Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Given present environment in football and how notoriously bad AFL clubs are at administration in general and the present furore over tanking (not recognised by afl ) third party contracts, salary cap ,gambling influences ,drug use (performance and non performance) I think we should be pro active and get an integrity officer in the football club as soon as possible - it would be costly but worth every cent if it prevents us falling foul of any of these issues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
frank dardew wrote:
Given present environment in football and how notoriously bad AFL clubs are at administration in general and the present furore over tanking (not recognised by afl ) third party contracts, salary cap ,gambling influences ,drug use (performance and non performance) I think we should be pro active and get an integrity officer in the football club as soon as possible - it would be costly but worth every cent if it prevents us falling foul of any of these issues


Not sure Frank, i'd like to think we'd develop a culture where such a position wouldn't be required.

Much like a company I worked for once, they had a couple of d1ckheads that cost them a lot of money on a number of transactions. Instead of getting rid of the people responsible (all a bit hard and some were family)they decided to appoint a Risk Manager to keep it from happening again.

So they kept the problem and added an extra cost to the business.

I'd much prefer that we had line managers who knew their jobs and the rules..

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Last edited by cimm1979 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Good idea. It should be called the John Nicholls Integrity Officer.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Yes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
prefer Harris/Khemlani integrity officer Mosche a bit more political intrigue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
It should be one of the Stephens, but which one?

O'Reilly or Silvagni.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:58 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
moshe25 wrote:
Good idea. It should be called the John Nicholls Integrity Officer.


:lol:

I vote for cimm's doggie.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
bluegirl72 wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Good idea. It should be called the John Nicholls Integrity Officer.


:lol:

I vote for cimm's doggie.


There'd be no stone left unturned!!

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
camelboy wrote:
It should be one of the Stephens, but which one?

O'Reilly or Silvagni.


Depends if it is a paid or non paid position.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
cimm1979 wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Good idea. It should be called the John Nicholls Integrity Officer.


:lol:

I vote for cimm's doggie.


There'd be no stone left unturned!!


woof!

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
GET BOMBER THOMPSON

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Yes. But not by choice. All clubs will have to have them. I'm ok with it, provided they're paid for by the AFL, not the club. With Juddy co-owning Eve nightclub and knowing 'racing identities' - the Carlton gig should resemble one long John Lennon FBI file.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
if the heads of each department aren't doing their job, then yes, we need an integrity officer :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
The ultimate position the AFL can put themselves in to control the clubs and the competition as a whole.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1287
Location: Melbourne
I'm ambivalent. One serious slip up can have catastrophic consequences and derail an entire club for years. However the type of integrity issues we've seen of late have hardly been caused by rogue individuals (contrary to claims) but rather by groups of senior people at clubs acting in concert. Would one relatively low ranking integrity officer who is answerable to and employed by these senior people be in a position to intercede in a meaningful way. Would the low ranking integrity officer become enmeshed with the culture of the club, be keen to please his or her masters, and after a while be inclined to overlook certain matters. Stockholm syndrome.

An integrity officer would need to be employed by and answerable to the AFL to be independent and effective.

Surely the answer is better corporate governance overall with better checks and balances rather than employing more cardigan-wearing paper shufflers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:35 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
I think we need one agree it should be funded/paid by combination of AFL and AFLPA so it is independent of influences at club but players have some ownership and can go to them if they need to be a whistleblower

Integrity officer role should not just deal with drug issue but a whole plethora of regulatorty issues salary cap, thid party player payment ,gambling


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:12 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
What's big Jack doing these days?


Last edited by The Normal One on Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Do you reckon the AFL Narc will be given a prime office location at each club? Will the in-house coffee shop continue to stuff up their order? Will they always be eating lunch alone in the corner?

The position may be warranted, but just imagine how much clubs will close ranks with the AFL rozzers on full time watch.

It will take some very well prepared and adhered to guidelines/regulations with all parties on board if it's to have any hope of being effective.

And how long until it is found that an integrity officer is on the take? It will happen.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree camel but really need to have this position with a similar status as CEO at the football club and need to ensure that it is as far as possible incorruptible types that are given job -AFL should insist on certain conditions in respect to tenure ie access etc
Wont be welcomed at club land but lets face it the reason these crisises happen is that the clubs are pretty fast and loose with the regulatory stuff and corporate governance cant tell me that if the right integrity officer was in at Essendon* sitting in on board /players/medical etc meetings that this fiasco at Essendon* would not have happened or would have raised the flag much earlier


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Yep, the theory is really good. Nailing the practice will be the hard part, and my faith in the AFL's ability to get something like this working effectively is rapidly diminishing.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group