Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 1:23 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:55 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
You see, the problem with taking a stand on either "it's the players" or "it's the coach" means that if there is a win like today, people end up being wrong anyway!

The issue is that we haven't won a premiership and won't until we fix our culture. A win against a team that turned up complacent after the 1st quarter is not the panacea to curing our ills as a football club.

Heck, celebrating 9th - are we Richmond supporters accidentally wearing blue?

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
[GoogleVideo][/GoogleVideo]
Trigger wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
Expected to win this one and so we should have (after all we have only lost to Richmond once in the last 3 years and we all know whose watch that was under) ... as I mentioned through the week ... player driven victory ... It can't have been the coach ... He doesn't offer anything in tactics.

And I was going crazy today when we hit the lead ... I love the mighty Blues ... no matter who is coaching. I just basically agree with Robert Walls and Leigh Mathews ... MM has done a lot of damage.

Don't worry .. you will see a lot more dumb decisions by MM before the year is out ... then as usual ... he blames everyone but himself ... very good at deflecting the blame is our Micky.

But it was a great win today ... and am very happy especially for the players he has ridiculed over the year. In the end, injuries forced his hand to make changes ... otherwise guys like Graham and Bell would still be waiting.

Well done Blues ... I love us beating the Tigers.

Go away


BBW ......which players has he ridiculed? You can have robert walls and Leigh Matthews....good luck to you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:45 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Still got a few cats to kick, I see


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
CarltonClem wrote:
You see, the problem with taking a stand on either "it's the players" or "it's the coach" means that if there is a win like today, people end up being wrong anyway!

The issue is that we haven't won a premiership and won't until we fix our culture. A win against a team that turned up complacent after the 1st quarter is not the panacea to curing our ills as a football club.

Heck, celebrating 9th - are we Richmond supporters accidentally wearing blue?

That's well said, at the moment we are all losers

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
Super duper win for a super duper coach. Well done tricky Micky, great performance today


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
People keep banging on about 1 final win in last few years. Do we have a better list now under mm then we had 2 years ago with irish and t bird as our key forwards?
Only missed prelim by 3points!

So if our list is better now and we have a better coach then ratten, why are we struggling to make the 8 with a list a lot healthier than last years injury plaqued season.

People will say u gotta give mm time but when you have sanderson take the crows to top 4 and hinkley to top 8 this season after being a rabble last year, it just makes you expect a crack at the flag. Not praying for Essendon* to lose premiership points to make top 8.

Great win today, but a win is always expected against the tigers. Our list is better than there's when the team plays as team together.

9th place is a fail!! And not good enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
TC has finally been overrun by idiots


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:06 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Sugarcane wrote:
TC has finally been overrun by idiots


You're obviously waaaaaaay too patient

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4580
Location: Blisstonia.
BigBlueWave wrote:
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.


Without going over old ground sometimes things aren't as simplistic as wins/losses 2012 vs 2013, but when the likes of Connolly, Robinson and Walls are saying so, how can any of us battling keyboard boffins prove otherwise?

IF we were to win the last two, rather than saying that's 11 wins v 12, I could spin the numbers to suit the argument to say from Round 3 2012 to Round 3 2013 we went 8-14, from Round 3 2013 to Round 22 we will have gone 12-7. 36% winning record to 63%.

Significant improvement :thumbsup:

Not every case is the same. Everyone likes to compare us to other clubs that have changed coaches and had instant 'success'. I'm really not sure why, as every club is in a different situation to what we currently are in:

A few examples.

Port. Basket case to a good side. Not only changed the coach, but the President, High Performance Manager, board members, assistant coaches (yes Richardson), and had recently acquired Keith Thomas as a CEO. Good start, but no guarantee that will transform to the next couple of levels. Not sure they are a good example of comparing where we were/are at with a change of coach.

More comparable to our 2007 to 2008 transition.

Adelaide. Had a very good base for Sanderson to step into. Professional club that didn't need any sort of restructuring when he arrived. Neil Craig had a great reputation but the group had gone stale under him. Stable board, strong development program.

Matt Rendell had the reputation as one of the best recruiters in the business. Crouch, Sloane, Brown, Talia, Walker, Tippett, Kerridge, Lyons, Dangerfield, Smith, Grigg, Henderson etc etc are just a group of their recent draftees that have had an impact the last couple of years.

Soft draw, and injury free last year but clearly under performing this year. How much impact the coach had in both the last two years is hard to gauge.

Fremantle. Probably our closest example. 'Success' in 2010 by finally winning their won final, but a poor 2011 saw the end of Mark Harvey for Ross Lyon.

Many people felt sympathy for Harvey due to the amount of injuries the team had in 2011. Sound familiar?

First half of 2012 Lyon tried to inject a more defensive style to a team known for being exciting, but flaky. At times the team looked like they'd forgotten how to score hitting the 100 point mark on just 1 time in the first 15 rounds. The Dockers were 6-7 at Rnd 13, went on to win a final, and are now certainties for Top 4 in 2013.

It took a while, but after an over adjustment to begin with the Lyon style is now their trademark. Players were challenged and not all responded straight away.

A couple of examples.

Early in 2012 Michael Walters was banished back to train with his WAFL club due to not being able to meet the fitness standards set out by Lyon. He is now a possible All-Australian.

Nick Suban was subbed at half time in Round 4. When asked whats wrong Lyon. Was blunt. 'He hasn't touched it, clearly he's under pressure to keep his spot'. Suban is now one of their most hard running and important players.

Garrick Ibbotson who was flying in 2013 before suffering an injury was dropped in 2012. He sat on the sidelines, to watch his team mates get smashed in a Derby. Lyon told him he wasn't giving all he could. It was a turning point in his career.

Spurr, Mayne, Mzungu, Johnson have improved. Daniel Pearce more consistent than he was at Port etc...

On here Lyon would be chastised for criticising the players in public and making them sad or not getting the best of them by dropping them or making them the sub, or not getting instant results by having them go backwards before being able to move forwards......

Others such as Greg Broughton were moved on. Broughton was a stats machine, but obviously didn't suit Lyon's style. He hasn't been missed.

The relevant point to Carlton in 2013 is that some players get such a dramatic change straight away, some need some tough love and lessons, others know what is required but need time and perhaps another pre-season and then there are others that never will adapt......

Western Bulldogs made the finals in 2008-2010 won 9 games in 2011 and then changed coach. They won just 5 in 2012, and AT BEST 9 in 2013. Sakc McCartney? They are obviously going nowhere by everyone's win v wins logic!......

Less simplistic version is obviously that finishing this year by winning 5 or 6 from the last 8 or 9 with the group coming through is going to be a much better result than winning the same amount of games in 2011 with a group on the slide, or losing their last 11 in 2012.

Reality is that yesterday was just another game in a bigger picture.

Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:50 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 1122
Blueboy74 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.


Without going over old ground sometimes things aren't as simplistic as wins/losses 2012 vs 2013, but when the likes of Connolly, Robinson and Walls are saying so, how can any of us battling keyboard boffins prove otherwise?

IF we were to win the last two, rather than saying that's 11 wins v 12, I could spin the numbers to suit the argument to say from Round 3 2012 to Round 3 2013 we went 8-14, from Round 3 2013 to Round 22 we will have gone 12-7. 36% winning record to 63%.

Significant improvement :thumbsup:

Not every case is the same. Everyone likes to compare us to other clubs that have changed coaches and had instant 'success'. I'm really not sure why, as every club is in a different situation to what we currently are in:

A few examples.

Port. Basket case to a good side. Not only changed the coach, but the President, High Performance Manager, board members, assistant coaches (yes Richardson), and had recently acquired Keith Thomas as a CEO. Good start, but no guarantee that will transform to the next couple of levels. Not sure they are a good example of comparing where we were/are at with a change of coach.

More comparable to our 2007 to 2008 transition.

Adelaide. Had a very good base for Sanderson to step into. Professional club that didn't need any sort of restructuring when he arrived. Neil Craig had a great reputation but the group had gone stale under him. Stable board, strong development program.

Matt Rendell had the reputation as one of the best recruiters in the business. Crouch, Sloane, Brown, Talia, Walker, Tippett, Kerridge, Lyons, Dangerfield, Smith, Grigg, Henderson etc etc are just a group of their recent draftees that have had an impact the last couple of years.

Soft draw, and injury free last year but clearly under performing this year. How much impact the coach had in both the last two years is hard to gauge.

Fremantle. Probably our closest example. 'Success' in 2010 by finally winning their won final, but a poor 2011 saw the end of Mark Harvey for Ross Lyon.

Many people felt sympathy for Harvey due to the amount of injuries the team had in 2011. Sound familiar?

First half of 2012 Lyon tried to inject a more defensive style to a team known for being exciting, but flaky. At times the team looked like they'd forgotten how to score hitting the 100 point mark on just 1 time in the first 15 rounds. The Dockers were 6-7 at Rnd 13, went on to win a final, and are now certainties for Top 4 in 2013.

It took a while, but after an over adjustment to begin with the Lyon style is now their trademark. Players were challenged and not all responded straight away.

A couple of examples.

Early in 2012 Michael Walters was banished back to train with his WAFL club due to not being able to meet the fitness standards set out by Lyon. He is now a possible All-Australian.

Nick Suban was subbed at half time in Round 4. When asked whats wrong Lyon. Was blunt. 'He hasn't touched it, clearly he's under pressure to keep his spot'. Suban is now one of their most hard running and important players.

Garrick Ibbotson who was flying in 2013 before suffering an injury was dropped in 2012. He sat on the sidelines, to watch his team mates get smashed in a Derby. Lyon told him he wasn't giving all he could. It was a turning point in his career.

Spurr, Mayne, Mzungu, Johnson have improved. Daniel Pearce more consistent than he was at Port etc...

On here Lyon would be chastised for criticising the players in public and making them sad or not getting the best of them by dropping them or making them the sub, or not getting instant results by having them go backwards before being able to move forwards......

Others such as Greg Broughton were moved on. Broughton was a stats machine, but obviously didn't suit Lyon's style. He hasn't been missed.

The relevant point to Carlton in 2013 is that some players get such a dramatic change straight away, some need some tough love and lessons, others know what is required but need time and perhaps another pre-season and then there are others that never will adapt......

Western Bulldogs made the finals in 2008-2010 won 9 games in 2011 and then changed coach. They won just 5 in 2012, and AT BEST 9 in 2013. Sakc McCartney? They are obviously going nowhere by everyone's win v wins logic!......

Less simplistic version is obviously that finishing this year by winning 5 or 6 from the last 8 or 9 with the group coming through is going to be a much better result than winning the same amount of games in 2011 with a group on the slide, or losing their last 11 in 2012.

Reality is that yesterday was just another game in a bigger picture.

Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....

That, my friends, is a brilliantly accurate and measured post, and I could not agree more.
:clap: :thumbsup:

_________________
i AM CARLTON


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Well said Blueboy74


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Blueboy74 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.


Without going over old ground sometimes things aren't as simplistic as wins/losses 2012 vs 2013, but when the likes of Connolly, Robinson and Walls are saying so, how can any of us battling keyboard boffins prove otherwise?

IF we were to win the last two, rather than saying that's 11 wins v 12, I could spin the numbers to suit the argument to say from Round 3 2012 to Round 3 2013 we went 8-14, from Round 3 2013 to Round 22 we will have gone 12-7. 36% winning record to 63%.

Significant improvement :thumbsup:

Not every case is the same. Everyone likes to compare us to other clubs that have changed coaches and had instant 'success'. I'm really not sure why, as every club is in a different situation to what we currently are in:

A few examples.

Port. Basket case to a good side. Not only changed the coach, but the President, High Performance Manager, board members, assistant coaches (yes Richardson), and had recently acquired Keith Thomas as a CEO. Good start, but no guarantee that will transform to the next couple of levels. Not sure they are a good example of comparing where we were/are at with a change of coach.

More comparable to our 2007 to 2008 transition.

Adelaide. Had a very good base for Sanderson to step into. Professional club that didn't need any sort of restructuring when he arrived. Neil Craig had a great reputation but the group had gone stale under him. Stable board, strong development program.

Matt Rendell had the reputation as one of the best recruiters in the business. Crouch, Sloane, Brown, Talia, Walker, Tippett, Kerridge, Lyons, Dangerfield, Smith, Grigg, Henderson etc etc are just a group of their recent draftees that have had an impact the last couple of years.

Soft draw, and injury free last year but clearly under performing this year. How much impact the coach had in both the last two years is hard to gauge.

Fremantle. Probably our closest example. 'Success' in 2010 by finally winning their won final, but a poor 2011 saw the end of Mark Harvey for Ross Lyon.

Many people felt sympathy for Harvey due to the amount of injuries the team had in 2011. Sound familiar?

First half of 2012 Lyon tried to inject a more defensive style to a team known for being exciting, but flaky. At times the team looked like they'd forgotten how to score hitting the 100 point mark on just 1 time in the first 15 rounds. The Dockers were 6-7 at Rnd 13, went on to win a final, and are now certainties for Top 4 in 2013.

It took a while, but after an over adjustment to begin with the Lyon style is now their trademark. Players were challenged and not all responded straight away.

A couple of examples.

Early in 2012 Michael Walters was banished back to train with his WAFL club due to not being able to meet the fitness standards set out by Lyon. He is now a possible All-Australian.

Nick Suban was subbed at half time in Round 4. When asked whats wrong Lyon. Was blunt. 'He hasn't touched it, clearly he's under pressure to keep his spot'. Suban is now one of their most hard running and important players.

Garrick Ibbotson who was flying in 2013 before suffering an injury was dropped in 2012. He sat on the sidelines, to watch his team mates get smashed in a Derby. Lyon told him he wasn't giving all he could. It was a turning point in his career.

Spurr, Mayne, Mzungu, Johnson have improved. Daniel Pearce more consistent than he was at Port etc...

On here Lyon would be chastised for criticising the players in public and making them sad or not getting the best of them by dropping them or making them the sub, or not getting instant results by having them go backwards before being able to move forwards......

Others such as Greg Broughton were moved on. Broughton was a stats machine, but obviously didn't suit Lyon's style. He hasn't been missed.

The relevant point to Carlton in 2013 is that some players get such a dramatic change straight away, some need some tough love and lessons, others know what is required but need time and perhaps another pre-season and then there are others that never will adapt......

Western Bulldogs made the finals in 2008-2010 won 9 games in 2011 and then changed coach. They won just 5 in 2012, and AT BEST 9 in 2013. Sakc McCartney? They are obviously going nowhere by everyone's win v wins logic!......

Less simplistic version is obviously that finishing this year by winning 5 or 6 from the last 8 or 9 with the group coming through is going to be a much better result than winning the same amount of games in 2011 with a group on the slide, or losing their last 11 in 2012.

Reality is that yesterday was just another game in a bigger picture.

Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....

Epic, epic post that sums the whole thing up beautifully :beer: :beer: :clap: :clap: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Sadly, it will likely fall on deaf ears as many minds have already been made up.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
posts like blueboy's illustrate why it's better to read the free contributions of amateur enthusiasts than it is the paid semi-literate gruntings of the Herald Sun's 'chief football writer' and his mates.

and these guys want us to PAY to read their shit online? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
JohnM wrote:
posts like blueboy's illustrate why it's better to read the free contributions of amateur enthusiasts than it is the paid semi-literate gruntings of the Herald Sun's 'chief football writer' and his mates.

and these guys want us to PAY to read their shit online? :lol:

THIS. Put TC behind a paywall.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:49 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
diesel_85 wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.


Without going over old ground sometimes things aren't as simplistic as wins/losses 2012 vs 2013, but when the likes of Connolly, Robinson and Walls are saying so, how can any of us battling keyboard boffins prove otherwise?

IF we were to win the last two, rather than saying that's 11 wins v 12, I could spin the numbers to suit the argument to say from Round 3 2012 to Round 3 2013 we went 8-14, from Round 3 2013 to Round 22 we will have gone 12-7. 36% winning record to 63%.

Significant improvement :thumbsup:

Not every case is the same. Everyone likes to compare us to other clubs that have changed coaches and had instant 'success'. I'm really not sure why, as every club is in a different situation to what we currently are in:

A few examples.

Port. Basket case to a good side. Not only changed the coach, but the President, High Performance Manager, board members, assistant coaches (yes Richardson), and had recently acquired Keith Thomas as a CEO. Good start, but no guarantee that will transform to the next couple of levels. Not sure they are a good example of comparing where we were/are at with a change of coach.

More comparable to our 2007 to 2008 transition.

Adelaide. Had a very good base for Sanderson to step into. Professional club that didn't need any sort of restructuring when he arrived. Neil Craig had a great reputation but the group had gone stale under him. Stable board, strong development program.

Matt Rendell had the reputation as one of the best recruiters in the business. Crouch, Sloane, Brown, Talia, Walker, Tippett, Kerridge, Lyons, Dangerfield, Smith, Grigg, Henderson etc etc are just a group of their recent draftees that have had an impact the last couple of years.

Soft draw, and injury free last year but clearly under performing this year. How much impact the coach had in both the last two years is hard to gauge.

Fremantle. Probably our closest example. 'Success' in 2010 by finally winning their won final, but a poor 2011 saw the end of Mark Harvey for Ross Lyon.

Many people felt sympathy for Harvey due to the amount of injuries the team had in 2011. Sound familiar?

First half of 2012 Lyon tried to inject a more defensive style to a team known for being exciting, but flaky. At times the team looked like they'd forgotten how to score hitting the 100 point mark on just 1 time in the first 15 rounds. The Dockers were 6-7 at Rnd 13, went on to win a final, and are now certainties for Top 4 in 2013.

It took a while, but after an over adjustment to begin with the Lyon style is now their trademark. Players were challenged and not all responded straight away.

A couple of examples.

Early in 2012 Michael Walters was banished back to train with his WAFL club due to not being able to meet the fitness standards set out by Lyon. He is now a possible All-Australian.

Nick Suban was subbed at half time in Round 4. When asked whats wrong Lyon. Was blunt. 'He hasn't touched it, clearly he's under pressure to keep his spot'. Suban is now one of their most hard running and important players.

Garrick Ibbotson who was flying in 2013 before suffering an injury was dropped in 2012. He sat on the sidelines, to watch his team mates get smashed in a Derby. Lyon told him he wasn't giving all he could. It was a turning point in his career.

Spurr, Mayne, Mzungu, Johnson have improved. Daniel Pearce more consistent than he was at Port etc...

On here Lyon would be chastised for criticising the players in public and making them sad or not getting the best of them by dropping them or making them the sub, or not getting instant results by having them go backwards before being able to move forwards......

Others such as Greg Broughton were moved on. Broughton was a stats machine, but obviously didn't suit Lyon's style. He hasn't been missed.

The relevant point to Carlton in 2013 is that some players get such a dramatic change straight away, some need some tough love and lessons, others know what is required but need time and perhaps another pre-season and then there are others that never will adapt......

Western Bulldogs made the finals in 2008-2010 won 9 games in 2011 and then changed coach. They won just 5 in 2012, and AT BEST 9 in 2013. Sakc McCartney? They are obviously going nowhere by everyone's win v wins logic!......

Less simplistic version is obviously that finishing this year by winning 5 or 6 from the last 8 or 9 with the group coming through is going to be a much better result than winning the same amount of games in 2011 with a group on the slide, or losing their last 11 in 2012.

Reality is that yesterday was just another game in a bigger picture.

Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....

That, my friends, is a brilliantly accurate and measured post, and I could not agree more.
:clap: :thumbsup:


Too much logic for this place. :clap:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7275
MM will not be sakced anytime soon and I have a feeling this thread has run it's course and may be locked in the coming days.

If so, what a way to end it Blueboy74 :clap:

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Blueboy74 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
The power of MM is amazing ... 1 game of football and the season is forgiven ... lol

Let me remind you that we have still only won 10 games ... with some luck we might win 12.

1 more than last year with a superior team ... its laughable ... lol :thumbsup:

MM has really made a big mess ... At the selection table you just cringe every week.

But anyway ... if it give you hope ... good stuff.


Without going over old ground sometimes things aren't as simplistic as wins/losses 2012 vs 2013, but when the likes of Connolly, Robinson and Walls are saying so, how can any of us battling keyboard boffins prove otherwise?

IF we were to win the last two, rather than saying that's 11 wins v 12, I could spin the numbers to suit the argument to say from Round 3 2012 to Round 3 2013 we went 8-14, from Round 3 2013 to Round 22 we will have gone 12-7. 36% winning record to 63%.

Significant improvement :thumbsup:

Not every case is the same. Everyone likes to compare us to other clubs that have changed coaches and had instant 'success'. I'm really not sure why, as every club is in a different situation to what we currently are in:

A few examples.

Port. Basket case to a good side. Not only changed the coach, but the President, High Performance Manager, board members, assistant coaches (yes Richardson), and had recently acquired Keith Thomas as a CEO. Good start, but no guarantee that will transform to the next couple of levels. Not sure they are a good example of comparing where we were/are at with a change of coach.

More comparable to our 2007 to 2008 transition.

Adelaide. Had a very good base for Sanderson to step into. Professional club that didn't need any sort of restructuring when he arrived. Neil Craig had a great reputation but the group had gone stale under him. Stable board, strong development program.

Matt Rendell had the reputation as one of the best recruiters in the business. Crouch, Sloane, Brown, Talia, Walker, Tippett, Kerridge, Lyons, Dangerfield, Smith, Grigg, Henderson etc etc are just a group of their recent draftees that have had an impact the last couple of years.

Soft draw, and injury free last year but clearly under performing this year. How much impact the coach had in both the last two years is hard to gauge.

Fremantle. Probably our closest example. 'Success' in 2010 by finally winning their won final, but a poor 2011 saw the end of Mark Harvey for Ross Lyon.

Many people felt sympathy for Harvey due to the amount of injuries the team had in 2011. Sound familiar?

First half of 2012 Lyon tried to inject a more defensive style to a team known for being exciting, but flaky. At times the team looked like they'd forgotten how to score hitting the 100 point mark on just 1 time in the first 15 rounds. The Dockers were 6-7 at Rnd 13, went on to win a final, and are now certainties for Top 4 in 2013.

It took a while, but after an over adjustment to begin with the Lyon style is now their trademark. Players were challenged and not all responded straight away.

A couple of examples.

Early in 2012 Michael Walters was banished back to train with his WAFL club due to not being able to meet the fitness standards set out by Lyon. He is now a possible All-Australian.

Nick Suban was subbed at half time in Round 4. When asked whats wrong Lyon. Was blunt. 'He hasn't touched it, clearly he's under pressure to keep his spot'. Suban is now one of their most hard running and important players.

Garrick Ibbotson who was flying in 2013 before suffering an injury was dropped in 2012. He sat on the sidelines, to watch his team mates get smashed in a Derby. Lyon told him he wasn't giving all he could. It was a turning point in his career.

Spurr, Mayne, Mzungu, Johnson have improved. Daniel Pearce more consistent than he was at Port etc...

On here Lyon would be chastised for criticising the players in public and making them sad or not getting the best of them by dropping them or making them the sub, or not getting instant results by having them go backwards before being able to move forwards......

Others such as Greg Broughton were moved on. Broughton was a stats machine, but obviously didn't suit Lyon's style. He hasn't been missed.

The relevant point to Carlton in 2013 is that some players get such a dramatic change straight away, some need some tough love and lessons, others know what is required but need time and perhaps another pre-season and then there are others that never will adapt......

Western Bulldogs made the finals in 2008-2010 won 9 games in 2011 and then changed coach. They won just 5 in 2012, and AT BEST 9 in 2013. Sakc McCartney? They are obviously going nowhere by everyone's win v wins logic!......

Less simplistic version is obviously that finishing this year by winning 5 or 6 from the last 8 or 9 with the group coming through is going to be a much better result than winning the same amount of games in 2011 with a group on the slide, or losing their last 11 in 2012.

Reality is that yesterday was just another game in a bigger picture.

Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....


Waaaay too intelligent and thorough a post for this site - great work :donk:

In Mick I trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Trust, but verify.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
blueboy74 wrote:
Those of us that criticise the anti-MM crew, haven't 'won'. We tell them to wait, and see what happens over the next couple of years before judging so it would be hypocritical to suggest otherwise now a result has gone our way.....

Ultimately it will come down to wins vs wins, and ladder positions v ladder positions, but lets wait until the final siren to judge otherwise.....


Fair call bb74. By the end of 2015 we will be premiers or be a genuine realistic chance, or we won't and will face a long time as alsorans. Time will tell. I certainly don't want another coach sacked in contract, but I detest MM and think he and those that chose him deserve to be marked hard. If the committee were right with the appointment then MM will land us a flag by 2015, and I look forward to that, I guess you don't need to like the coach to like the team. Despite the good result yesterday, I can't imagine any Carlton supporter would have taken 9th, or even 8th this year as a good performance but if MM gets us a flag with this list and whatever we can add in the next two years then I won't cease to detest him (maybe I will a little bit) but I'll dips me lid to his coaching prowess, because that will be his best achievement in footy and will put him at the top of the list of quadruple flag coaches.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group