bluegirl72 wrote:
Perhaps we should ask ourselves, 'What would the Sydney Swans do?'
I'm really not sure if I'm joking or not.
Of course, if we'd gotten BJ, our butts would be covered. He'd have made a perfect stand in with an absent Scotty.

I asked that very question in the Cultures and Values thread Bluegirl.
I'm astounded at the response on here. Have we learned nothing? On the one hand, everyone cries and laments that we don't have the culture that Sydney has, or Geelong has, that we lack the leadership to be a Premiership team. But then when something happens that demands strong leadership, that gives the Club the opportunity to begin to change its culture, to establish standards and levels of behaviour that will not be compromised, suddenly everyone is gun shy, suddenly it's the AFL driving the media to put pressure on us.
It's actually really simple. Scotland went out and king hit someone. He is a repeat offender. He put himself in a situation where he got into trouble. If our Club is going to demand uncompromised behaviour and performance from its players (and staff), then this cannot be tolerated. The Club should be strong, firm, and quick in its behaviour. It should drive the punishment, not be fighting the AFL to get Scotland a lighter penalty. Three weeks, four weeks, season proper. Make everyone at the Club understand in no uncertain terms that this is unacceptable behaviour. Make Scotland feel like not only has he behaved unacceptably, embarrassed himself etc, but that he has let down his teammates. his coaches, his Club and the supporters. And then, he won't do it again. Did we learn nothing from Fevola?
That is what Sydney and Geelong would do.
And that is how you go about changing the culture of a football club, and developing strong leadership.