Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 7:32 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Lucky Michael Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 1:04 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:56 am
Posts: 61
With Carlton having one of it's most disappointing seasons Mick escapes the heat. He never come under the intense Media he should have(except by Robert Walls).
James Hird really deflected the heat the whole season until the AFL who had hoodwinked the footy public the whole season finally refused the Bombers their place in the finals.
Malthouse is saved by a lucky win by a point over Port Adelaide.Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.


You have to be cynical of the AFL as they sit by and let Freo gift retiring St Kilda players a party that gives Ross Lyon on opportunity to attempt to redeem himself to the players and club he shafted two years ago


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 1:10 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 283
anthopides wrote:

Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.




I seem to recall that Carlton beat this so called best team outside the finals by a point a few weeks back.

As things stand at this time yes, the kangas are the best team outside the finals if you look at their ladder standing, we just happen to be better than that seeing as we are actually inside the 8!

Had they been good enough to beat us in a close encounter they would have been playing finals instead of us , so i guess we earned our place ahead of them. :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 1:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
we beat port twice
beat north
beat adelaide
beat brisbane
beat richmond
beat west coast

we have beaten all the teams around us

i say we deserve to be where we are

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
We played Melbourne, GWS and Gold Coast only once. (west coast also)

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:21 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:56 am
Posts: 61
Gab wrote:
anthopides wrote:

Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.




I seem to recall that Carlton beat this so called best team outside the finals by a point a few weeks back.

As things stand at this time yes, the kangas are the best team outside the finals if you look at their ladder standing, we just happen to be better than that seeing as we are actually inside the 8!

Had they been good enough to beat us in a close encounter they would have been playing finals instead of us , so i guess we earned our place ahead of them. :smoking:[/quote


July 19 the blues fell in by a point to the Kangas i think its apparent the kangas have a better percentage but the problem with all of this is how the footy public were led on until the death nell by the AFL so as not to forfeit TV rights and gate receipts by Essendon* being eliminated earlier.
Carlton only sneaked into the finals on the unprecedented elimination of the bombers at the very last minute whilst it had been obvious for months that the bombers were not going to be in the finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18496
Location: threeohfivethree
anthopides wrote:
With Carlton having one of it's most disappointing seasons Mick escapes the heat. He never come under the intense Media he should have(except by Robert Walls).
James Hird really deflected the heat the whole season until the AFL who had hoodwinked the footy public the whole season finally refused the Bombers their place in the finals.
Malthouse is saved by a lucky win by a point over Port Adelaide.Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.


You have to be cynical of the AFL as they sit by and let Freo gift retiring St Kilda players a party that gives Ross Lyon on opportunity to attempt to redeem himself to the players and club he shafted two years ago


Kangas won 10. Blues won 11.

I'm really struggling to see your point. Percentage is a secondary measure used only to separate teams should they end on the same number of wins.

We are where we are and the Kangas are where they are. 11 beats 10.

It's really not hard.

We were the 8th best non-cheating team in the league. That means we get to play finals. The cheats were disqualified because it's assumed that without the unfair advantage they got from cheating they wouldn't have been in the position they were in.

If you're going to troll you should take some lessons from Cerberus - he's awesome!

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:28 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6326
lets face it North won 10 games with a percentage of 120. Now that is bizarre. At one point during he season they were second in % of time they were in front of games. bizarre

ironically the Blues can beat Richmond and who knows
Still a token if you ask me
and call me old fashion but those baseball caps backwards are not a good look


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:12 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 15
Location: London
anthopides wrote:
Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.


How's he "lucky" if we/he lost every other close encounter this year? Sounds pretty unlucky to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
Unlucky for him we can't kick straight. There's another three or four wins.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:52 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Obvious troll is obvious


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:05 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
DISAGREE! As others have said. Deserve to be there!
Beaten teams in the 8. We have had a more difficult draw then others inside the eight and really only failed miserable in about 3 or 4 games throughout the year. With a little more luck or resolve, we could have easily beaten a couple of the top 4 sides as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
GWS wrote:
anthopides wrote:
With Carlton having one of it's most disappointing seasons Mick escapes the heat. He never come under the intense Media he should have(except by Robert Walls).
James Hird really deflected the heat the whole season until the AFL who had hoodwinked the footy public the whole season finally refused the Bombers their place in the finals.
Malthouse is saved by a lucky win by a point over Port Adelaide.Carlton who lost every close encounter through the season except this one get in at the expense of the Kangas the best team out of the finals.


You have to be cynical of the AFL as they sit by and let Freo gift retiring St Kilda players a party that gives Ross Lyon on opportunity to attempt to redeem himself to the players and club he shafted two years ago


Kangas won 10. Blues won 11.

I'm really struggling to see your point. Percentage is a secondary measure used only to separate teams should they end on the same number of wins.

We are where we are and the Kangas are where they are. 11 beats 10.

It's really not hard.

We were the 8th best non-cheating team in the league. That means we get to play finals. The cheats were disqualified because it's assumed that without the unfair advantage they got from cheating they wouldn't have been in the position they were in.

If you're going to troll you should take some lessons from Cerberus - he's awesome!


this. I don't understand this argument at all!! We have 11 wins, they have 10 ... end of story

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:40 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
anthopides wrote:
With Carlton having one of it's most disappointing seasons Mick escapes the heat.

Erm, no he doesn't...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:24 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
grrofunger wrote:
we beat port twice
beat north
beat adelaide
beat brisbane
beat richmond
beat west coast

we have beaten all the teams around us

i say we deserve to be where we are


This is the point no one ever states. I am sick of hearing about North being the best team out of the finals.

Fact is North lost to -

Carlton
Adelaide * 2
Brisbane
West Coast
Gold Coast

Can people explain to me how they deserve it more than us? People think North didn't make the finals because of some close loses to top teams. No they didn't make it because they couldn't beat the teams around them.

_________________
Have I run too far to get home?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:55 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Rubbish thread.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:55 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Rubbish thread.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:59 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
And we have to remember Essendon* were on the gear so they dont deserve to be in the finals.

So 8th is about right for us.

Don't think we will do much in the finals but out of all the clean teams we are the 8th best in 2013.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Double post


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
SAKC Malthouse.......... sorry clicked the wrong link.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Lucky Michael Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:58 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Troll.

I guess we should decide the whole ladder by percentage and forget about wins and losses.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GreatEx, Meekster and 105 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group