Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 6:04 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Blue Vain, you seriously think the current group of players can win a flag?

Take your meds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
chelodina wrote:
Blue Vain, you seriously think the current group of players can win a flag?

Take your meds


What are you on about? :lol:
I dont think we're anywhere near a premiership side with grandpa at the helm.
If you're going to take shots at me, at least try to place a hint of intelligence into it.

What I do know is this list has the ability to play finals if our players are anywhere near their best. Have a look through the team at the moment. Judd, Murphy, Carrazzo, Betts, Yarran, Warnock, Jamison, Garlett, Robinson, Gibbs etc
All playing well below their best at the moment. Some coming toward the latter part of their career, some just coming into their prime. Why are they not playing well?
Why are they shadows of the players they were 2 years ago?
The coaches role is to have as many players performing at their optimum as possible. Ours are nowhere near it. Posters here can throw them on the scrap heap but there are players in that list who have been multiple All Australians, coaches award winners, top 3 in the Brownlow. High level performers.
Why are they all playing poorly? Whats the common denominator?

Its Pagan all over again. A bloody minded attitude to make a list adapt to a coaches style instead of the coach assessing the list and developing a game style based on their strengths. Malthouses disciple, Mark Neeld did exactly the same at Melbourne and look where they are now.
Thats where the same bloody minded stupidity is sending us.
Enjoy the ride.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:10 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
To all you MM supporters that blame the lazy, weak, sooking, uninterested and uncoachable list.


He is there because his predecessor failed.


What the f!@# is he paid to do?

It's not up to the assistant coach's.
It's not up to leading teams.
It's not up to the president.

Just like your coach, it's everybody elses fault.

A sixty year old sook.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Can we please shut this thread down.
Its pathetic and Richmond like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I'm not a fan at all of our "process" for bringing him in. It reeked of complacency, laziness and a lack of professionalism.

But for me what it comes to is that Mick's our coach, and IMO should be given more than a season to prove what he can do. He should be given the chance to bring in the people he wants, and implement the strategies he wants.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:47 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Donstuie wrote:
I'm not a fan at all of our "process" for bringing him in. It reeked of complacency, laziness and a lack of professionalism.

But for me what it comes to is that Mick's our coach, and IMO should be given more than a season to prove what he can do. He should be given the chance to bring in the people he wants, and implement the strategies he wants.


Agree.

For me it has shown how ineffective we have been in so many areas over the past decade. Heads should role and changes need to be made because people who have been in charge of development, list management, recruiting haven't produced the results we need to be back at the top.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
redback wrote:
To all you MM supporters that blame the lazy, weak, sooking, uninterested and uncoachable list.


He is there because his predecessor failed.


What the f!@# is he paid to do?

It's not up to the assistant coach's.
It's not up to leading teams.
It's not up to the president.

Just like your coach, it's everybody elses fault.

A sixty year old sook.



no we always said it was up to the club
as coach ratten allowed a dark era of stupidity to fester
Look at the types of players we were using good picks on and trading for.

The game was changing and the Carlton brains-trust just couldnt see it.

The stolen years....

Now we must bottom out and start again... make no mistake!!!.. only StKilda and maybe Melbourne have a worse midfield going forward .....

And maybe not.. im not sure.. !!!
But we definitely are at the bottom of the pile when it comes to midfielders.

Can you tell me why?

Image

Some of the Carlton recruitment . development and footy dept staff... hard at work at their main job

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Synbad on Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:14 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
gerry atric wrote:
MM took a decade to get the Woods to a flag, backed by the richest footy department in the land. He has been a good and successful coach, as was Pagan with the most cash strapped club in the land, how did Dennis fare at Carlton? MM has been a good coach but he also has won one flag in 20 years, not a great strike rate. The problem is we chose him from a candidature of one. He will be there for two more seasons we will bottom out - again - and he can go and enjoy a very rich and bitter retirement, and if the stooges on the committee haven't changed we will continue to make shocking, poorly thought out decisions.

He was dragged out of retirement for reasons of bitterness ego and money. He has no interest in our club and is not desperately building a career. He thinks he knows it all, and is not interested in learning.

People quoting how he took a poor Collingwood side and fashioned them into a finals side that didn't win a flag in 2002 and didn't win a flag in 2003 are clutching at straws. It was a decade ago. How were the Roos travelling when Schimma got sacked after a 30 goal loss in a praccy match and Pagan took over? Not great, then Pagan made them a great side on the smell of an oily rag. That's ancient history in both cases. Ron Barrassi was a pretty good coach, maybe we should get him. He qualifies, he was a premiership coach and he is available. We are stuck with miserable Mick for three years. I am angry at our club for consistent bad decisions for many years, but I can't say I don't get some slight sense of enjoyment from a nasty ex Richmond player and collingwoood coach struggling, just wish he was struggling somewhere else.


Gerry, I normally enjoy your posts, but I have to comment on some of your MM gripes.

1. How can MM have been "dragged out of retirement" when he left C'wood on the back of being shafted by McGuire so that his beloved Bucks could get the gig? I stand corrected, but did he ever publicly declare he was retired? He was in the media one year before he was back coaching.

"Bitterness, ego and money" - just your opinion and here's mine. I've seen enough intensity from MM from the boundary and the box this year to strongly suggest he has his heart and mind well and truly in the right place to coach an AFL team. Jarad Waite will back this up.

2. The very fact that you've raised his days as a "nasty ex Richmond player" and being an "ex Collingwood" coach suggests that you're letting emotion get in the way of your normally balanced opinion.

Who could give a flower that he played for the Tiges and used to belt our lads back in the early 70's?? Was Parko a "Carlton lover" when he played? Hell, I was at Princes Park one day when an old lady threatened to jump the fence and assault him with her umbrella after he'd dealt harshly with one of ours. Barassi? Percy Bentley, an ex Richmond player and coach who crossed over and coached us to two flags back in the 40's?

Ironically, Pago grew up a Blues fan, need I say more. And, our gun coaching "alternative", Paul Roos, also grew up a Blues fan but I didn't see much love for us when he was coaching the Swans - he clearly enjoyed beating us more than most clubs, you only had to pick up his manner at pressers after our games.

Yes, this thread is getting Richmond like, it's scary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:32 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23911
Donstuie wrote:
I'm not a fan at all of our "process" for bringing him in. It reeked of complacency, laziness and a lack of professionalism.

But for me what it comes to is that Mick's our coach, and IMO should be given more than a season to prove what he can do. He should be given the chance to bring in the people he wants, and implement the strategies he wants.



DS, fwiw,I do agree with you.
Another season.
Too late to change what many of us didn't want.
I had to reluctantly concede that Ratts had his failings, despite the long injury list.
I don't see how he can solely be blamed for drafting deficiencies though.
Despite disliking many things about MM, I want him to succeed, because he is our bloody coach, or problem now.
So, I want to get behind him. he makes that incredibly hard this year.
My feeling is that he is quite poor at people management. Or, perhaps has no clue how to manage the introverted personality.
He strikes me as old school dictatorial type. not too flexible. I see Sando, and the warmth exuding between him and his players. We do not have that. I think MM is the 'favorites' kind of guy.
I suppose he will bring in players to fit his style, and we'll lose some to other clubs where I don't doubt they'll shine.
I wish we were a club where the highest potential is brought out in every player.
No evidence of that so far.
Completely happy to be won over, if we see that positive change next year.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:35 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
I just can't stomach that this bloke is at Carlton and he is giving me no reason to change that view.

Sakc him !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:37 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
99prelim wrote:
Effes wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
Even those people still wishing ratten was here would at best of got one more year out of him

He would of got the arse this year


You and many others don't seem to get it.

There are lots of us out there who didn't like the process in which Pagan was applied.

Didn't like Ratten being gifted it without real scrutiny - and to make it worse, surrounding him with a bunch of inexperienced assistants.

Then went and splashed the cash again on MM without any process, just so the board could say to the nuffy members 'look, we got the big name' (white knight complex again that this club is famous for). Even then still had to buy 5000 memberships (trying to get to the G).

A complete and utter shambles when it comes to coaching appointments.


What process did Sydney, Ess, Freo and Coll use? In fact, when have Coll ever gone through the process?

I understand your point and it's valid (particularly for the CFC who NEVER go through a process)
I'm also pissed off that it was sheer lazy governence to just throw money at an experienced coach rather than search harder
The bottom line, it's like any appointment - unless you can crystal ball into the future, its a risk.

IMHO, our list is the shambles, presided over by BR.
Is MM the best person to rebuild the list? I have no idea.
He's got 2 years. After that, we can tear him to shreds if the experiment fails


What's your definition of a "process"?

What I do know is Sydney, Geelong and Collingwood reviewed their football departments and made changes according to the findings of those reviews.
Sydney knew Roos was leaving and reviewed their coaching structure to see what changes would be required. They understood that their current structure was excellent and consequently Roos integrated Longmire into the senior role.

Geelong reviewed their football department and concluded that Thompson wasn't delegating responsibility to his assistant coaches and they needed additional "buy in" from their playing group. Hence the introduction of the Leading Teams philosophy into their coaching system.

Collingwood were similar. They reviewed the entire club and the football dept review recommended additional delegation to the assistant coaches and to bring Leading Teams in to address a poor culture that existed within the playing group. Both those recommendations spelt the end of Malthouses reign as he was adverse to both.

They're all processes. They are reviews of the football department to find the structure that gives the club the best opportunity to succeed. They then bought in or retained the best person to oversee that structure.

What was our process? What structure did we decide was the best one to take us forward?
None. The board were shitting themselves at the unrest with the membership so they tried to grab the best lifeline to buy themselves time.
Roos knocked them back so they offered Malthouse an offer he couldnt refuse.

What's worse, not only did they not have a comprehensive structure for him to come in and complement, they didnt have a @#$%&! clue of what one looked like.

So what was their process? Heres a million dollars Mick, come in and bring who you want, do what you want, act how you want, just bail us out for our ineptitude.
Wheres the accountability?

Process. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:49 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Player Ratings from Final siren. just as an objective measure (nowhere near perfect, but an index)

Players down from 2011

Murphy- 111 v 85 down 23%
Judd- 100 v 82 down 18% (end of career)
Gibbs- 105 v 90 down 14%
Betts- 69 v 57 down 17% (injured/suspended)
Yarran- 72 v 58 down 19%
Jamison 56 v 50 down 11%
Scotland- 99 v 82 down 17% (injured/end of career)
Warnock- 74 v 68 down 8%
Simpson- 95 v 83 down 13%
Robinson- 92 v 74 down 19%
Carrazzo- 92 v 63 down (32%) (injured and end of career)

Players about the same
Waite 72 v 71 (injured/end of career)
Garlett 72 v 73

Players that have improved
Brock Mclean 66 v 87 up 32%
Ed Curnow 72 v 76 up 5%
Walker 76 v 85 up 12%
aRMFIELD- 51 V 57 up 12%
Henderson- 52 v 72 up 39%
Tuohy 54 v 44 up 25%
Lucas- 70 v 59 up 19%
Cachia- 0 v 68

I think both Simpson's and Walker's numbers maybe anomalous because they are playing different roles this year, but the rest are about right.

Basically, you are concentrating on the Murphy's and Gibbs' in terms of your assessment, but others certainly have improved (but not enough to account for the drop in output from Murphy and Judd). The criticism of Malthouse should be about why he hasn't blooded more offensive midfielders.

This post may not show the 'intelligence' that you require, but it does deliver one objective measure for anyone to assess the coach.






Blue Vain wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Blue Vain, you seriously think the current group of players can win a flag?

Take your meds


What are you on about? :lol:
I dont think we're anywhere near a premiership side with grandpa at the helm.
If you're going to take shots at me, at least try to place a hint of intelligence into it.

What I do know is this list has the ability to play finals if our players are anywhere near their best. Have a look through the team at the moment. Judd, Murphy, Carrazzo, Betts, Yarran, Warnock, Jamison, Garlett, Robinson, Gibbs etc
All playing well below their best at the moment. Some coming toward the latter part of their career, some just coming into their prime. Why are they not playing well?
Why are they shadows of the players they were 2 years ago?
The coaches role is to have as many players performing at their optimum as possible. Ours are nowhere near it. Posters here can throw them on the scrap heap but there are players in that list who have been multiple All Australians, coaches award winners, top 3 in the Brownlow. High level performers.
Why are they all playing poorly? Whats the common denominator?

Its Pagan all over again. A bloody minded attitude to make a list adapt to a coaches style instead of the coach assessing the list and developing a game style based on their strengths. Malthouses disciple, Mark Neeld did exactly the same at Melbourne and look where they are now.
Thats where the same bloody minded stupidity is sending us.
Enjoy the ride.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Effes wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
Even those people still wishing ratten was here would at best of got one more year out of him

He would of got the arse this year


You and many others don't seem to get it.

There are lots of us out there who didn't like the process in which Pagan was applied.

Didn't like Ratten being gifted it without real scrutiny - and to make it worse, surrounding him with a bunch of inexperienced assistants.

Then went and splashed the cash again on MM without any process, just so the board could say to the nuffy members 'look, we got the big name' (white knight complex again that this club is famous for). Even then still had to buy 5000 memberships (trying to get to the G).

A complete and utter shambles when it comes to coaching appointments.


What process did Sydney, Ess, Freo and Coll use? In fact, when have Coll ever gone through the process?

I understand your point and it's valid (particularly for the CFC who NEVER go through a process)
I'm also pissed off that it was sheer lazy governence to just throw money at an experienced coach rather than search harder
The bottom line, it's like any appointment - unless you can crystal ball into the future, its a risk.

IMHO, our list is the shambles, presided over by BR.
Is MM the best person to rebuild the list? I have no idea.
He's got 2 years. After that, we can tear him to shreds if the experiment fails


What's your definition of a "process"?

What I do know is Sydney, Geelong and Collingwood reviewed their football departments and made changes according to the findings of those reviews.
Sydney knew Roos was leaving and reviewed their coaching structure to see what changes would be required. They understood that their current structure was excellent and consequently Roos integrated Longmire into the senior role.

Geelong reviewed their football department and concluded that Thompson wasn't delegating responsibility to his assistant coaches and they needed additional "buy in" from their playing group. Hence the introduction of the Leading Teams philosophy into their coaching system.

Collingwood were similar. They reviewed the entire club and the football dept review recommended additional delegation to the assistant coaches and to bring Leading Teams in to address a poor culture that existed within the playing group. Both those recommendations spelt the end of Malthouses reign as he was adverse to both.

They're all processes. They are reviews of the football department to find the structure that gives the club the best opportunity to succeed. They then bought in or retained the best person to oversee that structure.

What was our process? What structure did we decide was the best one to take us forward?
None. The board were shitting themselves at the unrest with the membership so they tried to grab the best lifeline to buy themselves time.
Roos knocked them back so they offered Malthouse an offer he couldnt refuse.

What's worse, not only did they not have a comprehensive structure for him to come in and complement, they didnt have a !@#$%& clue of what one looked like.

So what was their process? Heres a million dollars Mick, come in and bring who you want, do what you want, act how you want, just bail us out for our ineptitude.
Wheres the accountability?

Process. :lol:


yep it is probably the one competent person you want to come into a club and have carte blanche to do what they want at the footy club.

Time will tell if he is competent, but people are going to have to deal with it because no one is paying him out now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10376
Location: Coburg
Those saying its just the coach or just the players really are not getting it. Its a club that wins a flag sure the players get the hugs and the coach gets the CV but its the club - why is that? Cos it takes a whole club to win one of these flowers!

It is not Ratts per say

Not Mm per say

Not players per say

and certainly not Pagan per say

its a club a club that refuses to have a good hard @#$%&! look at itself and decide living in the past is done.

Not us we're Carlton @#$%&! the rest

and the rest laugh and say, "Carlton? [REDACTED]!"

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:23 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23911
dannyboy wrote:
Those saying its just the coach or just the players really are not getting it. Its a club that wins a flag sure the players get the hugs and the coach gets the CV but its the club - why is that? Cos it takes a whole club to win one of these !@#$%&!

It is not Ratts per say

Not Mm per say

Not players per say

and certainly not Pagan per say

its a club a club that refuses to have a good hard !@#$%& look at itself and decide living in the past is done.

Not us we're Carlton !@#$%& the rest

and the rest laugh and say, "Carlton? !@#$%&!"

yes!!

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
People need to get over what happened in 2011. That was 2 years ago.
Things fell apart for a reason. A gameplan with holes in it like Swiss Cheese, and a list full of downhill skiers and a dearth of key position talent.
This year was always going to be a wait and see year, particularly after Malthouse had a good look at our list over the pre season (you may have noticed the hosing down of expectations prior to the start of the season, as opposed to when he was first appointed).
I picked us to be between 6th-8th at best this year, and had some of those close losses in the first half of the year gone our way, this may have been the case.
Calling for the sacking of a coach after less then a year in charge is a total and utter joke. If this is happening this time next year, then I'd be concerned. Until then, we ll just have to wait and see.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Synbad wrote:
redback wrote:
To all you MM supporters that blame the lazy, weak, sooking, uninterested and uncoachable list.


He is there because his predecessor failed.


What the f!@# is he paid to do?

It's not up to the assistant coach's.
It's not up to leading teams.
It's not up to the president.

Just like your coach, it's everybody elses fault.

A sixty year old sook.



no we always said it was up to the club
as coach ratten allowed a dark era of stupidity to fester
Look at the types of players we were using good picks on and trading for.

The game was changing and the Carlton brains-trust just couldnt see it.

The stolen years....

Now we must bottom out and start again... make no mistake!!!.. only StKilda and maybe Melbourne have a worse midfield going forward .....

And maybe not.. im not sure.. !!!
But we definitely are at the bottom of the pile when it comes to midfielders.

Can you tell me why?

Image

Some of the Carlton recruitment . development and footy dept staff... hard at work at their main job




The midfielders are playing in the forward line and waiting for the taggers to win the ball and methodically and slowly bring it into the forward pocket.

When that fails and the opposition stream forward through the corridor at a good pace to an open forward line where our other mids (ball winners) are put under pressure to stop the onslaught and repel a Mick made game plan.

You’re right about one thing, we do have to rebuild now because tricky micky has destroyed the stability and sense of belonging of this playing group.

Why play for an old coote who degrades the very fabric of your ability.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
chelodina wrote:
yep it is probably the one competent person you want to come into a club and have carte blanche to do what they want at the footy club.

Time will tell if he is competent, but people are going to have to deal with it because no one is paying him out now.


Old school stupidity IMHO. This isnt a suburban football club with a turnover of 20 grand. It's an elite sporting organisation. You dont give one person "carte blanche" to do whatever he wants. Especially someone who was given the arse 12 months previous for the exact same thing.

You're right about 1 thing though. We'll have to deal with it because the flower who were responsibility for this farce aren't going to admit the error of their ways.

You know its laughable really. 10 years ago my company was a corporate sponsor of the club. I was invited into the club and taken in to meet Dick Pratt in the board room. There were "hangers on" and "coat tail pullers" hanging around telling me how the club was going somewhere and how we had changed our ways. They were talking innovation and upcoming success.
Those people were the "new blood" of the board. All thats happened is they've been indoctrinated into the apathy that exists in the board room or they've moved on.
Looking back, we're almost exactly where we were then. An over the hill autocrat bought in the carry the responsibility, a group of cashed up cheerleaders/board members fawning over the ex players on the board and a team of players being blamed because they cant turn an outdated gamestyle into chocolate cake.

Groundhog day, hey? What a pathetic waste of peoples time, money and emotional investment this administration has presided over. It makes me feel sick to look at our club at the moment.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10376
Location: Coburg
I agree BV our club smells.

I wish Fitzroy was still around, I think I'd go to their games for a few years.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Must agree BV after the match Saturday ,the bloody Edelstein article in the paper earlier and the continuing inertia and unwillingness or inability of club administration executive and board to work outside 1980s paradigm and the total lack of effort/care and hear of our playing group for the last umpteen years you do think why do I have such an emotional financial and time commitment to this mob as they are giving us NOTHING :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 199 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group