Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 10:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Pafloyul wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
Dukes wrote:
All this proves is that people perceive "action" during trade week to be good, and "inaction" to be bad ... wothout bothering to analyse the sum total of the moves.

Look a bit harder and you'll see that Melbourne are a basket case. Trading out a top 12 draft pick for Cam Pedersen, a top 3 pick for pick 88, bringing in Byrnes and Rodan who have played their best footy already, having to pay over the odds (ie more than double his Pies wage!) for Dawes ... should we go on???!!!!


Well said. People just can't help themselves. The grass is always greener on the other side...


Bull crap - the analogy hardly fits, there's seventeen 'other sides' for a start. Two years in a row that a mediocre club has to rely on the right players to somehow converge on the club from three mediocre draft picks - it's not good enough!


What would you have done, given the position of our list? What moves would you have tried to make that would genuinely have improved the list? Of the available talent out there, who did we really miss out on that we could realistically have got? Someone like Caddy would have been nice but we would have had to give up Pick 11 to get him, something about which you no doubt would have complained. We could have traded Warnock, that might have got us enough second round pick. Other than that?

All you ever do is talk in abstruse recruiting theories without ever offering names or any real substance or specifics. Tell us what you would have done.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7440
Apart from Goddard who arguably is getting on a bit, costs too much and not really what we need... there's not one traded player I 'regret' not pursuing.

Hindsight may prove me wrong at a later date but I'm quite content at not being overly active in this trade period. Was hoping to get a first or second rounder for Warnock but also happy we didn't just give him away.

I think we have a decent list and believe we'll see it nurtured with a more defensively minded game plan.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:15 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Blues2005 wrote:

What would you have done, given the position of our list?


That's all you needed to say. We butchered our list management to the point where it was impossible to get involved even if we did want to.

I haven't seen too many on the site pushing to trade for trading's sake. Just a lot of frustration that we hand cuffed ourselves to essentially the same group for two years running.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:33 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1238
Yep. No cap room and 4 players contracted for next year that we'd like to delist if we had the chance.

Not great list management.

Would expect some movement next year however.

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:35 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Now the trade period is over and nothing happened Im looking forward to seeing MM develop our kids and improve what we have in 2013.

Kids like Bootsma, Buckley, Dale, Lucas, OKeefe, Watson, McCarthy, Mitchell, Davies, Bell getting game time and showing their worth.

Players such as Gibbs, Yarran, Garlett, Laidler, Henderson, Waite, Walker, Warnock, Jamison being fit and/or playing to their ability on a consistent basis.

Add to that three kids like Stringer, Colquhoun & McBean and we still look pretty good. :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:34 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14741
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
For mine the moves I liked best were the cashing in of Collingwood for some more highish draft picks, but also the deals for very little to secure the zone players from GWS that Port and Hawks did

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15064
The replay of the round 3 game against Collingwood is on foxtel now. Amazing how much better the side was when we had almost a full strength side and players such as Laidler, Henderson and Waite fit and firing.
Hopefully we can have a better run with injuries next season and if Rogers can get our draft picks right we should have a better season.
MM will have a year to get a better look at our players and i expect us to be pretty active next trade period.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
kezza wrote:
The replay of the round 3 game against Collingwood is on foxtel now. Amazing how much better the side was when we had almost a full strength side and players such as Laidler, Henderson and Waite fit and firing.

I'd say it's more likely that the team were doing so well because the less motivated of our group were enjoying playing a lot more as our stars were getting the job done, making their own jobs easier and giving them more confidence in the process. Injuries are one reason for our slide this year, another equally (I would say more) important reason was lazy players not willing to put in the hard work when times weren't so good and they needed to dig deep. What we saw against Collingwood in round 3 was these guys riding a wave.

Remember, a very similar team lost to Gold Coast later in the year.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
List ages @ the end of next year is looking like this:
<21 = (10) 7 + 3 likely to come in via the draft
Bootsma, Watson, McCarthy, McInnes, Mitchell, Dale, Buckley
<23 = 6 (+1 re: Mitch Carter if not delisted)
Yarran, Davies, Lucas, O'Keeffe, Casboult, Bell
<25 = 13
Hampson, Ellard, Tuohy, Garlett, Henderson, Collins, Curnow, Robinson, Laidler, Kreuzer, Joseph, Gibbs, White
<27 = 8
Rowe, Betts, Armfield, Jamison, McLean, Warnock, Murphy, Walker
<29 = 2
- Duigan, Simpson
30+ = 4
- Scotland, Waite, Judd, Carrazzo

Good sign that the younger ones have all had a taste of AFL footy bar Buckley.

Interesting how CFC see the list moving forward with a lot of middle tier players (>25) in the line for delisting, some >27's that battle to stay on the park and a retirement (Scotland) + older player queries or 2 with their place in the team (Duigan)/fitness (Waite, though he'll have an extra year on his contract to run).
Our under 23's are mixed bag mostly of rookies but hopefully with some upside but none are regular players except for Yazz.
Our under 25's need to regular fixtures in the team however lot of names on here feature as regular "depth" players.


Last edited by BIRDTOWN on Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6460
except for injuries next year is a watershed year.
Our inactivity means we think the list is ok.
If certain big names cant peform in 2013 then they should be traded for the best draft picks we can get for them
and we start the rebuilding process.

I can understand the inactivity to some degree.

I agree with the other posters that this trade period is seriously overrated.
the facts are that most players traded arnt that good. Just average footballers. Yeah you can get some success stories like the 7 Swans guys who came from other clubs but
Have a look at the pies for example

Lynch looks like tarzan plays like Jane over 30 can kick it it a mile and occasionally take a pack mark but moves like a glacier on tranquilisers
in short shit
Young soft as a marshmellow injury prone. Kicks it a mile but a receiver. We have got enough of them at Carlton. His piss weak act that allowed Jack to kick that goal in the last quarter of the GF sealed his fate.
in short shit
Jordan Russell no explanantion
in short shit

Look at the Swans this year. Yes they are great at recycling players not wanted but if you look closely its pretty all about drafting properly.
15 of the premiership 22 were from the national draft as youngsters.


I guess what I am saying is if some of our big name players peform next year as they did this year then I would be looking for a trade for draft picks and starting to build our list from scratch
eg Gibbs to PA for picks 7 and 30

IMO we havent got the cattle to top our list up with recycled players who can have a second wind at another club.

If we arnt successful next year( we must win one final to be a success IMO)
then I believe we need to start from scratch and take a different view of our future.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3265
keogh wrote:
except for injuries next year is a watershed year.
Our inactivity means we think the list is ok.
If certain big names cant peform in 2013 then they should be traded for the best draft picks we can get for them
and we start the rebuilding process.

I can understand the inactivity to some degree.

I agree with the other posters that this trade period is seriously overrated.
the facts are that most players traded arnt that good. Just average footballers. Yeah you can get some success stories like the 7 Swans guys who came from other clubs but
Have a look at the pies for example

Lynch looks like tarzan plays like Jane over 30 can kick it it a mile and occasionally take a pack mark but moves like a glacier on tranquilisers
in short shit
Young soft as a marshmellow injury prone. Kicks it a mile but a receiver. We have got enough of them at Carlton. His piss weak act that allowed Jack to kick that goal in the last quarter of the GF sealed his fate.
in short shit
Jordan Russell no explanantion
in short shit

Look at the Swans this year. Yes they are great at recycling players not wanted but if you look closely its pretty all about drafting properly.
15 of the premiership 22 were from the national draft as youngsters.


I guess what I am saying is if some of our big name players peform next year as they did this year then I would be looking for a trade for draft picks and starting to build our list from scratch
eg Gibbs to PA for picks 7 and 30

IMO we havent got the cattle to top our list up with recycled players who can have a second wind at another club.

If we arnt successful next year( we must win one final to be a success IMO)
then I believe we need to start from scratch and take a different view of our future.


pragmatic and rational :clap: lets give it a crack this year with a new coach.....if guys like gibbs etc don't scrub up....trade very aggressively


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
BIRDTOWN wrote:
List ages @ the end of next year is looking like this:
>21 = (10) 7 + 3 likely to come in via the draft
Bootsma, Watson, McCarthy, McInnes, Mitchell, Dale, Buckley
>23 = 6 (+1 re: Mitch Carter if not delisted)
Yarran, Davies, Lucas, O'Keeffe, Casboult, Bell
>25 = 13
Hampson, Ellard, Tuohy, Garlett, Henderson, Collins, Curnow, Robinson, Laidler, Kreuzer, Joseph, Gibbs, White
>27 = 8
Rowe, Betts, Armfield, Jamison, McLean, Warnock, Murphy, Walker
>29 = 2
- Duigan, Simpson
30+ = 4
- Scotland, Waite, Judd, Carrazzo



Bootsma, Buckley and Dale all born in 1993, meaning they'd be 20 at December 31st 2013.

Bell, Davies and Lucas all born in 1991, meaning they'd be 22 at December 31st 2013.

Gibbs, Ellard, Tuohy, Henderson, Curnow, Laidler, Kruezer, Joseph, Robinson and Garlett all born in 1989, meaning they'd be 24 at December 31st 2013.

Rowe, Warnock and Murphy all born in 1987, meaning they'd be 26 at December 31st 2013.

22/40.

Barely a pass mark.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
What if I hit the right button <. More compelling reading.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
BIRDTOWN wrote:
What if I hit the right button <. More compelling reading.


Then you'd be 18/40 :lol:

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Megaman wrote:
For mine the moves I liked best were the cashing in of Collingwood for some more highish draft picks, but also the deals for very little to secure the zone players from GWS that Port and Hawks did

WC's work is underrated and better than Collingwood's effort. Not a massive Wellingham fan, but you can see him burning it up at home and complementing their inside mids. Ditto Cripps who could give them more run and carry along with Sheppard and Murray Newman.

Pick 44 for a surplus mid in Stevens was a win.

Morton cost them nothing, but if he can harden up a bit, he could realise his talent at a club who will be harder on him. Look at Josh Hill who was traded for next to nothing a year before they delisted Sherman. Worth a shot when he's shown more than Oakley-Nicholls who they rookied.

Held firm on Brown to get a trade that could have paid off for them. Had a win after they missed out on Hooker, but still got Cripps from that idiot Watters.

Pick 62 for Quinten Lynch is tidy work.

Upgraded Brad Dick who can play

They can win the flag with these players adding to their depth and moving into their best 35 players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
kezza wrote:
The replay of the round 3 game against Collingwood is on foxtel now. Amazing how much better the side was when we had almost a full strength side and players such as Laidler, Henderson and Waite fit and firing.
Hopefully we can have a better run with injuries next season and if Rogers can get our draft picks right we should have a better season.
MM will have a year to get a better look at our players and i expect us to be pretty active next trade period.


Certainly was an exciting team that ran out that night. If we play like that every week we'd be top 4 without a doubt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
We need Warnock because Kreuzer and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Kreuzer because Warnock and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Hampson because Kreuzer and Warnock are susceptible to injury


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
'twas the best team Ratt's had fielded in his 100 games was in the commentary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:26 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Rexy wrote:
We need Warnock because Kreuzer and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Kreuzer because Warnock and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Hampson because Kreuzer and Warnock are susceptible to injury

And we need Casboult because Kreuzer, Warnock, and Hampson are susceptible to injury.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25557
Location: Bondi Beach
moshe25 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
We need Warnock because Kreuzer and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Kreuzer because Warnock and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Hampson because Kreuzer and Warnock are susceptible to injury

And we need Casboult because Kreuzer, Warnock, and Hampson are susceptible to injury.


It was the same as when Sammy Jacobs was with us. They were all susceptible to injury.
I just hope its not a Carlton Curse and moreso we have grown out of it....the young bodies that is.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], titimus, Traveller86 and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group