Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 8:19 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 ... 172  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:38 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:36 am
Posts: 193
ThePsychologist wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
If this was the case, what would be your forward setup, provided everyone is fit?
Would you play Hendo, Waite, Casboult as talls? (With walker as a medium forward)
Surely this would mean we only play 1 ruckman.
It looks pretty good. I'd be interested to see how Hendo goes up forward. I still think he's played his best footy down back, but being a bit older and more experienced it would be interesting to try him forward again. We never really had the opportunity last year with all the injuries but with Jamo and Laidler fit and the emergence of Watson, McCarthy, and White I'm sure we'll see it at some stage this year


As Stefchook said Hendo has been training w the defenders all pre season. So I'm not sure where MM sees him.

As to what I would do, my philosophy in structure doesn't change. Having coached and developed for more than 20 years I have always been a big believer in ball use and players who have natural instincts in regards to best options, positioning etc. IMO this has even become more important with zones, flooding and such.

The reason I am so optimistic about this year and beyond is that I see our list as talented and filling many roles but has been used and developed poorly. This causes confusion and lack of confidence.

With MM at the helm the players will now have a clear agenda and style in which they can develop their own games. The clearer a player is in mind the better they can play to their maximum ability.

For me an ideal line up is:

B: Collins White Laidler
HB: Bootsma Watson OKeefe

C: Yarran McLean Carrazzo Simpson
Foll: Warnock Judd Murphy

HF: Gibbs Henderson
F: Betts Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Robinson Bell Waite

Unlucky: McInnes (mid year) Ellard Lucas Menzel Kruezer Graham Duigan Jamison McCarthy Armfield Scotland Hampson :yikes:

That's 34 players who could easily be in our top 22 this year. Depth is important.

Reasoning:

In defence I would really like to see a small shutdown defender. IMO Collins is the right person. He isn't the most talented but is hard and will always put the team first. His ball use is also fairly good and his pre season has been outstanding. I put White ahead of Jamo, not by much but he is a better offensive option and an excellent shut down player. Laidler is a gun and will be vital in third man up and assisting White. Also vital link player and his kicking is elite. OKeefe is much the same and with some continuity will show his worth and he is hard and tough. Watson is big and is improving and his kicking again is elite, I can however see McCarthy challenging him for that spot. Add Bootsma who is young and raw but has poise and that is a potential top class unit. The key will how they work together and how much the midfield assist.

The midfield talent and depth is first class. They will play 1-2 extra from HF and will rotate through deep defence. Do not be surprised to see Judd playing that role a lot. Smart, will position himself in the right spots, has dash, will create offensive opportunities and his contested ball winning is hugely underrated. The other key will be rotations, there is effectively 11 mids in that side. The more mids we can have as part of the best 22 the better we will be. That is why guys like Garlett, Hampson, Kruezer may struggle because of that need. The bigger bodies of Tuohy, Bell, McLean will also be a bonus.

Any issues with injury is handled with our flexibility. Laidler can play tall if needed. Waite, Henderson and Walker can easily go into defence if needed. Watson can handle some ruckwork in defence and Henderson/Casboult down forward allowing Warnock more minutes on the ball.

Up forward we have flexibility and options. Henderson is smart and clean. Casboult is a bash and crash option and Walker and Waite can play tall or small. Betts will thrive around this. Not to mention mids in Judd, Gibbs, Murphy, Robbo etc all enjoying time up there. Want to get a mid confident and "up", let him kick some goals.

In the ruck Warnock is the best No.1 option as he will bring our mids into the game. He is our BEST tap ruckman. However, I have no issue with Kruezer or Hampson taking that role. Competition is good.

All in all this sides ball winning capabilities and their ball use are high class. The best sides I have ever seen are Hawthorn 80s, Brisbane early 2000s and Geelong over the past 6-7 years. They all had this combined ability and were exceptionally well drilled. IMO we have that "potential".

Imagine being the opposition coach trying to match up on that line up??? :smoking:


CRAP!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:41 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:36 am
Posts: 193
Jack Donaghy wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
If this was the case, what would be your forward setup, provided everyone is fit?
Would you play Hendo, Waite, Casboult as talls? (With walker as a medium forward)
Surely this would mean we only play 1 ruckman.
It looks pretty good. I'd be interested to see how Hendo goes up forward. I still think he's played his best footy down back, but being a bit older and more experienced it would be interesting to try him forward again. We never really had the opportunity last year with all the injuries but with Jamo and Laidler fit and the emergence of Watson, McCarthy, and White I'm sure we'll see it at some stage this year


As Stefchook said Hendo has been training w the defenders all pre season. So I'm not sure where MM sees him.

As to what I would do, my philosophy in structure doesn't change. Having coached and developed for more than 20 years I have always been a big believer in ball use and players who have natural instincts in regards to best options, positioning etc. IMO this has even become more important with zones, flooding and such.

The reason I am so optimistic about this year and beyond is that I see our list as talented and filling many roles but has been used and developed poorly. This causes confusion and lack of confidence.

With MM at the helm the players will now have a clear agenda and style in which they can develop their own games. The clearer a player is in mind the better they can play to their maximum ability.

For me an ideal line up is:

B: Collins White Laidler
HB: Bootsma Watson OKeefe

C: Yarran McLean Carrazzo Simpson
Foll: Warnock Judd Murphy

HF: Gibbs Henderson
F: Betts Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Robinson Bell Waite

Unlucky: McInnes (mid year) Ellard Lucas Menzel Kruezer Graham Duigan Jamison McCarthy Armfield Scotland Hampson :yikes:

That's 34 players who could easily be in our top 22 this year. Depth is important.

Reasoning:

In defence I would really like to see a small shutdown defender. IMO Collins is the right person. He isn't the most talented but is hard and will always put the team first. His ball use is also fairly good and his pre season has been outstanding. I put White ahead of Jamo, not by much but he is a better offensive option and an excellent shut down player. Laidler is a gun and will be vital in third man up and assisting White. Also vital link player and his kicking is elite. OKeefe is much the same and with some continuity will show his worth and he is hard and tough. Watson is big and is improving and his kicking again is elite, I can however see McCarthy challenging him for that spot. Add Bootsma who is young and raw but has poise and that is a potential top class unit. The key will how they work together and how much the midfield assist.

The midfield talent and depth is first class. They will play 1-2 extra from HF and will rotate through deep defence. Do not be surprised to see Judd playing that role a lot. Smart, will position himself in the right spots, has dash, will create offensive opportunities and his contested ball winning is hugely underrated. The other key will be rotations, there is effectively 11 mids in that side. The more mids we can have as part of the best 22 the better we will be. That is why guys like Garlett, Hampson, Kruezer may struggle because of that need. The bigger bodies of Tuohy, Bell, McLean will also be a bonus.

Any issues with injury is handled with our flexibility. Laidler can play tall if needed. Waite, Henderson and Walker can easily go into defence if needed. Watson can handle some ruckwork in defence and Henderson/Casboult down forward allowing Warnock more minutes on the ball.

Up forward we have flexibility and options. Henderson is smart and clean. Casboult is a bash and crash option and Walker and Waite can play tall or small. Betts will thrive around this. Not to mention mids in Judd, Gibbs, Murphy, Robbo etc all enjoying time up there. Want to get a mid confident and "up", let him kick some goals.

In the ruck Warnock is the best No.1 option as he will bring our mids into the game. He is our BEST tap ruckman. However, I have no issue with Kruezer or Hampson taking that role. Competition is good.

All in all this sides ball winning capabilities and their ball use are high class. The best sides I have ever seen are Hawthorn 80s, Brisbane early 2000s and Geelong over the past 6-7 years. They all had this combined ability and were exceptionally well drilled. IMO we have that "potential".

Imagine being the opposition coach trying to match up on that line up??? :smoking:


CRAP!!!!!!!!


(sorry Psych - but it is!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:34 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3261
Jack Donaghy wrote:
Jack Donaghy wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
If this was the case, what would be your forward setup, provided everyone is fit?
Would you play Hendo, Waite, Casboult as talls? (With walker as a medium forward)
Surely this would mean we only play 1 ruckman.
It looks pretty good. I'd be interested to see how Hendo goes up forward. I still think he's played his best footy down back, but being a bit older and more experienced it would be interesting to try him forward again. We never really had the opportunity last year with all the injuries but with Jamo and Laidler fit and the emergence of Watson, McCarthy, and White I'm sure we'll see it at some stage this year


As Stefchook said Hendo has been training w the defenders all pre season. So I'm not sure where MM sees him.

As to what I would do, my philosophy in structure doesn't change. Having coached and developed for more than 20 years I have always been a big believer in ball use and players who have natural instincts in regards to best options, positioning etc. IMO this has even become more important with zones, flooding and such.

The reason I am so optimistic about this year and beyond is that I see our list as talented and filling many roles but has been used and developed poorly. This causes confusion and lack of confidence.

With MM at the helm the players will now have a clear agenda and style in which they can develop their own games. The clearer a player is in mind the better they can play to their maximum ability.

For me an ideal line up is:

B: Collins White Laidler
HB: Bootsma Watson OKeefe

C: Yarran McLean Carrazzo Simpson
Foll: Warnock Judd Murphy

HF: Gibbs Henderson
F: Betts Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Robinson Bell Waite

Unlucky: McInnes (mid year) Ellard Lucas Menzel Kruezer Graham Duigan Jamison McCarthy Armfield Scotland Hampson :yikes:

That's 34 players who could easily be in our top 22 this year. Depth is important.

Reasoning:

In defence I would really like to see a small shutdown defender. IMO Collins is the right person. He isn't the most talented but is hard and will always put the team first. His ball use is also fairly good and his pre season has been outstanding. I put White ahead of Jamo, not by much but he is a better offensive option and an excellent shut down player. Laidler is a gun and will be vital in third man up and assisting White. Also vital link player and his kicking is elite. OKeefe is much the same and with some continuity will show his worth and he is hard and tough. Watson is big and is improving and his kicking again is elite, I can however see McCarthy challenging him for that spot. Add Bootsma who is young and raw but has poise and that is a potential top class unit. The key will how they work together and how much the midfield assist.

The midfield talent and depth is first class. They will play 1-2 extra from HF and will rotate through deep defence. Do not be surprised to see Judd playing that role a lot. Smart, will position himself in the right spots, has dash, will create offensive opportunities and his contested ball winning is hugely underrated. The other key will be rotations, there is effectively 11 mids in that side. The more mids we can have as part of the best 22 the better we will be. That is why guys like Garlett, Hampson, Kruezer may struggle because of that need. The bigger bodies of Tuohy, Bell, McLean will also be a bonus.

Any issues with injury is handled with our flexibility. Laidler can play tall if needed. Waite, Henderson and Walker can easily go into defence if needed. Watson can handle some ruckwork in defence and Henderson/Casboult down forward allowing Warnock more minutes on the ball.

Up forward we have flexibility and options. Henderson is smart and clean. Casboult is a bash and crash option and Walker and Waite can play tall or small. Betts will thrive around this. Not to mention mids in Judd, Gibbs, Murphy, Robbo etc all enjoying time up there. Want to get a mid confident and "up", let him kick some goals.

In the ruck Warnock is the best No.1 option as he will bring our mids into the game. He is our BEST tap ruckman. However, I have no issue with Kruezer or Hampson taking that role. Competition is good.

All in all this sides ball winning capabilities and their ball use are high class. The best sides I have ever seen are Hawthorn 80s, Brisbane early 2000s and Geelong over the past 6-7 years. They all had this combined ability and were exceptionally well drilled. IMO we have that "potential".

Imagine being the opposition coach trying to match up on that line up??? :smoking:


CRAP!!!!!!!!


(sorry Psych - but it is!)


Psych, whether this will be the team or not, you do appear the poster that understands that anything is possible these couple of months........new coach, invigorated players........who knows where players will be positioned and who'll get a gig!

Exciting times and I'm glad to see someone gets it.
eg Nick Duigan leading the team out this week :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:06 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Thanks LB. I'm looking forward to a great year. It has been too long.

The odds are that what we put on the park will look nothing like I suggested. Too be honest I don't care. I trust the new regime to get it right.

My points were purely a discussion piece.

Always the same people quick to criticise but no reasoning why?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:12 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
harker wrote:
That back-line is a real stretch there Psyche.
No way would we go in with such an inexperienced set-up.

Armfield Jamison Laidler
Yarran Henderson Tuohy .... gives us the speed, strength, height that may be the starting point for an ideal back 6.

Jamison is taller and has better closing speed than White
Bootsma has another year to go before too much trust could be laid upon him.
Collins is better than he was last year but will still get over-awed under pressure.
Watson will be used but no one is really sure just yet.
O'Keeffe has the temperament to be seriously considered and has enough weapons to really give things a good shake and could relieve one of Yarran or Tuohy quite easily.


Have no issues with those points Harker and your back 6 is more likely than mine.

The point of mine is to show a possibility and how that may improve the depth and flexibility of the side.

Imagine if Collins stood up and filled that role. It releases Tuohy and others into the midfield.

Watson the same. If he or McCarthy can stand up that releases Hendo forward giving us more key forward options.

Jamo & White fighting for FB is a good thing and given both their injury history a must.

To have 30 plus players competing for spots and being able to fill mutiple roles is a must and a huge advantage. :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:18 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
I feel much safer with Jamison at fullback than anyone else on out list. When writing up a hypothetical best 22, Jamison at fullback is pretty much the first position I'll pencil in.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
I don't think Collins has the leg speed to play the role on the small forwards, I'd have Armfield, Tuohy and maybe down the track Temay ahead of him. I don't think his disposal is any better than Armfield either, it's a weakness for both of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:
The point of mine is to show a possibility and how that may improve the depth and flexibility of the side.
Imagine if Collins stood up and filled that role. It releases Tuohy and others into the midfield.

Watson the same. If he or McCarthy can stand up that releases Hendo forward giving us more key forward options.
Jamo & White fighting for FB is a good thing and given both their injury history a must.
To have 30 plus players competing for spots and being able to fill mutiple roles is a must and a huge advantage. :thumbsup:


It's interesting that Ratten wanted Collins off the HBF last year, which would have slowly released Yarran/Tuohy into the midfield as you say.
Ratten clearly had plans in mind, but situations conspired against us having any chance experimenting for the year.

I'd also be over the moon should Watson hold up a key post, releasing Henderson forward where I still think he belongs.
Kid has been injured for so much time it's easy to forget just how could he really can be.

White is certainly bigger bodied now, but I'd be worried that 190cm may not be tall enough for the beasts.

As you say though, there are plenty fighting for spots and from what I've heard: Don't lock anyone in just yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
ThePsychologist wrote:
In defence I would really like to see a small shutdown defender. IMO Collins is the right person.


I agree we need someone to stand up as a small defender Psych, but I don't see it being Collins. He isn't strong enough over the ball or in the tackle, nor is he quick enough IMO. I also think his skills are inconsistent (particularly under real pressure). I like his courage and endurance, and he's said to be a terrific clubman etc, but I think he is strictly a HF/HB/Winger (if anything) at AFL level.

I'd be delighted to be proven wrong, but I think he'll battle to get games in 2013.

What qualities are we looking for in a small shutdown defender? Discipline, concentration, body strength, acceleration, agility, ability to spoil overhead, cool under pressure, sound skills.

Current candidates for the role-

Tuohy: has shown real promise, but needs to get better at strking the right balance between attacking and defending. Put in some ordinary defensive efforts at times last year and also lost his early season flair running out of defence. I'm not sure if it was his body or his mind, but the season seemed too long for him last year (as it often does with young players). As his game sense improves, and his body gets used to playing a full season, I reckon he'll become a good player. I'm not 100% sure that it will be as a small shutdown defender (he may develop into a Scotland-type player), but he's our best small defender option at the moment, IMO.

Armfield: is coming off his most consistent AFL season, playing as a defensive forward/mid. It wouldn't seem to make sense to move him back into defence (where he's had plenty of opportunities in the past with mixed results). It really depends whether there is a spot for him in his 2012 forward/mid role under MM's structure. He has a go and has nice pace, but he's not a player I would back one-on-one close to goal against a quality small forward.

Walker: did a decent job on Milne in the last game in 2012. Unlikely that's where we'll see him play regularly in the future, but he has the tools to do it if he embraces the role. I prefer him in attack personally (that's where he had his best season in 2011), but if he struggles early in the year as a forward/mid, I wouldn't be surprised to see him return to the backline in shutdown roles.

AJ: I admire him in some ways, but to be honest I think he's lucky to still be on an AFL list. He would need to have a major rebirth under MM to play regularly in 2013.

Davies: lucky to still be on the list too. Has some of the tools you want for the role, but I just don't think he's good enough quite frankly. I appreciate he's still fairly young and has had injuries etc, but I'm not seeing it from him at AFL or VFL level. He might be one of those guys who goes back to the state leagues for a couple of years and returns to the AFL in his mid/late 20s as a harder, smarter, fitter footballer. Another one who would have to make a big turnaround under the new coach. I have low expectations of him coming into 2013 (but I hope to be shown to be wrong!).

Temay: not this year, but maybe a longer-term answer. Will need time.

Duigan: not nimble enough for the role probably, in any event he seems to be being groomed for a loose man in defence role (which I'm dubious about - personally, I see him as a fringer player).

Yarran: no, needs to be used in more attacking roles.

Gibbs: see Yarran.

Bootsma: in a couple of years when he's AFL smart, fit and strong I can see him playing a variety of roles on different types of opponents. I think he'd get killed by a quality small forward at the moment though. For the timebeing, he looks more comfortable as a HB/Wing/HF to me.

McInnes: can play on taller and smaller types. Generally gets the job done with minimum fuss. More suited to the medium/taller types, but there will be some games (in the 2nd half of the year and beyond) where he might be a good match up for the opposition's small forward - as long as the knee injury doesn't rob him of mobility.

ROK: has played in the backline but made his mark at VFL level as a mid. Lacks the pace for the small defender role and he's another one who I think, if he makes it, will be playing further up the ground. Dare I say it, but I could see him playing a similar role to that which Grigg plays at Tigerland.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
:clap: well said abns.

In regards to Collins I agree but with a bit of confidence and time who knows. It's amazing what happens to players when given confidence and a bit of time. I believe he has the basics. If he can do it it makes us a much better side. Depth!

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25550
Location: Bondi Beach
AK43 wrote:
I don't think Collins has the leg speed to play the role on the small forwards, I'd have Armfield, Tuohy and maybe down the track Temay ahead of him. I don't think his disposal is any better than Armfield either, it's a weakness for both of them.


Collins has a lot to prove imo.
He hasn't shown much other than flair.
Moves like Robbie Flower but just doesn't have the same 'positive' impact Robbie had.
Collins dances on a spot and gets tackled. Robbie dances and the opponent is wrong footed ala Rob Harvey.

Collins has a lot to prove and imo will be lucky to get a senior game this year if injuries aren't like 2012. Hope I'm wrong.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:48 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
hows watson looking for round 1? i missed the 1st game yesterday and didnt see him in the 2nd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:20 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
Watson was ordinary. Fumbled in the goal square for a cheap give-away goal, and did nothing to make you want to pencil him in for Round 1.

Plenty of positives however. Jamison looks fit and firing, and I think we're going to love the re-inclusion of Jeremy Laidler. White was okay. Henderson and Yarran a little rusty. In the midfield we seem to have plenty of options. Murphy, Carrazzo and Simpson remain all class. McLean is a lock in for starting. Betts in the middle worked okay. Hampson, Ellard, Bell, Dale, Robinson all worked hard in a scrappy, bustling type of game.

Up forward and there's a bit of work to do but much more to like than last year. Casboult's grabs are mighty fine (his kicking however isn't). Rowe looked good. Presented, took a couple of strong grabs and got the ball to the ground for the rovers. Loved his efforts. Hampson was flying around the park. Looked terrific. Gets a fair bit of air off the ground.

The biggest -ives for me are when Jamison isn't there. Patton regularly beat his opponent (White) for most of the day, and lots more work to go into the press, turn over and ball over the top that killed us last year. Happened a fair bit in Game 1.

Overall with no injuries, a couple of minor victories and some very positive signs, you had to be happy with the day.

Sydney look like a team who are a month behind in preparation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
Oh, and though he didn't do a great deal, Marcus Davies looks like a beast. I've been very tough on him, and willing to put it all in the past for a big 2013.

O'Keefe looked okay too. Got belted in one contest I noticed.

Garlett looked very rusty. He was one step ahead of where the ball was on more than one occassion. I still have belief in him. He'll click and be as good as ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:32 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3261
teknodeejay wrote:
Oh, and though he didn't do a great deal, Marcus Davies looks like a beast. I've been very tough on him, and willing to put it all in the past for a big 2013.

O'Keefe looked okay too. Got belted in one contest I noticed.

Garlett looked very rusty. He was one step ahead of where the ball was on more than one occassion. I still have belief in him. He'll click and be as good as ever.


agree with your observations techno

re garlett, would offer that he is probably adjusting to new roles. ie for the most part he was wing or HB (plus he seems to have added size).

mention should also go to Gibbs. 9 (game 1) and 11 (game 2) possesions were a positive and he was involved. he doesnt have an enormous presence, but i could see him definitely playing a role (i like the added 3 kgs he has added - tougher to move off the ball).

also thought Bell continued in his development.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Gibbs poor attempt at tackling Patton early on was embarrassing. Needs to get that crap out of his game.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..at the very beginning of the game Watto fumbled the ball yes, but do did pretty much everyone [ball was slippery with the humidity].. ..he got better, outmarked an opponent during a one on one, ran fwd to provide a link-up [play didnt come off], and generally looks like a very young inexperienced kpp.. ..still think ppl are expecting too much right away..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:21 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
no way is watson is in best 22 at moment. jamo and hendo will take the 2 KP down back and he cant play forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Gibbs poor attempt at tackling Patton early on was embarrassing. Needs to get that crap out of his game.


Get the feeling Gibbs won't be the last player to be embarrassed by Patton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:54 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Round One against Richmond will be interesting:

B: Tuohy Jamison Laidler
HB: Yarran Henderson Lucas

C: Simpson McLean Gibbs
Foll: Warnock Judd Murphy

HF: Robinson Casboult Waite
F: Betts Kruezer Walker

Int: Bell Carrazzo Ellard Duigan

Not easy.

Hammer for Kruezer or 206?
Armfield, Graham, OKeefe, Garlett, White, Collins, Curnow?
How can we leave Rowe out?
Kids in Bootsma, Watson, Menzel, McCarthy, Buckley, Dale pushing for spots.
Scotland still to come back as will McInnes

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 ... 172  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, Google [Bot], spiderman, timinfernie and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group