Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 12:09 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5824
Location: home
BTW Anyone else enjoy the goal from Tom Bell standing up in the tackle to get the scrubber kick forward for Robbo to smash in an contest with the ball spilling out the back to Eddie?
Been waiting for the two hard nuts to get on the ground together and this one was a highlight last night for me

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25550
Location: Bondi Beach
jimmae wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Right from the first bounce, Kreuzer seemed to have found a bit of a spring in his step.
I don't think he looked injured last night. He was really good in the ruck. Good taps to mids, and covered the ground really well.
So pleasing.

Against a 33 year old ruckman in Hudson. Looked good against Jolly too. Below average leap still Bondi, but I hold out hope yet.


I reckon Kreuaer has been going shithouse this year.
He hasn't been moving freely, and has lost the ability to jump....does not get off ground.
Last night it looked like the took off the weight off the big fella and he got up off thr ground.

I know who he was competing against and older types like Jolly, but he actually rucked and ruck roved.
Personally, I see him as a ruck rover, and am sticking with that...but that's when he's super light and fit.
I don't think he'll ever be super fit if he keeps jumping into other ruckmens knees.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:44 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7438
mikkey wrote:
Assume it looked better on TV - but live when you can see whats happening... woeful.

I've made mention to this a few times this year...

Watching us on TV does not do justice to how poor we really are at times.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1198
Mass video spam incoming


My highlights packaged
[youtube]2BvK-8GA4e8[/youtube]

AFL match Highlights
[youtube]EWRPfB-eCkk[/youtube]

Small but deadly
[youtube]xlihcxeh1GQ[/youtube]

Jumping Jarrad
[youtube]Zcv0dv6dWbk[/youtube]

Matthew Kreuzer after the siren
[youtube]2Y9gexfddC0[/youtube]

Bryce Gibbs after the siren
[youtube]2qKLZRUG97g[/youtube]

Brett Ratten post match interview
[youtube]Q5yL0_U1sV4[/youtube]

Carlton team song
[youtube]JHdg-zECqQg[/youtube]

Brett Ratten press conference
[youtube]jTWRuexUSe8[/youtube]

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 44
thought army was very good yet again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:16 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8189
Pros:

Real positive for mine was more midfield time for Gibbs. And a good performance too. The more midfield time he can get late this year the better.
Armfield again. Just had a fantastic season. Surely will do very well in the best and fairest.
Walker was good.
Casboult again showed some nice glimpses.
Watson was reasonable. Another game into him.
McInness was good again.
Nice to see Garlett's confidence return the last few weeks.
Thought White competed hard against Brown.
Kreuzer.

Cons:

Umpiring. They seemd to get a pretty good run with the umps, especially in the 50 metre arcs.
Tuohy was defensively poor against Bewick.
Good that Curnow is looking to feed it off by hand, given he's not a great kick. But he needs to show a lot more poise when doing so. Just seemed to flick it on straightaway without really looking.
O'Keeffe not getting much game time. Showed a little bit in a few passages of play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
keogh wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Glad you enjoyed the Swans game keogh. They're going well.



Yep
and Collingwood went well as well
Without Swann
and Pennders had a shocker
But hey wasnt it Sticks and Ratts who said that we were a top 4 side this year. [color=#FF0000Didn't we beat Collingwood earlier this year? Twice?[/color]

Why is it that guys like Blair and Beames step up

And we dont Bell has stepped up OK. Mcinness has too. And Casboult. And White did a great job on Brown. And Garlett is stepping up with stints inthe midfield. And McLean has stepped up big time. But we'll leave all those out just to have a rant, shall we?

Is it
recruiting
fitness
injury management
poor structures
poor coaching

No. It's injuries to two groups of key players. Talls and mids. The injuries haven't been spread around the group. It leads to a lack of cohesion and confidence when you can't keep the same group on the field for two weeks running. That in turn affects the way the coach can implement his game plan (which I will admit could do with an overhaul because it depends too much on our having the best 22 available)
Cimm I will take assume that if just about every post says the game didnt reach great heights then it was shit. So what if it was a shit game? Hawthorn and St Kilda played a game where les than ten goals were scored when they were both eyeing off a top 4 berth. The game against Richmond was shit too but it was also exciting because it was close. The WCE vs Sydney frand final was shit too but it was exciting because it was close and Sydney didn't lose (which was their aim as distinct from trying to win). What do people want from a game? A shootout every week where both teams never make a mistake, everyone runs to exactly the right place on the ground to receive a perfect lace-out pass or handball, nobody misses a tackle or drops a mark and the loser scores 20-0 120 against the winner's 21-0 126?

Brad
The club needs a total review from top to bottom. This is probably true and if it takes place won't happen until aftre the season is over so the whole year's results on-field can be included in the decision making.
Reckon Sticks will be in charge of that given his track record. This is just a throw away line. He has NEVER conducted a top to bottom review of the club before has he? So what track record are you talking about? How many unilateral decisions can you prove he has made? Will he alone select the people to undertake the review? Will he alone write the terms of reference?
Nah Nah what? That Sticks will be in charge of the review? You seem to be contradicting yourself here.

We are average. No argument there with the people we have on the park atm but with even close to a decent list to pick from, we are well above average and can beat anybody on the day.
I havent been to see us play since the Essendon* game because I am sick of us being average

I'm sure you've been sorely missed by the club since you decided we were average after that first loss for the season when we finished the game with one player available on the bench. They'll try and get better next year just so you can go, I'm sure. Meanwhile, the people who do go every week will keep going so there is a bit of atmosphere at the game and they will enjoy the little things that make them Carlton supporters. Like seeing the kids get a run or seeing Waite take a comedic hanger. And like seeing a group of kids get the four points and develop a winning feeling. And sing the song. 6-8 years ago, the true-blue-go-every-week supporters didn't get to sing it much and even when they did, it was soulless because they knew they weren't going anywhere.

As Bondi posted, you people from Melbourne take so much for granted being able to rock up when you feel like it. I'd love to be able to go every week as I once did but I can't. Next year my step mum turns 80 and my travel schedule is based around the fixture with her birthday as the fulcrum. That's what we far-flung members have to do. We can't go but we do stay up until 3:00 a.m. when we play afternoon games and we do get up at 4:15 when we play night games. I for one enjoy watching them play, even if they win a shit game because to me, that makes it a good game and I hate them losing a great game because to me, that makes it a shit game.

Try and view the glass as half full. It looks a lot better IMO.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:00 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6460
Reckon you have had too much Mexico sun or smog there BS

Well you couldnt get two more different points of view on the one subject

Have you read Hawks view which was posted on here a month or so ago

Most of it I agree with

One thing that struck a chord with me was where we are at now 5 years after the Judd deal

We are still a long way off getting that 17th and Judd wont be around in a couple of years

Its called the short term fix

The McLean deal( probably wouldnt get a game in a premiership team)
The Warnock deal
Short term fix

Injuries
Yep we have been hit hard by injuries but good coaching, solid structures and a full time reserves coach would compensate for the injuries to a large extent

Look at Geelong on the weekend
No Kelly, Chapman, Hunt, Smedts and Hawkins for most of the game and they lose by only five points

When we lost similar quality and numbers we became non competitive except against Collingwood, but whats more important
Beating Collingwood or playing finals

Mate I went to every Melbourne game when we were rock bottom seeing us getting pumped every week hoping the club had learnt from the mistakes from the Elliott years.

5 years on we are treading water. We arnt going anywhere and have lost a lot of interest in the Blues.

I am too old and and have seen too much to get excited beating a shit team with inexperienced youngsters or guys like Black and Brown who should hang up the boots.

As the Hawk said the AFL is designed now that success is built in roughly five year cycles.
Five years is up.
We may make a run at it in 2013
I hope we can

But If it was me the broom needs to be put into action
From the boardroom down to the bootstudder


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Nah BS, we are a pretty average footy side.

Last year with reasonable run of injuries we finished 2 (or was it 3 sorry cant remember) games out of the top 4, and didn't beat any of the top 4 sides all year.

That's definitely second-tier stuff. And don't think we really were set to improve much this year really.

There's this convenient line of thought that 2012 wasapotentially great season crueled by injury. Thes nothing in our recent history to suggest that's true.

I think we fact that went into this season having replaced our head of footy opps, and our head of recruiting tells us that the club is aware that the people responsible for assembling a side good enough to win a flag had failed.

That we're clearly considering replacing the senior coach also suggests that the club doesn't buy the 'unlucky with injuries' line either.

I know we came from rock bottom nearly ten years ago.... But by any measure we're currently a second-tier side. We're 5-8th on a large number of measures, Both on and off-field. That's not opinion, that's what the data says.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:53 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1198
JohnM wrote:
Nah BS, we are a pretty average footy side.

Last year with reasonable run of injuries we finished 2 (or was it 3 sorry cant remember) games out of the top 4, and didn't beat any of the top 4 sides all year.

That's definitely second-tier stuff. And don't think we really were set to improve much this year really.

There's this convenient line of thought that 2012 wasapotentially great season crueled by injury. Thes nothing in our recent history to suggest that's true.

I think we fact that went into this season having replaced our head of footy opps, and our head of recruiting tells us that the club is aware that the people responsible for assembling a side good enough to win a flag had failed.

That we're clearly considering replacing the senior coach also suggests that the club doesn't buy the 'unlucky with injuries' line either.

I know we came from rock bottom nearly ten years ago.... But by any measure we're currently a second-tier side. We're 5-8th on a large number of measures, Both on and off-field. That's not opinion, that's what the data says.


The data also says the season was cruelled by injuries. One of the worst in recent memory.

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4958
keogh wrote:
Its called the short term fix

The McLean deal( probably wouldnt get a game in a premiership team)
The Warnock deal
Short term fix

I don't necessarily disagree with you Keogh however it is worth noting that both Collingwood (Ball & Jolly) and Hawthorn (Gibson & Hale) have also gone down the "short term fix" path to an extent.
The difference is that their selections have been more astute than ours.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:27 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
The_Wookie wrote:
JohnM wrote:
Nah BS, we are a pretty average footy side.

Last year with reasonable run of injuries we finished 2 (or was it 3 sorry cant remember) games out of the top 4, and didn't beat any of the top 4 sides all year.

That's definitely second-tier stuff. And don't think we really were set to improve much this year really.

There's this convenient line of thought that 2012 wasapotentially great season crueled by injury. Thes nothing in our recent history to suggest that's true.

I think we fact that went into this season having replaced our head of footy opps, and our head of recruiting tells us that the club is aware that the people responsible for assembling a side good enough to win a flag had failed.

That we're clearly considering replacing the senior coach also suggests that the club doesn't buy the 'unlucky with injuries' line either.

I know we came from rock bottom nearly ten years ago.... But by any measure we're currently a second-tier side. We're 5-8th on a large number of measures, Both on and off-field. That's not opinion, that's what the data says.


The data also says the season was cruelled by injuries. One of the worst in recent memory.


Absolutely. Injuries probably cost us a few wins this year, but if you think that the only thing between Carlton and the top 3-4 is injuries then you'd be wrong. We were pretty good injury-wise last year and the top 4 teams were clearly better than us. We have a bad run this year and we're 12th. What makes anyone think this is a team that is good enough to have a genuine crack at the flag?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Quote:
Saturday night's 36-point victory over Brisbane may be consigned to the record books, but fresh in my mind is the opening quarter of the contest where we really got smashed in the battle for contested footy.

At that point in the game our intensity wasn't there and we weren't pushing up from one contest to the next to the next. Our poor ball use inside 50 didn't help our cause either and to complicate matters we gave away cheap free kicks and played from behind - which is why I vented my feelings fairly strongly at the quarter-time huddle.

I told the players that they needed to address these concerns immediately because if you give opposition teams an inch you've got them all night no matter who they are . . . and in the end we got the job done.


This shits me to tears - how can an AFL coach admit that they failed in getting the boys ready for the game? Why are we so turgid and it takes a rev up? Would Collingwood allow this to happen?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
JohnM wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
JohnM wrote:
Nah BS, we are a pretty average footy side.

Last year with reasonable run of injuries we finished 2 (or was it 3 sorry cant remember) games out of the top 4, and didn't beat any of the top 4 sides all year.

That's definitely second-tier stuff. And don't think we really were set to improve much this year really.

There's this convenient line of thought that 2012 wasapotentially great season crueled by injury. Thes nothing in our recent history to suggest that's true.

I think we fact that went into this season having replaced our head of footy opps, and our head of recruiting tells us that the club is aware that the people responsible for assembling a side good enough to win a flag had failed.

That we're clearly considering replacing the senior coach also suggests that the club doesn't buy the 'unlucky with injuries' line either.

I know we came from rock bottom nearly ten years ago.... But by any measure we're currently a second-tier side. We're 5-8th on a large number of measures, Both on and off-field. That's not opinion, that's what the data says.


The data also says the season was cruelled by injuries. One of the worst in recent memory.


Absolutely. Injuries probably cost us a few wins this year, but if you think that the only thing between Carlton and the top 3-4 is injuries then you'd be wrong. We were pretty good injury-wise last year and the top 4 teams were clearly better than us. We have a bad run this year and we're 12th. What makes anyone think this is a team that is good enough to have a genuine crack at the flag?


Laidler, Henderson, Hampson, Judd, Jamison, missing currently.
Through the year Walker, Murphy, Carrots, Waite,Murphy
Underdone but currently playing Murph, Carrots, Waite, Casboult, White.

Against the Lions eight players under 30 games; of those eight, six under 15; and of those, four under seven.

I can easily see a case for top 4 given we pumped the 3rd place side twice.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
JohnM wrote:
We were pretty good injury-wise last year and the top 4 teams were clearly better than us.


We were 1 kick away from beating West Coast at their home ground, coming off a shorter break and missing Waite, Kreuzer and Gibbs, with Jamo on one leg and Setanta as our back-up ruckman.

We had a bad injury run last year (specifically to all our talls bar T-bird and Warnock), but this year has been disastrous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
molsey wrote:
Quote:
Saturday night's 36-point victory over Brisbane may be consigned to the record books, but fresh in my mind is the opening quarter of the contest where we really got smashed in the battle for contested footy.

At that point in the game our intensity wasn't there and we weren't pushing up from one contest to the next to the next. Our poor ball use inside 50 didn't help our cause either and to complicate matters we gave away cheap free kicks and played from behind - which is why I vented my feelings fairly strongly at the quarter-time huddle.

I told the players that they needed to address these concerns immediately because if you give opposition teams an inch you've got them all night no matter who they are . . . and in the end we got the job done.


This shits me to tears - how can an AFL coach admit that they failed in getting the boys ready for the game? Why are we so turgid and it takes a rev up? Would Collingwood allow this to happen?


You mean the side we pumped twice this year with blistering opening quarters?

You tell me.

Happens to all sides, Geelong got 8 goals up on the flag faves just two weeks ago.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:39 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I don't think 2 wins over Collingwood outweighs our losses to Sydney, WCE, Adelaide (terribly), Geelong, Hawthorn (terribly), Essendon* (before injuries) and even St Kilda (terribly; very meak). I think our pace and our rucks troubled Collingwood and they don't seem to have been able to counter it that well (as yet). Sometimes match-ups just work for one list versus others. Our overall W/L record against top 8 clubs is terrible and has been a problem for the past 2 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
Essendon* wasn't before injuries. We got 2 in the first 5 minutes, and 2 more before the 1st quarter was out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
molsey wrote:
I don't think 2 wins over Collingwood outweighs our losses to Sydney, WCE, Adelaide (terribly), Geelong, Hawthorn (terribly), Essendon* (before injuries) and even St Kilda (terribly; very meak). I think our pace and our rucks troubled Collingwood and they don't seem to have been able to counter it that well (as yet). Sometimes match-ups just work for one list versus others. Our overall W/L record against top 8 clubs is terrible and has been a problem for the past 2 years.


Maybe, but that wasn't what you were arguing about though.

Getting players fired up for opening quarters was your complaint.

Our issue hasn't been the starts it's been maintaining the intensity.

The games we've been awful in this year have gone like this.

We come out, look a million bucks, have a few shot's on goal then sometime between the 20minute marke of the first or the 10 minute mark of the second quarter we wilt like weeds in December.

It's not the starts it's been the resilience through the middle part of the game that killed us earlier in the year. Against the Tigers, Dogs and Lions we've been much better through the whole game and not just the start. Even against the Swans we fought hard to get back in the game in the third quarter and won a lot of the stats.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Made me pretty upset to see Gibbs running with Rich to be honest.
Rich is a 2nd rate midfielder and we are playing Brisbane for @#$%&!'s sake.
Just let Gibbs play please.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group