Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 7:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:35 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
Effes wrote:
I have confidence in Rogers based on his statement:

"Geelong is one of the clubs that draft and just sit and wait and have some patience. I reckon we’re at that point. Carlton hasn’t been use to that before. It’s been a “there’s the best player let’s go out and buy him.” The rules have changed. We’ve gotta draft and we’ve got to embrace the draft – the supporters and the footy club."


Rogers did say that mid year but then Geelong did go out and recruit Rivers, Caddy and McIntosh.

I don't think there can ever be one way only. The trick is to have a system in place but the capacity to move when need be.

Our start comes this year and as much as I don't wish bad on any of our players, I'd be disappointed if we haven't at the very least, 8 new faces next year.


The issue is we are followers and not leaders. Geelong and Sydney are the absolute minimum standard we should be aspiring.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
ThePsychologist wrote:
You only have to read the responses of Cazz. Here is someone who has an intimate knowledge of our recruiting yet cannot answer a question sensibly or with any factual evidence. His responses are childish and as such are a poor reflection on the CFC whether he likes it or not. In the private sector he would be sacked for such remarks.
.


:lol: :lol: :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Quote:
You only have to read the responses of Cazz. Here is someone who has an intimate knowledge of our recruiting yet cannot answer a question sensibly or with any factual evidence. His responses are childish and as such are a poor reflection on the CFC whetehr he likes it or not. In the private sector he would be sacked for such remarks.

:lol:

You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.

Anyone who thinks Callum Sinclair is more aggressive than Kreuzer is just asking to be laughed at.
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
hey cazz!!!... im just looking at results..!!!
Are you satisgied with your teams results???

Dont worry about your little secrets and Gillys tips... youre sounding very Hanke..

IS the recruiting to a standard this club is happy with?
Yes or No?

thats the crux of why we have a recruiting team... not to let me in on little secrets..!!!

So back to my questions ..
Why do we need a mini rebuild after one eliminational final win..
Are you satisfied?
What would you mark yourselves out of TEN for magnificent... EIGHT is very Good..(Wells)... and Zero is extremeley extremely poor.. (noone gets Zero...not even MElbourne...)

Well???

Pass is five..... would you give yourselves a pass ???


Nick Stevens gave us 9.5 :lol:

Go and goad someone else with your 12yr old thought processes.

Regards Cazzesman



Cazz.... you didnt answer the question..

Are you champion recruiters satisfield with your collective million dollar investment input into the club???

Ahhhhh thats one you dont wanna answer is it??
And yes the club knows Stevo put up a very high case for this boy to be recruited by us... think it had to do something with "nothing left after pick 30 again".....

After Nick you rookied Collins and Cachia.

That is the extent of your collective sub 12 year old thought process... :lol:

So Cazz... are you satisfied with the recruiting departments drafting???

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
this is going well...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:
The issue is we are followers and not leaders. Geelong and Sydney are the absolute minimum standard we should be aspiring.


Geelong weren't leaders until 2007................44 years between premierships.
Sydney weren't leaders until 2005.................72 years between premierships.

We've fallen behind without question and every team can go back to a time when things didn't go their way and we've had our time.
The real question is "Are we doing something about it now"?
There will be a Premier and a Wooden-Spooner in every given year and every team is endeavouring to do exactly what we're wanting to do.

Our arrogance still abounds though when we think it our right to have the "best in the league" in every nook and cranny at the CFC.
We should though, as with any good business, have reviews that consider every aspect of the operation. No-one and nothing excluded. Not sure we have that, which isn't really a good thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
ThePsychologist wrote:
and people wonder why a lot of us are angry and frustrated?

You only have to read the responses of Cazz. Here is someone who has an intimate knowledge of our recruiting yet cannot answer a question sensibly or with any factual evidence. His responses are childish and as such are a poor reflection on the CFC whetehr he likes it or not. In the private sector he would be sacked for such remarks.

The fact is our recruitment over the past decade has been incredibly poor. There is no denying it.

Yet, the same people are still involved. I would really like someone to explain the Wayne Hughes move. Proven to be not up to it yet is demoted and not removed. From a pure business point of view it doesn't make sense.

If the recruitment of Williams is supposed to be a great deal why isn't he in charge?

Until we get this area right we will struggle and the sooner the whole department is cleaned out and replaced the better.



his responses are 10 year old.s......

The problem with Cazz and Gilly and Co... is they cannot win this argument...!!!.. no matter which way they go..
So just amuse me when engaging...!!!
Were not having a rebuild after one elim finals win to our name after an UNPRECEDENTED number of early picks and the side chok-a-block full of rookie drafted footballers....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Amusing to try and apply TC behaviour to the real world.

Using this logic half the people on this site would have been bashed within an inch of their lives for some of the taunting, bullying and abuse but on here they are macho men.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Kouta wrote:
Quote:
You only have to read the responses of Cazz. Here is someone who has an intimate knowledge of our recruiting yet cannot answer a question sensibly or with any factual evidence. His responses are childish and as such are a poor reflection on the CFC whetehr he likes it or not. In the private sector he would be sacked for such remarks.

:lol:

You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.

Anyone who thinks Callum Sinclair is more aggressive than Kreuzer is just asking to be laughed at.
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
hey cazz!!!... im just looking at results..!!!
Are you satisgied with your teams results???

Dont worry about your little secrets and Gillys tips... youre sounding very Hanke..

IS the recruiting to a standard this club is happy with?
Yes or No?

thats the crux of why we have a recruiting team... not to let me in on little secrets..!!!

So back to my questions ..
Why do we need a mini rebuild after one eliminational final win..
Are you satisfied?
What would you mark yourselves out of TEN for magnificent... EIGHT is very Good..(Wells)... and Zero is extremeley extremely poor.. (noone gets Zero...not even MElbourne...)

Well???

Pass is five..... would you give yourselves a pass ???


Nick Stevens gave us 9.5 :lol:

Go and goad someone else with your 12yr old thought processes.

Regards Cazzesman



Cazz.... you didnt answer the question..

Are you champion recruiters satisfield with your collective million dollar investment input into the club???

Ahhhhh thats one you dont wanna answer is it??
And yes the club knows Stevo put up a very high case for this boy to be recruited by us... think it had to do something with "nothing left after pick 30 again".....

After Nick you rookied Collins and Cachia.

That is the extent of your collective sub 12 year old thought process... :lol:

So Cazz... are you satisfied with the recruiting departments drafting???

Image




no i dont think if you were wrong youd know it... wanna know why??

cos u dont know it...... :thumbsup:

We cannot turn a bind eye on crimes against this footy club from top to bottom...!!!
We need an indie review....

noone spared!!!

wont have one??
... i know.. cos the perpeTRAITORS from top to bottom dont like reviews!!!... they dont like criticism... they want to be left alone to fix this.....!!!... :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:17 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Kouta wrote:
You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.


That is so generalised it's ridiculous. As a member it's a bit like being a shareholder of a company. We are well entitled to have an opinion on our club.

Personally I am frustrated and angry. Have been for a while. We are pathetic in so many areas.

Why is it a poor reflection to want success?

Synners is right. It starts at the top.

The difference in all this discussion is that Cazz is a "representative" of the club. His comments and replies are immature, offensive and just something that shouldn't be put in writing on an internet forum. Does nothing positive to the image of the club and its people.

The fact is I want answers and how we are going to fix our problems. Simple. As a member and supporter we are entitled to know.

I am sure that Swann and the board would not be supportive of his responses.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:30 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
The issue is we are followers and not leaders. Geelong and Sydney are the absolute minimum standard we should be aspiring.


Geelong weren't leaders until 2007................44 years between premierships.
Sydney weren't leaders until 2005.................72 years between premierships.

We've fallen behind without question and every team can go back to a time when things didn't go their way and we've had our time.
The real question is "Are we doing something about it now"?
There will be a Premier and a Wooden-Spooner in every given year and every team is endeavouring to do exactly what we're wanting to do.

Our arrogance still abounds though when we think it our right to have the "best in the league" in every nook and cranny at the CFC.
We should though, as with any good business, have reviews that consider every aspect of the operation. No-one and nothing excluded. Not sure we have that, which isn't really a good thing.


Some fair points

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:05 pm
Posts: 358
.....any way back to the topic.
For me I think these guys are goners

19 Eddie Betts - FA
16 Andrew Collins was delisted then beought back with our last pick I believe too many injuries.
34 Nick Duigan - 1 game and got games as an emergency, was underrated in his first year but now is a ghost of his former self. Why do have so many players show potential only get injured and lose there mojo. Poor list management rushing them back only to wreck there body's ?.
45 Aaron Joseph - been good against Rioli and Jetta but that's about it.
15 Jeremy Laidler - Too slow and probably another example of rushing players back only to wreck them.
20 Rhys Okeefe - Too many injuries can't see how he could retain a spot.
25 Luke Mitchel - The great white hope. Was supposed to be our spine but from I understand has shown nothing much. Maybe given another year but I doubt it.

That's 7 possible delistings.

Then we have trade bait....
Warnock/Hampson what do we get for it.

I'm really unsure of what Mick will be planning as far as trades though.
We shall find out in trade and draft periods.

Probably not saying anything new here.

Any feel free to play around, add or what everybody else does on here and completely disagree.
:grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Collins wasn't actually de-listed. He had a three year contract with us.

You can't start a list of goners without having Davies at the head of the pack. Couldn't possibly get another contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10643
I hope Betts isn't gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Rocky Henderson wrote:
.....any way back to the topic.
For me I think these guys are goners

19 Eddie Betts - FA
16 Andrew Collins was delisted then beought back with our last pick I believe too many injuries.
34 Nick Duigan - 1 game and got games as an emergency, was underrated in his first year but now is a ghost of his former self. Why do have so many players show potential only get injured and lose there mojo. Poor list management rushing them back only to wreck there body's ?.
45 Aaron Joseph - been good against Rioli and Jetta but that's about it.
15 Jeremy Laidler - Too slow and probably another example of rushing players back only to wreck them.
20 Rhys Okeefe - Too many injuries can't see how he could retain a spot.
25 Luke Mitchel - The great white hope. Was supposed to be our spine but from I understand has shown nothing much. Maybe given another year but I doubt it.

That's 7 possible delistings.

Then we have trade bait....
Warnock/Hampson what do we get for it.

I'm really unsure of what Mick will be planning as far as trades though.
We shall find out in trade and draft periods.

Probably not saying anything new here.

Any feel free to play around, add or what everybody else does on here and completely disagree.
:grin:

Davies can be added.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7460
Kouta wrote:
You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.

... because everything is just peachy down at the club?

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Reckon Mitchell might be given one more year, possibly as a rookie.
Reason being that in reality, while he's been on our list for 3 years, his first 2 pre seasons and in fact, seasons in general, were wrecked by injury.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18081
You know what, if he trained flat out, did all the extras and gave the impression that he'd do anything to succeed, I'd possibly agree.
Unfortunately I get the feeling he wants it to come easy. If that's the case and I hope I'm not doing him an injustice, I'd rather give the spot to someone who wants it more.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10093
Location: Australia
ThePsychologist wrote:
Kouta wrote:
You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.


That is so generalised it's ridiculous. As a member it's a bit like being a shareholder of a company. We are well entitled to have an opinion on our club.

Personally I am frustrated and angry. Have been for a while. We are pathetic in so many areas.

Why is it a poor reflection to want success?

Synners is right. It starts at the top.

The difference in all this discussion is that Cazz is a "representative" of the club. His comments and replies are immature, offensive and just something that shouldn't be put in writing on an internet forum. Does nothing positive to the image of the club and its people.

The fact is I want answers and how we are going to fix our problems. Simple. As a member and supporter we are entitled to know.

I am sure that Swann and the board would not be supportive of his responses.


I think everyone is getting a little precious here, my guess is Cazz posts in here for the same reasons we all do, he's a staunch supporter of the CFC and enjoys the camaraderie (LOL). Remember this is just one of many CFC supporter forums on the internet and has no official status with CFC.

If people really think Caz should be posting here as a Club rep then I suggest we create a new "official" account for him where he can post as an official and we can deal with him as such (although why would he take on such a responsibility when he will get nothing from it but puerile abuse?).

In the meantime perhaps a simple disclaimer in your footer Cazz along the lines of "The views expressed on this forum are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer"? Then we are all clear where everyone stands.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Blue Vain wrote:
You know what, if he trained flat out, did all the extras and gave the impression that he'd do anything to succeed, I'd possibly agree.
Unfortunately I get the feeling he wants it to come easy. If that's the case and I hope I'm not doing him an injustice, I'd rather give the spot to someone who wants it more.


That's not the case BV or at least not until the half-way point of this season.
The kid has been terrific over the past couple of years but his confidence now seems to be well and truly shot.

I didn't think I'd be saying this 20 months ago but I just can't see him being retained post 2013.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 17026
Location: Melbourne
sinbagger wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Kouta wrote:
You're the perfect reflection of our supporter base. Anyone from the club would shake their head and wonder what's wrong with our supporters.


That is so generalised it's ridiculous. As a member it's a bit like being a shareholder of a company. We are well entitled to have an opinion on our club.

Personally I am frustrated and angry. Have been for a while. We are pathetic in so many areas.

Why is it a poor reflection to want success?

Synners is right. It starts at the top.

The difference in all this discussion is that Cazz is a "representative" of the club. His comments and replies are immature, offensive and just something that shouldn't be put in writing on an internet forum. Does nothing positive to the image of the club and its people.

The fact is I want answers and how we are going to fix our problems. Simple. As a member and supporter we are entitled to know.

I am sure that Swann and the board would not be supportive of his responses.


I think everyone is getting a little precious here, my guess is Cazz posts in here for the same reasons we all do, he's a staunch supporter of the CFC and enjoys the camaraderie (LOL). Remember this is just one of many CFC supporter forums on the internet and has no official status with CFC.

If people really think Caz should be posting here as a Club rep then I suggest we create a new "official" account for him where he can post as an official and we can deal with him as such (although why would he take on such a responsibility when he will get nothing from it but puerile abuse?).

In the meantime perhaps a simple disclaimer in your footer Cazz along the lines of "The views expressed on this forum are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer"? Then we are all clear where everyone stands.


How about this disclaimer.....

As a Carlton supporter and 15yr poster on TC and TBV I use to get bent out of shape by blowhard verbose posters with over-rated opinions of their own importance (including myself :wink: ) but times change and now they just make me laugh and want to post pictures.

Life's too short to be bitter and twisted. Turn that frown upside down all you dearly depressed.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group