Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 5:55 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 109  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
club29 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
17 games at the G a year.

I would love that for us.


something like 10 straight at the end of 2010. still ballsed it up on grand final day :razz:


Heh ... as long as they get the most important one wrong, all is well with the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
BigKev wrote:
What flawed text Synners? I told you I conceded the point about being those teams being "competitive at times".

John's original post discussed achieving "success". Perhaps that's where our difference of opinion lays? St.Kilda for example have been a lot more competitive than us the past decade, but have they been successful? Not in my book. No flags = No success.

In the modern era, IMO, success requires patience. None of those teams you listed bottomed out anywhere near as badly as we did.

My point is still that none of these teams achieved success quickly and neither will we.


Maybe not as badly as we did, but some not far off it.

Hawthorn finished 15th with 4 wins in 2004, sacked Schwab, and were literally in crisis. 4 years later they won a flag.

Collingwood were hugely in debt and had won a wooden spoon in 1999. Granted McGuire has been the drive behind their rise to power, but Malthouse managed to get a wooden spoon team into 2 grand finals shortly after. (What McGuire achieved with Collingwood puts our Board to shame. But that's a discussion for another thread.)

WC lost Judd and Cousins, had huge cultural issues, and won a spoon. Now they are a genuine top 4 contender. Imagine what would happen if Judd and Murphy went elsewhere.

St K is interesting. They decided on the back of consecutive Prelim finals that Thomas couldn't get them to a flag. It was probably their best window in terms of pure talent. Lyon then came in and took a good but not brilliant team to within a bee's dick of back to back premierships. Bear in mind of course that St K have been a perennial basket case. They finished bottom in 2000, 15th in 2001 and 15th in 2002. Within 2 years, they played a prelim (lost by 6 points) another prelim the next year, and 2 grand finals a few years after that.

Each of those teams were down the bottom, with serious challenges, and managed to come up pretty quickly, in some cases with ultimate success. We're still wallowing.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:54 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Siegfried wrote:
BigKev wrote:
What flawed text Synners? I told you I conceded the point about being those teams being "competitive at times".

John's original post discussed achieving "success". Perhaps that's where our difference of opinion lays? St.Kilda for example have been a lot more competitive than us the past decade, but have they been successful? Not in my book. No flags = No success.

In the modern era, IMO, success requires patience. None of those teams you listed bottomed out anywhere near as badly as we did.

My point is still that none of these teams achieved success quickly and neither will we.


Maybe not as badly as we did, but some not far off it.

Hawthorn finished 15th with 4 wins in 2004, sacked Schwab, and were literally in crisis. 4 years later they won a flag.

Collingwood were hugely in debt and had won a wooden spoon in 1999. Granted McGuire has been the drive behind their rise to power, but Malthouse managed to get a wooden spoon team into 2 grand finals shortly after. (What McGuire achieved with Collingwood puts our Board to shame. But that's a discussion for another thread.)

WC lost Judd and Cousins, had huge cultural issues, and won a spoon. Now they are a genuine top 4 contender. Imagine what would happen if Judd and Murphy went elsewhere.

St K is interesting. They decided on the back of consecutive Prelim finals that Thomas couldn't get them to a flag. It was probably their best window in terms of pure talent. Lyon then came in and took a good but not brilliant team to within a bee's dick of back to back premierships. Bear in mind of course that St K have been a perennial basket case. They finished bottom in 2000, 15th in 2001 and 15th in 2002. Within 2 years, they played a prelim (lost by 6 points) another prelim the next year, and 2 grand finals a few years after that.

Each of those teams were down the bottom, with serious challenges, and managed to come up pretty quickly, in some cases with ultimate success. We're still wallowing.


Who are these other clubs you speak of? We're Carlton, %#@$ the rest!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Siegfried wrote:
BigKev wrote:
What flawed text Synners? I told you I conceded the point about being those teams being "competitive at times".

John's original post discussed achieving "success". Perhaps that's where our difference of opinion lays? St.Kilda for example have been a lot more competitive than us the past decade, but have they been successful? Not in my book. No flags = No success.

In the modern era, IMO, success requires patience. None of those teams you listed bottomed out anywhere near as badly as we did.

My point is still that none of these teams achieved success quickly and neither will we.


Maybe not as badly as we did, but some not far off it.

Hawthorn finished 15th with 4 wins in 2004, sacked Schwab, and were literally in crisis. 4 years later they won a flag.

Collingwood were hugely in debt and had won a wooden spoon in 1999. Granted McGuire has been the drive behind their rise to power, but Malthouse managed to get a wooden spoon team into 2 grand finals shortly after. (What McGuire achieved with Collingwood puts our Board to shame. But that's a discussion for another thread.)

WC lost Judd and Cousins, had huge cultural issues, and won a spoon. Now they are a genuine top 4 contender. Imagine what would happen if Judd and Murphy went elsewhere.

St K is interesting. They decided on the back of consecutive Prelim finals that Thomas couldn't get them to a flag. It was probably their best window in terms of pure talent. Lyon then came in and took a good but not brilliant team to within a bee's dick of back to back premierships. Bear in mind of course that St K have been a perennial basket case. They finished bottom in 2000, 15th in 2001 and 15th in 2002. Within 2 years, they played a prelim (lost by 6 points) another prelim the next year, and 2 grand finals a few years after that.

Each of those teams were down the bottom, with serious challenges, and managed to come up pretty quickly, in some cases with ultimate success. We're still wallowing.



Interesting sn't it

Both Lyon and Worsfold were assistants to Parkin, if I recall correctly..Hmmmm

More evidence for Ratten and Parkins endorsement of him

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:28 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
baz_baz wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
BigKev wrote:
What flawed text Synners? I told you I conceded the point about being those teams being "competitive at times".

John's original post discussed achieving "success". Perhaps that's where our difference of opinion lays? St.Kilda for example have been a lot more competitive than us the past decade, but have they been successful? Not in my book. No flags = No success.

In the modern era, IMO, success requires patience. None of those teams you listed bottomed out anywhere near as badly as we did.

My point is still that none of these teams achieved success quickly and neither will we.


Maybe not as badly as we did, but some not far off it.

Hawthorn finished 15th with 4 wins in 2004, sacked Schwab, and were literally in crisis. 4 years later they won a flag.

Collingwood were hugely in debt and had won a wooden spoon in 1999. Granted McGuire has been the drive behind their rise to power, but Malthouse managed to get a wooden spoon team into 2 grand finals shortly after. (What McGuire achieved with Collingwood puts our Board to shame. But that's a discussion for another thread.)

WC lost Judd and Cousins, had huge cultural issues, and won a spoon. Now they are a genuine top 4 contender. Imagine what would happen if Judd and Murphy went elsewhere.

St K is interesting. They decided on the back of consecutive Prelim finals that Thomas couldn't get them to a flag. It was probably their best window in terms of pure talent. Lyon then came in and took a good but not brilliant team to within a bee's dick of back to back premierships. Bear in mind of course that St K have been a perennial basket case. They finished bottom in 2000, 15th in 2001 and 15th in 2002. Within 2 years, they played a prelim (lost by 6 points) another prelim the next year, and 2 grand finals a few years after that.

Each of those teams were down the bottom, with serious challenges, and managed to come up pretty quickly, in some cases with ultimate success. We're still wallowing.



Interesting sn't it

Both Lyon and Worsfold were assistants to Parkin, if I recall correctly..Hmmmm

More evidence for Ratten and Parkins endorsement of him

Are we still waiting for the alternatives to rotten or have I missed something


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
JohnM wrote:
muzza wrote:
BigKev wrote:
What flawed text Synners? I told you I conceded the point about being those teams being "competitive at times".

John's original post discussed achieving "success". Perhaps that's where our difference of opinion lays? St.Kilda for example have been a lot more competitive than us the past decade, but have they been successful? Not in my book. No flags = No success.

In the modern era, IMO, success requires patience. None of those teams you listed bottomed out anywhere near as badly as we did.

My point is still that none of these teams achieved success quickly and neither will we.

It's about perception really. Collingwood to some are the most successful in the modern era because they have been able to build a huge supporter base and develop a business model that will set them up for decades. If its about a business and money, which I hear many on this site sprout, then they have it hands down.


Well... Collingwood has also won a flag during my teenage children's lifetime, and our last one was before they were born. So that kind of thing sorta puts them ahead of us too, really.

It's fair enough to defend our club. But for anyone to suggest that collingwood somehow isn't doing things in a way that other clubs would aspire to, it's just crazy. In what way is huge membership, big sponsorships, 17 games a year at the MCG, a very recent premiership and massive media coverage something to scoff at??

Maybe if you're Geelong you can. But we can't. In every single measure, they're ahead of us. Unfortunately.

Not scoffing in the slightest. Admiring


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:17 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
Siegfried wrote:
WC lost Judd and Cousins, had huge cultural issues, and won a spoon. Now they are a genuine top 4 contender. Imagine what would happen if Judd and Murphy went elsewhere.


No they aren't. They will probably finish the H&A season 1 win ahead of us. :roll: Sakc Woosh? :smoking:

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:09 pm
Posts: 35
Braithy wrote:
Synbad wrote:
the best is one eliminational final win in a decade . :clap:
and wth the aim of hopefully getting a finals home game... :thumbsup:


That is raising the bar high.......


Seriously. Your point would have merit if we never got fined a squillion dollars and had all of our draft picks taken away from us. For CHEATING!

Fact is, no club in AFL history has had a bigger hole to climb out of than what we did.

That set us back a decade. The way I see it, is we're right on course to get back up there.

Shane Rogers is bringing the right mindset and work ethic to our recruiting & drafting and development.

The prime picks on our list are about to enter their prime -- Gibbs, Murphy, Yarran, Kruezer etc etc.

And we have an improving coach, who based on the last 5-6 weeks, has a fair case to make for the most improved coach in the comp.

We're not playing football manager on playstation. We can't fast track anything. It is, what it is ...


Perhaps the most improved coach since round 10, but not for the season. If he was coaching like he is now in the first half of the season we wouldn't be relying on Richmond-like permutations to make the finals. He went backwards before picking up the pace.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
Blue Laguna wrote:

Perhaps the most improved coach since round 10, but not for the season. If he was coaching like he is now in the first half of the season we wouldn't be relying on Richmond-like permutations to make the finals. He went backwards before picking up the pace.



imo, It's another massive expectation -- read; unreal expectation -- to think Ratten will get served a plethora of injuries to key positional and midfield players and come up with answers, structures and a tailored gameplan to the personnel available, overnight.

It took ratten weeks to adjust where it might take some coaches a season or not at all.

I'd love to see a stat of previous seasons, where teams had a similar injury count to key personnel and see where they ended up on the ladder.

I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.

Yet ... here at TC there are guys championing Clarkson as far superior to Ratten. Interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Braithy wrote:
Blue Laguna wrote:

Perhaps the most improved coach since round 10, but not for the season. If he was coaching like he is now in the first half of the season we wouldn't be relying on Richmond-like permutations to make the finals. He went backwards before picking up the pace.



imo, It's another massive expectation -- read; unreal expectation -- to think Ratten will get served a plethora of injuries to key positional and midfield players and come up with answers, structures and a tailored gameplan to the personnel available, overnight.

It took ratten weeks to adjust where it might take some coaches a season or not at all.

I'd love to see a stat of previous seasons, where teams had a similar injury count to key personnel and see where they ended up on the ladder.

I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.

Yet ... here at TC there are guys championing Clarkson as far superior to Ratten. Interesting.


Other coaches wouldnt be as Ratt shit as what happened to us this year

And yes you are correct ... Ratts is a better coach than Clarkson...

You know what youre missing about Clarkson not defending his flag in finals ???.... he won the flag....thats what....!! :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:27 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
Hawthorn's list whether we like it or not, is superior to ours.

Their best 30 players > our best 30


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Braithy wrote:
Hawthorn's list whether we like it or not, is superior to ours.

Their best 30 players > our best 30

So do we find someone who can get more out of our list or turn it over?....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Braithy wrote:
Blue Laguna wrote:

Perhaps the most improved coach since round 10, but not for the season. If he was coaching like he is now in the first half of the season we wouldn't be relying on Richmond-like permutations to make the finals. He went backwards before picking up the pace.



imo, It's another massive expectation -- read; unreal expectation -- to think Ratten will get served a plethora of injuries to key positional and midfield players and come up with answers, structures and a tailored gameplan to the personnel available, overnight.

It took ratten weeks to adjust where it might take some coaches a season or not at all.

I'd love to see a stat of previous seasons, where teams had a similar injury count to key personnel and see where they ended up on the ladder.

I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.

Yet ... here at TC there are guys championing Clarkson as far superior to Ratten. Interesting.


What?? :screwy:

Of course it's a massive expectation to do that AFTER injuries hit.

The expectation is that a senior coach has already done that BEFORE injuries hit.

A senior coach who knows what he's doing has his team drilled and structured so the players are performing roles. So if one goes down, another can come up to play that role. Most likely not as effectively, but it certainly won't leave a gaping hole in the team.

Ratten's Carlton relies almost solely on key individuals standing up. "Kick it to the champ" (that's straight from Ratt's mouth).

When Carrots went down, we had no-one able to fill in, because we only had one Carrots. The squad wasn't drilled well enough for others to fill in and play a role, as they can do at say Collingwood.

Ratten was exposed this year. Injuries to key players, rather than be used as an excuse for the catastrophic way the team collapsed, should be seen for what they were: they shone a light on the fact that Ratten's built a Carlton side that is almost totally reliant on key players standing up.

Look, give the guy 3 more years and he'll probably have that side of coaching nailed by then. I'm just not sure why he should be serving his coaching apprenticeship as our senior coach. It's really quite damning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:47 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Braithy wrote:
I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.


Collingwood in 91, Essendon* in 94, Adelaide in 99.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
The Rhino wrote:
Braithy wrote:
I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.


Collingwood in 91, Essendon* in 94, Adelaide in 99.


:lol:
First time, fourth time. SANFL, EDFL... what's the difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The Rhino wrote:
Braithy wrote:
I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.


Collingwood in 91, Essendon* in 94, Adelaide in 99.

I think the poi nt hes tryi ng to make is Ratts is a better coach than Maathews Sheedy and Blight as well as Clarkson.... just his argument is abit historically flawed...

and those guys won flags.... Ratts has one eliminational final win in 5 years... and a home final.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
JohnM wrote:

Of course it's a massive expectation to do that AFTER injuries hit.

The expectation is that a senior coach has already done that BEFORE injuries hit.



Sorry. couldn't read any further.

Before injuries hit, our list went about 17 deep. It's been our achilles ever since Parkin left. No depth. Forever our bottom 4 or 5 players is almost always worse than whichever team we're playing's bottom 4 or 5.

Hawthorn started the whole notion you need 30 players to develop on your list. And it's a concept we haven't been able to execute. We're showing signs with some of our kids, that next year we'll be approaching a 30-deep list.

To hang ratten up for a club-wide issue which started 5-6 years before he took the job, is pretty typical of the Ratten witch hunters here.

Maybe I'm reading the wrong threads John ... but why don't you throw a few names out there to succeed where Ratten has failed and take CFC to a premiership.

Also explain how long you are willing to give the incumbent in order to reach this goal?

I'm guessing like Synners, you will selectively avoid this part of my post and fail miserably -- like Synners --to come up with anything constructive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:51 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
The Rhino wrote:
Braithy wrote:
I remember Clarkson in 09 didn't even make the 8 with a defending premiership list after injuries derailed him and the hawk's season. The first time in AFL history a team didn't even make the finals to defend its crown.


Collingwood in 91, Essendon* in 94, Adelaide in 99.


Last time I'll lazily use wikipedia as my sole source of research.

My bad.


Still, it's a fair point. I wonder how many here would've been calling for Clarkson's head after he finished 9th than 11th after a grand final win?

Both seasons ravaged with injuries. Which prompted Clarkson to adopt a 30-deep list which Geelong & Collingwood are now implementing as well.

But apparently, that injuries are no excuse at Carlton football club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
Synbad wrote:

Ratts has one eliminational final win in 5 years... and a home final.....



Wrong on so many levels.

When was 5 years a long time? Certainly not since the VFL became the AFL. The sanctions & fines placed against us, set us back a decade.

The sense of entitlement on this board breaks my brain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Braithy wrote:
JohnM wrote:

Of course it's a massive expectation to do that AFTER injuries hit.

The expectation is that a senior coach has already done that BEFORE injuries hit.



Sorry. couldn't read any further.

Before injuries hit, our list went about 17 deep. It's been our achilles ever since Parkin left. No depth.

I stopped reading here....if that's the case (and I don't believe it is) why were we so adamant of a top four finish and a crack at a flag?

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 109  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], keogh and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group