redback wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Micks walked into a playing group.
He wants to see what he has here.
He is giving our will give everything and everyone a go.
Yes! Including Watson. He tells them all they're nice and good. That they can play.
That they are in his plans.....
There is nothing not logical about what he has done and doing. He is learning about them.
He doesn't know them... For they are not his sheep.
He has only but inherited them.
You don't understand this or you are pretending?
Answer the question grasshopper.....
He wouldn't know Davis or Joseph's personality and inner being if he tripped over them.
Carlton is an unusual animal in what he has inherited.
Nobody doubts we have some talent even if is out of wack!
What is mystifying is the collective mindset and culture... As well as all the individual idiosyncratic make up of the players.
Ate you following grasshopper?
I should hold tutorials for the slower ones here.... For a fee of course! Line up.
Rattz had them for five years and six games and didn't understand them... and they were his very own creation. He built the team. Many know no other coach.
Five years and six games is an awful long time to understand what you are building.
You achnowledge this yes?
Or is your answer no?
Hold whatever you need but don’t shake it too much.
Just like your logic of smashing St kilda.
How did that go?
Please spare my your amateur psychological crap and spin it somewhere else.
You wanted leadership you got leadership.
He needs to lead and stop passing blame.
Promises the world to get support then back tracks, should be a politician but that would only hurt his hip pocket and incur some scrutiny.
Sheedy could very well be right. The only reason I thought he would have been good for us was to instil some discipline and standard but he has failed every hurdle he has come up against thus far, and don’t even get me started with the way he went about picking our next captain.
How about protecting your new captain the one you picked for our future?
If your players are too stupid to think about it or act on it it’s up to the coach to bring it to their attention.
Oh that’s right he’s building their characters.
He chastises a player that’s not on the ground and blames him for the loss but not for his selections or taking hurt players into the game.
What a leader what a coach.
Maybe after we tank a few times he can build a list he’s “ able” to coach until that time enjoy the ride and process obi wan.
As an only child which i assume you are... you do not understand leadership...
How does leadership grow if the coach is involved in everything?
If he directs everything... LEadership also happens on the ground.. in the heat of the battle...!!!
Which is where we are so often found lacking!!!
Its also up to the players to grow some cohones
We had leadership people come and talk to us... problem is ... there is no leadership from Sticks and Ratten...
So they have learnt nothing!!!
How do i know there is no leadership from Ratts and Sticks in the past?
Well they have been unaccountable...
Sticks stays on ... not taking any responsibility in where were at.. and his appointments and st uff ups.
Ratten blamed Journeyman Curnow and in another instance Hampson for losses.. he never ut his hand up.
He spoke about kind of lines in the sand.
Were a very mollycoddled club at Carlton.. and MM is seen stupidly by some people as an outsider... he needs these players to stand up and take some responsibility themselves and of course up the standards.
His first year his hands are tied.. he will not try to rock the unique culture and special set of circumstances we have craeted or ourselves.
End of year things will change.. when he is accustomed to what is there .. and theyre accustomed to him more.
Surrey must be another only child too i assume?
Before we get upset about my wild guessed.. i think you initiated discussion in your all your wisedom of Solomon.. that you display before us time and time again... attempting to prove to us that you indeed are a visionary of sorts and understand the goings on at the club??
You impress me i must say...in that you have very little grasp in what we have before us currenty.. and where were at.
Of course i know what we should have done to StKilda... in order to not have repeats time and time again of clubs thining they can spoil our party.
As for psychology.. i did study it *abit*.. i dropped out cos of the huge aount of statsistics involved.. but i can assure you the theory bit i was pretty good at.... the stats got me...
Never good at stats ....i wont lie i am no great Ratten type of mathematician...
But i do have a very good understanding of what makes people tick.. i reckon i have you pegged out...!!!
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
