Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
trublu wrote:
Mick is very smart and calculated.
I know a part of his decisions not play a few players has to do with the money they are being paid compared to their lack of out put but.......
Playing the likes of Laidler, Duigan and Hampson would have probably won us a extra game or two but is that the result Mick really wants?
I believe the position we are in something Mick has set out to achieve. This means now most supporters can accept that we need a mini rebuild where as plugging a few holes with Laidler and Duigan would only continue the wrong path we've been on which clearly thinks isn't good enough.
Righhhht. So Mick is intentionally making us play shitfull to show the supporters how bad the list is.
This site is blessed to have such impeccable inside mail letting the supporters know exactly what makes this magnificent club and coaches tick..
BV Andy McKay happens to agree with it though.....
is it just MAlthouse??
Or is Andy McKAy too weak to do his job therefore shouldnt be there...
im not sure how McKay isnt being mentioned at all...
only at Carton would that be the case....
We keep hearing MM MM MM MM whatabout AM???
Whats his role???
It isnt about the people, its about the culture and the structure.
If we had a quality structure with accountability McKay may not be in the role, Ratten wouldnt have got the job and we wouldnt have appointed another coach until we knew the best way forward.
Malthouse is operating under the same system. People say "MM will sort it out", they're dreaming.
We need external people to come in, go through the club like a dose of salts and set up a structure that makes people accountable. We need best practice, not "Carlton swagger"
The review should have taken place mid last year at the latest.
Then they can appoint staff knowing what their roles and responsibilities are going forward.
We have lame duck assistants and average at best football staff. Why, because their is zero accountability. People are given responsibilities beyond their capabilities.
Why, because the people who are making the decisions are doing them on the run. Make it up as you go.
Without a full and comprehensive external review, nothing has or will change.
Posters say I'm against Malthouse. I'm actually against the process that appointed him. Or lack of process I should say.
Its wallpapering over the cracks with expensive wallpaper.
Login
Register
FAQ
), Hendo ( 
), Hawkins (F/S), Cloke (F/S), Waite (F/S), Tippett,
