Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 4:16 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Rino Hawthorn did that last year in most games 10 minutes of purple patch football given their talent blew most teams away

However in the finals - nearly came a cropper against Adelaide but a bit of cyril magic got them just over the line - tried that in GF but couldnt do it to redoubtable swans

teams of lesser talent must play 4 quarters - hawthorn is an exception I reckon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
BigKev wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
club29 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
If tricky Micky is teaching the boys about defense ... either ... he is teaching them the wrong thing ... or ... they are not listening. Some of the setups at stopages in our defensive half were abysmal. Our tackling execution is poor ... Our game plan is predictable and because its so slow, the opposition are just being given too much time to fill the spaces and we don't have a player in the forward line to take the big pack mark. Which brings me to another aspect of our game ... delivery into the forward line. Please Mick ... no more bombing recklessly to our forwards ... it just doesn't work!!!

If we lose the next 2 matches and there is a real chance we will ... then we can kiss the season goodbye. :mad: :mad: :mad:


In Micks defence I think he has no choice but to bomb. We don't have a marking forward but we have good crumbers. I am sure the numbers show we get rebounded on far too easy when we try to pinpoint someone inside fifty or attempt shallow entries. We also score well off deep inside 50 stoppages ( that are created from deep bombs). We also have a good press at the start of quarters. Fades later due to our crap fitness. With our personnel i think both Mick and coaches past know what our best bet is. Coaches get a lot of information from stats.

We are scoring ok it is our defensive side that is rubbish.


I think its both. When we Bomb the ball ... it results in quick turnovers that hurt us at the other end.


Would've been nice to see a bit more leading Sat night. I can't think of any justification for a stagnant, immobile forward line other than laziness.


Its stagnant because MM has got them bombing the ball in ... and also because we are so slow bringing the ball up from defense, the opposition just fill up all the gaps. :mad: :mad: :mad:

If this boring predictable game plan that we have was winning us games I'd be happy ... but instead :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7275
Blue Vain wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Did anyone really think we'd be anywhere near the top 4 this year??.


Considering we were'nt too far off last time we had a relatively injury free list, yes.

Besides, the board recently sacked the coach because he failed to make Top 4, so why should we lower our expectations now?

Weren't too far off what... beating a team (any team) above us that year?

The board... they thought we had a top 4 list... the board and myself were mistaken... imo

After recruiting and list development over the past 6 or so years, we have a list in 2013 with many deficiencies.

It lacks a decent 'big man' forward... masquerading ruckmen don't count... the one good one only plays half a season and is aging.

An aging midfield with no real 'guns' after Murphy & Gibbs coming through.

A haphazard backline forced to play a forward in a key role... half back flankers are no problem though... quick but just need to learn the basics like tackling, shepherding, kicking, handballing etc... like a lot of our list to be fair.

Ruck stocks are ok when not used as permanent forwards.

In the past 6 years we've mastered the art of downhill skiing... not once did we have a lesson in cross country.

This list may be good enough to make finals... but needs a slight rebuild to go all the way... imo

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
frank dardew wrote:
not sure you are right psych - its not the usual hysterics that are concerned its actually some of the more moderate posters who are concerned -hoping we are 5-5 at round 10 but its a long way back from 0-3 and maybe 0-4

We wera chance for a 4 or 5 losses out of 5 games with that draw on most years.
What we need to do is not lose sight of the bigger picture.... and thats how will we go over a season or two.
Were focusing on the hole in the donut and not the whole of the donut again.
Personally we wont win a flag in the new future.. but we will be in a better position .. than where we were when Malthouse took over
That was terrib le list managment and development.. the fact we have no obvious leaders basically tells us all we need to know.
This is Rattens list!!!.. he built it . he developed it and Malthouse has Rattens hand me down.

15 half back flankers and an ageing midflield.. an ageing judd
3 rucks that have never shown much...
no key forward
and a hamstrung salary cap for trading

wow! Thats impressive!!!


I have negative nellies :grin:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Last year we'd be 2-1 right now, so at worst 2-3 after 5. Much better than being equal last, bottom four and winless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:15 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
not sure you are right psych - its not the usual hysterics that are concerned its actually some of the more moderate posters who are concerned -hoping we are 5-5 at round 10 but its a long way back from 0-3 and maybe 0-4

We wera chance for a 4 or 5 losses out of 5 games with that draw on most years.
What we need to do is not lose sight of the bigger picture.... and thats how will we go over a season or two.
Were focusing on the hole in the donut and not the whole of the donut again.
Personally we wont win a flag in the new future.. but we will be in a better position .. than where we were when Malthouse took over
That was terrib le list managment and development.. the fact we have no obvious leaders basically tells us all we need to know.
This is Rattens list!!!.. he built it . he developed it and Malthouse has Rattens hand me down.15 half back flankers and an ageing midflield.. an ageing judd
3 rucks that have never shown much...
no key forward
and a hamstrung salary cap for trading

wow! Thats impressive!!!


I have negative nellies :grin:


...and when it came time for him to change it a bit for himself he chose not to. He was happy with the list. Only wanted to go to a club with a good list that didnt require a rebuild, one that was on the cusp,"if the stars align a flag waits" .
He could have traded if he didn't like the list because it wasn't his.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
frank dardew wrote:
Rino Hawthorn did that last year in most games 10 minutes of purple patch football given their talent blew most teams away

However in the finals - nearly came a cropper against Adelaide but a bit of cyril magic got them just over the line - tried that in GF but couldnt do it to redoubtable swans

teams of lesser talent must play 4 quarters - hawthorn is an exception I reckon


Big bodied, aggressive midfielders. Numerous elite kicks of the footy in the backline. A kickout strategy that is as predictable as it is successful and robotic.

I reckon they succeed at it for these attributes. If anything, I reckon we're a more talented side and we fail for how little of the above we have.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9646
Location: Australia
Synbad wrote:
we won't have major changes overall till sticks is gone


So what you are saying is that hiring MM and getting rid of Ratten is all meaningless until we can replace the Prez and the board?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
sinbagger wrote:
Synbad wrote:
we won't have major changes overall till sticks is gone


So what you are saying is that hiring MM and getting rid of Ratten is all meaningless until we can replace the Prez and the board?


sinbagger wrote:
Synbad wrote:
we won't have major changes overall till sticks is gone


So what you are saying is that hiring Ratten and getting rid of Pagan is all meaningless until we can replace the Prez and the board?


sinbagger wrote:
Synbad wrote:
we won't have major changes overall till sticks is gone


So what you are saying is that hiring Pagan and getting rid of Brittain is all meaningless until we can replace the Prez and the board?


Take your pick.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:48 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
The Rhino wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
Rino Hawthorn did that last year in most games 10 minutes of purple patch football given their talent blew most teams away

However in the finals - nearly came a cropper against Adelaide but a bit of cyril magic got them just over the line - tried that in GF but couldnt do it to redoubtable swans

teams of lesser talent must play 4 quarters - hawthorn is an exception I reckon


Big bodied, aggressive midfielders. Numerous elite kicks of the footy in the backline. A kickout strategy that is as predictable as it is successful and robotic.

I reckon they succeed at it for these attributes. If anything, I reckon we're a more talented side and we fail for how little of the above we have.


Totally agree. Been saying it for years.

I do however believe the players are there but because of injury or lack development we haven't seen enough if them.

In defence OKeefe is an elite kick as is Watson. A small defender who can kick is also needed. Is Yarran still the best bet? Maybe if he worked hard enough. Ellard may be another option. Laidler in form is an elite kick. Henderson is a good kick as well. Walker kicking has been good in defence. Scotland is also a good kick.

Size around the ball is the other issue. McLean was bought in for that reason but is a bit slow. Bell should help and its why I push for Tuohy in there. His kicking is also elite. Robbo is tough but light. Ellard and Carrots are hard but small.

Graham when in will prove himself a very good kick and Menzel is elite. Buckley and Dale are very good as well. Gibbs is elite and I like it when Betts is on the ball because of his ball use. Yarran as well.

The question is can they stand up and can we get the best out of them? If they do we are a much different side.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Carlton is now in the best position it's been in for years.

Why ?

Because the bullshit charade has finally been recognised by most observers.

Our gutsy losing semi-final effort against the Eagles in reality was a con. Yes, the players busted a gut in that game and nearly pulled off a win but in reality the same problems of inconsistency and mental lapses were on display often in that year and have been the issue since the rebuild started in 2005.

I believe we've now reached a stage where real change for the better will now be orchestrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
How about we starting winning games?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:10 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Individually our players have plenty of good traits. Collectively they don't have that hardness that wins the tough games.
That is why i believe we needed to trade to get a different mix happening and stop flogging a dead horse. Ratts putting his faith in that group was what brought him down IMO. He put together the wrong group. Probably went a bit safe on getting good people after being burnt by Fev, WHitnal and Stevens types. Malthouse is finding out about the group for himself now but he should have known or at least been told.

Hope trublu is right and they have a long game plan going where it all becomes obvious this pre season and we get a few hardnut guns in exhange for a few of our own talented but big part players in what makes our group so easily beat by strong teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Rexy wrote:
Carlton is now in the best position it's been in for years.

Why ?

Because the bullshit charade has finally been recognised by most observers.

Our gutsy losing semi-final effort against the Eagles in reality was a con. Yes, the players busted a gut in that game and nearly pulled off a win but in reality the same problems of inconsistency and mental lapses were on display often in that year and have been the issue since the rebuild started in 2005.

I believe we've now reached a stage where real change for the better will now be orchestrated.


Please.
Surely you've played footy Rexy?
If so, you'd realise how difficult a propsition it is to endure a full season and to make a finals series.
Teams dont "con" their way to 3 finals series in a row, let alone being very competitive in those matches.
To suggest it was a charade is ridiculous.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
ThePsychologist wrote:
Bloody Hell. So many of you guys read so much into a single performance or an individual effort.

The reality was that Ratten was sacked because of the inconsistency of our group and the lack of development of our next level players. The performance against Port Adelaide last year was the effectively the end of his coaching reign at Carlton.

We can argue all day whether it was right or not but that was the reason.

MM has come in and is here to get the best out of our group whilst assessing who is up to being part of the next great Carlton side or not.

In the first three rounds we have played an improving Richmond and lost by just five points. Beaten by Collingwood after leading late in the game and just being rolled by this years flag favourites on a ground we don't play well.

I bet all three of those side will play finals this year and we were close and yet we are no where near our best. Previously we may have well been blown away by one or two of those sides.

The fact is we have played some very good and some very bad football in those games. That is what happens with a new coach and a new game plan. Imagine if we had had Sydney's first three weeks. GWS, Gold Coast & North!

Malthouse has played 28 players in 3 rounds. That is more than anyone else. Why? to expose players to the big games, see who can play and in what positions and to get experience into our potential stars of the future. It is a fine balancing act.

We have a number of players who have had a lot of chances over the past few years and have teased without producing consistent and match winning football. A call needs to be made on their future and it will.

To go to the next level we need to know who can play at the required level and who cant. Simple.
As Malthouse has said he no pre conceived idea of any players, and he will be assessing them as he goes.

I know this is hard but patience is required, but not that much. The hardest part (on paper) of our draw has been played. We now have WCE (tough but winnable) then Adelaide (struggling) at the G, Melb (pathetic)at the G, St Kilda (gone)at Etihad then Port (improving) at Etihad and Brisbane (struggling).

If we can beat WCE we could easily gain a lot of confidence and momentum and those next games are easily winnable. It is not impossible to be 6-3 after 9 or at worst 5-4 and we are right back in it and on a roll.

Not only that during that time guys like Warnock, McCarthy, Menzel, Temay, Watson, White, Ellard, Buckley, Dale, Collins, Bell will all be given a real opportunity to prove their worth and by years end we will have a "real" idea of our list.

On top of that we will have Waite, McInnes & Betts back in our line up.

Individually the "Wins" we have had in the first few weeks are:

1. Walker to a HBF and playing to his potential
2. Kruezer fit and firing after knee
3. Hendersons growth as a key position footballer
4. Bootsma, Buckley, Davies getting game time in big games
5. Rowe's comeback
6. Judd fit & free of pressure
7. Lucas improving
8. Gibbs back in middle and playing contested footy
9. Murphy will be a very good Captain in time
10. Ability to kick goals yet still don't have a proper key forward

Seriously, have a bit of a bigger picture look at what's going on and I have no doubt by mid year we will be in a much better position and on our way up. :thumbsup:


Thank god for some reason here.
The pessimism and irrationality by some is bordering on embarrassing. Our three losses have been to sides who have collectively lost one game between them.
Don't like to win with luck bounces etc but we could easily have been 2-1 with some accuracy in front of goal.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Blue Vain wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Carlton is now in the best position it's been in for years.

Why ?

Because the bullshit charade has finally been recognised by most observers.

Our gutsy losing semi-final effort against the Eagles in reality was a con. Yes, the players busted a gut in that game and nearly pulled off a win but in reality the same problems of inconsistency and mental lapses were on display often in that year and have been the issue since the rebuild started in 2005.

I believe we've now reached a stage where real change for the better will now be orchestrated.


Please.
Surely you've played footy Rexy?
If so, you'd realise how difficult a propsition it is to endure a full season and to make a finals series.
Teams dont "con" their way to 3 finals series in a row, let alone being very competitive in those matches.
To suggest it was a charade is ridiculous.

It isn't that difficult to finish in the top 8.

It is difficult to reach the top 4 - the real finals where the premier team basicly comes from.

We have talented players - who've gotten us to top 8 level - but have failed to go to the next level.

The club's been conning itself for years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Making the eight isn't that easy.

Now Richmond are better than us, along with Collingwood and Geelong. Add in last years grand finalists and there's five teams ahead of us. If West Coast and Adelaide can beat us, that's seven sides meaning we're eighth at best, disregaring Essendon* and Fremantle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
I think Malthouse is trying to rebuild us on the move. Notice that Bootsma got a couple of games, Buckley got a game and will probably get another run this week, and expect another kid to get a go in the next few weeks. Difference between Malthouse and Ratten is the bulk of kids played in 2012 only got a go when we were decimated by injuries, barring Bootsma.

We saw Malthouse do this at Collingwood and its served them well in terms of depth. At least this way stocks get built and we have players ready to step in when needed rather than playing raw kids with next to no AFL experience when injuries strike etc.

He knows what he's doing but he also knows it's going to take time.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10492
frank dardew wrote:
No we dont its 3 performances plus a particularly insipid performance in NAB CUP FINAL - we were in a winning position in all 3 of those premiership season games and as usual over the last 5 years cant close them out against good opposition - new coach same lack of execution same lack of mental toughness same propensity to not work hard enough - we were all but guaranteed when they made the change by the admin and board that we would make the finals - AT THIS VERY EARLY STAGE it doesnt look like we will make the finals so dont know why you wouldnt be expecting angst from the fans and dont know why you dont understand why we are concerned - mick supposed to be defensive minded coach but we leak goals like they are going out of fashion -all sides have kicked over 100 points against us anyone reckon the eagles might kick the ton this week - apart from Walker and Jamison the rest of the side hasnt strung 2 let alone 3 consistent games- wasnt mick going to bridge the gap between our best and worst -we still seem ridiculously mentally fragile and still are intimidated physically and psychologically by teams like collingwood and geelong

Sure we are still on board with Mick and be delighted if Im wrong and we make the finals this year but that is an absolute minimum and if we dont the malthouse experiment has failed in the first year of the three year project- With this team there isnt an instant cure but with the players available we should with this squad at least make the finals this year- he may succeed rather than fail in his next 2 years who knows and yes you need to assess over the 3 year tenure but losses from first 3 games doesnt instil great confidence - didnt even have poise to beat tigers when they tried to lose the game - and contrary to your view if the eagles belt us on the weekend are you still going to be content with the way its going


As per normal Frankie, you put it so much better than I could. :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Rexy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Carlton is now in the best position it's been in for years.

Why ?

Because the bullshit charade has finally been recognised by most observers.

Our gutsy losing semi-final effort against the Eagles in reality was a con. Yes, the players busted a gut in that game and nearly pulled off a win but in reality the same problems of inconsistency and mental lapses were on display often in that year and have been the issue since the rebuild started in 2005.

I believe we've now reached a stage where real change for the better will now be orchestrated.


Please.
Surely you've played footy Rexy?
If so, you'd realise how difficult a propsition it is to endure a full season and to make a finals series.
Teams dont "con" their way to 3 finals series in a row, let alone being very competitive in those matches.
To suggest it was a charade is ridiculous.

It isn't that difficult to finish in the top 8.

It is difficult to reach the top 4 - the real finals where the premier team basicly comes from.

We have talented players - who've gotten us to top 8 level - but have failed to go to the next level.

The club's been conning itself for years.


A club conning itself into 3 consecutive finals performances.
I've heard it all now. :lol:
If it was such a con, why were were ultra competitive when we got there?

Tell me, if its not difficult to make the top 8, why are there 10 teams that miss out every year.
In fact, some havent been there for 20 years!
I dont understand why several of you are so keen to undersell the previous regimes achievements. Especially after 10 years in the wilderness.

Malthouse can only dream about obtaining the performances Ratten achieved as it stands.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 122 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group