I'm sorry they're being deleted teaguey as one can only respond to what presents.
Mick has already put a knife through any suggestions of Kreuzer or Gibbs being traded. I think he means it and for very good reasons.

Why would you think that Kreuzers value will diminish. It may happen but it may just as much go the other way.
If someone has some facts at hand then all fine but just to rattle off the same old over and again against everything coming out of the CFC is a little bit...............pointless?

Anyway, again my response for you suggesting that Kreuzer was useless on Saturday. All thing considered he wasn't but if that's what one wants to believe against all the facts, so be it.


ridiculous way to manage someones career ie what is their trade value.....savings wont make you wealthy

key question? does the club want him? = yes (bad luck teague). opportunity = continue to invest in the big fella and get more and more out of him! a guy with his size wont be going anywhere


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Incidentally, for anyone interested the Storm are playing at ANZ the night before this game. I know it's a rival code and all, but come on, it's the @#$%&! STORM! :wink:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
teagueyubeauty wrote:
harker wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Was a liability on the weekend, will help not being there.....harsh, but true


Who Kreuzer?

He spent three quarters on the ground where many other men wouldn't have.
That's not a liability. That's an absolute bonus that he still had impact and was able to relieve Warnock and fare favourably.

Keep it real.

I am keeping it real mate, he's nowhere near what he should be. Was a liability full stop.

I'd trade him.....but then I've said that multiple times before.

The scary thing is he'd be tracking worse than Josh Fraser at the same time in their careers but people get hard ons because of his 1%ers, I'd prefer a shitload more of 10%ers to go with those 1%ers.

The amount of dribble I see here in regards to Gibbs, Murph, Robinson etc etc is mind blowing compared to the faunicating over Kreuzer.


This is my new favorite word. Does it mean fornicating with a faun?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:38 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
as a ruckman Kruezer is 2nd to none when it comes to follow up work at stoppages and overall his 1% ,s are very good, i just dont know why he misses marks he should take , averages over his career about 2.5 marks per game. just not enough to be anywhere near an elite footballer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
Not a lot giving us a chance.

Just like last week.

Expect the worst, and be delighted with the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:28 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:30 pm
Posts: 379
Kreuz is turning 25 next year.....he'll peak in about 4 years... drool drool....a keeper I would have thought.

Back to business...if he doesn't come up, it's gotta be Levi. Pinch hits well. 206 has a better tank than given credit and will run out this game.

When Levi goes forward he must either lead up to the wing or be chained to the goal square. No in the middle of these two options.

If Brock is ready, Andy McInnes goes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:33 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Springsteen wrote:
as a ruckman Kruezer is 2nd to none when it comes to follow up work at stoppages and overall his 1% ,s are very good, i just dont know why he misses marks he should take , averages over his career about 2.5 marks per game. just not enough to be anywhere near an elite footballer


..nature of the position/role, rucks are not marking players..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
maybe so but what about when he goes forward? surely he could clunk a few more.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:13 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
as a ruckman Kruezer is 2nd to none when it comes to follow up work at stoppages and overall his 1% ,s are very good, i just dont know why he misses marks he should take , averages over his career about 2.5 marks per game. just not enough to be anywhere near an elite footballer


..nature of the position/role, rucks are not marking players..


You do hear the Kroooooz call quite a bit when he has the sit but he doesn't pluck a lot of them. I often think the chant is putting him off.

I think opposition know how to shift him when he is going for a mark and his marking style is pretty one dimensional. Gets to where he thinks its going to land and then jumps straight up with straight arms. No launching into packs or anything like that.
Might need some re training.

Not a knock on his overall game. Just his marking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:31 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
yup. seems to be his body positioning a lot of the time, i believe the right coaching and he will get much better and then become an elite player.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13196
Location: Melbourne
Jesus Christ is Hampson really a chance?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:01 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
club29 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
as a ruckman Kruezer is 2nd to none when it comes to follow up work at stoppages and overall his 1% ,s are very good, i just dont know why he misses marks he should take , averages over his career about 2.5 marks per game. just not enough to be anywhere near an elite footballer


..nature of the position/role, rucks are not marking players..


You do hear the Kroooooz call quite a bit when he has the sit but he doesn't pluck a lot of them. I often think the chant is putting him off.

I think opposition know how to shift him when he is going for a mark and his marking style is pretty one dimensional. Gets to where he thinks its going to land and then jumps straight up with straight arms. No launching into packs or anything like that.
Might need some re training.

Not a knock on his overall game. Just his marking.


..not a great mark no, was just more talking in regards to mark averages.. ..it's a misleading stat at times, mids will have more mark KPFs more often than not in regards to the stat, rucks are often the instigators of a possession chain, vs being the end.. ..to get a better idea of how a ruck is going in regards to marks, best checking him alongside his peers.. ..but i think his biggest flaw in marking, is that he doesn't protect the drop of the ball.. ..whether standing and wrestling, or jumping for it.... ..he lets his opponent get in close to spoil, many good marks dont allow that..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
missnaut wrote:
Jesus Christ is Hampson really a chance?


..slim chance.. ..MM is "hopeful" that Krooz will be ok to go, being managed [for all that can help].. ....must still be delirious after the win, cos am warming up to the idea of Hammer in a final [is it his first?].. ..looking at the swans' rucks, none of them are leapers and Hammer can certainly get up there.. ..and certainly has them all easily covered in regards to pace..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
I think Mick's messing with Longmire's head.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:38 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:23 pm
Posts: 158
Surely Levi's got better chance than Hammer if Kruzer doesn't come up?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:36 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8962
Location: Melbourne
Springsteen wrote:
as a ruckman Kruezer is 2nd to none when it comes to follow up work at stoppages and overall his 1% ,s are very good, i just dont know why he misses marks he should take , averages over his career about 2.5 marks per game. just not enough to be anywhere near an elite footballer


Spot on. He really is over rated by our supporters. Has a lot of potential, but imo it's becoming less and less likely that he'll fulfill it.
I remember maybe 4 or 5 games he's played where you just think he's going to be a star, but sadly we haven't seen one for a while.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 533 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 27  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 127 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group