Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 1:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
mikeychook wrote:
harker wrote:
mikeychook wrote:
It is a little concerning for me to hear of other sides that are declaring their eagerness to be a highly active player come trade week.
Bulldogs
GWS
Suns
Saints
Bombers(not that I think they should be allowed to trade themselves into the first rounds)

These guys are all quite outward at the moment in signalling somewhat aggressive intentions for the coming trade period.
Where will this leave us in the scheme of it all?
It could work either way, depending on who we are really willing to part ways with.
I hope we don't get left behind due to the basic laws of supply/demand.

I got a baaaad feeling on this one.


I know what you're saying and that's why Carlton has to build itself as a place of destiny.
We haven't been that in recent years and Hawthorn have shown up as being many players first choice.

My concerns aren't as much as for who we may not get but for who we may.
Not saying it's going to happen but you wouldn't want your scenario playing out and us opting for second best.
I don't think that will be the case but have to say I'm just a little nervous.

Only time will tell.


To use an analogy, I see our trade position like a poker hand with a King, a Jack, a pair of sixes and a three.

No hearts.

Most of the other teams billed to attack the trade period have at least one Ace(higher pick or player with more upside/less inefficiencies).

I just get the feeling we will need to add more "sweeteners" than any other club to get a hallmark deal done.

This will inevitably leave us short come draft time.

Time will tell, yes and I'll keep my fingers crossed the entire time.



We are the "sweetener" team when it comes to trade time. We have always been the soft touch, it's actually our trade week strategy so we are seen as the "team to deal with", and where has it left us.

We sweetened the Judd deal by adding Josh Kennedy, we crafted the McLean deal about 1 month out from the official start of trade week, and ludicrously thought we could add some " steak knives" to the deal later and we collapsed like a house of cards during the Jacobs trade and bent ourselves over without lube, and gave up up a 2nd round draft pick for Warnock.

And if anyone brings up the Fevola trade as one in our favour, then please, that was a complete accident. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
All you need to know is Rogers now makes the ultimate decisions as head of Recruitment and has the final say if and when there needs to be a call made on a selection. Just like every other club in the AFL. One man has the final say. That is why he is in charge.

Regards Cazzesman

To what extent is the role of the coach in decision making? difference between Ratten and Malthouse if you know.

Does the coach have the ultimate say in the 'type' of player he want's... and then the recruiters seek them out... or is it a five man jamboree?


No idea how MM will work it this year. Last year because MM was out of the Loop to some extent it was left to SR and WH.

Regards Cazzesman



What was the go with Temay?
What sort of player is he?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
harker wrote:
BigKev wrote:
I've made this point before, but I like to make it again each time new "evidence" comes in.

We are very good at delisting. You get delisted from Carlton then there is very little chance that you will make it anywhere else.

Thorton and OHalpin delisted from GWS.


Not sure what you're saying and sorry I missed the revelation the first time around.
I think upon further "evidence" that you may find that to be the case for most clubs.
Guess we're just waiting for Russell and Austin to be quit, to solidify this evidence? :smile:

Maybe we can look at it another way: We've done O.K. for picking up others de-listings, so I guess it may just depend which way you want to look at things.


You're not sure what I'm saying? Really?

Hmmm .... ok how about if I put it this way:

Every season we delist players. Every season since I've been following TC there will be a number of posts critical of the delistings because players x, y and/or z were going to become great players elsewhere. My point, in a thread that seems almost universally critical of our list management, is that history is showing that in fact this one area of list management that we do very well.

And you're correct about Russell and Austin. Their future will either support this trend or not. Austin's delisting in particular I recall generated a lot of criticism. So far I'm still waiting for him to show that we got it wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
BigKev wrote:
You're not sure what I'm saying? Really?

Hmmm .... ok how about if I put it this way:

Every season we delist players. Every season since I've been following TC there will be a number of posts critical of the delistings because players x, y and/or z were going to become great players elsewhere. My point, in a thread that seems almost universally critical of our list management, is that history is showing that in fact this one area of list management that we do very well.

And you're correct about Russell and Austin. Their future will either support this trend or not. Austin's delisting in particular I recall generated a lot of criticism. So far I'm still waiting for him to show that we got it wrong.


O.K. I see.

Our recruitment hasn't been the best but neither has it been the worst and until we can truly get a handle of the recruitment/development bond, we're really only stabbing in the dark.
e.g. What do we think would have happened should have we recruited Pyke and Sydney Hampson?

There are many factors why some players will come on and where and there's a very good reason for that.
There are only so many self-driven players about and the rest need to be moulded into the system.
Get all the cogs right in that mechanism and you have a much better chance at getting the best out of the individual and in turn the team.

Malthouse is going about things the right way so we can only hope that he doesn't run out of puff putting the right structures in place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
All you need to know is Rogers now makes the ultimate decisions as head of Recruitment and has the final say if and when there needs to be a call made on a selection. Just like every other club in the AFL. One man has the final say. That is why he is in charge.

Regards Cazzesman

To what extent is the role of the coach in decision making? difference between Ratten and Malthouse if you know.

Does the coach have the ultimate say in the 'type' of player he want's... and then the recruiters seek them out... or is it a five man jamboree?


No idea how MM will work it this year. Last year because MM was out of the Loop to some extent it was left to SR and WH.

Regards Cazzesman



What was the go with Temay?
What sort of player is he?


Possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
All you need to know is Rogers now makes the ultimate decisions as head of Recruitment and has the final say if and when there needs to be a call made on a selection. Just like every other club in the AFL. One man has the final say. That is why he is in charge.

Regards Cazzesman

To what extent is the role of the coach in decision making? difference between Ratten and Malthouse if you know.

Does the coach have the ultimate say in the 'type' of player he want's... and then the recruiters seek them out... or is it a five man jamboree?


No idea how MM will work it this year. Last year because MM was out of the Loop to some extent it was left to SR and WH.

Regards Cazzesman



What was the go with Temay?
What sort of player is he?


Possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.

Regards Cazzesman




I recall once predicting that Andrew Jobling would end up being a triple Brownlow Medallist, but it just didn't work out. :oops:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:35 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
All you need to know is Rogers now makes the ultimate decisions as head of Recruitment and has the final say if and when there needs to be a call made on a selection. Just like every other club in the AFL. One man has the final say. That is why he is in charge.

Regards Cazzesman

To what extent is the role of the coach in decision making? difference between Ratten and Malthouse if you know.

Does the coach have the ultimate say in the 'type' of player he want's... and then the recruiters seek them out... or is it a five man jamboree?


No idea how MM will work it this year. Last year because MM was out of the Loop to some extent it was left to SR and WH.

Regards Cazzesman


What was the go with Temay?
What sort of player is he?


The 'meat and potatoes' type player that we usually go for with 'in between' type picks. For us it is our second or third selection out of three or four and we usually presage our intentions on TC a few months in advance (and they usually just happen to be still available). You can take it to the bank that, so far, it hasn't worked for us.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:56 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
All you need to know is Rogers now makes the ultimate decisions as head of Recruitment and has the final say if and when there needs to be a call made on a selection. Just like every other club in the AFL. One man has the final say. That is why he is in charge.

Regards Cazzesman

To what extent is the role of the coach in decision making? difference between Ratten and Malthouse if you know.

Does the coach have the ultimate say in the 'type' of player he want's... and then the recruiters seek them out... or is it a five man jamboree?


No idea how MM will work it this year. Last year because MM was out of the Loop to some extent it was left to SR and WH.

Regards Cazzesman



What was the go with Temay?
What sort of player is he?


Possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.

Regards Cazzesman

Is this when we turn into Geelong or when we let them all get older cos right now everyone is too young???

Ok Shane Rogers on centre stage.

Menzel.. well i would have chosen him too..
Temay.. i never heard of him but possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.
Graham .. Nick Stevens highly speaks of this kid.... i could have said yes to him too.. if i didnt know anyone else.

Collins.... rookie.. ok ... possibly would have done that...dont know anyone else.
Cachia..rookie pick.. ok.. maybe i would have done that too... dont know anyone else.

A whole years work... what did that set the club back???

I and Nick Stevens suggestion could have saved this club hundreds of thousands of dolllars on that one seasons work...

An ex number 1 IC.. and a current 1 IC...

at least a couple hundred thousand in just wages...plus everybody else on the payroll.. and the recruiting budget to fly around Aussie...

The interesting one in there is Temay... small defender with a second rounder... with a vanilla game for AFL footy....but its ok... "he possibly is a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell."

Thats the probem with the recruitment group.. same as the board... everyone has been breathing each others air for too long..

a small defender with our second rounder??... who the hell does that!!!.. grab a mid and turn him into a defender...but he is a midfielder too...!!!

saw Temay this year... interrupted season maybe.. but cant think of one thing about his game thats a standout .. sure he might be a good runner..........small defender eh???... another hbfer type*....

Oh yes.... "give him time Synbad....!!!.."

We have to.... but thats not where i would be looking with a second round pick.. a guy under 180 cm and is a defender with no big penetrating kick.. and no real midfield creativity...!!!

Just there in a nutshell is where Rogers is Hughes Mk2.... theyre from the same recruitment school... i know Gilly said "heres a tip for you Synabd...there is no university for learning to be a recruiter...".....Gilly had a t[img]ip for ME...!!!!
Yes Gilly.. but there is the school of average recruiters and the school of good recruiters.. why do you think we went out to poach(pooch) Williams??.....he WAS breathing the same air as Wells.. now hes going to breathe in the same air as Hughes / Rogers.
=Image

Just get Emma Quales list and save hundreds of thousands of dollars and you cant go worse...

We have the same problem with the board and succession plans..

They have all been breathing in the same air...
Its the Moshe fishbowl analogy

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:11 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
very good


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:

Menzel.. well i would have chosen him too..
Temay.. i never heard of him but possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.
Graham .. Nick Stevens highly speaks of this kid.... i could have said yes to him too.. if i didnt know anyone else.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_AFL_D ... onal_Draft

Feel free to tell TC who you would have picked that came after the Temay and Graham picks. :smoking: Even with hindsight I long to hear you answers and WHY.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:41 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Synbad wrote:
The interesting one in there is Temay... small defender with a second rounder... with a vanilla game for AFL footy....but its ok... "he possibly is a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell."

Thats the probem with the recruitment group.. same as the board... everyone has been breathing each others air for too long..
a small defender with our second rounder??... who the hell does that!!!.. grab a mid and turn him into a defender...but he is a midfielder too...!!!

saw Temay this year... interrupted season maybe.. but cant think of one thing about his game thats a standout .. sure he might be a good runner..........small defender eh???... another hbfer type*....

Oh yes.... "give him time Synbad....!!!.."
We have to.... but thats not where i would be looking with a second round pick.. a guy under 180 cm and is a defender with no big penetrating kick.. and no real midfield creativity...!!!


Temay is interesting and where Menzel and Graham had interrupted pre-seasons/seasons, Temay didn't.
Had a couple of weeks out for minor injury but that's about it from what I recall.

Interesting that he was used forward for quite a few games through the last half of the season.

As it stands I've seen very little to suggest that we have a winner on our hands but as you say.................only time will tell.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Cazzesman wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_AFL_D ... onal_Draft

Feel free to tell TC who you would have picked that came after the Temay and Graham picks. :smoking: Even with hindsight I long to hear you answers and WHY.

Regards Cazzesman



What does the club think of Temay's opening season?

I know there's plenty of time and he looks and moves every inch a footballer but I just can't pick what the club is trying to do with him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:46 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Menzel.. well i would have chosen him too..
Temay.. i never heard of him but possibly a multiple AA Brownlow medalist with a couple of Coleman's thrown in for good measure, but only time will tell.
Graham .. Nick Stevens highly speaks of this kid.... i could have said yes to him too.. if i didnt know anyone else.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_AFL_D ... onal_Draft

Feel free to tell TC who you would have picked that came after the Temay and Graham picks. :smoking: Even with hindsight I long to hear you answers and WHY.

Regards Cazzesman

i would nt have taken temay ur right.....nothing there after pick 30 i know.,, i know how u guys think.... too hard takre the 179 guy everyone passed up on...
graham id have gone with stevos assessment.. why not? u blokes did!!!

and listen.. i dont get paid the money rogers and stevens are to have the answers.... u understand that bit right??

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:50 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..colquhoun [sp?] was talked up pre-draft, and i think plenty were surprised he 'slipped' right down.out of ND and was picked up in secondary drafts.. ..dayle garTlett we all know clubs were warned off, and seems he got his shite together but ,maybe a relapse..??, but certainly the rookie draft is the place to take the punt on the talented but flawed high risk high reward type pick..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15044
I also posted this in talking players.
Greg Denham is reporting Eddie Betts off to Adelaide with a 4 year deal worth almost $2 million.
Will Carlton match it considering Betts is on the veterans list from 2015?
At least make Adelaide trade for him if we match it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:59 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
I don't think the drafting is the problem - not sure about temay graham and menzel look good to me - my beef for a number of years has been the the development of the players once they get there and secondly the trading (have we done a good trade since crazy vossie gifted us Henderson and lucas) and the free agency debacle last year - last year hawthorn swans geelong Collingwood tigers bummers all improved their list in trading /free agency period - where were we hello -too busy paying out contracts of assistant and senior coaches - too busy talking up the new coach

Does it surprise anyone that our club was instead of being at the forefront of the free agency was at the back of the queue

The difficulty is we are not an attractive club that players from other clubs want to trade into - caddy last year - gunston the year before - both good young players both wanting to come home - both would have improved our list - both not wanting to come to carlton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:02 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 1021
Remember at the time I was pretty peeved we didn't go for Membrey but was happy with Temay too. It's a pretty bad draft after the quality first 20 or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
frank dardew wrote:

The difficulty is we are not an attractive club that players from other clubs want to trade into - caddy last year - gunston the year before - both good young players both wanting to come home - both would have improved our list - both not wanting to come to carlton


I'm not sure that's right.

Sort of makes sense that once we got wind of getting Menzel at #11, that we'd sooner go that path than to hand over pick #11 for Caddy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 1021
Development is our problem though...Frazer Dale, Dylan Buckley, Kane Lucas, Josh Bootsma, Pat McCarthy, Luke Mitchell, Levi Casboult, Shaun Hampson all have obvious deficiencies that don't seem to get fixed or have no specific role/position.

Just fix half of that list and I'll be happy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19526
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
The other issue is trading a lot of picks for one player....we reduce the number of picks we have at the draft and rely on the player coming in and being a success instead of spreading the risk.

I have confidence in Rogers based on his statement:

"Geelong is one of the clubs that draft and just sit and wait and have some patience. I reckon we’re at that point. Carlton hasn’t been use to that before. It’s been a “there’s the best player let’s go out and buy him.” The rules have changed. We’ve gotta draft and we’ve got to embrace the draft – the supporters and the footy club."

The concern is others in the football department getting in the way and getting the cheque book out to appease the members. There needs to be a plan instead of thinking throwing a bag of cash at D Thomas will solve all our problems. Sure that might be via free agency but you still have to think of the salary cap consequences.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot], malbi and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group