bondiblue wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
Watching eagles rucks destroy hawks hopeless rucks shows how disappointing kruz is
I think most posters would be lying if they said they didn't expect Kreuzer to be dominating post 23yo.
I would be surprised if any poster says they didn't expect Kreuzer to be better as a ruckman and at marking thatn he is.
That doesn't suggest that Kreuzer is a dud as a footballer.
But I think more to the point maybe Bigred meant that NicNat (pick 2) and Cox (rookie) are miles ahead of our rucks Kreuzer (pick 1), Hampson (pick 17) and Warnock (pick 23).
Both Nic Nat and Cox have an allround game: tapping, marking, kicking, handballing, linking....none of ours have that.
That's pretty disappointing imo.
..dominating post 23?, fair chance he would have, if he didn't have a two and a half year ACL setback..
..in regards to rucking, he had 32 hitouts vs hawks, at 41% adv.. ..that's huge, and more than either cox or nicnat had.... ..in regards to marking, 2013 averages he's better than average, and is ahead of NicNat [though not as flashy].. ..Cox is very good, but he racks up good marking numbers more'so when playing 2nd ruck to Nicnat..
..Krooz has a very balanced and all-round game.. ..NicNat and Cox are a rare ruck combo that works well together week in, week out.. ..very few ruck combo's are as consistently good as cox and nicnat.. ..Krooz has Casboult as his back-up, a developing KPF and not a pure ruck, plus Bolt has to play a proper KPF role up fwd when not rucking, so he's carrying a big workload.. ..Cox wasnt as good earlier in the year when rucking mostly alone..
BKB
I'll breal up your post in 3 sections and there's threaa different viewpoints...
I guess you're saying Kreuzer would be better if....
Kreuzer is better than Cox and Noc Nat because....
Kreuzer doesn't share the ruck duties with anyone the quality of Nic Nat and Cox and for that reason.....
I like Kreuzer. I like his never say die attitude. He's a competitive beast. When the ball hits the ground he hunts it....yeah they are his attributes....now back to the ruck thingy.....I'm not an apoligist.
He couldn't jump before the ACL, he was never a marking machine.....not interested in excuses, more interested in the facts. The now and the future.
Given this is the Hawthorn game thread...I'll be relevant...Kreuzer was up against Bailey who was a good ruck, but is shit now having done 3 x ACL's ....and you're comparing Kreuzers numbers against him....gotta laugh.
..not a jumper of the nicnat, majak or hampson variety i agree, but more rucks jump like krooz than dont.. ..think of cox, jacobs, minson, jolly, mummy, etc etc.. ..none are jumpers.. ..you might get tall kpps that have big jumps like say Ryder that enable him to make up for lack of height with leap.. ..but otherwise most rucks dont get that high off the ground.. ..yes Krooz was never a leaper, but he's got his spring back, what he originally had.. ..just took a while to get it back post acl..
..thats right, Krooz was against Bailey, and the following week so were cox and nicnat, hence why another madew a comment saying how great they were vs hawks, and how krooz hasnt shown number 1 quality.. ..and so i said he got more hitouts than either of eagles rucks in games vs hawks, that his marks per game average is better than many of his talked up rivals, and that his hitout numbers and especially hit to adv percentages is very good..
..i think krooz's actual ruckwork is under-rated.. ..i can back up my comments with facts.. ..i9've posted plenty of numbers [facts] in the krooz player thread.. ..his hitout numbers, how his marks compare to other rucks etc etc.. ..factor in the acl setback, another fact that cant be ignored simply cos you dont want 'excuses'.. ..and he's doing very well.. ..is main flaw this season has been his goal kicking accuracy, which is better then it has been this year..