Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 3:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 906
Sin City wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..well, if Malty were to 'stay to type', he likes 3 tall fwds.. ..think of Cloke as the roaming CHF, Dawes as the hit-up FF and Brown was the fwd/ruck relief.. ..can we develop a similar set-up from within?, i think so..


Damn right. Casboult, Mitchell, Henderson, Waite, Rowe can fill any of those roles. Be easy with a dominate midfield, structures and good ball use. :wink:

Completely agree, we'd need more forward pressure from the midfield as we'd only be playing two small/medium forwards instead of three but I can see that happening under Malthouse anyway.

Would like to see a forward setup of

Garlett Waite Gibbs/Bell/Robinson (defensive forward)
Betts Rowe Casboult

With Walker moving into the midfield.


Not a bad option if the 3 talls use their mobility. I didn't realise Casboult had it in him but he showed some real defensive pressure when he was in the 1s. Haven't seen enough of Rowe but he looks like he has reasonable mobility and we know Waite does. Add to that a real emphasis on defensive pressure from Betts and Garlett and whoever the other flanker is and the set-up would seem to be able to avoid letting the opposition defenders stream forward. That becomes more of an issue if we rest our ruck forward, Hampson has the pace to chase harder than he does, turning circle is more of an issue, but Kreuzer and especially Warnock are laible to be run off. But we may well not rest them forward with the suggested set-up. You might look to rest say Walker forward as the 3rd tall and rest the ruck off the ground. Or go a 2-talls set up just for a change-up. Or give Gibbs/Bell/Robinson the 3rd forward role for a bit.


Personally I prefer Walker as 3rd/4th tall and Gibbs/Bell/Robinson in the middle. A defence struggling to cover 3 talls might really struggle with Walker as well. but that is perhaps a matter of how the opposition lines up from game to game.

And of course if Jeffy has another year like 2012 he'll be likely out on his arse regardless of the defensive pressure he brings. Armfield by the end of the season was giving great defensive pressure and nailing goals too - so he's another real option up there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
I don't mind Tex rotating occasionally through the middle but I think our forward line is much more dangerous with him closer to goal.

As far a the rucks are concerned, if Casboult and Waite are in the team then I can really only see room for one ruckman. I think 206 could actually be the best one we have but so much depends on him getting his body right for him to achieve his full potential. I wonder if MM will be as beholden to Special-K as Ratts was ?

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:50 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Id prefer to keep Hampson out of the two but there may be other circumstances with contracts and stuff.

...also Hampsons value maybe higher with a new club if it means Gale will be seen in the rooms and at events. Good for the clubs image.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
This idea of Hampson as a forward is just wrong. Yes, he can pinch hit but he is NOT a forward. I cannot see Malthouse playing two of any of our ruckman at anyone time. Who that will be is anyones guess and none of them are a standout.

Personally, whilst I think there is some ability is there they are nothing special. I wouldn't rank any off them in the top 15 in the competition especially given their injury concerns and lack of consistent output.

As for the comments on Walker. Leave him forward with small stints on ball. It's where he played his best football.

Seriously, with a gun midfield and right structures this forward line would stretch any side.

"Mids" Henderson Waite
Betts Casboult Walker

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
ThePsychologist wrote:
This idea of Hampson as a forward is just wrong. Yes, he can pinch hit but he is NOT a forward. I cannot see Malthouse playing two of any of our ruckman at anyone time. Who that will be is anyones guess and none of them are a standout.

Personally, whilst I think there is some ability is there they are nothing special. I wouldn't rank any off them in the top 15 in the competition especially given their injury concerns and lack of consistent output.

As for the comments on Walker. Leave him forward with small stints on ball. It's where he played his best football.

Seriously, with a gun midfield and right structures this forward line would stretch any side.

"Mids" Henderson Waite
Betts Casboult Walker


Being rebounded against will be a worry with that 6. MM might have a different press that could allow it to work but I doubt it. The top teams this year except for Geelong at times only use the one KPF and one ruck/forward. That makes hampson more valuable that Warnock to us and makes it a contest out of Hampson and Casboult for that second spot.

Henderson to FB. Jamo traded. (just thought i would throw that in)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19415
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Having reviewed Hampson's numbers I will change my mind and not trade him...although I wouldn't like trading Warnock either.

Really depends on what we are offered - if the offer was clearly in our favour then I would trade one of them.

Hampson was on track to kick 25-30 goals...it was all starting to click for him.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Effes wrote:
Having reviewed Hampson's numbers I will change my mind and not trade him...although I wouldn't like trading Warnock either.

Really depends on what we are offered - if the offer was clearly in our favour then I would trade one of them.

Hampson was on track to kick 25-30 goals...it was all starting to click for him.
Fair chance Casboult will nail that and maybe more. Also a better forward. If you looking for a bloke to ruck for very short periods, as were we late this year, you want it to be a forward.

Don't want to lose either but with the excess of rucks there's real currency.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
club29 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
This idea of Hampson as a forward is just wrong. Yes, he can pinch hit but he is NOT a forward. I cannot see Malthouse playing two of any of our ruckman at anyone time. Who that will be is anyones guess and none of them are a standout.

Personally, whilst I think there is some ability is there they are nothing special. I wouldn't rank any off them in the top 15 in the competition especially given their injury concerns and lack of consistent output.

As for the comments on Walker. Leave him forward with small stints on ball. It's where he played his best football.

Seriously, with a gun midfield and right structures this forward line would stretch any side.

"Mids" Henderson Waite
Betts Casboult Walker


Being rebounded against will be a worry with that 6. MM might have a different press that could allow it to work but I doubt it. The top teams this year except for Geelong at times only use the one KPF and one ruck/forward. That makes hampson more valuable that Warnock to us and makes it a contest out of Hampson and Casboult for that second spot.

Henderson to FB. Jamo traded. (just thought i would throw that in)
Don't see a rebound worry there. We saw Casboult run down Dempsey twice in one game.

West Coast play an abundance of talls forward. When North had their run they had 3 talls forward firing. Pies were always at their best under MM with 3 talls. Other's played 2 with one man rucking for 85% of the game and a forward pinch-hitting. Depends on how the side wants to structure up according to personnel and game plan.

If we want a forward pinch-hitting we want it to be a true forward not a ruckman. Hammer is not a forward. Warnock becomes more valuable as he provides something different and by far our best tap ruck. We already have similar types to Hampson but they are, bar Kreuzer, more forward types, which we want.

Love Rowe to come though this year, would allow us to play Waite as a HF 3rd tall. Waite isn't you ordinary tall. We can only hope there though with Rowe as we have no idea, hence can't bank on it. He's another forward who can ruck decently and won't be under the same pressure with the other talls around the forward line.

I'm guessing trading Jammo was tongue-in-cheek.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19415
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
jim wrote:
Effes wrote:
Having reviewed Hampson's numbers I will change my mind and not trade him...although I wouldn't like trading Warnock either.

Really depends on what we are offered - if the offer was clearly in our favour then I would trade one of them.

Hampson was on track to kick 25-30 goals...it was all starting to click for him.
Fair chance Casboult will nail that and maybe more. Also a better forward. If you looking for a bloke to ruck for very short periods, as were we late this year, you want it to be a forward.

Don't want to lose either but with the excess of rucks there's real currency.


You'd want your forward to be able to kick accurately.

Hampson 15 goals 4 behinds to Casboult's 7 goals 12 behinds. We all saw against Gold Coast what inaccurate goalkicking result in.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:01 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Westcoast didnt really have that many talls in their forward line this year. Darling = Walker in my scenario. In the end WC picked one too many talls and lost their biggest game of the year because of that and the fact that the ones that did play were rendered useless onces onball game got picked apart.

Norths 3 talls only worked on Etihad and was a reason they were so limp and lacking in options in their biggest game of the year.

Casboult did run down Dempsey but i would prefer we set up in a way that didnt allow dempsey to even get those 10 steps in in the first place if the ball at all.

I dont see it working. I reckon losing one tall from the arc is a change that has shifted into the game (apart from north and at times Geelong) since MM got the arse from Collingwood.
Ratts had us doing it a year before all that using Walker as the 2nd tall with Waite and resting ruck.

It might work having all that lumber in the arc but it will take a shift in the way we press.

For me it comes down to Casboult and Hampson fighting for a second ruck spot. Warnock is one dimensional but is good at that dimension when fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
I thought WC's talls in that final against Collingwood really hurt them. Once the ball hit the deck, Collingwood were able to run it out with ease. The talls work when they're marking. As good as Darling is on the ground, WC were crying out for some really nippy smalls that night. In retrospect, they would have been better off had Lynch been suspended.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Unfortunately Lynch will come to us i reckon.
Warnock or Hampson will be traded.
And we wil look for a ruckman in the draft with a late pick.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:27 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
Synbad wrote:
Unfortunately Lynch will come to us i reckon.
Warnock or Hampson will be traded.
And we wil look for a ruckman in the draft with a late pick.


Don't want Lynch, but would be very happy if points 2 and 3 happened.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Hard to not have emotion clouding judgment on that one.

Warnock's never really seemed a Carlton player. Hampson has. I think that has a large part in who I'd rather see leave.

I think Warnock is the better chance of succeeding though....

Flip a coin.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Problem with Lynch is he is one dimmensional... purely mark and kick...
He can kick a long scud....

His other problem is he isnt much taller than Thornton.. he might be a bigger body but thats about it...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
Lynch will be 30 next year. Casboult 23 and Mitchell 21.

I still think that Mitchell's another year away at least, but assuming Cloke stays at Collingwood, I'd rather keep developing Casboult than play Lynch. Casboult has shown a bit, and I'm not sure Lynch has anything more to offer.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:26 pm
Posts: 44
ThePsychologist wrote:
This idea of Hampson as a forward is just wrong. Yes, he can pinch hit but he is NOT a forward. I cannot see Malthouse playing two of any of our ruckman at anyone time. Who that will be is anyones guess and none of them are a standout.


Actually Hampson has real good potential to be a decent forward. He crashes packs and makes a contest of everything thrown his way and lets not forget his monster height and athletic ability makes it very very hard to man up on. His marking can be questionable but he will improve and even if he doesn't mark it he will most likely bring it to ground and you got betts/garlett at his heels.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Expecting Casboult, Hampson, Waite etc to fill our key positions is foolish. Apart from the fact Waite and Hammer cant stay on the park, they're too inconsistent.
We need a class key forward and it should be our number one priority in the draft.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Siegfried wrote:
I thought WC's talls in that final against Collingwood really hurt them. Once the ball hit the deck, Collingwood were able to run it out with ease. The talls work when they're marking. As good as Darling is on the ground, WC were crying out for some really nippy smalls that night. In retrospect, they would have been better off had Lynch been suspended.


Agree. Said in the game thread about how they missed LeCras, Nicoski or even Hams.

Have heard the last three times about how they are going to stretch the Collingwood backline. Twice this year, and once last year.

Also keep hearing about how everyone is going to stretch Hawthorn's defence, yet they are flag favourites.

It's about the collective. Pressure from the forwards to keep the ball in, two way pressure and running from the midfield to stop the transition and put heat on the delivery, as well as dominance and clearance and stoppages, and for the back 6 to work unselfishly avoiding 1 on 1's and being able to read where the ball will go to create pack situations etc etc.....

...not assuming 196cm players are going to destroy 193cm players...

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Warnock v Hampson
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Edited for cocking up the quote

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group