Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 6:59 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21069
Location: Missing Kouta
camelboy wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
I wonder how much the Tigers being flowers actually helped our performance. Our typically sedate, introverted team seemed to be fired up by their antagonism.
Our team need to learn to harness the energy that comes from peak arousal and not approach each game as a "business as usual, off to work" mindset.

What do you think?


They certainly have more than their fair share of flowers in the team. Hreivwoldt is a juvenile, and I'm not sure they can ever win a flag with him in the team. Lots of ability, no brains.


Have always said he is Fev Mk2.

Thankfully, for Jack, at this stage that is only manifesting itself on field. So long as he stays off the turps he has hope. But he'll always be a massive sook.

We need more extroverts. :yikes: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Effes wrote:
Coaches votes

Richmond vs Carlton


9 McLean (Carl)
6 Robinson (Carl)
5 Simpson (Carl)
4 Walker (Carl)
3 Curnow (Carl)
3 Deledio (Rich)



Interesting that many here opted Gibbs up high, yet the coaches don't. I reckon Deledios impact was overrated

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
Wall paper, schmallpaper.

I couldnt give a rats arse about negative implications. The reality is we won and deserved the win.
IMO, the differences were obvious. We dropped a tag in the midfield which allowed us to work harder offensively when we had possession. It also gave us more flexibility with our midfield rotations and allowed us to be less reactive.
Most importantly, our scoring efficiency was better than theres. Quite often that is the difference.

Credit to Mick for adapting. Let's hope he learns his lesson and continues to play to our strengths and give opportunities to the kids.

For those who have been telling us for the past couple of weeks how poor Jamison is and how McLeans disposals dont hurt the opposition, watch the replay and get a clue.
Yes Jamo has his deficiencies but he's far and away the best tall defender we have on the last line.
Go Blues.



Source:
www.backpedalling.com.au

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:13 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Effes wrote:
Coaches votes

Richmond vs Carlton


9 McLean (Carl)
6 Robinson (Carl)
5 Simpson (Carl)
4 Walker (Carl)
3 Curnow (Carl)
3 Deledio (Rich)



Interesting that many here opted Gibbs up high, yet the coaches don't. I reckon Deledios impact was overrated

Interesting. IMO, Hardwick gave Lids 3 votes. In fact, my guess is they were distributed as below, given the totals:

MALTHOUSE

5. McLean
4. Simpson
3. Curnow
2. Walker
1. Robinson


HARDWICK

5. Robinson
4. McLean
3. DeLidio
2. Walker
1. Simpson






HARDWICK
------------------------------------

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:48 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
I thought Bolt would sneak a vote. Had a huge influence on the result.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:14 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14707
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Barely noticed "lids" tbh

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I was surprised to read he had it 29 times.
His gut running late in the game was pretty good.

He's a gun.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:00 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Wall paper, schmallpaper.

I couldnt give a rats arse about negative implications. The reality is we won and deserved the win.
IMO, the differences were obvious. We dropped a tag in the midfield which allowed us to work harder offensively when we had possession. It also gave us more flexibility with our midfield rotations and allowed us to be less reactive.
Most importantly, our scoring efficiency was better than theres. Quite often that is the difference.

Credit to Mick for adapting. Let's hope he learns his lesson and continues to play to our strengths and give opportunities to the kids.

For those who have been telling us for the past couple of weeks how poor Jamison is and how McLeans disposals dont hurt the opposition, watch the replay and get a clue.
Yes Jamo has his deficiencies but he's far and away the best tall defender we have on the last line.
Go Blues.



Source:
http://www.backpedalling.com.au


Nice try.
Not only did I tip us to win, I've also constantly stated the list has the quality to be a finals contender if they can play to their strengths.
While you and your mates have been sitting back sniping the players, I kept faith in them.
You must be bleeding you cant can the players for another 7 days? What will you do for the week? :lol:

They just need Mick to stop trying to stamp his authority on the team and let them play to their strengths.
A good result all round.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:53 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10488
Blue Vain wrote:
Nice try.
Not only did I tip us to win, I've also constantly stated the list has the quality to be a finals contender if they can play to their strengths.
While you and your mates have been sitting back sniping the players, I kept faith in them.
You must be bleeding you cant can the players for another 7 days? What will you do for the week? :lol:

They just need Mick to stop trying to stamp his authority on the team and let them play to their strengths.
A good result all round.


This is why I enjoy reading your posts BV. Bravo. :clap:
You also keep your focus when replying ...... compared to me. :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:23 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..who wants to be a finals contender though..?.. ..seriously, if you're not a real, regular flag contender, playing finals is fun but bittersweet cos you know yer no real chance.. ..don't wanna be like laidley's roo's or eade's dogs, where you play finals for no threat.. ..they even used to make top 4, but they were never truely in the race.. ..our list played to its strengths wasn't flag worthy.. ..it's been corrected, and will still use some of its strengths but in a much better way.. ..never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Good post BV - I don't think it is coincidental that in both this season and the last whilst both disappointing in terms of results we played our best footy when we elected to go with youth ie casboult bell etc - need to be constantly finding blooding and exposing kids to senior football particularly when existing senior side continues to come up short in both winnable games and against better sides

The disgrace that was the early game against Aints and game against dogs cost us a finals spot -let alone first match against tigers and abominable lack of grit and ability to hang onto a lead against Essendon*

Turnover of list should be savage at the end of the year a lot of dead wood at back end of senior list - need more kids and unlike last exchange/draft period - need some adroit trading - no excuses about money contracts etc this time

I thought it was a significant win on Saturday - given we hadn't apart from port beaten a top 8 side - started horribly didn't drop their bundle and like a good side ground away to win


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:27 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
.never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..


This.
Whenever I read through the arguments on TC,
I just have to stop and imagine how Hawthorn, Sydney, and Geelong fans must be pissing themselves laughing at our petty issues.

We NEED to play finals for 6 years in a row.
We NEED to be top 4 for at least 4 to 5 years in a row.
We NEED at least one flag from that top 4 period
Sticks has the right goal,
He just has dubious plans on how to get there.


Really enjoyed the game on Saturday,
but won't be getting carried away.


Last edited by Bluey44 on Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:49 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..who wants to be a finals contender though..?.. ..seriously, if you're not a real, regular flag contender, playing finals is fun but bittersweet cos you know yer no real chance.. ..don't wanna be like laidley's roo's or eade's dogs, where you play finals for no threat.. ..they even used to make top 4, but they were never truely in the race.. ..our list played to its strengths wasn't flag worthy.. ..it's been corrected, and will still use some of its strengths but in a much better way.. ..never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..


Yes, I see you've been steadfast in your views in our previous finals campaigns.

Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..and personally, even taking into account where our list was coming from.. ..finals footy this year should be a given.. ..finals footy shouldn't have been the pass mark for Ratts, it's simply not a high enough benchmark.. ..with the list we have there should be no doubt about finals footy.. ..regardless, it's more how we play footy that's more the concern for mine..

..finals footy was always gonna happen.. ..unless we either got cruelled by injuries to seriously important players, or our coaching staff are totally incompetent..

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
The reasons I hate Ty Vickery

1. His stupid hair string holding his dreads that he keeps adjusting
2. The way he gives "high 10" whenever he kicks a goal while jumping in the air.
3. KB thinks he's Royce Hart and Michael Roach rolled into 1
4. He always seems to be on the right side of stupid free kicks eg him jumping to "spoil" from 5m away while cannoning into Simpson who was running forward and getting a shepherding free and his 50m against Robbo
5. He scored 3 goals 3 times this year, twice against us. He scored 0 or 1 15 times but is considered to be a good player.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:37 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Bluey44 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..who wants to be a finals contender though..?.. ..seriously, if you're not a real, regular flag contender, playing finals is fun but bittersweet cos you know yer no real chance.. ..don't wanna be like laidley's roo's or eade's dogs, where you play finals for no threat.. ..they even used to make top 4, but they were never truely in the race.. ..our list played to its strengths wasn't flag worthy.. ..it's been corrected, and will still use some of its strengths but in a much better way.. ..never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..


This.
Whenever I read through the arguments on TC,
or get pleasure out of turning the corner and winning one game against Richmond,

I just have to stop and imagine how Hawthorn, Sydney, and Geelong fans must be pissing themselves laughing at our petty issues.

We NEED to play finals for 6 years in a row.
We NEED to be top 4 for at least 4 to 5 years in a row.
We NEED at least one flag from that top 4 period

Sticks has the right goal,
He just has dubious plans on how to get there.


Really enjoyed the game on Saturday,
but won't be getting carried away.


Are they the same Hawthorn supporters who saw their team win a flag after 1 year of finals appearances in the previous seven years?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
[youtube]axw__b41_14[/youtube]

Imagine if "Thyril" had kicked that last goal.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..who wants to be a finals contender though..?.. ..seriously, if you're not a real, regular flag contender, playing finals is fun but bittersweet cos you know yer no real chance.. ..don't wanna be like laidley's roo's or eade's dogs, where you play finals for no threat.. ..they even used to make top 4, but they were never truely in the race.. ..our list played to its strengths wasn't flag worthy.. ..it's been corrected, and will still use some of its strengths but in a much better way.. ..never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..


Yes, I see you've been steadfast in your views in our previous finals campaigns.

Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..and personally, even taking into account where our list was coming from.. ..finals footy this year should be a given.. ..finals footy shouldn't have been the pass mark for Ratts, it's simply not a high enough benchmark.. ..with the list we have there should be no doubt about finals footy.. ..regardless, it's more how we play footy that's more the concern for mine..

..finals footy was always gonna happen.. ..unless we either got cruelled by injuries to seriously important players, or our coaching staff are totally incompetent..


..and yet, in all of that you glossed over the bit where i said "regardless, it's more how we play footy that's more the concern for mine".. ....ultimately, playing finals footy, and playing footy in the finals isn't the same thing.. ..do i think we Might miss finals due to injuries?, no.. ..do i think we might due to coaching?, yes.. ..but not because of bad coaching, but due to corrective coaching.. ..for years we played on talent, with no discernible system that held up to pressure, or was even regularly adhered to, win or lose.. ..now, with so much of the talent on a decline, Judd [being massive for us recently], Snotland who can still play well getting the ball and running and helping support, but his kicking isnt what it used to be.. ..Carrots likewise, and Murph injured 2 seasons in a row [not declining though, injured]..

..now, that doesn't sound too bad, but when you play on talent and no system,, it is bad.. ..this year i think our list should have made finals, yes.. ..but making finals isn't enough.. ..we want to be a flag threat, so younger players needed to get their chances, which they have.. ..an actual gameplan, with recognised structures and understood systems needed to be implemented.. ..defensive accountability is still the struggle to instill.. ..real, honest two-way running.. ..disciplined team footy instead of flashy selfishness.. ..unearthing new leaders, etc etc.. ..we're coming from a long way back, and yes we could eke out a shallow finals foray this year and the coming few, or we could retreat a little and sort out everything we all see and agree needs sorting out.. ..i dont think anyone was truely beliving we could have been a legitimate repeat flag contender.. .at best, if everything went right, we might have fluked one.. ..maybe.... hopefully..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Blue Vain wrote:
Bluey44 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..who wants to be a finals contender though..?.. ..seriously, if you're not a real, regular flag contender, playing finals is fun but bittersweet cos you know yer no real chance.. ..don't wanna be like laidley's roo's or eade's dogs, where you play finals for no threat.. ..they even used to make top 4, but they were never truely in the race.. ..our list played to its strengths wasn't flag worthy.. ..it's been corrected, and will still use some of its strengths but in a much better way.. ..never gonna win a flag unless you can play finals footy week in week out.. ..even our best yr of 2011 we didnt play finals footy, couldn't string more than a few wins together, how the hell you gonna go deep into the finals without winning more than a few games in a row thru the season, every season for a decade..


This.
Whenever I read through the arguments on TC,
or get pleasure out of turning the corner and winning one game against Richmond,

I just have to stop and imagine how Hawthorn, Sydney, and Geelong fans must be pissing themselves laughing at our petty issues.

We NEED to play finals for 6 years in a row.
We NEED to be top 4 for at least 4 to 5 years in a row.
We NEED at least one flag from that top 4 period

Sticks has the right goal,
He just has dubious plans on how to get there.


Really enjoyed the game on Saturday,
but won't be getting carried away.


Are they the same Hawthorn supporters who saw their team win a flag after 1 year of finals appearances in the previous seven years?


I'm not saying that you can't win a flag straight off the bat !
I just want to be at the top and be consistent for a sustained period!

Is that too much to hope for ? :lol:


EDIT - Actually when I reread what I had quoted, it wasn't exactly the same as the point I was trying to make.

The point is - we need to get back up there and stay up there.
I genuinely hope Mick can kickstart that process


Last edited by Bluey44 on Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:

Are they the same Hawthorn supporters who saw their team win a flag after 1 year of finals appearances in the previous seven years?


..yes.. ..and they're still pinching themselves, and it's still often referred to as the 'bradbury'.. ..now, we'll take 'em any way we can get 'em, but everyone said even after they won that it was 'before schedule', and a surprise.. ..and yet for the dynasty, it's still the only one.. ..they are more exception than rule..

..edit - also of note, were the 2 rule changes after that flag that have 'hindered' some of the dawks play and style as well..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:16 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Wall paper, schmallpaper.

I couldnt give a rats arse about negative implications. The reality is we won and deserved the win.
IMO, the differences were obvious. We dropped a tag in the midfield which allowed us to work harder offensively when we had possession. It also gave us more flexibility with our midfield rotations and allowed us to be less reactive.
Most importantly, our scoring efficiency was better than theres. Quite often that is the difference.

Credit to Mick for adapting. Let's hope he learns his lesson and continues to play to our strengths and give opportunities to the kids.

For those who have been telling us for the past couple of weeks how poor Jamison is and how McLeans disposals dont hurt the opposition, watch the replay and get a clue.
Yes Jamo has his deficiencies but he's far and away the best tall defender we have on the last line.
Go Blues.



Source:
http://www.backpedalling.com.au


Nice try.
Not only did I tip us to win, I've also constantly stated the list has the quality to be a finals contender if they can play to their strengths.
While you and your mates have been sitting back sniping the players, I kept faith in them.
You must be bleeding you cant can the players for another 7 days? What will you do for the week? :lol:

They just need Mick to stop trying to stamp his authority on the team and let them play to their strengths.
A good result all round.


That's easy BV...read a selection of your previous (personal) posts on MM and delight in the hypocracy

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 261 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group