cimm1979 wrote:
molsey wrote:
I don't think 2 wins over Collingwood outweighs our losses to Sydney, WCE, Adelaide (terribly), Geelong, Hawthorn (terribly), Essendon* (before injuries) and even St Kilda (terribly; very meak). I think our pace and our rucks troubled Collingwood and they don't seem to have been able to counter it that well (as yet). Sometimes match-ups just work for one list versus others. Our overall W/L record against top 8 clubs is terrible and has been a problem for the past 2 years.
Maybe, but that wasn't what you were arguing about though.
Getting players fired up for opening quarters was your complaint.
Our issue hasn't been the starts it's been maintaining the intensity.
The games we've been awful in this year have gone like this.
We come out, look a million bucks, have a few shot's on goal then sometime between the 20minute marke of the first or the 10 minute mark of the second quarter we wilt like weeds in December.
It's not the starts it's been the resilience through the middle part of the game that killed us earlier in the year. Against the Tigers, Dogs and Lions we've been much better through the whole game and not just the start. Even against the Swans we fought hard to get back in the game in the third quarter and won a lot of the stats.
cimm, the above post about Collingwood was in response to a different comment in this thread:
Quote:
I can easily see a case for top 4 given we pumped the 3rd place side twice.
apologies for the poor quoting. I don't see us being near a top 4 team irrespective of injuries, but that's probably our $64m question right now and the position the CLub takes will determine trading / coaching / delisting in the coming months I guess. I've been turned into a pessimist as you can probably guess.
My argument / frustration around Ratten's 'Word from the Coach' goes to a pretty poor position for us in last week's game; that we allowed a poor team away from home to outrun and outplay us. Do that against the Bombers and we'll be done for sure; we'll be 6 goals down very quickly and thus a bit off a bottom 8 team. I think the Collingwood examples are different; in the first game we clearly were pumped but so were the Pies (IMHO); I think our ruckwork and play-it-on at all costs surprised the Pies (as distinct from them not being switched on). IN the second game they kicked 1.5 to our 3.1 so I'd see poor kicking for goal as one of the factors there.