Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 1:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 262 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19232
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
A $1M offer to Cloke shows MM is also responsible for the state of the list.

The club are experts at paying out contracts before they expire - it could have been done with Joseph, Davies etc.

He has to take some responsibility for the shape of the list, as well as poor team selection - Rowe-Waite-Henderson. Rowe slow, Waite no VFL work. The 3 rucks against St Kilda.

Not blooding Graham when so many on this site say the midfield is screwed; we have a promising youngster in the VFL who has done more than enough to warrant a game. An attacking midfielder who makes good decisions and is a pretty good kick.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:40 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 424
To think we had the opportunity of drafting Cotchin, Selwood and Pendlebury. That's the modern competition for you, the drafting table is so important.

Realistically we haven't had the list in the last 5 years to take us to the top. It's looked good on paper at times, but the balance of mid-20's A Graders, top line veterans and solid kids just hasn't been here. That's why I'm happy with the result this year. Forces us into significant changes as opposed to finishing in the 3 to 6 range and thinking we are close.

Been said before but we have too many one dimensional midfielders, too many guys that that meet the dictionary definition of half-hearted (Jamo, Gibbs and Yarran for starters) and too many A Graders that are struggling for different reasons (Judd, Murphy and Betts).

What kills me is that our forwards rarely get separation going forward, whereas our backs struggle to keep close to their opponents. It is a classic Carlton trait of the last 10 years.

All we can hope for now is a significant rebuild and that we can contend in the couple of years after Gold Coast and GWS have been to the well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Sugarcane wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
Let's talk reality, we have gone backwards under mickey mouse. Not only that, players have gone backwards in development under him.
Only a couple have improved, this was worse than the gold coast loss last year, I'm suspending my AFL membership next season and expect our membership numbers to fall until he's gone. You can blame the board, president and the boot studder but malthouse makes the on field decisions and they have been shit from day 1


Look I don't know this for sure (but then neither do you), but for arguments sakes - and let me play devils advocate here - lets assume the reality is the list was felt to have hit their ceiling with fifth and Mick (and the club) thinks the list is too soft and too front runnig and so needs to develop a more defensive edge to go forward, and that's why we are playing Simpson down back and are playing more defensive in many other ways (young mids used as taggers, more defensive game plan) BUT the players, not all but a significant amount, are struggling with this change.

Where does that leave us? Abandon the plan or overhaul the list to find cattle that will toe the line?

I'm not in the inner sanctum so I don't know what's going on but I suspect it's something along these lines



OK, how about I play devils advocate as well.

We have a board that appointed a coach 5 years ago based upon the fact he was a Carlton person. No process other than appoint our mate.

5 years later we have a board under pressure who appoint a big name coach to take the pressure off themselves. No process again. (Remind you of Carlton circa 2002?) Synbad talks about Rattens coaching philosophy being about "give it to the champ". Well., the board's just done the same thing. Handballed the club to Malthouse and hoped like hell he will drag them out of the shit.
Unfortunately, Mick isnt in it for the right reasons. His motivation was to prove Collingwood wrong. He didnt give a rats arse about coaching us.
Even he knows his heart isnt in it.

The funny part is, Collingwood werent wrong. Buckley has given opportunities to many more kids than Mick was doing (Which apparently Mick was good at) :?
Collingwood took control from Mick because they could see the autocratic role is insufficient in successful clubs. They could see that progressive and successful clubs like Sydney and Geelong are moving away from our archaic recently introduced structure. (Give total control of an AFL club to 1 person!) :lol: And what's worse, Collingwood talked us into giving him the exact same role they'd sacked him from 12 months earlier. :lol:

You argument is laughable. Bring in a 60 year old man to try to implement an outdated game style and when the players cant make it a success, you get rid of all the players.
Your constant remarks about the players being weak and soft doesnt hold water. This team has been one of the best contested ball sides in the AFL for years.
Thats not an assumption like your rantings, its fact.
If the change in coaching has made that fall away, perhaps its the change in coaching that should take responsibility.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
99prelim wrote:
club29 wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:

Whose giving him a free pass?

I said be needs to take some heat for this loss and the players looking flat

But if you can't see the bigger picture then I can't help you

Look at the list

The fact this list have never done better than fifth

It's common sense really

How many players are either unskilled or soft? It's half the list !


If that is the measure it would have been a measure last off season when Mick decided to sit on his hands during trade week.

How he let us go into this year with our current list is a mystery. The whole football world knew where we were at except him.


So if you knew where we were at, why are you so shocked at where we find ourselves, wanting MM basically sacked?
Our list is close to the worst in the AFL (5 players tonight from the last 5 drafts FFFFFMMMMMDDD) It's basically made up of #1 picks and rookies FFS
Has MM over estimated our list...yeah probably...big flowering deal. His assessment of each player is now informed. From October, it becomes his side. Judge him next year
MM has experimented this year. Some things have worked, some haven't
He won't go anytime soon. You and some others can sook all summer about another year with the silver haired grumpy prick.
I'm not a disciple of his but I'll give him some time


I am not shocked.

It was clear this mix of players was not going to achieve anything a long time ago. The whole football world knew it but Malthouse.
He thought he could turn it around. Ego or just plain blind?? All it would take was "stars aligning".

Wasted last off season by not changing the mix. He will make the changes we all would have made last year this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
A telling quote from McCartney
Quote:
"We're just really happy for Granty. The number one thing, the way he's playing is a by-product of him growing up and accepting that when he's out on the field in a Western Bulldogs' jumper, you play a certain way.

**********

McCartney admits coaching Grant hasn't always been smooth sailing.

"I think we've had an interesting 18 months, Granty and I," McCartney said.

"I've got no doubt that this 12 months, and in particular, the last few months, the respect levels are very high, coach to player and player to coach. That's helped.

"We've had our good days and we've had our not so good days, coach to player, but he's coming out the other side. "

Sounds to me like someone who's been told to HTFU by his coach, and instead of sooking tried to get the most out of himself.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Donstuie wrote:
A telling quote from McCartney
Quote:
"We're just really happy for Granty. The number one thing, the way he's playing is a by-product of him growing up and accepting that when he's out on the field in a Western Bulldogs' jumper, you play a certain way.

**********

McCartney admits coaching Grant hasn't always been smooth sailing.

"I think we've had an interesting 18 months, Granty and I," McCartney said.

"I've got no doubt that this 12 months, and in particular, the last few months, the respect levels are very high, coach to player and player to coach. That's helped.

"We've had our good days and we've had our not so good days, coach to player, but he's coming out the other side. "

Sounds to me like someone who's been told to HTFU by his coach, and instead of sooking tried to get the most out of himself.



Did he announce it to the world 18 months ago that he needed topullhis finger out or was it done privately?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
The MM discussion is ludicrous. I have disagreed with his team selection but he has achieved alot this year. He has shown us that Judd made this list overachieve a few years back and injuries last year were no excuse. The list is not good enough.


Now the question that will define him, is what can he do about it. He must get every trade and every draft pick right this year and next year. This will be difficult.

He could be further advanced if he made some decisions last year. But the club and MM sat on their hands. Hence every decision he makes from now on is critical to his tenure at the club and us being a finals force within 2-3 years in the post-Judd era.

I think he will battle and the club's tolerance will be stretched. We will know a little bit more next year. A bottom four finish is likely, but if we have developing players that have shown glimpses in key positions then we are on the way.

If I were MM, I would target Thomas and the number 1 pick to get Boyd. I would also think about Watts as a HF flanker/wingman, but would not sell the house to get him.

The rest of the list decisions will take care if themselves after that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
redback wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
A telling quote from McCartney
Quote:
"We're just really happy for Granty. The number one thing, the way he's playing is a by-product of him growing up and accepting that when he's out on the field in a Western Bulldogs' jumper, you play a certain way.

**********

McCartney admits coaching Grant hasn't always been smooth sailing.

"I think we've had an interesting 18 months, Granty and I," McCartney said.

"I've got no doubt that this 12 months, and in particular, the last few months, the respect levels are very high, coach to player and player to coach. That's helped.

"We've had our good days and we've had our not so good days, coach to player, but he's coming out the other side. "

Sounds to me like someone who's been told to HTFU by his coach, and instead of sooking tried to get the most out of himself.



Did he announce it to the world 18 months ago that he needed topullhis finger out or was it done privately?

:eek:

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
redback wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
A telling quote from McCartney
Quote:
"We're just really happy for Granty. The number one thing, the way he's playing is a by-product of him growing up and accepting that when he's out on the field in a Western Bulldogs' jumper, you play a certain way.

**********

McCartney admits coaching Grant hasn't always been smooth sailing.

"I think we've had an interesting 18 months, Granty and I," McCartney said.

"I've got no doubt that this 12 months, and in particular, the last few months, the respect levels are very high, coach to player and player to coach. That's helped.

"We've had our good days and we've had our not so good days, coach to player, but he's coming out the other side. "

Sounds to me like someone who's been told to HTFU by his coach, and instead of sooking tried to get the most out of himself.



Did he announce it to the world 18 months ago that he needed topullhis finger out or was it done privately?

He's been mentioned in public forums quite a number of times if I recall.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
chelodina wrote:
The MM discussion is ludicrous. I have disagreed with his team selection but he has achieved alot this year. He has shown us that Judd made this list overachieve a few years back and injuries last year were no excuse. The list is not good enough.


Now the question that will define him, is what can he do about it. He must get every trade and every draft pick right this year and next year. This will be difficult.

He could be further advanced if he made some decisions last year. But the club and MM sat on their hands. Hence every decision he makes from now on is critical to his tenure at the club and us being a finals force within 2-3 years in the post-Judd era.

I think he will battle and the club's tolerance will be stretched. We will know a little bit more next year. A bottom four finish is likely, but if we have developing players that have shown glimpses in key positions then we are on the way.

If I were MM, I would target Thomas and the number 1 pick to get Boyd. I would also think about Watts as a HF flanker/wingman, but would not sell the house to get him.

The rest of the list decisions will take care if themselves after that

You lost me at malthouse has achieved alot this year

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Donstuie wrote:
redback wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
A telling quote from McCartney
Quote:
"We're just really happy for Granty. The number one thing, the way he's playing is a by-product of him growing up and accepting that when he's out on the field in a Western Bulldogs' jumper, you play a certain way.

**********

McCartney admits coaching Grant hasn't always been smooth sailing.

"I think we've had an interesting 18 months, Granty and I," McCartney said.

"I've got no doubt that this 12 months, and in particular, the last few months, the respect levels are very high, coach to player and player to coach. That's helped.

"We've had our good days and we've had our not so good days, coach to player, but he's coming out the other side. "

Sounds to me like someone who's been told to HTFU by his coach, and instead of sooking tried to get the most out of himself.



Did he announce it to the world 18 months ago that he needed topullhis finger out or was it done privately?

He's been mentioned in public forums quite a number of times if I recall.



Mentioned in forums and berated by your coach in public is a fare way separated on different sides of the spectrum I would have thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I think we differ on our take on what "berated in public" means

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4580
Location: Blisstonia.
Mick is an idiot for coming into the club and backing everyone in by not making mass changes to the list, but he is now also an idiot for suggesting publically that changes will be made which in turn has destroyed the morale.

I cant keep up any more.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:38 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Blueboy74 wrote:
Mick is an idiot for coming into the club and backing everyone in by not making mass changes to the list, but he is now also an idiot for suggesting publically that changes will be made which in turn has destroyed the morale.

I cant keep up any more.


No he's not. Tell me a coach who has taken over and made massive changes to the list they've inherited up front?

Everyone gets an opportunity to see if they are capable of playing his type of football. Now he has seen what we have in the reality of home and away games he has a baseline to make the appropriate changes.

Some people on this forum moan about MM publicly criticising players, yet another part of management change is not to come in and make sweeping changes immediately. See what the strengths and weaknesses are, then make the changes as required.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4747
What chance did we have with Cachia, Curnow, McLean, Judd, an unfit Murphy in the midfield. Shocked at that, we got slaughtered in the midfield and not one change for the whole game.. How is that good for development. Development would have been graham, bell, yarran, menzel etc through the midfield.

We had an unbalance team last night. Walker, Jammu, Simmo, Murphy, Gibbs - we got nothing from them.

Could have a least tried something different in the last quarter to try and win the game. Ie Gibbs in the midfield, or walker, or Simmo, or even touhy.

C'mon enough is enough...... Not happy.........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
nice try but no cigar (X 2)...Rex Hunt would have been disappointed
A bit like Carlton's list, I overrated your argumentative acumen

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4580
Location: Blisstonia.
King Kenny wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Mick is an idiot for coming into the club and backing everyone in by not making mass changes to the list, but he is now also an idiot for suggesting publically that changes will be made which in turn has destroyed the morale.

I cant keep up any more.


No he's not. Tell me a coach who has taken over and made massive changes to the list they've inherited up front?

Everyone gets an opportunity to see if they are capable of playing his type of football. Now he has seen what we have in the reality of home and away games he has a baseline to make the appropriate changes.

Some people on this forum moan about MM publicly criticising players, yet another part of management change is not to come in and make sweeping changes immediately. See what the strengths and weaknesses are, then make the changes as required.


You missed my sarcasm KK.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:56 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Blueboy74 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Mick is an idiot for coming into the club and backing everyone in by not making mass changes to the list, but he is now also an idiot for suggesting publically that changes will be made which in turn has destroyed the morale.

I cant keep up any more.


No he's not. Tell me a coach who has taken over and made massive changes to the list they've inherited up front?

Everyone gets an opportunity to see if they are capable of playing his type of football. Now he has seen what we have in the reality of home and away games he has a baseline to make the appropriate changes.

Some people on this forum moan about MM publicly criticising players, yet another part of management change is not to come in and make sweeping changes immediately. See what the strengths and weaknesses are, then make the changes as required.


You missed my sarcasm KK.


Emoticons Blueboy :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:02 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Can someone explain why for the second straight week, our oldest player I repeat our oldest player had the most disposals for the game?

The pressure is on & the players are failing just as they have in the past when up against a top 4 team or crunch game etc etc

Prima donnas!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:03 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Gab wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Missed krooz terribly today, he sets the agenda



Kreuzer is certainly a talented player ( that is to be expected from a number 1 draft pick) but honestly i fail to see how he sets any agenda, he puts in some very good performances but he is no leader at our club and that is one thing we really are crying out for, people with leadership qualities and a list of players who are willing to fight to win games not roll over when it all becomes too hard for them.

Unless we bring some people into the club who possess those qualities we will continue to go nowhere.


He sets the agenda, by how he plays. Hard at every contest, chases every opponent, doesn't shirk contact, doesn't stop trying no matter the score. He plays finals footy every game, winning or losing. And he does this from the very first bounce, he shelters and blocks for his mids, he taps the ball into space, his intensity shows the way. Agree or disagree with MM, he was right when he said krooz has nothing to prove, one of a few on our list you go to war with, next year will be in leadership group

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 262 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 106 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group