Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Because he took us backward over a 5 year period
Yeah. He only took us from a wooden spoon in his first year to 12th in his fifth year.
Mick took the Pies from 13th in his first year to 13th in his fifth year.
Let me get this straight BV..... Are you saying Ratten was a good coach???.... or a better coaching option than Malthouse???
No. I havent said anywhere Ratten was a good coach. He had major deficiencies but they werent evident at the time because our pathetic board appointed him without a comprehensive process. Looking after a mate.
Fast forward 6 years and the same flower are making the same stupid decisions.
By all means appoint Malthouse but do it after interviewing all the available candidates and choosing the best one.
Their next mistake is to give him total control over the football department. How can we spend in excess of $2m to change coaching groups and end up with a midfield coach who hasnt been involved in the AFL for a decade?
Do these flower leave their brains in a jar when they come to work?
2 million dollars of our money pissed up against the wall and a sub standard coaching group to show for it.
Port Adelaide must have been rubbing their hands together to get Alan Richardson and what's more, we're paying his wages for them.
Sorry mate but this is 2003 all over again IMO. Desperate fools have sold the farm to protect their own arses and you know who's copping it in the neck?
Us. The members who are gullible enough to keep putting our hands in our pockets to fund this train wreck.
Login
Register
FAQ
