Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 1:00 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:21 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
At the expense of all this rhetoric it is only 7 games into the season. Perhaps a few more games before MM gets the sack?

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Its not a sprint!!!
He needs to get the fundamentals right!!!... he always said this group is a bunch of introverts... im sure he sees this as more important to deal wit h than any gameplan...

He will deal with it!!1... make no mistake!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35705
Location: Half back flank
Synbad wrote:
He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.



Sounds like something from the bible :lol:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
CK95 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.



Sounds like something from the bible :lol:


:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
CK95 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.



Sounds like something from the bible :lol:

:wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16816
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.



Sounds like something from the bible :lol:

:wink:


Synbad's .......

Image

Regards Cazzesman :wink:

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:41 pm
Posts: 952
Location: way, way, way out the Outback
Synbad wrote:
Oh and you guys are totally missing the point...!!!

Mick Malthouse has been appointed to get results over 3 seasons...not 10 weeks..!!!


We were talking about this today down at the local waterhole.

IMO, I cant see MM getting results in 3 seasons, and if so
will MM call it quits after is contract by stating, "This rabble can't be coached"

or

Will he continue beyond 3 seasons to achieve what he set out to do??

_________________
BRING BACK PERFORMANCE BASE PAYMENTS !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:20 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Outback Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Oh and you guys are totally missing the point...!!!

Mick Malthouse has been appointed to get results over 3 seasons...not 10 weeks..!!!


We were talking about this today down at the local waterhole.

IMO, I cant see MM getting results in 3 seasons, and if so
will MM call it quits after is contract by stating, "This rabble can't be coached"

or

Will he continue beyond 3 seasons to achieve what he set out to do??


I believe at worst MM will leave a new culture behind that will see Carlton emerge as a challenger for many years.

Think Barassi at Sydney.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Outback Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Oh and you guys are totally missing the point...!!!

Mick Malthouse has been appointed to get results over 3 seasons...not 10 weeks..!!!


We were talking about this today down at the local waterhole.

IMO, I cant see MM getting results in 3 seasons, and if so
will MM call it quits after is contract by stating, "This rabble can't be coached"

or

Will he continue beyond 3 seasons to achieve what he set out to do??

i reckon he will turn us around

if he doesnt... well he will call it quits me thinks.

he isnt a young man ... and there wll be signs he isnt going anywhere.. the board will have to achnowledge a new direction is needed.

he has 3 years...

i think youll see the fruits of it starting this year and next year more obvious

now why doesnt he rate laidler bell and duigan?

duigan too slow and gets turned inside out too easily and fumbles

laidler isnt his self.. anyone who has watched him in the reserves would know he is slower than before

bell just isnt fit enough for AFL footy .. maybe his fitness base has gone up the last month but when i saw him he was miles off running out a game in the AFL... he was strugging to run in the bullants

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Synbad wrote:
redback wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Micks walked into a playing group.
He wants to see what he has here.
He is giving our will give everything and everyone a go.

Yes! Including Watson. He tells them all they're nice and good. That they can play.
That they are in his plans.....

There is nothing not logical about what he has done and doing. He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.

You don't understand this or you are pretending?
Answer the question grasshopper.....

He wouldn't know Davis or Joseph's personality and inner being if he tripped over them.

Carlton is an unusual animal in what he has inherited.
Nobody doubts we have some talent even if is out of wack!
What is mystifying is the collective mindset and culture... As well as all the individual idiosyncratic make up of the players.

Ate you following grasshopper?

I should hold tutorials for the slower ones here.... For a fee of course! Line up.

Rattz had them for five years and six games and didn't understand them... and they were his very own creation. He built the team. Many know no other coach.
Five years and six games is an awful long time to understand what you are building.
You achnowledge this yes?

Or is your answer no?


Hold whatever you need but don’t shake it too much.
Just like your logic of smashing St kilda.
How did that go?
Please spare my your amateur psychological crap and spin it somewhere else.

You wanted leadership you got leadership.
He needs to lead and stop passing blame.

Promises the world to get support then back tracks, should be a politician but that would only hurt his hip pocket and incur some scrutiny.
Sheedy could very well be right. The only reason I thought he would have been good for us was to instil some discipline and standard but he has failed every hurdle he has come up against thus far, and don’t even get me started with the way he went about picking our next captain.
How about protecting your new captain the one you picked for our future?
If your players are too stupid to think about it or act on it it’s up to the coach to bring it to their attention.
Oh that’s right he’s building their characters.
He chastises a player that’s not on the ground and blames him for the loss but not for his selections or taking hurt players into the game.
What a leader what a coach.
Maybe after we tank a few times he can build a list he’s “ able” to coach until that time enjoy the ride and process obi wan.


As an only child which i assume you are... you do not understand leadership...

How does leadership grow if the coach is involved in everything?
If he directs everything... LEadership also happens on the ground.. in the heat of the battle...!!!
Which is where we are so often found lacking!!!
Its also up to the players to grow some cohones

We had leadership people come and talk to us... problem is ... there is no leadership from Sticks and Ratten...
So they have learnt nothing!!!

How do i know there is no leadership from Ratts and Sticks in the past?
Well they have been unaccountable...
Sticks stays on ... not taking any responsibility in where were at.. and his appointments and st uff ups.
Ratten blamed Journeyman Curnow and in another instance Hampson for losses.. he never ut his hand up.
He spoke about kind of lines in the sand.

Were a very mollycoddled club at Carlton.. and MM is seen stupidly by some people as an outsider... he needs these players to stand up and take some responsibility themselves and of course up the standards.

His first year his hands are tied.. he will not try to rock the unique culture and special set of circumstances we have craeted or ourselves.

End of year things will change.. when he is accustomed to what is there .. and theyre accustomed to him more.

Surrey must be another only child too i assume?
Before we get upset about my wild guessed.. i think you initiated discussion in your all your wisedom of Solomon.. that you display before us time and time again... attempting to prove to us that you indeed are a visionary of sorts and understand the goings on at the club??

You impress me i must say...in that you have very little grasp in what we have before us currenty.. and where were at.

Of course i know what we should have done to StKilda... in order to not have repeats time and time again of clubs thining they can spoil our party.

As for psychology.. i did study it *abit*.. i dropped out cos of the huge aount of statsistics involved.. but i can assure you the theory bit i was pretty good at.... the stats got me...

Never good at stats ....i wont lie i am no great Ratten type of mathematician...

But i do have a very good understanding of what makes people tick.. i reckon i have you pegged out...!!! :thumbsup:


You should have finished your studies then you might know when to stop waffling on and make a factual statement or at least an intelligent observation.

Just like a chicken in a hen house clucking all day and going around in circles.
No were else to go and nothing new to say.

You can’t make a leader in 2 weeks or 2 years but you can lead them.
That is the reason Malthouse was hired.

We needed a strong and knowledgeable coach to take charge so he could instil some discipline, fear and knowledge into or mentally fragile group so they would follow him. Selwood, Hodge and so on weren’t born leaders they were made leaders by having strong role models around them and growing into great leaders that the rest will follow.
Yes they need to grow but because we haven’t got much leadership on the ground it needs to start off the ground and that means Malthouse. Just like spoilt children he needs to enforce boundaries, hand out punishment and impart wisdom.

I doubt stats got you I think it was manila at La Trobe.
Dropping out didn’t help you in your objective analysis much either I see.

Anyway I’m bored with your inadequate hypothesis and limited mind set again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:39 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
bondiblue wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..don't know about the off-field part of it all, but on-field players like Army, Hendo, McLean, Krooz,, these are the players with leadership in game



McLean and Krooz??? Can't see it.

Krooz is great using his body as a battering ram when the ball is on the ground, but doesn't speak (hence the nic name Humphrey).

Brock likes to peel away from the pack and spread to receive the next pass. Isn't he suppose to be in and under hard ball get? When he does get the hard ball, like Simmo, he dives on it and tries to hold it in, iunvaraibly having a free paid against him. He too doesn't say much.


..Krooz got nick-named Humphrey early on cos he was quiet, but he's been 'the tractor' for years now.. ..less so on field, but training you'd see him talking to some of the younger recruits.. ..on field, the way he blocks, the way he's willing to sacrifice his own game for team mates.. ..the way he runs hard both ways.. ..the way he'll chase an opposition runner all down the ground, and run by his smaller faster team mates shows dedication to the team cause.. ..he plays with leadership..

..Brock puts his body on the lines every time, he runs hard to spread and doesnt stay flat footed.. ..he blocks, he helps out team mates being worked over.. ....he doesnt drop his head and drop work ethic when things arent going his way.. .... ..with a career on the line he got it back on track.. ..he changed his attitude and won back the respect of his team.. ..he played his medicine of ressies games to win his way back..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
WOW wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
rhys87 wrote:

Kreuzer is when he is 100%....lifts when it matters in games.



When was the last time he was 100% and how long did that last?


When did he actually lift and win us games. If he has they have been sparse in number. Nowhere near a match winner. Disappointing for a number one draft pick and an important part of our next premiership tilt.



..sure, he re-injured himself early this year.. ..but first games in he was super fit, it was always going to take him a while to recover from that ACL, and playing him for the majority of last season with a torn meniscus wasn't exactly smart player management either.. ..but, up until he did his acl in his 3rd season, he missed only a few games.. ..great effort for a ruck recruit, even at pick 1.. ..a break down..

2008 - after missing the first few games of the season in recovery from op., he played the full season, earned wide respect and admiration for his game.. ..won us that port game off his boot in the last Q, away in the wet..

2009 - played the majority of the season, again won us a comeback victory with his 2nd 3 goal effort vs port away.. ..was carrying 1st ruck, and led the rucks in the final vs lions.. ..set the scene for our early domination in that final with that awesome tap and follow-up goal out of the center square.. ..can still remember the look of amazement on the face of simon black..

2010 - young kid is starting to show signs of tiring, but is still played with a heavy ruckload which he shoulders.. ..running back to help out defence, does his knee in an awkward landing from a spoil.. ..out for the year

2011 - comes back midyear, in his 1st game back shows good signs vs lions, 2nd game back single-handedly tears swans apart.. ..in the thumpings of tigers and bummers, again has very good games.. ..looking good before the mystery foot ailment, misses last couple of games of season

2012 - hands out a football lesson to Jolly, twice.. ..3 charlie votes for BoG in round 1, continues tigers pain in rematch with a 45 hitout performance to go with his all-round game style, when he was struggling with the injury which he carried for most of the season.. ..is big part of the belting we gave the bummers in that season rematch with his silver-platter serving of the ball at the stoppages to judd and murphy.. .... ..plays out the year, even though for most of it he's getting fluid drained from his knee on a regular basis..

2013 - again a very good all round game vs the tigers rnd 1, is all over Jolly early in the pies match, before cruncking him and keeping Jolly out of the side for 3 weeks [also fractured pears? leg in a bombers match the year or two previously] [krooz will legally crunch and hurt the opposition] ..running to help out the defence, he again hurts himself when landing awkwardly from a spoiling attempt..

..early in his 6th season he's almost played a 100 games, a huge effort for a young ruck that's suffered a very bad ACL.. .... ..and make no mistake about what he brings to the contest, on field..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:19 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
WOW wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
rhys87 wrote:

Kreuzer is when he is 100%....lifts when it matters in games.



When was the last time he was 100% and how long did that last?


When did he actually lift and win us games. If he has they have been sparse in number. Nowhere near a match winner. Disappointing for a number one draft pick and an important part of our next premiership tilt.



..sure, he re-injured himself early this year.. ..but first games in he was super fit, it was always going to take him a while to recover from that ACL, and playing him for the majority of last season with a torn meniscus wasn't exactly smart player management either.. ..but, up until he did his acl in his 3rd season, he missed only a few games.. ..great effort for a ruck recruit, even at pick 1.. ..a break down..

2008 - after missing the first few games of the season in recovery from op., he played the full season, earned wide respect and admiration for his game.. ..won us that port game off his boot in the last Q, away in the wet..

2009 - played the majority of the season, again won us a comeback victory with his 2nd 3 goal effort vs port away.. ..was carrying 1st ruck, and led the rucks in the final vs lions.. ..set the scene for our early domination in that final with that awesome tap and follow-up goal out of the center square.. ..can still remember the look of amazement on the face of simon black..

2010 - young kid is starting to show signs of tiring, but is still played with a heavy ruckload which he shoulders.. ..running back to help out defence, does his knee in an awkward landing from a spoil.. ..out for the year

2011 - comes back midyear, in his 1st game back shows good signs vs lions, 2nd game back single-handedly tears swans apart.. ..in the thumpings of tigers and bummers, again has very good games.. ..looking good before the mystery foot ailment, misses last couple of games of season

2012 - hands out a football lesson to Jolly, twice.. ..3 charlie votes for BoG in round 1, continues tigers pain in rematch with a 45 hitout performance to go with his all-round game style, when he was struggling with the injury which he carried for most of the season.. ..is big part of the belting we gave the bummers in that season rematch with his silver-platter serving of the ball at the stoppages to judd and murphy.. .... ..plays out the year, even though for most of it he's getting fluid drained from his knee on a regular basis..

2013 - again a very good all round game vs the tigers rnd 1, is all over Jolly early in the pies match, before cruncking him and keeping Jolly out of the side for 3 weeks [also fractured pears? leg in a bombers match the year or two previously] [krooz will legally crunch and hurt the opposition] ..running to help out the defence, he again hurts himself when landing awkwardly from a spoiling attempt..

..early in his 6th season he's almost played a 100 games, a huge effort for a young ruck that's suffered a very bad ACL.. .... ..and make no mistake about what he brings to the contest, on field..


Impressive response BKB, cant really argue with the facts you've presented, most of which I was ignorant of. Perhaps my criticism of Kruiz is ill founded. I hope it all comes together for him in the next few weeks. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..also what's interesting to note is how ex-players just assume that krooz is our first ruck.. ..for them, it's just how it is.. ..ex-cats Ling and Mooney can't talk highly enough of Krooz.. ..MM early in his tenure puts Krooz alongside Judd as examples of players that don't have to prove themselves to him.. ..there's not many other players in that 'proven' group for MM..

..i think if we rotate Knockers and Krooz thru the ruck, and when either player isn't rucking rest them primarily on the bench, and have them ruck and work all over the ground at full pace before rotating for a breather, and play only fwds up fwd [no hammer].. ..i don't think we'd suffer as a result of using bench space for the rucks.. ..just play 1 tall up fwd if either a lumberer of the rowe/bolt variety.. ..only 2 kpf set-up i'd consider would be waite and hendo.. ..both are natrurally roaming CHFs, and we won't lose run, or have a stagnant fwd-line if we play them both.. ..otherwise waite, and a medium hit-up leading target to go with smalls.. ..MM will rotate enough runners thru the middle..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:40 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
redback wrote:
Synbad wrote:
redback wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Micks walked into a playing group.
He wants to see what he has here.
He is giving our will give everything and everyone a go.

Yes! Including Watson. He tells them all they're nice and good. That they can play.
That they are in his plans.....

There is nothing not logical about what he has done and doing. He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.

You don't understand this or you are pretending?
Answer the question grasshopper.....

He wouldn't know Davis or Joseph's personality and inner being if he tripped over them.

Carlton is an unusual animal in what he has inherited.
Nobody doubts we have some talent even if is out of wack!
What is mystifying is the collective mindset and culture... As well as all the individual idiosyncratic make up of the players.

Ate you following grasshopper?

I should hold tutorials for the slower ones here.... For a fee of course! Line up.

Rattz had them for five years and six games and didn't understand them... and they were his very own creation. He built the team. Many know no other coach.
Five years and six games is an awful long time to understand what you are building.
You achnowledge this yes?

Or is your answer no?


Hold whatever you need but don’t shake it too much.
Just like your logic of smashing St kilda.
How did that go?
Please spare my your amateur psychological crap and spin it somewhere else.

You wanted leadership you got leadership.
He needs to lead and stop passing blame.

Promises the world to get support then back tracks, should be a politician but that would only hurt his hip pocket and incur some scrutiny.
Sheedy could very well be right. The only reason I thought he would have been good for us was to instil some discipline and standard but he has failed every hurdle he has come up against thus far, and don’t even get me started with the way he went about picking our next captain.
How about protecting your new captain the one you picked for our future?
If your players are too stupid to think about it or act on it it’s up to the coach to bring it to their attention.
Oh that’s right he’s building their characters.
He chastises a player that’s not on the ground and blames him for the loss but not for his selections or taking hurt players into the game.
What a leader what a coach.
Maybe after we tank a few times he can build a list he’s “ able” to coach until that time enjoy the ride and process obi wan.


As an only child which i assume you are... you do not understand leadership...

How does leadership grow if the coach is involved in everything?
If he directs everything... LEadership also happens on the ground.. in the heat of the battle...!!!
Which is where we are so often found lacking!!!
Its also up to the players to grow some cohones

We had leadership people come and talk to us... problem is ... there is no leadership from Sticks and Ratten...
So they have learnt nothing!!!

How do i know there is no leadership from Ratts and Sticks in the past?
Well they have been unaccountable...
Sticks stays on ... not taking any responsibility in where were at.. and his appointments and st uff ups.
Ratten blamed Journeyman Curnow and in another instance Hampson for losses.. he never ut his hand up.
He spoke about kind of lines in the sand.

Were a very mollycoddled club at Carlton.. and MM is seen stupidly by some people as an outsider... he needs these players to stand up and take some responsibility themselves and of course up the standards.

His first year his hands are tied.. he will not try to rock the unique culture and special set of circumstances we have craeted or ourselves.

End of year things will change.. when he is accustomed to what is there .. and theyre accustomed to him more.

Surrey must be another only child too i assume?
Before we get upset about my wild guessed.. i think you initiated discussion in your all your wisedom of Solomon.. that you display before us time and time again... attempting to prove to us that you indeed are a visionary of sorts and understand the goings on at the club??

You impress me i must say...in that you have very little grasp in what we have before us currenty.. and where were at.

Of course i know what we should have done to StKilda... in order to not have repeats time and time again of clubs thining they can spoil our party.

As for psychology.. i did study it *abit*.. i dropped out cos of the huge aount of statsistics involved.. but i can assure you the theory bit i was pretty good at.... the stats got me...

Never good at stats ....i wont lie i am no great Ratten type of mathematician...

But i do have a very good understanding of what makes people tick.. i reckon i have you pegged out...!!! :thumbsup:


You should have finished your studies then you might know when to stop waffling on and make a factual statement or at least an intelligent observation.

Just like a chicken in a hen house clucking all day and going around in circles.
No were else to go and nothing new to say.

You can’t make a leader in 2 weeks or 2 years but you can lead them.
That is the reason Malthouse was hired.

We needed a strong and knowledgeable coach to take charge so he could instil some discipline, fear and knowledge into or mentally fragile group so they would follow him. Selwood, Hodge and so on weren’t born leaders they were made leaders by having strong role models around them and growing into great leaders that the rest will follow.
Yes they need to grow but because we haven’t got much leadership on the ground it needs to start off the ground and that means Malthouse. Just like spoilt children he needs to enforce boundaries, hand out punishment and impart wisdom.

I doubt stats got you I think it was manila at La Trobe.
Dropping out didn’t help you in your objective analysis much either I see.

Anyway I’m bored with your inadequate hypothesis and limited mind set again.



youre funny

culture cant be wiped out in a single blow.... cos the people inside the bad culture dont understand that theyre in a bad culture they think its correct.

the culture change must come from within ....the players need to understand what a good culture is themselves
to have malthouse wack it out of them.. means they will get narky towards mathouse and he will be the bad witch.

its something you dont understand is it???

they can be guided... but ultimately it will be up to them.. to tell judd to run both ways.. and lucas to stick his tackles.. and waite to not be a @#$%&! head.. and nothing short is acceptable!!!

LEADERSHIP on the ground...!!!


their peers....!!!

oh i didnt go to latrobe... :lol:


try to learn what leadership is.. in a footy sense.. they all must be leaders on the ground...!!!

Good teams dont have ONE leader... !!!.. they have mutiples!!!.. thats what you dont get!!!!... and multiples decide what the cuture will be.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:22 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Our last 6 losses have been by less than 18 points. Or to put it another way, we've lost our last 6 close games.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
I reckon he needs to go back to the twos for a month.

Yes, he's out of touch at the moment, but more importantly, think there's better chance teaching Kreuzer to play a different role (whether it be as an old school resting ruck in the back pocket type, or potentially a CHB) in the twos, than there is developing Hampson as a key forward in the twos or Warnock adding an extra string to his bow.

Let Kreuz play a few weeks at a lower level taking advantage of the lower skill levels on display, mopping up across half back, rather than drop Hampson back and rely on similar level of kicking, and potentially hinder Rowe/Casboult/Mitchell at the same time.

Whilst Warnock is both a) not injured and b) at least breaking even, I reckon it makes sense. Not like any of the above 3 offer more than Hampson at this stage either.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 4:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
The leadership group need to forge out a path for the team.
Obviously everything they have been doing till now has not been covering them in glory.
So what they now must do is change the status quo.
That begins with the leaders of the team as far as the team is concerned.
Do these guys not understand the growth must come from within themselves? They must identify standards and uphold them.
It's crucial!
It's not about being comfortable and mate ships not being rocked! It's about standards.

What does this group of players want out of football for themselves... Their mates.... Their club?

Excellence chasing high standards or losing to crap sides at every big challenge.

The game lost is from a lack of desire to belong in the high standards group.

High standards does not necessarily mean a flag but it gives you a chance.
Lack of standards definitely gives you no chance of a flag.

Mick's given this group a chance to govern
Itself and not treat them like school children.

They need to come out and set some standards.

I wonder if the leadership group ever tells Chris Judd that his lack of accountability is not good enough... Or that Waite is an idiot and should be punished for letting down the side.
Or that tackles are expected to stick and players must use their bodies for more than show.
How honest are these guys really with each other?

Alot of things that are unacceptable need to be pointed out.

We have this problem all over the club.... From president down....!


Let's find some accountability and balls to grow ourselves a spine...
Then maybe we might begin to head somewhere.


Wasnt that what we employed leading teams for :oops: :lol: :lol:


Yes it is.
Leading Teams are suited to the strong clubs with a willingness to chase success without compromise. (Sydney, Geelong)
Too many insecure people in our coaching group for that to be implemented.
God forbid the powerbase would be diluted somewhat.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:42 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
The Rhino wrote:
I reckon he needs to go back to the twos for a month.

Yes, he's out of touch at the moment, but more importantly, think there's better chance teaching Kreuzer to play a different role (whether it be as an old school resting ruck in the back pocket type, or potentially a CHB) in the twos, than there is developing Hampson as a key forward in the twos or Warnock adding an extra string to his bow.

Let Kreuz play a few weeks at a lower level taking advantage of the lower skill levels on display, mopping up across half back, rather than drop Hampson back and rely on similar level of kicking, and potentially hinder Rowe/Casboult/Mitchell at the same time.

Whilst Warnock is both a) not injured and b) at least breaking even, I reckon it makes sense. Not like any of the above 3 offer more than Hampson at this stage either.


..except that Hampson isn't doing too well either.. ..he's played 6 games mostly in the fwd line, for 3 goals return.. ..Krooz plays mostly ruck for 4 games, has kicked 2.. ..Rowe has played 4 games, and has kicked 4 goals.. .... ..Hampson isn't all that much better than Rowe in the KPF/ruck relief role.. .... ..and Krooz was rushed back early from an injury, thats different to being out of touch..

..i don't think Krooz would work as a CHB, and if you're thinking he can ruck, and be taught to drift back to be loose in the backline.. ..why try to attempt to change him, when his around the ground work is so good.. ..if he's playing ruck, let him ruck and rove, vs ruck and float loose.. ..much better to have him contribute around the contest, and because of this have his opposite ruck have to go with him around the ground.. ..vs letting both rucks sag off the contest and play loose behind the ball..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I think we've fallen again for the messiah complex - bring someone in on big bucks and she'll be right.

We peaked a few years ago and whatever window we had is gone. I'm not sure of the merits of bringing in a 60 year old to reset a list or to reset a playing expectation, which is a long term game.

Our playing list balance tells me that we'll be mediocre for a while yet - good enough to win a number of games but not good enough to really challenge. Will our mids collectively work hard enough to compete with the very good teams? No, I don't think so.

If 'Mick has a lot of him' I think our best hope is that his influence can lead us to effective club / list management structures and we can catch up on some of the best thinking from recent years. Unfortunately we didn't do that (couldn't afford to?) as we emerged from the dark years but I cant help but feel that the surge from that opportunity is now wasted.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group