Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 3:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:47 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 832
How the @#$%&! is our list better this year than last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
dadadadada wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Trigger wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Explain his game plan then BS? I'm interested.

If your talking about playing the boundaries, that is a rule but it is not his game plan.

Even the players have admitted he has changed it since the start of the season.

Some of you critics may be surprised at what his "game plan" entails.

Why would they be surprised, they know our game plan better than mm does apparently.

OK, You explain it.


I think you have stumped him.

Yawn!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
He's typical of many here who just criticize and have no idea. I am happy to be criticized by anybody who would like to debate. That's the beauty of this site but there are far to may who just use the garthp: smiley or whatever to cover their inadequacies. Like Tigger.

I tried to explain MM's game plan in response to a sensible question from one of the few posters here who seems to be a rational thinker. My concept may be right or wrong but one thing is for sure, Tigger hasn't got a clue or he'd have done what I did and tried his hand at it.

Weak.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Blue Sombrero wrote:
He's typical of many here who just criticize and have no idea. I am happy to be criticized by anybody who would like to debate. That's the beauty of this site but there are far to may who just use the garthp: smiley or whatever to cover their inadequacies. Like Tigger.

I tried to explain MM's game plan in response to a sensible question from one of the few posters here who seems to be a rational thinker. My concept may be right or wrong but one thing is for sure, Tigger hasn't got a clue or he'd have done what I did and tried his hand at it.

Weak.

As Piss :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..i don't think MM's gameplan is out-dated at all.. .it's been tweaked, it will get tweaked on a continual basis, just like it always has been throughout his entire career.. ..yes he plays wide, because the corridor is high-risk high-reward.. ..we don't have the cattle for that.. ..not enough good kicks, not enough good kicks/handballs under pressure, not enough run and spread, nowhere near enough defensive running to bottle up a turnover.. ..and looking ahead, we've got almost 10 'kids' that will become more regular parts of the team, so we have right now an unbalanced list in regards to experience..

..geelong are held up as the virtues of exciting hard attacking football, and MM's gameplan has broken them more than they've been broken by them.. ..most teams don't use the press these days to fanatical extremes, but Freo still use a gameplan thats as old as MM's, and they're going very well indeed.. ..everyone knows exactly how to unravel the Rossy gameplan, but his team's buy-in is so impressive that knowing how to undo it, and then being able to unlock freo, is extremely difficult.. ..and they've had an unsettled, 3/4 strength team for the entire season..

..hawks have a chip chip short kicking gameplan, everyone knows they can be beaten by speed on the outside.. ..and yet they've been bonafide flag contenders for 3 seasons straight.. ..2011 lost to MM in 'that' prelim.. ..2012 swans matched their hardness, and then got them on the outside.. ..but for all the swans run and dash from the stoppage 'slingshot' style, if you watch them play they still will run wide more often than straight down the middle.. ..they attack, but always with a defensive angle..

..gameplans need not be brand shiney new, they just need all players [seniors and ressies] understanding exactly what must be done, and all of them committing to it.. ..it takes strong trust in team mates.. ..and obviously a good run with injuries and a good balance between hardened experience and vibrant youth..

..i will say this, MM has gone a bit away from his zoning, and it playing a bit more 'finals style' one on one footy, which i think is best for a team such as ours.. ..we need to learn and become experienced with winning individual contests all over the ground.. ..go thru MM's good teams and you'll find plenty of players that would run and carry..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Thine own lips hath spake it.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
dannyboy wrote:
I love these arguments (apart from a small few who actually try and discuss the pros and cons and thus spoil everything :screwy: )

they go like this

everything that went right is his/not his work :clap:

everything that goes wrong is/is not his work :fight:

just add fifty pages of this shit and you're about done and dusted. :gift:


That's about the size of it. It doesn't matter why we gave Malthouse the job, we are what we are and he is what he is. For me (in terms of how we should handle the list post season) the only difference from the way I want us to go and the 'realist' approach to where we are at and what we need, is a try for Boyd. Apart from that, we should be under no illusions as to where we are at and how deep the list cuts should go.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:45 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Game plan looked OK after quarter time last week when Mick told the players they were getting sucked in


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:12 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:50 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Strathmore
Sugarcane wrote:
Game plan looked OK after quarter time last week when Mick told the players they were getting sucked in


How do you know what Mick told the players?

_________________
'‘He had an enormous capacity to pump himself up and get the best out of himself when it mattered. He had a fire in his belly – a passion for the contest like few other players’' -- D Parkin in reference to the dominator


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:21 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
One thing I like about Malthouse ... and it's purely a perception ... and I have no idea if Ratten and his team did the same thing ...
is that players are sent back to the twos and told that they have to specifically fix something before they'll be picked again.

Apparently Casboult was told that he wasn't running enough and so had to really work a lot harder.
Not sure what Robbo was told, but he was as valuable to the team against Richmond as I've seen him.

Love to know what the message to Lucas was. He's had a pretty good year really, but I suspect Mick's not happy with something.
Might be tackling, might be something else.

Almost sounds like player development. :eek:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24614
Location: Kaloyasena
BigKev wrote:

Love to know what the message to Lucas was. He's had a pretty good year really, but I suspect Mick's not happy with something.
Might be tackling, might be something else.

Almost sounds like player development. :eek:




Don't know what was said but from reports it seems Lucas didn't work on anything last weekend.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:38 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
AGRO wrote:
BigKev wrote:

Love to know what the message to Lucas was. He's had a pretty good year really, but I suspect Mick's not happy with something.
Might be tackling, might be something else.

Almost sounds like player development. :eek:




Don't know what was said but from reports it seems Lucas didn't work on anything last weekend.

How do you know that? Maybe he was told to work on being more relaxed, not getting injured, and kicking like shit.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
BigKev wrote:
One thing I like about Malthouse ... and it's purely a perception ... and I have no idea if Ratten and his team did the same thing ...
is that players are sent back to the twos and told that they have to specifically fix something before they'll be picked again.

Apparently Casboult was told that he wasn't running enough and so had to really work a lot harder.
Not sure what Robbo was told, but he was as valuable to the team against Richmond as I've seen him.

Love to know what the message to Lucas was. He's had a pretty good year really, but I suspect Mick's not happy with something.
Might be tackling, might be something else.

Almost sounds like player development. :eek:



Gee I hope that's the case Kev.

...and deep down I believe it is.
Only thing that sort of worries me is how the players take it.
Gen Y New age thing...not saying all Gen Y's are precious...just haven't met any who.....

HTFU...soft cocks dont play well in Aussie Rules GF's....any level

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14940
Sugarcane wrote:
Game plan looked OK after quarter time last week when Mick told the players they were getting sucked in

Was it only me or did anyone else think that players used the middle more on Saturday?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
kezza wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
Game plan looked OK after quarter time last week when Mick told the players they were getting sucked in

Was it only me or did anyone else think that players used the middle more on Saturday?

When the players decide to run and support that is definitely the case, but if they do not ,the player has no choice but to kick it long to a contest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:28 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4747
Robbo was told to keep his feet in contests............... This is what he had to work on in the VFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:04 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10488
Most know I give credit were it's due and Malthouse does "rotate" the list well. Always has.
He believes in creating depth through the list and you do that by playing players in the VFL and AFL as much as possible.
He believes by keeping players in the VFL for too long, they lose pace of the game, etc and then aren't ready if needed.
If you rotate them they keep working on deficiencies and keep up with the AFL tempo and are ready to step in at any time.
He has done that well this year with our peripheral players or players he believes are "depth players".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:09 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
SurreyBlue wrote:
Most know I give credit were it's due and Malthouse does "rotate" the list well. Always has.
He believes in creating depth through the list and you do that by playing players in the VFL and AFL as much as possible.
He believes by keeping players in the VFL for too long, they lose pace of the game, etc and then aren't ready if needed.
If you rotate them they keep working on deficiencies and keep up with the AFL tempo and are ready to step in at any time.
He has done that well this year with our peripheral players or players he believes are "depth players".

Nice post, SB.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
SurreyBlue wrote:
Most know I give credit were it's due and Malthouse does "rotate" the list well. Always has.
He believes in creating depth through the list and you do that by playing players in the VFL and AFL as much as possible.
He believes by keeping players in the VFL for too long, they lose pace of the game, etc and then aren't ready if needed.
If you rotate them they keep working on deficiencies and keep up with the AFL tempo and are ready to step in at any time.
He has done that well this year with our peripheral players or players he believes are "depth players".

I have "fond" memories of the number of times young players would come into the Collingwood seniors and immediately looked like they belonged.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..i reckon we'll be seeing plenty of it over the next few years as well as we get more youth into the system..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mkarp1 and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group