Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 442 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
I'm over the love for Casboult on here...some think he's Lockett

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Those suggesting we should make Waite languish in the 2's this week must think our administration are stupid (and I admit that sometimes it looks that way).

If you wanted Waite out for 2 weeks you challenge the MRP ruling ( 2 weeks and 50 carry-over points). If we win, he gets no suspension and no carryover points.

We accepted the penalty so he got 1 week suspension and 87.5 carry-over points. Now you want us to leave him in the seconds, thus making his penalty (virtually) 2 matches and 87.5 points.

Sorry, but you have no idea.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Or the club saves $$$ on a lawyer to defend Waite, and make a bigger statement by saying that we could have argued the charge. But we won't. You'll take the two weeks and like it. Put a dent in the psyche that thinks he's above the same rules the other team members abide by, because he's indispensable to the side.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
You don't think we can find a lawyer (probably a SC) to defend one of our players for nothing?

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
kkk wrote:
You don't think we can find a lawyer (probably a SC) to defend one of our players for nothing?



Lionel Hutz barracks for Carlton?

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:39 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9798
Location: Australia
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm over the love for Casboult on here...some think he's Lockett


No, but he is a better key forward than Hampson, even if that isn't saying much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
kkk wrote:
You don't think we can find a lawyer (probably a SC) to defend one of our players for nothing?


I refer you to the record of the one we normally use pro bono...

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:42 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9798
Location: Australia
kkk wrote:
Those suggesting we should make Waite languish in the 2's this week must think our administration are stupid (and I admit that sometimes it looks that way).

If you wanted Waite out for 2 weeks you challenge the MRP ruling ( 2 weeks and 50 carry-over points). If we win, he gets no suspension and no carryover points.

We accepted the penalty so he got 1 week suspension and 87.5 carry-over points. Now you want us to leave him in the seconds, thus making his penalty (virtually) 2 matches and 87.5 points.

Sorry, but you have no idea.


The point is the difference between Waite being judged by the tribunal vs being judged by his teammates and peers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:43 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Probably a bit late to be trying to teach Waite lessons about responsibility. He's 30 years old and is what he is. If making him wait was used to set an example for the rest of the playing group that selfish behaviour onfield will no longer be tolerated I'd be all for it. Would need to be accompanied by increased expectations from the rest of them though or it's a pointless exercise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
sinbagger wrote:
kkk wrote:
Those suggesting we should make Waite languish in the 2's this week must think our administration are stupid (and I admit that sometimes it looks that way).

If you wanted Waite out for 2 weeks you challenge the MRP ruling ( 2 weeks and 50 carry-over points). If we win, he gets no suspension and no carryover points.

We accepted the penalty so he got 1 week suspension and 87.5 carry-over points. Now you want us to leave him in the seconds, thus making his penalty (virtually) 2 matches and 87.5 points.

Sorry, but you have no idea.


The point is the difference between Waite being judged by the tribunal vs being judged by his teammates and peers.


And possibly being available in a big game (maybe a final, unlikely perhaps but maybe a Grand Final, or a game that might get us into the finals) or being suspended.

If he so much as farts with 87.5 points carry-over he'll get 2 games, with 50 points he'll get off with 1.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:58 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
So we're quibbling over whether Waite will be one or two weeks away in the future, hypothetically?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 12:07 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9798
Location: Australia
kkk wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
kkk wrote:
Those suggesting we should make Waite languish in the 2's this week must think our administration are stupid (and I admit that sometimes it looks that way).

If you wanted Waite out for 2 weeks you challenge the MRP ruling ( 2 weeks and 50 carry-over points). If we win, he gets no suspension and no carryover points.

We accepted the penalty so he got 1 week suspension and 87.5 carry-over points. Now you want us to leave him in the seconds, thus making his penalty (virtually) 2 matches and 87.5 points.

Sorry, but you have no idea.


The point is the difference between Waite being judged by the tribunal vs being judged by his teammates and peers.


And possibly being available in a big game (maybe a final, unlikely perhaps but maybe a Grand Final, or a game that might get us into the finals) or being suspended.

If he so much as farts with 87.5 points carry-over he'll get 2 games, with 50 points he'll get off with 1.


We'll never make that 'big game' until we change our culture, and that comes from a strong playing group controlling their own and setting examples, not palming off team discipline to the tribunal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 12:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Attention to detail, Rhino.

Probably never happen but 1 per cent chance it might.

Why risk it?

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 12:20 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9059
Location: Melbourne
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
To everyone who seems to think Waite should have been left out by the leadership group this week I ask you,

Has any team, coach, leadership group EVER imposed an extra week(s) ban for a suspended player in addition to that handed down by the tribunal?

And it doesn't count if it's a fringe player.
This is by far our best key forward in a team that is absolutely screaming for a key forward.
A guy that many believe to be the most important to our team, if not at least in the top 5.


Essendon* last week with Ryder?


I've already been over this, but i'll repost:

Gumbleton had kick 9 goals and 22 marks from his 3 games prior to Ryder not getting selected. He was in great form and didn't deserve to be dropped.

You seen anyone in the key forward ranks racking up those kind of stats for us lately?
They didn't need to bring Ryder back because they have key forward options coming out their ears.
We... Do not.

I'm sure if we had a couple of key forwards playing too well to drop we'd gladly leave Waite out for a week :thumbsup:

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 12:54 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm over the love for Casboult on here...some think he's Lockett


Nah he's not but he provides a contest, can take strong packs marks, crashes them when he doesn't and generally puts in an honest effort, something the guy wearing number 22 hasn't managed to do in 60 odd games. MM stated last Sunday that if Kruz didn't come up Monday then Casbault would be in... Strange that he didn't pick him in the squad this week.

If we play 3 ruckmen again this week it's going to be tough for me to will myself to this game, If I want predictability I can get that by switching on the TV.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
as a matter of interest, what position has cornes been playing of late?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 7:09 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
The Rhino wrote:
Mitchell?

The same Luke Mitchell's who's played one decent game all year?


Wouldn't need to do much to perform at the level of Hampson at AFL level. I'm sure if he was given 60 games he would clearly surpass anything Hammer has produced also.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 7:37 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Cazzesman wrote:
I think a few are confused about the cause and affect here.

Continue to play poorly and it doesn't work.
Play well and it probably works because it can stretch the defense and stop Waite being double teamed.

The reason the 3 tall's is not working is because only Warnock is contributing at the moment and that is only in the ruck, not around the ground. If the other two can pull their weight, takes some marks and kick some goals then the 3 tall's can work.

It is same with having the 8 onballers. If 80% off them struggle, as they are, then does that mean 8 onballers doesn't work and we should only have 5?

If each players lifts and the team lifts as a cohesive unit, then all might be right with the world.

Regards Cazzesman


You are seriously taking the p!ss.

It's not three TALLS its three RUCKMAN. You need only one. It is a specialist position.

Ruckman aren't forwards or backs or anything else. Up forward they don't move to the right spots are poor below their feet, average contested marks and virtually not existent defensively.

NONE of our 3 Ruckman can play anywhere else but Ruck effectively and for long periods.

The problem is we are having Ruckman fill positions they will NEVER be any good at and it stifles so much flexibility and rotations.

As people like Leigh Mathews and Paul Roos stated during the week it doesnt work and never has.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 8:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
kkk wrote:
You don't think we can find a lawyer (probably a SC) to defend one of our players for nothing?

simon wilson!!!.... he would have made sure waite gets 4

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 8:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Waite's incident was minor. That in itself was challenge-able.
But him getting off for kicking the Richmond players nuts 2 years ago and the bump last year meant he wasn't getting off, even for a meaningless head tap.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 442 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], GWS, Humpers, keogh and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group