Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 681 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 35  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:32 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Evolutionary NOT revolutionary


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Yeah but its innovative, so who cares

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
and intuitive

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
kingkerna wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I dont know why we have to think a bout playing games in the coloseum , sahara or mars... the game isnt an international game.. it never will be ... and our bread and butter is in australia... if we cant get things right with our supporters here or interstate im at a loss to know why wed be looking o/s

Its Australias elite sport but ts way behind the rest of the world..... im pretty sure there are a heap of things we can still do here (Like Collingwood is ) to put daylight between ourselves and the competition without resorting to NZ etc

I agree 100%

will the members want it? Nope
will we increase our membership as a result? Nope
will our players be worse off from the travel during the season? Yep
Is there a long term benefit to the club? Nope
Are the 'leading' clubs doing this? Nope

You're both spot on...

It seems that we all want our club to better connect with it's fan base... sending home games overseas to markets that couldn't give a %$#& about AFL isn't conducive to that goal. It's nothing more than a short term financial gain but may be detrimental in the long run.

I'm not going to pretend I have the answers but I perceive sending home games interstate/international as a last resort for a club.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
The way the league is set up these days with the big shots at AFL calling the shots almost down to who will be playing finals season to season i cant see any reason why anyone would bother investing in club membership other than getting into games cheaper.
It is entertainment. The whole idea of being a part of club goes straight over my head and i know most of my friends feel the same.
Buying a membership to me when i don't go to many games would make me feel like i am being taken for a ride by AD and co.

Contributing in getting us to the MCG is a good reason to buy one i guess. Then i would go to more games and then want a membership to save bucks.

I hope those in charge of the club are looking into other ways to make us better than just getting members because there are only so many carlton supporters out there that are that into it.

Collingwood have the advantage with membership because their demographic are right into handing their money over to be part of an AFL football club.

I see no reason to connect with the club in the modern environment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10576
club29 wrote:
The way the league is set up these days with the big shots at AFL calling the shots almost down to who will be playing finals season to season i cant see any reason why anyone would bother investing in club membership other than getting into games cheaper.
It is entertainment. The whole idea of being a part of club goes straight over my head and i know most of my friends feel the same.
Buying a membership to me when i don't go to many games would make me feel like i am being taken for a ride by AD and co.

Contributing in getting us to the MCG is a good reason to buy one i guess. Then i would go to more games and then want a membership to save bucks.

I hope those in charge of the club are looking into other ways to make us better than just getting members because there are only so many carlton supporters out there that are that into it.

Collingwood have the advantage with membership because their demographic are right into handing their money over to be part of an AFL football club.

I see no reason to connect with the club in the modern environment.


:clap: :clap: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10576
Hornet wrote:
It seems that we all want our club to better connect with it's fan base... sending home games overseas to markets that couldn't give a %$#& about AFL isn't conducive to that goal. It's nothing more than a short term financial gain but may be detrimental in the long run.

I'm not going to pretend I have the answers but I perceive sending home games interstate/international as a last resort for a club.


:clap: :clap: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
basically what club29 said


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Rexy wrote:
basically what club29 said


Which part Rexy? The part where he says the competition is rigged by the governing body.. :?:

club29 wrote:
The way the league is set up these days with the big shots at AFL calling the shots almost down to who will be playing finals season to season


...or the mistake most Carlton supporters make with Collingwood's demographic?
club29 wrote:
Collingwood have the advantage with membership because their demographic are right into handing their money over to be part of an AFL football club.


Sure, they have their fair share of nuff-nuffs, but one only needs to glance at Carlton's facebook page to see the Blues do to. I know my Collingwood supporting friends are teachers, lawyers and doctors.

This following statement was a good point though...

club29 wrote:
Contributing in getting us to the MCG is a good reason to buy one i guess.
:thumbsup:

club29 wrote:
I hope those in charge of the club are looking into other ways to make us better than just getting members because there are only so many carlton supporters out there that aren't that into it.


They are. But they're trying to make money. That's a key part of their core business. Like all clubs, they're trying to promote themselves accordingly so people will want more of their product. Here's where you have to view the club as being in the entertainment business.

club29 wrote:
I see no reason to connect with the club in the modern environment.


Modern environment meaning you're happy to watch on TV? Not satisfied with value for money? I understand why people aren't members, and people are also members for differing reasons - to feel 'a part of the place' isn't wholly a determining factor for many either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Ok so its buy a membership so we might go to the G...

nice one....

Whatabout why so many people dont buy memberships???

You know? disconnect????

The great Carlton divide.

Before you guys can look at the G you have to fix the disconnect the club has with so many......

Youre putting the cart before the horse... and crappy argument.... if i may say :roll:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Synbad wrote:
Ok so its buy a membership so we might go to the G...

nice one....

Whatabout why so many people dont buy memberships???

You know? disconnect????

The great Carlton divide.

Before you guys can look at the G you have to fix the disconnect the club has with so many......

Youre putting the cart before the horse... and crappy argument.... if i may say :roll:


All depends what level of expectation you have Synbad. Are you really that disconnected? Discontented maybe. See I chose to disconnect myself in 2012. It was unsatisfaction with some decision making. But I didn't know the full story. Had that been spelled out to me earlier - then I may have forgiven the bad decision making and the way it was communicated. And that's where the club has let itself down (IMO) the most. It hasn't understood the supporter, and hasn't communicated to them like they should be communicated to. They are now on their way to doing that. If you don't see it now - you'll see it soon.

Before you look at the 'G??? Have you not been reading? The negotiations commence this year. Greg Swann's most important role this season should be to present a compelling case as to why Carlton should move to the MCG. If you leave it too late, you're stuck with an Etihad deal. It's now or never.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:47 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
basically what club29 said


Which part Rexy? The part where he says the competition is rigged by the governing body.. :?:

club29 wrote:
The way the league is set up these days with the big shots at AFL calling the shots almost down to who will be playing finals season to season


...or the mistake most Carlton supporters make with Collingwood's demographic?
club29 wrote:
Collingwood have the advantage with membership because their demographic are right into handing their money over to be part of an AFL football club.


Sure, they have their fair share of nuff-nuffs, but one only needs to glance at Carlton's facebook page to see the Blues do to. I know my Collingwood supporting friends are teachers, lawyers and doctors.

This following statement was a good point though...

club29 wrote:
Contributing in getting us to the MCG is a good reason to buy one i guess.
:thumbsup:

club29 wrote:
I hope those in charge of the club are looking into other ways to make us better than just getting members because there are only so many carlton supporters out there that aren't that into it.


They are. But they're trying to make money. That's a key part of their core business. Like all clubs, they're trying to promote themselves accordingly so people will want more of their product. Here's where you have to view the club as being in the entertainment business.

club29 wrote:
I see no reason to connect with the club in the modern environment.


Modern environment meaning you're happy to watch on TV? Not satisfied with value for money? I understand why people aren't members, and people are also members for differing reasons - to feel 'a part of the place' isn't wholly a determining factor for many either.


I am betting GWS and GC make the finals in three years time if not before then. Sydney will always be up there. The pies will always get loads of games on the same ground.

Only an opinion about Collingwood fans but it looks pretty obvious to me. There are always exceptions like the teachers and doctors and carlton facebook pagers you speak of. Go to a Mill Park maccas 3 hours before a pies game and you will find it chock full of them. All part of the game day experience which they will hand down to their children.

By modern environment i am referring to the AFL having their hands on too much. Tv too. Also the economy. Why would anyone give money away to connect with a football club??

For me it is watch them play on TV or live, cheer on the blue team, review the game and tactics and watch reserves for future talent the following day before moving onto the next weeks game.

The club should offer memberships that get you into games cheaper as you go. Like a concession card. No cap, mag, phone calls from judd, invites, voting rights, finals tickets or anything else like that. Just a blank card that costs $50 that gets $8 taken off at the gate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DocSherrin wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok so its buy a membership so we might go to the G...

nice one....

Whatabout why so many people dont buy memberships???

You know? disconnect????

The great Carlton divide.

Before you guys can look at the G you have to fix the disconnect the club has with so many......

Youre putting the cart before the horse... and crappy argument.... if i may say :roll:


All depends what level of expectation you have Synbad. Are you really that disconnected? Discontented maybe. See I chose to disconnect myself in 2012. It was unsatisfaction with some decision making. But I didn't know the full story. Had that been spelled out to me earlier - then I may have forgiven the bad decision making and the way it was communicated. And that's where the club has let itself down (IMO) the most. It hasn't understood the supporter, and hasn't communicated to them like they should be communicated to. They are now on their way to doing that. If you don't see it now - you'll see it soon.

Before you look at the 'G??? Have you not been reading? The negotiations commence this year. Greg Swann's most important role this season should be to present a compelling case as to why Carlton should move to the MCG. If you leave it too late, you're stuck with an Etihad deal. It's now or never.



Discontened and disconnected.

Not sure how its an exclusive club.

and as for the G.. Essendon* play at the Dome but have more members than us... and travelling worse....

Its straw clutching...

International games in Siberia.... get your membership so we can play at the G....

But falling behind the other big games.... and one eliminational finals win in 10 years under the belt.. plus a heap of stuff ups that come all the way through to the Ratts extensions.. and then the sackings of him and his assistants.. and unable to field a full house of coaches..
The VFL part time headmaster coach last season and the Robert Wiley jack of all trades this year.....
Plus the rejections of the Irish boom recruit.. and some assiatant coaches...

Add that to an underperforming corporate sponsorship book...
And an Oligarchical ownership at the very top... cos they are asked to keep tipping in cos the club cant manage to stand up on its own two feet...

But yeah..... the new mantra is ... "Buy your memebership so one day we can play at the G"

We WILL play at the G when we get our shit together enough to play off in a GF....

thats the on ly time i give a @#$%&! about whether were playing at the G or the Dome...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:11 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6406
kingkerna wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I dont know why we have to think a bout playing games in the coloseum , sahara or mars... the game isnt an international game.. it never will be ... and our bread and butter is in australia... if we cant get things right with our supporters here or interstate im at a loss to know why wed be looking o/s

Its Australias elite sport but ts way behind the rest of the world..... im pretty sure there are a heap of things we can still do here (Like Collingwood is ) to put daylight between ourselves and the competition without resorting to NZ etc

I agree 100%

will the members want it? Nope
will we increase our membership as a result? Nope
will our players be worse off from the travel during the season? Yep
Is there a long term benefit to the club? Nope
Are the 'leading' clubs doing this? Nope


Will the members want it
one home game overseas on tv around 5.00 wouldnt be a problem and the AFL could give us an extra home game in Melbourne
will it increase our membership as a result
likely with the number of people in Asia
will our players be worse off from travel during the season
I am advocating one game. Answer no. Their flower professional athletes. You can play in heat in Perth or humidity in Brisbane depending on the time of year. There can be an 8 day break or play the game before the bye
Is there a long term benefit to the club
possibly. Nope is a dumb answer
are the leading clubs doing this
This response sums up the old fashioned arrogant redundant Carlton attitiude
NOPE
Kerna we arnt are leading club at the moment. Havent been for a decade We are average or below in every area. So we dont do it because neither is Essendon* or Collingwood.
Oh I get it its StKilda that team that has one premiership and that was one by one point with a flukey kick. Ateam that has basically pantsed us if you look at the last ten years
lets see how it all goes in Wellington on Anzac day

Your answer to the last question sums up the problem Carlton has had.
An arrogance to not look at something that could be great because we are so flower good that we dont have to do it.

You need to pull your head out of the eighties time warp it resides in.
The saints have been far more successful in the last decade. Our efforts on and off the field in comparison have been pathetic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:48 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
I like keogh. He's grumpier than me. :smoking:

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:21 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
club29 wrote:
The club should offer memberships that get you into games cheaper as you go. Like a concession card. No cap, mag, phone calls from judd, invites, voting rights, finals tickets or anything else like that. Just a blank card that costs $50 that gets $8 taken off at the gate.


a) they wouldn't be allowed by the AFL and b) they wouldn't want to. It's a business, not a charity.

I think there's a bit of a misconception as to what a membership is. It's just a season ticket of different varieties. With some parameters. There is a club constitution that needs to be adhered to - so for varying reasons it's a little more than a season ticket, it's a membership. It should, in most instances give the individual who holds one a right to vote and should the club fold it means you're handing over $50 as well.

If you don't want to join - that's perfectly ok. No one is forcing you. I think people are stupid for joining a gym when they would save thousands via other methods. But some view it as the only way they can keep fit. Some view a season ticket as the only way they can get their Carlton fill...the entertainment value of the atmosphere that no TV has can ever replicate.

But aside from corporate sponsorship, TV rights cash and monies from investments, the club relies on membership sales as a major financial boon to its coffers. And it will be membership in 2013 and 2014 that has a large bearing on the direction of our football club. I do not want to take my children to Etihad in 5 years and tell them it's our home ground. The equation is pretty simple for me although part of my positivity is based on some of the action the club has taken in the off-season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Yep and if they cant get the membership and corporate figures up.... we are too blame ot them.

Id love to know who is sharing responsibility with us the supporters with the way the club is....

anyone??

Or is just some of us???


See to me thats the salient point...

If supporters are the key.. why have they been marginalised??

thats a can of worms asking that question.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Hornet wrote:

It seems that we all want our club to better connect with it's fan base... sending home games overseas to markets that couldn't give a %$#& about AFL isn't conducive to that goal. It's nothing more than a short term financial gain but may be detrimental in the long run.

I'm not going to pretend I have the answers but I perceive sending home games interstate/international as a last resort for a club.


I don't have all the facts and figures at hand either but every club has a responsibility to maximize its revenue.
Hawthorn jumped the gun and got involved with Tasmania. Best guess would be that several other Melbourne based clubs wish they had have now.

Short, medium and long term scenarios must be constantly explored and reviewed and what seems like the ridiculous today may well be the norm in ten/twenty years time.
Getting to the MCG in 2015 is a no-brainer and may be all that most of us care about now, but we're not allowed to take our eye off the bigger picture and if that means getting a slice of the action in New Zealand, South Africa, China etc. then so be it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6406
harker wrote:
Hornet wrote:

It seems that we all want our club to better connect with it's fan base... sending home games overseas to markets that couldn't give a %$#& about AFL isn't conducive to that goal. It's nothing more than a short term financial gain but may be detrimental in the long run.

I'm not going to pretend I have the answers but I perceive sending home games interstate/international as a last resort for a club.


I don't have all the facts and figures at hand either but every club has a responsibility to maximize its revenue.
Hawthorn jumped the gun and got involved with Tasmania. Best guess would be that several other Melbourne based clubs wish they had have now.

Short, medium and long term scenarios must be constantly explored and reviewed and what seems like the ridiculous today may well be the norm in ten/twenty years time.






Getting to the MCG in 2015 is a no-brainer and may be all that most of us care about now, but we're not allowed to take our eye off the bigger picture and if that means getting a slice of the action in New Zealand, South Africa, China etc. then so be it.



The last two sentences are the key. Well said
I reckon you can talk as much as you like about connecting to members etc the bottom line is that the world may rotate at the same pace astronomically speaking but change is getting faster and faster. Clubs are going to have to find new ways of creating new revenue to keep afloat

For those opposed to playing one game overseas tell me where can you play in Australia where the game can expand with an AFL presence. Ballarat, Wagga Albury/Wodonga and maybe one or two other regional areas. And that can only happen with upgrading of the grounds.

The way forward is partly to look towards playing at least one game overseas.

The board should at least look at it
The best time to play(weather patterns)
Facilities
Insurance
Travel and working with the AFL and the people who design the draw to compensate for recovery from the travel
Marketing the game
Playing the game a weekend there isnt a big sporting event in that country
Time zones and TV time in Australia

The board should look at this and cost it then go to Andy and say we are looking at playing a game overseas for 4 premiership points

Now I am not one for kissing the bosses arse but the AFL and Andy D have made no secret of their desire to go international and if they and the two federal governments tipped in some money it might not cost much at all to do it

You are exposing yourself to a completely new population base.
I agree the game will never be truly international but that isnt a concern. There may be huge benefits in terms of sponsorship which is the number one revenue raiser. Membership as well

Look think back 30 years when the Swans went to Sydney. Nobody thought it would work. It has . Its still a rugby city but because its in a population base of 4 million people it works. So much so that there is now 2 teams.

Things people didnt think were possible happpen but they can only happen if the people running the show at least look at it from the beginning.
Look forward 30 years from now.
Can anyone predict that the Pratts and Mathiesons will be supplying this club cash.
No you cant
One things almost certain
Jeannie and Bruce will be dead and buried and that can change things


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Playing AFL games overseas is a silly idea - Sounds like the AFL Commission are trying to franchise the AFL Code internationally like World Wrestling, X-Factor and American Idol :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 681 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 35  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group