Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:36 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 452 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:16 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18023
mikkey wrote:
Quote:
I have seen Hird, Lyon, Sanderson and even Hinkley stamp their brand of football on a team from round 1 first year.


I sheits me no end to see the moaning and carry on, but it just gets too far when the facts are turned 180 degrees:

Hird? 1 finals in 3 years and that one final we bitch slapped them.
Lyon: Freo was struggling big time for the first half of the season until they learned Lyon's game plan.
Sanderson: Yes, big improvement first year and the easiest draw of all. How are they going this year?
Hinkley: Far to early. Won against the Demons.... nuff said....


Some people here really need to get a grip. I wont be surprised if we are 1 and 4 after 5, but I am sure we will improve a lot from there.


Yeah, forget Hird, Lyon and Sanderson. Lets look at the relevant ones.
Neeld! Retrofitted the Malthouse gameplan to Melbourne. Thats going well.
Watters is another MM protege who praised his gameplan and wanted to bring the principles to the Saints. St Kilda are on fire!

Some people need to get a grip.

Forget Port. They've beaten no one. They're only second on the ladder! Plus they took our former senior assistant. You know, the one we paid out to get in a senior assistant who hasnt had an AFL level job for 10 years. Plus those decisions cost us over 2 million dollars! Ha. we stuck it to them.
Champion decisions. Our board are great thinkers.

We're just unlucky. Non decisions by the umps, Armfields push in the back. Piss weak players etc etc etc Unlucky.
Get a grip you lot. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:16 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
verbs wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
verbs wrote:
mikkey wrote:
Quote:
I have seen Hird, Lyon, Sanderson and even Hinkley stamp their brand of football on a team from round 1 first year.


I sheits me no end to see the moaning and carry on, but it just gets too far when the facts are turned 180 degrees:

Hird? 1 finals in 3 years and that one final we bitch slapped them.
Lyon: Freo was struggling big time for the first half of the season until they learned Lyon's game plan.
Sanderson: Yes, big improvement first year and the easiest draw of all. How are they going this year?
Hinkley: Far to early. Won against the Demons.... nuff said....


Some people here really need to get a grip. I wont be surprised if we are 1 and 4 after 5, but I am sure we will improve a lot from there.


Which is the 1 you think we will win?


Might win the next 3 or might win none.

We do have some weak links but they need to be played to make sure of it.

By all reports the seconds where flint hard yesterday so I'll be interested to see who plays.

I reckon MM will blood a player or two every week. Next week it might be Cachia and Buckley but I would think Casboults days are numbered.


I'd like a call on us beating Geelong, WCE or Adelaide.

We'd be rank outsiders in all three. At least one upset necessary to not go down 0-5 to start Mick's inglorious reign.

Rank outsiders vs wc?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:17 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 832
Interesting observations Boris. I didn't see the game but it sounds like the last quarter was a bit disappointing. I think we have a fair way to go yet and only time will tell. I am not sure what I am expecting this season. I know what I am hoping for. I've read a lot of the post match comments from my fellow TC'ers and there is a lot of disappointment and frustrations shown. We must remember that even though the Scum had some good players out we also had several key players missing and quite a deal of inexperience in our side as well. The Scum are pretty well drilled and this obviously showed in the end. If I recall we won these two games last season but that did not make any difference at the end of the day. Don't forget Ratts had over 5 years, Micks only had 2 games so far. I am prepared for the long haul.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:17 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:36 am
Posts: 193
harry obrien must stink so bad or be THAT much of a faaaarkhead coz no-one went near him all day


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Forget the last 10 minutes; and it was anyone's game......when the REAL pressure was applied; we were found wanting.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Jack Donaghy wrote:
harry obrien must stink so bad or be THAT much of a faaaarkhead coz no-one went near him all day


More to the point, Gibbs got towelled up

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
mots wrote:
Interesting observations Boris. I didn't see the game but it sounds like the last quarter was a bit disappointing. .


Slightly

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Gutted. Before the game I didn't think we would win, but as the game panned out we should have been able to win it.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I hate to say this because Gibbs has been looking great this year; but; he stopped as though shot a few times today when confronted by an opponent who wanted the ball more than him.

It was embarrassing to watch....... :eek:

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Bigredisback wrote:
Rank outsiders vs wc?


Yes, over there for sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Better times ahead, maybe, but knowing that some players can't play for crap doesn't help. The improvement was always going to come from the better credentialed players. It still probably won't be enough. All it takes is a couple of posters to get a bit emotional and suddenly the bigger picture is irrelevant.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15000
Went to the game, thought it was a great game and with 3 minutes to go either team could have won.
Yes, we did run out of puff which was surprising considering we had an extra 3 days off.
We need to work on our tackling as so many were too easily shrugged off.
Some of our younger players were a bit overawed, Bell got caught too many times.
Laidler was disappointing as was Simpson again.
Really pleased with Yarran and Garlett, Judd had a great first half and Murphy was good. Kreuzer dominated, as he should.
Disappointing to go down to them, had feral supporters in front of us.
Umpiring was terrible and we really got a rough deal from them.
Oh well, i picked 9 winners.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
kingkerna wrote:
Why did we sakc ratts again?

Because he spent over five years accumulating half back flankers and today we have no identifiable leaders , forward, players who run two ways and winners.

Anyway it's the fault of Sticks Kernahan.
Quicker people realize we are ordinary on field because it mirrors or off field group the better.
Still I'm expecting muck to improve the terrible culture we have created.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
I was worried at 3qt...far more upside for them than us...should have been further ahead, but having said that didn't think we wasted many opportunities.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Warby wrote:
I hate to say this because Gibbs has been looking great this year; but; he stopped as though shot a few times today when confronted by an opponent who wanted the ball more than him.

It was embarrassing to watch....... :eek:

Russell was OK though playing for the winning side.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2058
I think we are being a tad harsh on our performance today. I would prefer to wait and reserve judgement after 7 - 8 rounds. We should have a better idea by then.

The endeavour and application was there and better than last week, but I don't think we have enough quality at the bottom end of our list.
We continually get found out with silly errors and a lack of composure. Both Bootsma and Davies were poor today and you can't have too many passengers if you want to win matches. Lack of development over the last 2-3 years is really hurting us.

I also believe Henderson needs to go forward. We are a one trick pony when it comes to our forward structure and avenue to goals. Our smaller forwards were great today but small forwards don't win you premierships. Need a lead up forward who can take a mark and run to the right positions and offer a genuine target. Not simply rely on flukey goals and big pack marks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
DocSherrin wrote:
Disgraceful. Not because we lost, but because they went into their shells and were soft. When it came time to put their heads over the ball (talking to you Bryce Gibbs) or gut run to provide another option (hello Brock McLean), they were found wanting.

A case of too many expecting too few to get the team over the line. Not impressed.



It's the same old story with this club they have an attitude of fragility with no appetite for the hard work to make a contest of a game against fierce opposition when required.

The clubs that do have this appetite like Collingwood, Geelong, Hawthorn, etc and those weaker clubs like Richmond and dare I say even Port Adelaide know this and know if they truly set themselves for a game against us that they are in with a chance if they have a red hot crack at us because they know we will fold like a pack of cards.

Collingwood showed they have the appetite and heart required to do the things that were needed in the lasr quarter to win this game - we predictably folded like a pack of cards.

Until every player on our side is prepared to work hard for themselves and each other then we will only every be mediocre.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
WOW wrote:

I also believe Henderson needs to go forward. .


He might go thee more often now.

Rowe isn't bad as a CHB either.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 1123
The biggest annoyance for me today were the differing kick outs.

On one hand when collingwood scored a behind, they would zone/press up into position immediately and someone would man the mark 2m out from the goal square and immediately pressure our kick taker should he decide to play on. When our players kicked to themselves from a kick in they would take 3 steps and face immediate pressure and would only be able to kick to 55-60m.

On the other hand when our boys kicked a behind it was a light jog to position and the bloke on the mark (a few times this was Yarran) would stand 8-10m out from the goal square and lightly jog in the direction that the pies player would choose to play on to, allowing him to run to 25m from goal and execute a long kick to 70m from goal.

It may seem minor, but these easy metres over 120 mins of footy and the lazy mindset are worth their weight in gold. Pies always wanted to apply all the pressure they could whilst our boys chose when to apply it. Until these chinks are ironed out we will only be a middle of the road team

_________________
i AM CARLTON


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10575
They wanted it more. Our players did not want the ball when it counted. That is the true story.
I thought Malthouse coached well today and got his match-up's right.
Collingwood just wanted the win in the end and except for a limited few, our boys waited for some-one else to do it.
Seen it before with these guys unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 452 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, DesEnglish, Google [Bot] and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group