Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..i'm not a fan of a player breaking his back to get the team towards finals, and another playing being 'managed' to come good finals.. ..throws off morale i believe, and also consistency regarding structures.. ..and if the already non-durable breaks down come finals, what then.. ..another switch back to old structures..?.. ..the more games players play together, the better they get as a team.. ..our revolving doors issues regarding team selection doesn't help team development..
..we seriously need to pick 1 player, and give him CHF to make his own.. ..more important than FF, though having a designated FF would be preferable as well, though not at the expense of a designated CHF.. ..Rowe/Bolt used as CHF one week, and then KPFG/Ruck the next week isn't what i'm talking about, ditto Krooz/Hammer.. ..they're all still light on for experience [ages notwithstanding], and all this shifting about position/role wise isn't helping development, nor team cohesion and understanding..
Completely agree with this logic and Rowe, Casboult, Hampson or even Mitchell need to hold down the two forward KP's.
I see Waite a third Kp with the ability to use his making strength and agility to take the pressure off the other two when he returns.
This with two small crumbing forwards and another medium with marking utility will be able to form a strong unit in the air as well as at ground level with the ability to apply forward pressure as a defence also.
The medium and small forward positional players will obviously be made up of all the mids and the rotationary forwards.
