Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:54 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 594 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 30  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35883
Location: Half back flank
King Kenny wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
It will be interesting to see who they try and tag Walker with. He is the man at the moment and I think alot of thought will go into him. Good luck trying to keep up with him. :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


Kommer.




Punctuation was fine by me...

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
bondiblue wrote:
blueoutlaw wrote:
Doc Larkins said on channel seven that he thinks judd might miss next week???



Doc Larkins is a know it all. Truly shits me.
What does he know about Judd?
Judd was expected to be ready for GWS and by his own admission Judd wasn't quite right according to MM.
Why does that make it a 2 week lay off?

I bet Judd plays against the Bumbers.

See Yarran v Aints

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
CK95 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
It will be interesting to see who they try and tag Walker with. He is the man at the moment and I think alot of thought will go into him. Good luck trying to keep up with him. :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


Kommer.




Punctuation was fine by me...


:yikes:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:56 am
Posts: 27
warnock's previous game included 1 possession, which was a kick out of a pack that went backwards. he didn't have a single touch other than that and no marks. i can't even recall him getting to a marking contest. we lost the centre clearances 13 - 11. he offers absolutely no value. it would be like going into the match with one player down. i would rather have hampson in - at least he gets to contests. i felt relieved that warnock was out injured this week, to give kruezer the chance to dominate in the middle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:59 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
if Warnock was playing at another club, and returning those stats each game, we'd be laughing ourselves silly, fact. needs more strings to his bow, as Malthouse is demanding of everyone.

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
true_blue3 wrote:
it will never happen but i wonder how we would go if we were to try kreuzer at chb, warnock in the ruck and hendo at chf....


You're not the Lone Ranger on this. He was quite ok when he played CHB v Saints after 1/2 time. Surely if Rutten can be such an effective back, why can't Krooze? A few around here see him as a midfielder, so I reckon he'd have the flexibility and smarts for it. I'd love them to try it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
ThePsychologist wrote:
Curnow on Watson and Armfield on Stanton.

Shut them down and its all over.



I'd put Armfield on Hibberd. He really is a key for them...in form and uses the ball well

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Hornet wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
blueoutlaw wrote:
Doc Larkins said on channel seven that he thinks judd might miss next week???



Doc Larkins is a know it all. Truly shits me.
What does he know about Judd?
Judd was expected to be ready for GWS and by his own admission Judd wasn't quite right according to MM.
Why does that make it a 2 week lay off?

I bet Judd plays against the Bumbers.

See Yarran v Aints



You're assuming Judd had a sore hammy in the first place

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 2:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Hornet wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
blueoutlaw wrote:
Doc Larkins said on channel seven that he thinks judd might miss next week???



Doc Larkins is a know it all. Truly shits me.
What does he know about Judd?
Judd was expected to be ready for GWS and by his own admission Judd wasn't quite right according to MM.
Why does that make it a 2 week lay off?

I bet Judd plays against the Bumbers.

See Yarran v Aints



You're assuming Judd had a sore hammy in the first place

I am... people here bagging the Doc but he can only go by what the club has said

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25189
Location: Bondi Beach
Hornet wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Hornet wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
blueoutlaw wrote:
Doc Larkins said on channel seven that he thinks judd might miss next week???



Doc Larkins is a know it all. Truly shits me.
What does he know about Judd?
Judd was expected to be ready for GWS and by his own admission Judd wasn't quite right according to MM.
Why does that make it a 2 week lay off?

I bet Judd plays against the Bumbers.

See Yarran v Aints



You're assuming Judd had a sore hammy in the first place

I am... people here bagging the Doc but he can only go by what the club has said


I don't think he bases much on what the club says. His is basically guess work.
He isn't Yarran's nor Judd's physician, let alone have any inkling what the prognosis is from the player or club.
He's guessing and basing on what the injury is perceived to be as is with any spectator at the ground.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: perth
Blues Clues wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
it will never happen but i wonder how we would go if we were to try kreuzer at chb, warnock in the ruck and hendo at chf....


You're not the Lone Ranger on this. He was quite ok when he played CHB v Saints after 1/2 time. Surely if Rutten can be such an effective back, why can't Krooze? A few around here see him as a midfielder, so I reckon he'd have the flexibility and smarts for it. I'd love them to try it.


Not agile or quick enough. He has the strangest posture. A hunched back and a high butt. Almost looks like a cyclist out there, which I know he enjoys.

He gets no power through his core and legs. Gets pushed around and it effects his acceleration and lateral movement. It does allow him to get down low for his great pickups, but his body just doesn't have natural fluidity of motion. As opposed to someone like Nathan Vardy. Similar height and weight but different body proportions. It affects his ability to run jump and overall strength. It's why he could never be a KPP long term. Just doesn't have the athleticism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
King Kenny wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Curnow on Watson and Armfield on Stanton.

Shut them down and its all over.


I'd have Cachia on Watson, good learning curve.

Curnow has the endurance for Stanton.


I agree. Although if Carrazzo's ready, he takes Cachia's place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:11 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
bondiblue wrote:
Bettsy can also play in the midfield.


He sure can. But I reckon Garlett's more likely to for fitness reasons. Garlett was fantastic the couple of times he started in the centre square yesterday. He was one of the few who could actually get it out for us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Stefchook wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Curnow on Watson and Armfield on Stanton.

Shut them down and its all over.


I'd have Cachia on Watson, good learning curve.

Curnow has the endurance for Stanton.


I agree. Although if Carrazzo's ready, he takes Cachia's place.


he's missed a substantial number of weeks, may not have the req match fitness. would have probably needed to play yesterday to be able to reliably see out that role.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
SurreyBlue wrote:
Warnock is our best tap ruckman. He should be straight back in next week.


Does SFA after that. Out!

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
club29 wrote:
dane wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
recent games as in 3 out of the last 4 when we have smashed them?


:lol: :lol:

can't spell lose either.


Go back further and they have beaten twice in the last 7 times we have played them. :grin:


don't know where you guys are looking back if you go back till 2006 you'll see that we've had 4 loses and a draw when we play them early in the season.........


Totz soz bout the speling mistaces two

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Cazzesman wrote:
It will be interesting to see who they try and tag Walker with. He is the man at the moment and I think alot of thought will go into him. Good luck trying to keep up with him. :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


Jobe's Dad mentioned that in the commentary yesterday. Something along the lines of "Will be interesting to see how much time Essendon* put into Walker next week".

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
99prelim wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Warnock is our best tap ruckman. He should be straight back in next week.


Does SFA after that. Out!


+1

I've been on Warnocks back lately...nothing personal, just don't think he adds any value whatsoever to the team apart from hitouts.

Why not give Hammer an extended run as no 1 ruck???
He would offer lots more around the ground, can jump and has a bit of mongrel in him. Something Warnock lacks.

Hammer and Kruez could alternate in the ruck, leave Casboult up fwd with Waite

On another matter.....that Saints loss could come back to bite us. They are truly crap!!! :cry: :cry:

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Mark J wrote:
[q

On another matter.....that Saints loss could come back to bite us. They are truly crap!!! :cry: :cry:

yes but as marc murphy said... were not taking them lightly...

i did watch that on telly(north).. had my slippers on ....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Blueboy74 wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
It will be interesting to see who they try and tag Walker with. He is the man at the moment and I think alot of thought will go into him. Good luck trying to keep up with him. :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


Jobe's Dad mentioned that in the commentary yesterday. Something along the lines of "Will be interesting to see how much time Essendon* put into Walker next week".



Luckily Lonergan won't be there to clean him up

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 594 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 30  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dingo blue, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group